|
Main
Date: 31 Mar 2008 10:34:42
From: Folkert van Heusden
Subject: double pawns?
|
Hi, If I'm not mistaken then a double pawn is like: +---+
|
|
|
Date: 31 Mar 2008 10:39:58
From: David Richerby
Subject: Re: double pawns?
|
Folkert van Heusden <[email protected] > wrote: > If I'm not mistaken then a double pawn is like: > > +---+ >
|
|
Date: 31 Mar 2008 02:09:34
From: help bot
Subject: Re: double pawns?
|
On 31, 4:34 am, "Folkert van Heusden" <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi, > > If I'm not mistaken then a double pawn is like: > > +---+ >
|
| |
Date: 31 Mar 2008 16:53:53
From: Folkert van Heusden
Subject: Re: double pawns?
|
Thank you all for the clarification! -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com "help bot" <[email protected] > wrote in message news:[email protected]... > On 31, 4:34 am, "Folkert van Heusden" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> If I'm not mistaken then a double pawn is like: >> >> +---+ >>
|
|