| |
Main
Date: 18 Oct 2007 00:08:39
From: samsloan
Subject: Two Computers Truong Used
|
If you want to get to the bottom of this (and I would hope that you
have no interest in covering it up) you could locate the two computers
Truong used while at your campus.
They have IP addresses of:
129.118.87.222
75.111.194.9
The first is definitely a Texas Tech University computer. The second
is attached to a Suddenlink Cable modem. Both computers are in
Lubbock, Texas and we would like to find out exactly where they are.
Sam Sloan
|
|
| |
Date: 18 Oct 2007 21:14:23
From: GeekBoy
Subject: Re: One Usenet Troll Used
|
"suckcocksloan" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> If you want to get to the bottom of this (and I would hope that you
> have no interest in covering it up) you could locate the two computers
> Truong used while at your campus.
>
> My IP addresses is:
>
> 129.118.87.222
> 75.111.194.9
>
> The first is definitely a Texas Tech University computer. The second
> is attached to a Suddenlink Cable modem. Both computers are in
> Lubbock, Texas and we would like to find out exactly where they are.
>
> Sam "Cock Suck" Sloan
True true
>
|
| |
Date: 18 Oct 2007 09:07:35
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Two Computers Truong Used
|
On Oct 18, 7:01 am, LEC <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Oct 18, 3:08 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > If you want to get to the bottom of this (and I would hope that you
> > have no interest in covering it up) you could locate the two computers
> > Truong used while at your campus.
>
> > They have IP addresses of:
>
> > 129.118.87.222
> > 75.111.194.9
>
> > The first is definitely a Texas Tech University computer. The second
> > is attached to a Suddenlink Cable modem. Both computers are in
> > Lubbock, Texas and we would like to find out exactly where they are.
>
> Is this supposed to be a formal Request for Production of Documents
> from a defendant or what, exactly? And why would TTU be responsible
> for any information related to Suddenlink, an independent commercial
> cable provider in Texas? (For that, how about a subpoena/court
> order?)
>
> BTW, were any fake posts ever made from TTU? In Polgar's blogspot.com
> blog, she quotes Mottleshead as saying:
>
> ""Snits is correct that I never found any evidence that there had been
> any Fake Sam Sloan posts from a Texas Tech IP Address. In his lawsuit,
> Sam said that there had been posts from a Texas Tech computer, a
> little bit different than an IP address. When I asked Sam about this,
> he seemed to think that it was possible that his version was true. I
> wouldn't have put that in a lawsuit, but it is Sam Sloan's lawsuit."
>
> You might want to do a search yourself in Brian's FSS log and see if
> it is actually true that none of the fake posts originate from a TTU
> IP address. Maybe Polgar misstated something in the blog quote or
> maybe Brian overlooked something himself. Perhaps Brian didn't
> capture all the FFS posts and someone here has them saved locally and
> could search the initial digits of the TTU address string easily. In
> your interrogatories to TTU and other defendants, specific questions
> could address the issue of TTU (and USCF) computers that might have
> been supplied for off-campus (and away from Crossville) usage. This
> would go toward your respondeant superior liability theories. (The
> above is merely a personal opinion and not legal advice. For that,
> consult your own attorney. Also see Nolo Press for books on being a
> pro se (pro per) litigant to learn more about Requests for
> Production.)
Good questions, thank you.
Brian Mottershead modified the joomla-bridge in such a way as to
capture the details of the logins on September 16, 2007. However,
Polgar and Truong took their seats on the board replacing me on August
4, 2007, so we do not have nearly as much detail about what happened
prior to September 16.
To demonstrate the difference, here are the last three logins from
"ChessPromotion" which is acknowledged to be Truong but could be Susan
as well, before the new bridge was set up and the first three after
the new bridge started working.
Sun Sep 16 19:31:04 2007 "ChessPromotion" 500 "ChessPromotion" /forums/
style.php
Sun Sep 16 19:46:57 2007 "ChessPromotion" 500 "ChessPromotion" /forums/
viewforum.php
Sun Sep 16 19:46:59 2007 "ChessPromotion" 500 "ChessPromotion" /forums/
style.php
Sun Sep 16 20:39:24 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
"ChessPromotion" /forums/viewforum.php
Sun Sep 16 20:39:26 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
"ChessPromotion" /forums/style.php
Sun Sep 16 20:39:36 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
"ChessPromotion" /forums/viewtopic.php
This also shows exactly what they are yelling and screaming about.
They are claiming that it was an "invasion of privacy" to capture and
preserve the IP address of these logins.
There were 192 logins on that one day alone, September 16, 2007.
The following morning at 8:00 AM was when the logins from the Texas
Tech IP address started. Here they are:
Just after that was when the User Agent strings and other data started
to be captured proving even more conclusively that Truong and possibly
Polgar were guilty of the Fake Sam Sloan posts:
Sun Sep 16 23:45:34 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
"ChessPromotion" /forums/viewforum.php
Sun Sep 16 23:45:36 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
"ChessPromotion" /forums/style.php
Sun Sep 16 23:45:43 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
"ChessPromotion" /forums/viewtopic.php
Mon Sep 17 08:13:21 2007 129.118.87.222 "ChessPromotion" 500 "" /
forums/index.php
Mon Sep 17 08:13:22 2007 129.118.87.222 "ChessPromotion" 500
"ChessPromotion" /forums/style.php
Mon Sep 17 08:13:28 2007 129.118.87.222 "ChessPromotion" 500
"ChessPromotion" /forums/viewforum.php
Mon Sep 17 08:13:41 2007 129.118.87.222 "ChessPromotion" 500
"ChessPromotion" /forums/viewtopic.php
Mon Sep 17 08:14:20 2007 129.118.87.222 "ChessPromotion" 500
"ChessPromotion" /forums/viewforum.php
Mon Sep 17 08:50:56 2007 129.118.87.222 "ChessPromotion" 500
"ChessPromotion" /forums/viewforum.php
Mon Sep 17 08:50:58 2007 129.118.87.222 "ChessPromotion" 500
"ChessPromotion" /forums/style.php
Mon Sep 17 11:20:12 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500 "" /forums/
index.php "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0;
SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506;
InfoPath.2)"
Mon Sep 17 11:20:29 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
"ChessPromotion" /forums/style.php "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0;
Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET
CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2)"
Mon Sep 17 11:21:44 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
"ChessPromotion" /forums/viewforum.php "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE
7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC
5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2)"
Mon Sep 17 11:21:55 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
"ChessPromotion" /forums/viewforum.php "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE
7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC
5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2)"
Mon Sep 17 11:22:02 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
"ChessPromotion" /forums/viewforum.php "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE
7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC
5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2)"
Mon Sep 17 11:22:45 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
"ChessPromotion" /forums/viewtopic.php "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE
7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC
5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2)"
All of the above data comes from the report:
chesspromotion-joomla-bridge.txt
Can you find any possible holes in this report?
Sam Sloan
|
| | |
Date: 18 Oct 2007 11:49:23
From: Gerard Snitselaar
Subject: Re: Two Computers Truong Used
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
samsloan wrote:
> On Oct 18, 7:01 am, LEC <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Oct 18, 3:08 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> If you want to get to the bottom of this (and I would hope that you
>>> have no interest in covering it up) you could locate the two computers
>>> Truong used while at your campus.
>>> They have IP addresses of:
>>> 129.118.87.222
>>> 75.111.194.9
>>> The first is definitely a Texas Tech University computer. The second
>>> is attached to a Suddenlink Cable modem. Both computers are in
>>> Lubbock, Texas and we would like to find out exactly where they are.
>> Is this supposed to be a formal Request for Production of Documents
>> from a defendant or what, exactly? And why would TTU be responsible
>> for any information related to Suddenlink, an independent commercial
>> cable provider in Texas? (For that, how about a subpoena/court
>> order?)
>>
>> BTW, were any fake posts ever made from TTU? In Polgar's blogspot.com
>> blog, she quotes Mottleshead as saying:
>>
>> ""Snits is correct that I never found any evidence that there had been
>> any Fake Sam Sloan posts from a Texas Tech IP Address. In his lawsuit,
>> Sam said that there had been posts from a Texas Tech computer, a
>> little bit different than an IP address. When I asked Sam about this,
>> he seemed to think that it was possible that his version was true. I
>> wouldn't have put that in a lawsuit, but it is Sam Sloan's lawsuit."
>>
>> You might want to do a search yourself in Brian's FSS log and see if
>> it is actually true that none of the fake posts originate from a TTU
>> IP address. Maybe Polgar misstated something in the blog quote or
>> maybe Brian overlooked something himself. Perhaps Brian didn't
>> capture all the FFS posts and someone here has them saved locally and
>> could search the initial digits of the TTU address string easily. In
>> your interrogatories to TTU and other defendants, specific questions
>> could address the issue of TTU (and USCF) computers that might have
>> been supplied for off-campus (and away from Crossville) usage. This
>> would go toward your respondeant superior liability theories. (The
>> above is merely a personal opinion and not legal advice. For that,
>> consult your own attorney. Also see Nolo Press for books on being a
>> pro se (pro per) litigant to learn more about Requests for
>> Production.)
>
> Good questions, thank you.
>
> Brian Mottershead modified the joomla-bridge in such a way as to
> capture the details of the logins on September 16, 2007. However,
> Polgar and Truong took their seats on the board replacing me on August
> 4, 2007, so we do not have nearly as much detail about what happened
> prior to September 16.
>
> To demonstrate the difference, here are the last three logins from
> "ChessPromotion" which is acknowledged to be Truong but could be Susan
> as well, before the new bridge was set up and the first three after
> the new bridge started working.
>
> Sun Sep 16 19:31:04 2007 "ChessPromotion" 500 "ChessPromotion" /forums/
> style.php
> Sun Sep 16 19:46:57 2007 "ChessPromotion" 500 "ChessPromotion" /forums/
> viewforum.php
> Sun Sep 16 19:46:59 2007 "ChessPromotion" 500 "ChessPromotion" /forums/
> style.php
> Sun Sep 16 20:39:24 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
> "ChessPromotion" /forums/viewforum.php
> Sun Sep 16 20:39:26 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
> "ChessPromotion" /forums/style.php
> Sun Sep 16 20:39:36 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
> "ChessPromotion" /forums/viewtopic.php
>
> This also shows exactly what they are yelling and screaming about.
> They are claiming that it was an "invasion of privacy" to capture and
> preserve the IP address of these logins.
>
> There were 192 logins on that one day alone, September 16, 2007.
>
> The following morning at 8:00 AM was when the logins from the Texas
> Tech IP address started. Here they are:
>
> Just after that was when the User Agent strings and other data started
> to be captured proving even more conclusively that Truong and possibly
> Polgar were guilty of the Fake Sam Sloan posts:
>
> Sun Sep 16 23:45:34 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
> "ChessPromotion" /forums/viewforum.php
> Sun Sep 16 23:45:36 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
> "ChessPromotion" /forums/style.php
> Sun Sep 16 23:45:43 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
> "ChessPromotion" /forums/viewtopic.php
> Mon Sep 17 08:13:21 2007 129.118.87.222 "ChessPromotion" 500 "" /
> forums/index.php
> Mon Sep 17 08:13:22 2007 129.118.87.222 "ChessPromotion" 500
> "ChessPromotion" /forums/style.php
> Mon Sep 17 08:13:28 2007 129.118.87.222 "ChessPromotion" 500
> "ChessPromotion" /forums/viewforum.php
> Mon Sep 17 08:13:41 2007 129.118.87.222 "ChessPromotion" 500
> "ChessPromotion" /forums/viewtopic.php
> Mon Sep 17 08:14:20 2007 129.118.87.222 "ChessPromotion" 500
> "ChessPromotion" /forums/viewforum.php
> Mon Sep 17 08:50:56 2007 129.118.87.222 "ChessPromotion" 500
> "ChessPromotion" /forums/viewforum.php
> Mon Sep 17 08:50:58 2007 129.118.87.222 "ChessPromotion" 500
> "ChessPromotion" /forums/style.php
> Mon Sep 17 11:20:12 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500 "" /forums/
> index.php "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0;
> SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506;
> InfoPath.2)"
> Mon Sep 17 11:20:29 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
> "ChessPromotion" /forums/style.php "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0;
> Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET
> CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2)"
> Mon Sep 17 11:21:44 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
> "ChessPromotion" /forums/viewforum.php "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE
> 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC
> 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2)"
> Mon Sep 17 11:21:55 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
> "ChessPromotion" /forums/viewforum.php "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE
> 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC
> 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2)"
> Mon Sep 17 11:22:02 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
> "ChessPromotion" /forums/viewforum.php "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE
> 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC
> 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2)"
> Mon Sep 17 11:22:45 2007 75.111.194.9 "ChessPromotion" 500
> "ChessPromotion" /forums/viewtopic.php "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE
> 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC
> 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2)"
>
> All of the above data comes from the report:
> chesspromotion-joomla-bridge.txt
>
> Can you find any possible holes in this report?
>
> Sam Sloan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Sam those are logs for the USCF forum, where there haven't been any fake posts.
Brian's fake-sam-sloan.txt does not have any instances of 129.118.87.222 so
could you provide a FSS USENET post that has that ip address in the
NNTP-Posting-Host header field? If not, there is still no evidence that a post
was made from the TTU subnet.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHF6qyOlUOp/+ZgKYRAi6DAKCmFWJnv5kgEuA0UrhtHekeT+DngQCffEKc
vIgqmN8jTKLor150LSFlR1A=
=zN81
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| |
Date: 18 Oct 2007 04:01:44
From: LEC
Subject: Re: Two Computers Truong Used
|
On Oct 18, 3:08 am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> If you want to get to the bottom of this (and I would hope that you
> have no interest in covering it up) you could locate the two computers
> Truong used while at your campus.
>
> They have IP addresses of:
>
> 129.118.87.222
> 75.111.194.9
>
> The first is definitely a Texas Tech University computer. The second
> is attached to a Suddenlink Cable modem. Both computers are in
> Lubbock, Texas and we would like to find out exactly where they are.
Is this supposed to be a formal Request for Production of Documents
from a defendant or what, exactly? And why would TTU be responsible
for any information related to Suddenlink, an independent commercial
cable provider in Texas? (For that, how about a subpoena/court
order?)
BTW, were any fake posts ever made from TTU? In Polgar's blogspot.com
blog, she quotes Mottleshead as saying:
""Snits is correct that I never found any evidence that there had been
any Fake Sam Sloan posts from a Texas Tech IP Address. In his lawsuit,
Sam said that there had been posts from a Texas Tech computer, a
little bit different than an IP address. When I asked Sam about this,
he seemed to think that it was possible that his version was true. I
wouldn't have put that in a lawsuit, but it is Sam Sloan's lawsuit."
You might want to do a search yourself in Brian's FSS log and see if
it is actually true that none of the fake posts originate from a TTU
IP address. Maybe Polgar misstated something in the blog quote or
maybe Brian overlooked something himself. Perhaps Brian didn't
capture all the FFS posts and someone here has them saved locally and
could search the initial digits of the TTU address string easily. In
your interrogatories to TTU and other defendants, specific questions
could address the issue of TTU (and USCF) computers that might have
been supplied for off-campus (and away from Crossville) usage. This
would go toward your respondeant superior liability theories. (The
above is merely a personal opinion and not legal advice. For that,
consult your own attorney. Also see Nolo Press for books on being a
pro se (pro per) litigant to learn more about Requests for
Production.)
|
| | |
Date: 18 Oct 2007 12:45:10
From: Ray Gordon, creator of the \pivot\
Subject: Re: Two Computers Truong Used
|
> consult your own attorney. Also see Nolo Press for books on being a
> pro se (pro per) litigant to learn more about Requests for
> Production.)
Thanks! Just in case the two dozen law firms of varying sizes covering two
states and almost all areas of practice that I worked for over the last
twenty years missed something, those books will come in VERY handy!
--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy
Ray's new "Project 5000" is here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/project-5000
This group will be restricted to 5,000 members. All new theory from the
creator of the PIVOT!
Don't rely on overexposed, mass-keted commercial seduction methods which
have been rendered worthless through mainstream media exposure. It really
is game over for community material. Beware of Milli Vanilli gurus who
stole their ideas from others!
http://moderncaveman.typepad.com
The Official Ray Gordon Blog
|
| | | |
Date: 19 Oct 2007 12:28:53
From: Ted E Bear
Subject: Re: Bullshit Allert!!!!!!
|
On 18-Oct-2007, "Ray Gordon, Court Jester" <[email protected] > wrote:
> > consult your own attorney. Also see Nolo Press for books on being a
> > pro se (pro per) litigant to learn more about Requests for
> > Production.)
>
> Thanks! Just in case the two dozen law firms of varying sizes covering
> two states and almost all areas of practice that I worked for over the
> last
> twenty years missed something, those books will come in VERY handy!
If you believe the above statement, you probably also believe in the tooth
fairy and the Easter Bunny......
--
"...serial and vexatious litigant in both the state and federal courts..."
Gordon Roy Parker in his Memorandum Opposing Google's MTD
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| |
Date: 18 Oct 2007 07:33:10
From:
Subject: Re: Two Computers Truong Used
|
On Oct 18, 2:30 am, [email protected] wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2:24 am, [email protected] wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 18, 2:17 am, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 18, 2:08 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > If you want to get to the bottom of this (and I would hope that you
> > > > have no interest in covering it up) you could locate the two computers
> > > > Truong used while at your campus.
>
> > > > They have IP addresses of:
>
> > > > 129.118.87.222
> > > > 75.111.194.9
>
> > > > The first is definitely a Texas Tech University computer. The second
> > > > is attached to a Suddenlink Cable modem. Both computers are in
> > > > Lubbock, Texas and we would like to find out exactly where they are.
>
> > > > Sam Sloan
>
> > > Sam, can you confirm for the record that 201.134.236.150 is really a
> > > Mexico City, IP, per the "Gulity as Charged" digram I want the reader
> > > clear!
>
> > > Thanks
>
> > > cus Roberts
>
> > he is gulity as shit
>
> > OrgName: Latin American and Caribbean IP address Regional Registry
> > OrgID: LACNIC
> > Address: Rambla Republica de Mexico 6125
> > City: Montevideo
> > StateProv:
> > PostalCode: 11400
> > Country: UY
>
> > ReferralServer: whois://whois.lacnic.net
>
> > NetRange: 201.0.0.0 - 201.255.255.255
> > CIDR: 201.0.0.0/8
> > NetName: LACNIC-201
> > NetHandle: NET-201-0-0-0-1
> > Parent:
> > NetType: Allocated to LACNIC
> > NameServer: NS.LACNIC.NET
> > NameServer: NS2.DNS.BR
> > NameServer: TINNIE.ARIN.NET
> > NameServer: NS-SEC.RIPE.NET
> > NameServer: SEC3.APNIC.NET
> > NameServer: NS3.AFRINIC.NET
> > Comment: This IP address range is under LACNIC responsibility
> > Comment: for further allocations to users in LACNIC region.
> > Comment: Please seehttp://www.lacnic.net/forfurther details,
> > Comment: or check the WHOIS server located at whois.lacnic.net
> > RegDate: 2003-04-03
> > Updated: 2006-10-23
>
> > OrgTechHandle: LACNIC-ARIN
> > OrgTechName: LACNIC Whois Info
> > OrgTechPhone:
> > OrgTechEmail: [email protected] Hide quoted text -
>
> OrgName: Suddenlink Communications
> OrgID: SUDDE
> Address: 1021 ESE Loop 323
> Address: Suite 100
> City: Tyler
> StateProv: TX
> PostalCode: 75701
> Country: US
>
> ReferralServer: rwhois://rwhois.suddenlink.net:4321
>
> NetRange: 75.108.0.0 - 75.111.255.255
> CIDR: 75.108.0.0/14
> NetName: SUDDE-NETBLK
> NetHandle: NET-75-108-0-0-1
> Parent: NET-75-0-0-0-0
> NetType: Direct Allocation
> NameServer: NS1.SUDDENLINK.NET
> NameServer: NS2.SUDDENLINK.NET
> Comment:
> RegDate: 2006-07-18
> Updated: 2006-09-27
>
> RAbuseHandle: ABUSE1394-ARIN
> RAbuseName: Abuse
> RAbusePhone: +1-903-266-4800
> RAbuseEmail: [email protected]
>
> RNOCHandle: NOC1310-ARIN
> RNOCName: Network Operations Center
> RNOCPhone: +1-903-939-9008
> RNOCEmail: [email protected]
>
> RTechHandle: SW714-ARIN
> RTechName: Whitton, Steve
> RTechPhone: +1-903-266-4840
> RTechEmail: [email protected]
>
> OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE1394-ARIN
> OrgAbuseName: Abuse
> OrgAbusePhone: +1-903-266-4800
> OrgAbuseEmail: [email protected]
>
> OrgNOCHandle: NOC1310-ARIN
> OrgNOCName: Network Operations Center
> OrgNOCPhone: +1-903-939-9008
> OrgNOCEmail: [email protected]
>
> OrgTechHandle: DNSHO5-ARIN
> OrgTechName: DNS Hosting
> OrgTechPhone: +1-903-266-4836
> OrgTechEmail: [email protected]
>
> # ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2007-10-17 19:10
> # Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.
>
> Other WHOIS Servers: AfriNIC APNIC LACNIC RIPE InterNIC
>
> Request Bulk Copies of ARIN WHOIS Data
>
>
>
>
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Here is Texas Tech. Oh well, Law student. Texas Tech has just been
NAILED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
OrgName: Texas Tech University
OrgID: TTU-1
Address: Telecommunications Department
Address: 2500 Broadway
City: Lubbock
StateProv: TX
PostalCode: 79409
Country: US
NetRange: 129.118.0.0 - 129.118.255.255
CIDR: 129.118.0.0/16
NetName: TTUNET
NetHandle: NET-129-118-0-0-1
Parent: NET-129-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Assignment
NameServer: MINOTAUR.NET.TTU.EDU
NameServer: UNICORN.NET.TTU.EDU
NameServer: CHINATI.OTS.TTU.EDU
Comment:
RegDate: 1987-11-06
Updated: 2003-02-04
RTechHandle: JS450-ARIN
RTechName: Stalcup, J
RTechPhone: +1-806-742-3698
RTechEmail: [email protected]
OrgTechHandle: NOC1620-ARIN
OrgTechName: Network Operations Center
OrgTechPhone: +1-806-742-4858
OrgTechEmail: [email protected]
# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2007-10-17 19:10
# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.
|
| |
Date: 18 Oct 2007 07:30:12
From:
Subject: Re: Two Computers Truong Used
|
On Oct 18, 2:24 am, [email protected] wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2:17 am, [email protected] wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 18, 2:08 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > If you want to get to the bottom of this (and I would hope that you
> > > have no interest in covering it up) you could locate the two computers
> > > Truong used while at your campus.
>
> > > They have IP addresses of:
>
> > > 129.118.87.222
> > > 75.111.194.9
>
> > > The first is definitely a Texas Tech University computer. The second
> > > is attached to a Suddenlink Cable modem. Both computers are in
> > > Lubbock, Texas and we would like to find out exactly where they are.
>
> > > Sam Sloan
>
> > Sam, can you confirm for the record that 201.134.236.150 is really a
> > Mexico City, IP, per the "Gulity as Charged" digram I want the reader
> > clear!
>
> > Thanks
>
> > cus Roberts
>
> he is gulity as shit
>
> OrgName: Latin American and Caribbean IP address Regional Registry
> OrgID: LACNIC
> Address: Rambla Republica de Mexico 6125
> City: Montevideo
> StateProv:
> PostalCode: 11400
> Country: UY
>
> ReferralServer: whois://whois.lacnic.net
>
> NetRange: 201.0.0.0 - 201.255.255.255
> CIDR: 201.0.0.0/8
> NetName: LACNIC-201
> NetHandle: NET-201-0-0-0-1
> Parent:
> NetType: Allocated to LACNIC
> NameServer: NS.LACNIC.NET
> NameServer: NS2.DNS.BR
> NameServer: TINNIE.ARIN.NET
> NameServer: NS-SEC.RIPE.NET
> NameServer: SEC3.APNIC.NET
> NameServer: NS3.AFRINIC.NET
> Comment: This IP address range is under LACNIC responsibility
> Comment: for further allocations to users in LACNIC region.
> Comment: Please seehttp://www.lacnic.net/for further details,
> Comment: or check the WHOIS server located at whois.lacnic.net
> RegDate: 2003-04-03
> Updated: 2006-10-23
>
> OrgTechHandle: LACNIC-ARIN
> OrgTechName: LACNIC Whois Info
> OrgTechPhone:
> OrgTechEmail: [email protected] Hide quoted text -
OrgName: Suddenlink Communications
OrgID: SUDDE
Address: 1021 ESE Loop 323
Address: Suite 100
City: Tyler
StateProv: TX
PostalCode: 75701
Country: US
ReferralServer: rwhois://rwhois.suddenlink.net:4321
NetRange: 75.108.0.0 - 75.111.255.255
CIDR: 75.108.0.0/14
NetName: SUDDE-NETBLK
NetHandle: NET-75-108-0-0-1
Parent: NET-75-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
NameServer: NS1.SUDDENLINK.NET
NameServer: NS2.SUDDENLINK.NET
Comment:
RegDate: 2006-07-18
Updated: 2006-09-27
RAbuseHandle: ABUSE1394-ARIN
RAbuseName: Abuse
RAbusePhone: +1-903-266-4800
RAbuseEmail: [email protected]
RNOCHandle: NOC1310-ARIN
RNOCName: Network Operations Center
RNOCPhone: +1-903-939-9008
RNOCEmail: [email protected]
RTechHandle: SW714-ARIN
RTechName: Whitton, Steve
RTechPhone: +1-903-266-4840
RTechEmail: [email protected]
OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE1394-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Abuse
OrgAbusePhone: +1-903-266-4800
OrgAbuseEmail: [email protected]
OrgNOCHandle: NOC1310-ARIN
OrgNOCName: Network Operations Center
OrgNOCPhone: +1-903-939-9008
OrgNOCEmail: [email protected]
OrgTechHandle: DNSHO5-ARIN
OrgTechName: DNS Hosting
OrgTechPhone: +1-903-266-4836
OrgTechEmail: [email protected]
# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2007-10-17 19:10
# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.
Other WHOIS Servers: AfriNIC APNIC LACNIC RIPE InterNIC
Request Bulk Copies of ARIN WHOIS Data
>
> - Show quoted text -
|
| |
Date: 18 Oct 2007 07:24:31
From:
Subject: Re: Two Computers Truong Used
|
On Oct 18, 2:17 am, [email protected] wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2:08 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > If you want to get to the bottom of this (and I would hope that you
> > have no interest in covering it up) you could locate the two computers
> > Truong used while at your campus.
>
> > They have IP addresses of:
>
> > 129.118.87.222
> > 75.111.194.9
>
> > The first is definitely a Texas Tech University computer. The second
> > is attached to a Suddenlink Cable modem. Both computers are in
> > Lubbock, Texas and we would like to find out exactly where they are.
>
> > Sam Sloan
>
> Sam, can you confirm for the record that 201.134.236.150 is really a
> Mexico City, IP, per the "Gulity as Charged" digram I want the reader
> clear!
>
> Thanks
>
> cus Roberts
he is gulity as shit
OrgName: Latin American and Caribbean IP address Regional Registry
OrgID: LACNIC
Address: Rambla Republica de Mexico 6125
City: Montevideo
StateProv:
PostalCode: 11400
Country: UY
ReferralServer: whois://whois.lacnic.net
NetRange: 201.0.0.0 - 201.255.255.255
CIDR: 201.0.0.0/8
NetName: LACNIC-201
NetHandle: NET-201-0-0-0-1
Parent:
NetType: Allocated to LACNIC
NameServer: NS.LACNIC.NET
NameServer: NS2.DNS.BR
NameServer: TINNIE.ARIN.NET
NameServer: NS-SEC.RIPE.NET
NameServer: SEC3.APNIC.NET
NameServer: NS3.AFRINIC.NET
Comment: This IP address range is under LACNIC responsibility
Comment: for further allocations to users in LACNIC region.
Comment: Please see http://www.lacnic.net/ for further details,
Comment: or check the WHOIS server located at whois.lacnic.net
RegDate: 2003-04-03
Updated: 2006-10-23
OrgTechHandle: LACNIC-ARIN
OrgTechName: LACNIC Whois Info
OrgTechPhone:
OrgTechEmail: [email protected]
|
| |
Date: 18 Oct 2007 07:17:31
From:
Subject: Re: Two Computers Truong Used
|
On Oct 18, 2:08 am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> If you want to get to the bottom of this (and I would hope that you
> have no interest in covering it up) you could locate the two computers
> Truong used while at your campus.
>
> They have IP addresses of:
>
> 129.118.87.222
> 75.111.194.9
>
> The first is definitely a Texas Tech University computer. The second
> is attached to a Suddenlink Cable modem. Both computers are in
> Lubbock, Texas and we would like to find out exactly where they are.
>
> Sam Sloan
Sam, can you confirm for the record that 201.134.236.150 is really a
Mexico City, IP, per the "Gulity as Charged" digram I want the reader
clear!
Thanks
cus Roberts
|
| |
Date: 18 Oct 2007 07:11:13
From:
Subject: Re: Two Computers Truong Used
|
On Oct 18, 2:08 am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> If you want to get to the bottom of this (and I would hope that you
> have no interest in covering it up) you could locate the two computers
> Truong used while at your campus.
>
> They have IP addresses of:
>
> 129.118.87.222
> 75.111.194.9
>
> The first is definitely a Texas Tech University computer. The second
> is attached to a Suddenlink Cable modem. Both computers are in
> Lubbock, Texas and we would like to find out exactly where they are.
>
> Sam Sloan
Very Good Sam! I say, let's share the discovery, and I'll pay you guys
if I win big without you!
cus Roberts
|
| | |
Date: 18 Oct 2007 03:15:19
From: Ray Gordon, creator of the \pivot\
Subject: Re: Two Computers Truong Used
|
> Very Good Sam! I say, let's share the discovery, and I'll pay you guys
> if I win big without you!
Please do NOT offer me money.
--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy
Ray's new "Project 5000" is here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/project-5000
This group will be restricted to 5,000 members. All new theory from the
creator of the PIVOT!
Don't rely on overexposed, mass-keted commercial seduction methods which
have been rendered worthless through mainstream media exposure. It really
is game over for community material. Beware of Milli Vanilli gurus who
stole their ideas from others!
http://moderncaveman.typepad.com
The Official Ray Gordon Blog
|
|
