| |
Main
Date: 31 Dec 2008 18:25:08
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Thank You "revenge will be to (sic) sweet"
|
to (sic) sweet wrote here earlier today:
If lier writes 'I am definitely not planning to do' which is very
clear enough, he plans not to but with reluctance, gets persuaded.
CHOOSE YOUR SIDES, THERE WAS ONLY ONE CHANCE
FUCKYOU 'BRAIN', FUCKYOU FUCKYOU FUCKYOU
****************************************************
I had not planned to run for the USCF EB, but your anonymous remails
crap has convinced me otherwise. If I can get the petition signatures
needed, I will run for the EB in the coming USCF election.
I will campaign on three fundamental principles:
1. Transparency in all USCF Dealings
2. Fiscal Responsibility
3. Ethical Behavior
Again, thanks "to (sic) sweet" for helping me come to a decision.
|
|
| |
Date: 02 Jan 2009 23:16:16
From: Nunya Beez Waxxxmann
Subject: Re: Thank You "revenge will be to (sic) sweet"
|
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:25:08 GMT, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected] >
wrote:
>3. Ethical Behavior
I have no stake in anything chess related, but aren't you an attorney?
How is #3 even possible if that is the case? Are you referring to the
type of "ethics" attorneys set for themselves and modify, evaluate and
adjudicate themselves?
|
| |
Date: 02 Jan 2009 11:44:44
From: anti-pederasty slate
Subject: Re: Thank You "revenge will be to (sic) sweet"
|
I love little girls they make me feel so good
I love little girls they make me feel so bad
When theyre around they make me feel
Like Im the only guy in town
I love little girls they make me feel so good
They dont care if Im a one way mirror
Theyre not frightened by my cold exterior
They dont ask me questions
They dont want to scold me
They dont look for answers
They just want to hold me
Isnt this fun
Isnt this what lifes all about
Isnt this a dream come true
Isnt this a nightmare too
(repeat first verse)
They dont care about my inclinations
Theyre not frightened by my revelations
Uh oh take a second take
Uh oh its a mistake
Uh oh Im in trouble
Uh oh the little girl was just to little
Too little, too little, too little
Isnt this what lifes all about
Isnt this a dream come true
Isnt this a nightmare too . . .
And I dont care what people say
And I dont care what people think
And I dont care how we look walking down the street
(repeat chorus)
(repeat first verse)
FUCKYOU SAMSLOAN, FUCKYOU FUCKYOU FUCKYOU
[email protected] wrote in rec.games.chess.politics, misc.legal,
rec.games.chess.misc, rec.games.chess.computer, alt.chess with Subject: Re:
Will the Goichberg Strategy Backfire? on Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:31:06 -0800
(PST) and NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:31:06 +0000 (UTC) from
Organization: http://groups.google.com with NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.82.9.60
and settings of Mime-Version: 1.0, Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1, Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable with
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1230838266 14357 127.0.0.1 (1 Jan 2009 19:31:06
GMT), X-Complaints-To: [email protected], Complaints-To:
[email protected] from User-Agent: G2/1.0, X-HTTP-UserAgent:
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET
CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) tracked by Injection-Info:
s20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-hostf.82.9.60;
posting-account=I5OEWwoAAACY13Nbk8MKz1gM0el4tSB5 in message
news:3b6a2867-c0b5-4bf9-80c6-efa5404dc7b9@s20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com
quoting References:
<b4a3dcef-cedd-42e3-86a3-d4af58e0beec@k36g2000yqe.googlegroups.com >
<a4378472-f54a-49cb-91b4-6ad010169843@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com >
<83ff93bc-8a43-4e7f-8581-5ad1ce893acd@w34g2000yqm.googlegroups.com >:
> On Jan 1, 12:44 pm, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > ( typical Sloan crap removed )
> Sam Sloan
>
> YOU ARE A GOD DAMN FELON AND CHILD MOLESTER. FUCK YOU
>
> I will beat the shit out of you if you threaten me again! You are a
> god DAMN criminal and child molester!
>
> Marcus Roberts
> Ambassador of St kitts and Nevis
Marcus later saw this Message from discussion Thank You "revenge will be to
(sic) sweet"
View parsed - Show only message text
Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.com!
feeder.news-service.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!
spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!nwrddc01.gnilink.net.POSTED!
302ce388!not-for-mail
From: "B. Lafferty" <[email protected] >
Reply-To: [email protected]
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc
Subject: Thank You "revenge will be to (sic) sweet"
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <[email protected] >
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:25:08 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 98.118.116.182
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Trace: nwrddc01.gnilink.net 1230747908 98.118.116.182 (Wed,
31 Dec 2008 13:25:08 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:25:08 EST
to (sic) sweet wrote here earlier today:
If lier writes 'I am definitely not planning to do' which is very
clear enough, he plans not to but with reluctance, gets persuaded.
CHOOSE YOUR SIDES, THERE WAS ONLY ONE CHANCE
FUCKYOU 'BRAIN', FUCKYOU FUCKYOU FUCKYOU
****************************************************
I had not planned to run for the USCF EB, but your anonymous remails
crap has convinced me otherwise. If I can get the petition signatures
needed, I will run for the EB in the coming USCF election.
I will campaign on three fundamental principles:
1. Transparency in all USCF Dealings
2. Fiscal Responsibility
3. Ethical Behavior
Again, thanks "to (sic) sweet" for helping me come to a decision.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service -
Privacy Policy
- -
The above atrocity is archived for Mr Killion and associates.
It was even easier than expected to provoke Lafferty into revealing
his hand early. You say this guy was once a working lawyer, lol.
Now that Lafferty's ambitions have been exposed to light, Lafferty's
motives in conducting his attacks against Susan and Paul are suspect.
Since that at all relevant times Lafferty concealed, even denied, his
objectives, this can be spun in to the most devastating expose which
will be e-mailed to most of the USCF membership. As with much else,
this may well come in most useful, both in court (where there is more
than one way to interpret the evidence, and the evidence itself may
have been subject to tampering by biased folk) and campaigning (is
this a desirable leader of the federation, who hides his agenda, and
attacks a man / woman on the basis of their marriage while appearing
content to ally himself to a convicted felon and notorious pederast?)
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzewuo9u/brianlaffertysuscfelectionblog/index.html
When I tried to post there I could not the coward, as expected, is
definately only permitting himself to post there. No matter, an
un abridged mirror site will be set up, with the difference that any
material O'Flattery puts up will have our sweetest comments added.
FUCKYOU 'BRAIN', FUCKYOU FUCKYOU FUCKYOU
If any one finds a copy of the post from Al-Naqba 2008 <calvin@yahoo.
au > replying on 12/22 to foad <[email protected]> than please post it.
After I had read it, it must have got canceled by The Usual Clown.
|
| | |
Date: 02 Jan 2009 11:19:59
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Thank You "revenge will be to (sic) sweet"
|
anti-pederasty slate wrote:
> I love little girls they make me feel so good
> I love little girls they make me feel so bad
> When theyre around they make me feel
> Like Im the only guy in town
> I love little girls they make me feel so good
>
> They dont care if Im a one way mirror
> Theyre not frightened by my cold exterior
>
> They dont ask me questions
> They dont want to scold me
> They dont look for answers
> They just want to hold me
> Isnt this fun
> Isnt this what lifes all about
> Isnt this a dream come true
> Isnt this a nightmare too
>
> (repeat first verse)
>
> They dont care about my inclinations
> Theyre not frightened by my revelations
>
> Uh oh take a second take
> Uh oh its a mistake
> Uh oh Im in trouble
> Uh oh the little girl was just to little
> Too little, too little, too little
> Isnt this what lifes all about
> Isnt this a dream come true
> Isnt this a nightmare too . . .
>
> And I dont care what people say
> And I dont care what people think
> And I dont care how we look walking down the street
>
> (repeat chorus)
>
> (repeat first verse)
>
> FUCKYOU SAMSLOAN, FUCKYOU FUCKYOU FUCKYOU
>
> [email protected] wrote in rec.games.chess.politics, misc.legal,
> rec.games.chess.misc, rec.games.chess.computer, alt.chess with Subject: Re:
> Will the Goichberg Strategy Backfire? on Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:31:06 -0800
> (PST) and NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:31:06 +0000 (UTC) from
> Organization: http://groups.google.com with NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.82.9.60
> and settings of Mime-Version: 1.0, Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset=O-8859-1, Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable with
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1230838266 14357 127.0.0.1 (1 Jan 2009 19:31:06
> GMT), X-Complaints-To: [email protected], Complaints-To:
> [email protected] from User-Agent: G2/1.0, X-HTTP-UserAgent:
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) tracked by Injection-Info:
> s20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-hostf.82.9.60;
> posting-account=OEWwoAAACY13Nbk8MKz1gM0el4tSB5 in message
> news:3b6a2867-c0b5-4bf9-80c6-efa5404dc7b9@s20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com
> quoting References:
> <b4a3dcef-cedd-42e3-86a3-d4af58e0beec@k36g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
> <a4378472-f54a-49cb-91b4-6ad010169843@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
> <83ff93bc-8a43-4e7f-8581-5ad1ce893acd@w34g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>:
>
>> On Jan 1, 12:44 pm, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> ( typical Sloan crap removed )
>> Sam Sloan
>>
>> YOU ARE A GOD DAMN FELON AND CHILD MOLESTER. FUCK YOU
>>
>> I will beat the shit out of you if you threaten me again! You are a
>> god DAMN criminal and child molester!
>>
>> Marcus Roberts
>> Ambassador of St kitts and Nevis
>
> Marcus later saw this Message from discussion Thank You "revenge will be to
> (sic) sweet"
>
> View parsed - Show only message text
>
> Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.com!
> feeder.news-service.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!
> spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!nwrddc01.gnilink.net.POSTED!
> 302ce388!not-for-mail
> From: "B. Lafferty" <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc
> Subject: Thank You "revenge will be to (sic) sweet"
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=O-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:25:08 GMT
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 98.118.116.182
> X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
> X-Trace: nwrddc01.gnilink.net 1230747908 98.118.116.182 (Wed,
> 31 Dec 2008 13:25:08 EST)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:25:08 EST
>
> to (sic) sweet wrote here earlier today:
>
> If lier writes 'I am definitely not planning to do' which is very
> clear enough, he plans not to but with reluctance, gets persuaded.
> CHOOSE YOUR SIDES, THERE WAS ONLY ONE CHANCE
> FUCKYOU 'BRAIN', FUCKYOU FUCKYOU FUCKYOU
>
> ****************************************************
>
> I had not planned to run for the USCF EB, but your anonymous remails
> crap has convinced me otherwise. If I can get the petition signatures
> needed, I will run for the EB in the coming USCF election.
>
> I will campaign on three fundamental principles:
>
> 1. Transparency in all USCF Dealings
>
> 2. Fiscal Responsibility
>
> 3. Ethical Behavior
>
> Again, thanks "to (sic) sweet" for helping me come to a decision.
>
>
> Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service -
> Privacy Policy
> - -
>
> The above atrocity is archived for Mr Killion and associates.
> It was even easier than expected to provoke Lafferty into revealing
> his hand early. You say this guy was once a working lawyer, lol.
> Now that Lafferty's ambitions have been exposed to light, Lafferty's
> motives in conducting his attacks against Susan and Paul are suspect.
> Since that at all relevant times Lafferty concealed, even denied, his
> objectives, this can be spun in to the most devastating expose which
> will be e-mailed to most of the USCF membership. As with much else,
> this may well come in most useful, both in court (where there is more
> than one way to interpret the evidence, and the evidence itself may
> have been subject to tampering by biased folk) and campaigning (is
> this a desirable leader of the federation, who hides his agenda, and
> attacks a man / woman on the basis of their marriage while appearing
> content to ally himself to a convicted felon and notorious pederast?)
> http://mysite.verizon.net/vzewuo9u/brianlaffertysuscfelectionblog/index.html
> When I tried to post there I could not the coward, as expected, is
> definately only permitting himself to post there. No matter, an
> un abridged mirror site will be set up, with the difference that any
> material O'Flattery puts up will have our sweetest comments added.
> FUCKYOU 'BRAIN', FUCKYOU FUCKYOU FUCKYOU
> If any one finds a copy of the post from Al-Naqba 2008 <calvin@yahoo.
> au> replying on 12/22 to foad <[email protected]> than please post it.
> After I had read it, it must have got canceled by The Usual Clown.
>
Archived.
|
| |
Date: 31 Dec 2008 15:22:58
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Thank You "revenge will be to (sic) sweet"
|
On Dec 31, 1:25=A0pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected] > wrote:
> I had not planned to run for the USCF EB, but your anonymous remails
> crap has convinced me otherwise. =A0If I can get the petition signatures
> needed, I will run for the EB in the coming USCF election.
One thing you need to do if you hope to get
elected is change your name.
Nobody is going to vote for someone called
"Jackass Lafferty". May I suggest doing
what most people in show biz do -- pick a
pseudonym, like say, "Diamond", or "Star"
or "Kid", and attach it to your surname,
dropping the first part. How about this one:
"Lucky Gold Star Lafferty"?
-- help bot
|
| | |
Date: 31 Dec 2008 23:24:31
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Thank You "revenge will be to (sic) sweet"
|
help bot wrote:
> On Dec 31, 1:25 pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I had not planned to run for the USCF EB, but your anonymous remails
>> crap has convinced me otherwise. If I can get the petition signatures
>> needed, I will run for the EB in the coming USCF election.
>
>
> One thing you need to do if you hope to get
> elected is change your name.
>
> Nobody is going to vote for someone called
> "Jackass Lafferty". May I suggest doing
> what most people in show biz do -- pick a
> pseudonym, like say, "Diamond", or "Star"
> or "Kid", and attach it to your surname,
> dropping the first part. How about this one:
> "Lucky Gold Star Lafferty"?
>
>
> -- help bot
LOL. Thanks for the advice.
|
| |
Date: 31 Dec 2008 10:52:01
From: johnny_t
Subject: Re: Thank You "revenge will be to (sic) sweet"
|
B. Lafferty wrote:
>
> to (sic) sweet wrote here earlier today:
>
> If lier writes 'I am definitely not planning to do' which is very
> clear enough, he plans not to but with reluctance, gets persuaded.
> CHOOSE YOUR SIDES, THERE WAS ONLY ONE CHANCE
> FUCKYOU 'BRAIN', FUCKYOU FUCKYOU FUCKYOU
>
> ****************************************************
>
> I had not planned to run for the USCF EB, but your anonymous remails
> crap has convinced me otherwise. If I can get the petition signatures
> needed, I will run for the EB in the coming USCF election.
>
> I will campaign on three fundamental principles:
>
> 1. Transparency in all USCF Dealings
>
> 2. Fiscal Responsibility
>
> 3. Ethical Behavior
>
> Again, thanks "to (sic) sweet" for helping me come to a decision.
This is bizarre. Shouldn't these three things to be assumed to be true.
If you are running on them, and not on any on point issue, isn't this
actually a 100% pure negative campaign? Because the only way this is
sufficient is if the opponents or existing board doesn't behave this way
already.
And a 100% negative campaign is just going to come across as too much
like dad, the pope, or the commissioner.
This isn't to say the organization doesn't need this. But this is NOT
why I am a member of the organization. And if this IS what it is, I
don't care. I just won't be a member any more.
|
| | |
Date: 31 Dec 2008 13:54:07
From:
Subject: Re: Thank You "revenge will be to (sic) sweet"
|
I guess the days of requiring actual accomplishment or experience in a
Board member are behind us. A loud mouth and a big ego are sufficient.
|
| | | |
Date: 31 Dec 2008 22:03:56
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Thank You "revenge will be to (sic) sweet"
|
[email protected] wrote:
> I guess the days of requiring actual accomplishment or experience in a
> Board member are behind us. A loud mouth and a big ego are sufficient.
I love you, too, John. Hug.
|
| | |
Date: 31 Dec 2008 13:34:42
From:
Subject: Re: Thank You "revenge will be to (sic) sweet"
|
On Dec 31, 3:07=A0pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected] > wrote:
> johnny_t wrote:
> > B. Lafferty wrote:
>
> >> Not a negative comment on anyone at all. =A0I'm pledging for myself th=
at
> >> I will adhere to those three principles.
>
> > I see what you are doing there.
>
> > Good luck on that!
>
> Thanks. =A0I will have an election issue blog set up in a day or so to
> address any issues that come up during the "election season."
Brian,
Can you also add a PayPal donation button to your election campaign
website?
Seriously, I want to donate to this cause, so you can buy a USCF
mailing list and send out little cards too as Bill Goichberg does.
In this season, yours is the best campaign platform I've seen! Don't
drop this idea, even if you come under pressure from the "other side,"
please!
Good Luck!!!!
- JAP
|
| | | |
Date: 31 Dec 2008 22:05:30
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Thank You "revenge will be to (sic) sweet"
|
[email protected] wrote:
> On Dec 31, 3:07 pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> johnny_t wrote:
>>> B. Lafferty wrote:
>>>> Not a negative comment on anyone at all. I'm pledging for myself that
>>>> I will adhere to those three principles.
>>> I see what you are doing there.
>>> Good luck on that!
>> Thanks. I will have an election issue blog set up in a day or so to
>> address any issues that come up during the "election season."
>
> Brian,
>
> Can you also add a PayPal donation button to your election campaign
> website?
>
> Seriously, I want to donate to this cause, so you can buy a USCF
> mailing list and send out little cards too as Bill Goichberg does.
>
> In this season, yours is the best campaign platform I've seen! Don't
> drop this idea, even if you come under pressure from the "other side,"
> please!
>
> Good Luck!!!!
>
> - JAP
Thanks, but this is going to be a no-frils activity. There will be ways
to help bring the USCF forward as an organization. Stay tuned. I will
have a blog up shortly with information.
|
| | | | |
Date: 31 Dec 2008 23:32:03
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Thank You "revenge will be to (sic) sweet"
|
My election blog is up and can be found at
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzewuo9u/brianlaffertysuscfelectionblog/index.html
B. Lafferty wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>> On Dec 31, 3:07 pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> johnny_t wrote:
>>>> B. Lafferty wrote:
>>>>> Not a negative comment on anyone at all. I'm pledging for myself that
>>>>> I will adhere to those three principles.
>>>> I see what you are doing there.
>>>> Good luck on that!
>>> Thanks. I will have an election issue blog set up in a day or so to
>>> address any issues that come up during the "election season."
>>
>> Brian,
>>
>> Can you also add a PayPal donation button to your election campaign
>> website?
>>
>> Seriously, I want to donate to this cause, so you can buy a USCF
>> mailing list and send out little cards too as Bill Goichberg does.
>>
>> In this season, yours is the best campaign platform I've seen! Don't
>> drop this idea, even if you come under pressure from the "other side,"
>> please!
>>
>> Good Luck!!!!
>>
>> - JAP
> Thanks, but this is going to be a no-frils activity. There will be ways
> to help bring the USCF forward as an organization. Stay tuned. I will
> have a blog up shortly with information.
|
| | |
Date: 31 Dec 2008 19:01:58
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Thank You "revenge will be to (sic) sweet"
|
johnny_t wrote:
> B. Lafferty wrote:
>>
>> to (sic) sweet wrote here earlier today:
>>
>> If lier writes 'I am definitely not planning to do' which is very
>> clear enough, he plans not to but with reluctance, gets persuaded.
>> CHOOSE YOUR SIDES, THERE WAS ONLY ONE CHANCE
>> FUCKYOU 'BRAIN', FUCKYOU FUCKYOU FUCKYOU
>>
>> ****************************************************
>>
>> I had not planned to run for the USCF EB, but your anonymous remails
>> crap has convinced me otherwise. If I can get the petition signatures
>> needed, I will run for the EB in the coming USCF election.
>>
>> I will campaign on three fundamental principles:
>>
>> 1. Transparency in all USCF Dealings
>>
>> 2. Fiscal Responsibility
>>
>> 3. Ethical Behavior
>>
>> Again, thanks "to (sic) sweet" for helping me come to a decision.
>
> This is bizarre. Shouldn't these three things to be assumed to be true.
> If you are running on them, and not on any on point issue, isn't this
> actually a 100% pure negative campaign? Because the only way this is
> sufficient is if the opponents or existing board doesn't behave this way
> already.
>
> And a 100% negative campaign is just going to come across as too much
> like dad, the pope, or the commissioner.
>
> This isn't to say the organization doesn't need this. But this is NOT
> why I am a member of the organization. And if this IS what it is, I
> don't care. I just won't be a member any more.
Not a negative comment on anyone at all. I'm pledging for myself that I
will adhere to those three principles.
|
| | | |
Date: 31 Dec 2008 12:04:26
From: johnny_t
Subject: Re: Thank You "revenge will be to (sic) sweet"
|
B. Lafferty wrote:
> Not a negative comment on anyone at all. I'm pledging for myself that I
> will adhere to those three principles.
I see what you are doing there.
Good luck on that!
|
| | | | |
Date: 31 Dec 2008 20:07:00
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Thank You "revenge will be to (sic) sweet"
|
johnny_t wrote:
> B. Lafferty wrote:
>
>> Not a negative comment on anyone at all. I'm pledging for myself that
>> I will adhere to those three principles.
>
> I see what you are doing there.
>
> Good luck on that!
Thanks. I will have an election issue blog set up in a day or so to
address any issues that come up during the "election season."
|
|
