Text of Second Order of Protection against Polgar and Truong

Main

Date: 20 Dec 2007 18:32:10
From: Sam Sloan
Subject: Text of Second Order of Protection against Polgar and Truong

Page 2
Docket No. V-11575-06-07C,
V-11576-06/07C
GFs 2002

[99] Observe such other condition(s) as are necessary to further the
purposes of protection: FOR: Leeam Shutzmam (DOB: 11/2000) and Tom
Shutzman(DOB: 03/06/1999) RESPONDENT MOTHER MAY NOT INTERFERE OR DENY
THE FATHER (JACK SHUTZMAN) VISITATION WITH THE SUBJECT CHILDREN AS
WRITTEN IN THE DIVORCE ORDER OR FAMILY COURT ORDER. RESPONDENT MOTHER
IS NOT TO USE CORPORAL PUNISHMENT OF ANY KIND ON THE SUBJECT CHILDREN
AND RESPONDENT MOTHER IS NOT TO LEAVE CHILDREN UNDER THE SUPERVISION
OF HER HUSBAND (PAUL) PENDING FURTHER INVESTIGATION AND INGESTION OF
HOT SAUCE IS NOT TO BE USED AS A FORM OF DISCIPLINE.;

It is further ordered that this Temporary Order Of Protection shall
remain in effect up to and including ch 27, 2007;

Dated: January 11, 2007 ENTER

__________________________
Honorable Rhea G.
Friedman

The Family Court Act provides that presentation of a copy of this
order of protection to any Police officer or peace officer acting
pursuant to his or her special duties shall authorize, and in some
situations may require, such officer to arrest a person who is alleged
to have violated its terms and to bring him or her before the court to
face whatever penalties my be imposed therefore.

Federal law provides that this order must be honored and enforced by
state and tribal courts, including courts of a state, the District of
Columbia, a commonwealth, territory or possession of the United
States, if it is established that the person against whom the order is
sought has been or will be afforded reasonable notice and opportunity
to be heard in accordance with state law sufficient to protect that
person's rights (18 U.S.C. ��2265, 2266).

It is a federal offense to: cross state lines to violate an order of
protection; cross state Braes to engage in stalking, harassment or
domestic violence against an intimate partner or family member;
possess, purchase, ship, transfer or receive a handgun, rifle,
shotgun, or other firearm or ammunition following a conviction of a
domestic misdemeanor involving the use or attempted use of physical
force or a deadly weapon; or (except for military or law enforcement
officers while on duty) possess, purchase, ship, transfer or receive a
handgun, rifle, shotgun or other firearm or ammunition while an order
of protection, issued after notice and an opportunity to be heard,
that protects an intimate partner against assault, harassment,
threatening and/or stalking, remains in effect (18 U.S.C. ��922(g(8),
922(g)(9), 2261, 2261A, 2262).

PURSUANT TO SECTION 1113 OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, AN APPEAL FROM THIS
ORDER MUST BETAKEN WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE ORDER BY APPELLANT
1N COURT, 35 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF MAILING OF THE ORDER TO APPELLANT
TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR 30 DAYS AFTER SERVICE BY A PARTY OR THE LAW
GUARDIAN UPON THE APPELLANT, WHICHEVER IS EARLEST.

Check applicable box:

Here are the links to the two orders of protection:

http://www.shamema.com/polgar-op-1.pdf

http://www.shamema.com/polgar-op-2.pdf

Date: 21 Dec 2007 19:23:59
From:
Subject: Re: Text of Second Order of Protection against Polgar and Truong

On Dec 21, 06:22 am, [email protected] (Sam Sloan) wrote:
> Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!
> feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.mixmin.net!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-
> x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
> Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address
> above.
> It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
> Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
> remailer administrator at <[email protected]>.
> Identifying the real sender is technically impossible.
> Subject: Re: Text of Second Order of Protection against Polgar and
> Truong
> References: <[email protected]>
> X-No-Archive: yes
> Newsgroups:
> rec.games.chess.misc,rec.games.chess.politics,alt.sex.pedophilia.girls
> From: ine Sergeant Adolphus H. Kiddie-Fucker, Jr. (retd.)
> <[email protected]>
> Message-ID:
> <[email protected]>
> Precedence: anon
> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:07:19 +0100
> X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
> Organization: Bananasplit - Mail2News
>
> On Dec 21, 4:07 am, ine Sergeant Adolphus H. Kiddie-Fucker, Jr.
> (retd.) <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Dec 20, 12:32 pm, [email protected] (Sam Sloan) wrote:
>>
>> > IS NOT TO USE CORPORAL PUNISHMENT OF ANY KIND ON THE SUBJECT CHILDREN
>> > AND RESPONDENT MOTHER IS NOT TO LEAVE CHILDREN UNDER THE SUPERVISION
>> > OF HER HUSBAND (PAUL) PENDING FURTHER INVESTIGATION AND INGESTION OF
>> > HOT SAUCE IS NOT TO BE USED AS A FORM OF DISCIPLINE.;
>>
>> I don't know these gamesters, did you post this for my information ?
>> If you [email protected] are the same as [email protected] who at
>> <7b4846c5-f3b3-4ebb-ad28-e2a482ff8cf8@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
>> replied to my postreq for a poontang trip coordinator look at your
>> g-ddamn email where I sent contact info . I was shooting fucking gooks
>> to defend your pussy-chasing days with Poland at Berkeley and you can
>> start payback by showing due RESPECT and replying PRONTO . Get to it .
>> In your answer tell me who are the other two joes who replied to my
>> postreq namely [email protected] and [email protected] . Now .
>> ##
>> Adolphus H. Kiddie-Fucker

You there [email protected] . Twice you replied to my rfi posts
not adding one single word but changing some letters to ... dots .
I never heard of you till you answered my first rfi post . Why the
fuck did you reply if you didn't want to deal ? My email is on the
table . What is your g-ddamn game ? Are you stalking me ? Don't
jerk me off boy, you won't like it if I get riled. I don't have
time for draftdodging pussies prudes namblas faggots or commies .
##
Adolphus H. Kiddie-Fucker

Date: 21 Dec 2007 10:07:19
From: Marine Sergeant Adolphus H. Kiddie-Fucker, Jr. (retd.)
Subject: Re: Text of Second Order of Protection against Polgar and Truong

On Dec 20, 12:32 pm, [email protected] (Sam Sloan) wrote:
> IS NOT TO USE CORPORAL PUNISHMENT OF ANY KIND ON THE SUBJECT CHILDREN
> AND RESPONDENT MOTHER IS NOT TO LEAVE CHILDREN UNDER THE SUPERVISION
> OF HER HUSBAND (PAUL) PENDING FURTHER INVESTIGATION AND INGESTION OF
> HOT SAUCE IS NOT TO BE USED AS A FORM OF DISCIPLINE.;

I don't know these gamesters, did you post this for my information ?
If you [email protected] are the same as [email protected] who at
<7b4846c5-f3b3-4ebb-ad28-e2a482ff8cf8@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com >
replied to my postreq for a poontang trip coordinator look at your
g-ddamn email where I sent contact info . I was shooting fucking gooks
to defend your pussy-chasing days with Poland at Berkeley and you can
start payback by showing due RESPECT and replying PRONTO . Get to it .
In your answer tell me who are the other two joes who replied to my
postreq namely [email protected] and [email protected] . Now .
##
Adolphus H. Kiddie-Fucker

Date: 21 Dec 2007 03:22:31
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Text of Second Order of Protection against Polgar and Truong

Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!
feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.mixmin.net!news.bananasplit.info!mail2news-
x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address
above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at <[email protected] >.
Identifying the real sender is technically impossible.
Subject: Re: Text of Second Order of Protection against Polgar and
Truong
References: <[email protected] >
X-No-Archive: yes
Newsgroups:
rec.games.chess.misc,rec.games.chess.politics,alt.sex.pedophilia.girls
From: ine Sergeant Adolphus H. Kiddie-Fucker, Jr. (retd.)
<[email protected] >
Message-ID:
<[email protected] >
Precedence: anon
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:07:19 +0100
X-Abuse-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Bananasplit - Mail2News

On Dec 21, 4:07 am, ine Sergeant Adolphus H. Kiddie-Fucker, Jr.
(retd.) <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 20, 12:32 pm, [email protected] (Sam Sloan) wrote:
>
> > IS NOT TO USE CORPORAL PUNISHMENT OF ANY KIND ON THE SUBJECT CHILDREN
> > AND RESPONDENT MOTHER IS NOT TO LEAVE CHILDREN UNDER THE SUPERVISION
> > OF HER HUSBAND (PAUL) PENDING FURTHER INVESTIGATION AND INGESTION OF
> > HOT SAUCE IS NOT TO BE USED AS A FORM OF DISCIPLINE.;
>
> I don't know these gamesters, did you post this for my information ?
> If you [email protected] are the same as [email protected] who at
> <7b4846c5-f3b3-4ebb-ad28-e2a482ff8...@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
> replied to my postreq for a poontang trip coordinator look at your
> g-ddamn email where I sent contact info . I was shooting fucking gooks
> to defend your pussy-chasing days with Poland at Berkeley and you can
> start payback by showing due RESPECT and replying PRONTO . Get to it .
> In your answer tell me who are the other two joes who replied to my
> postreq namely [email protected] and [email protected] . Now .
> ##
> Adolphus H. Kiddie-Fucker