| |
Main
Date: 30 Sep 2008 09:36:02
From: samsloan
Subject: Surprising Call From Jim Killion Representing Susan Polgar
|
I just received a surprising call at 11:53 AM from Jim Killion in
Texas, who represents Susan Polgar.
He asked me to agree to withdraw my counterclaim against Susan Polgar.
When I refused to agree, he said that he would file a motion to
dismiss my claim on the grounds that it fails to state a claim on
which relief would be granted.
He then asked me to come to Texas at my expense for a deposition.
I said that I would be willing to be deposed at any time in New York
but I would not be able to come to Texas especially at my own expense
for a deposition.
He said that in that case he will file a motion with the federal court
to REQUIRE me to travel to Texas for a deposition.
I told him to go ahead.
I find it noteworthy that his client, Susan Polgar, who lives in
Texas, is not willing to submit to a deposition in Texas, but he
believes that the federal court will require me to come to Texas for a
deposition.
Sam Sloan
|
|
| |
Date: 30 Sep 2008 21:09:50
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: Surprising Call From Jim Killion Representing Susan Polgar
|
On Sep 30, 11:36=A0am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> I find it noteworthy that his client, Susan Polgar, who lives in
> Texas, is not willing to submit to a deposition in Texas, but he
> believes that the federal court will require me to come to Texas for a
> deposition.
>
> Sam Sloan
She can't afford a deposition. Her hubby's bankrupt, remember?
|
| |
Date: 30 Sep 2008 21:08:39
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: Surprising Call From Jim Killion Representing Susan Polgar
|
On Sep 30, 1:53=A0pm, Mike Murray <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:42:10 GMT, Brian Lafferty
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >It is likely that the Federal court will require that he depose you in
> >NYC at his client's expense. =A0Let him make his motion to dismiss. =A0I
> >suspect your claim for defamation will survive.
>
> Sound as if someone's running a bluff ?
Hasn't the entire Trollgar position been bluff since the Mottershead
Report became public?
|
| |
Date: 30 Sep 2008 16:42:10
From: Brian Lafferty
Subject: Re: Surprising Call From Jim Killion Representing Susan Polgar
|
samsloan wrote:
> I just received a surprising call at 11:53 AM from Jim Killion in
> Texas, who represents Susan Polgar.
>
> He asked me to agree to withdraw my counterclaim against Susan Polgar.
>
> When I refused to agree, he said that he would file a motion to
> dismiss my claim on the grounds that it fails to state a claim on
> which relief would be granted.
>
> He then asked me to come to Texas at my expense for a deposition.
>
> I said that I would be willing to be deposed at any time in New York
> but I would not be able to come to Texas especially at my own expense
> for a deposition.
>
> He said that in that case he will file a motion with the federal court
> to REQUIRE me to travel to Texas for a deposition.
>
> I told him to go ahead.
>
> I find it noteworthy that his client, Susan Polgar, who lives in
> Texas, is not willing to submit to a deposition in Texas, but he
> believes that the federal court will require me to come to Texas for a
> deposition.
>
> Sam Sloan
It is likely that the Federal court will require that he depose you in
NYC at his client's expense. Let him make his motion to dismiss. I
suspect your claim for defamation will survive.
|
| | |
Date: 30 Sep 2008 11:53:14
From: Mike Murray
Subject: Re: Surprising Call From Jim Killion Representing Susan Polgar
|
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:42:10 GMT, Brian Lafferty
<[email protected] > wrote:
>It is likely that the Federal court will require that he depose you in
>NYC at his client's expense. Let him make his motion to dismiss. I
>suspect your claim for defamation will survive.
Sound as if someone's running a bluff ?
|
|
