| |
Main
Date: 08 Oct 2008 20:55:34
From: samsloan
Subject: Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible Answer
|
I hereby move that we create a Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible
Answer.
As many people are aware, Our Future President Sarah Palin set some
sort of record for Incomprehensible Answer, topping even the infamous
answer that Miss Tenn South Carolina gave in the 2007 Miss Teen USA
Beauty Contest.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r36Xc0GG4iQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww
Not only was the answer given by Sarah Palin far more
incomprehensible, but Miss Teen South Carolina was not running for
president.
In honor of the achievement by Our Future President in giving an
utterly incomprehensible answer to Katie Couric, we should give out an
award to one of our own, memorializing the same.
I hereby nominate the recent posting by Phil Innes for the most
incomprehensible posting. I urge readers of this forum to find one
that can top this. However, to be fair, you are allowed to use other
postings by Phil Innes. As Innes is by far the most incomprehensible
person to post here, it would be unfair to limit the entries to
posting by others.
So, here is the posting that I nominate for this award. Other entries
are welcome:
**Gosh - now Sam Sloan drops the ideas of ratings altogether - as if
he
doesn't understand the issue - and it may seem so, since Sam Sloan at
the
same time also snipped the context of the very thing he complains
about,
while providing a ratings list - the dufus-like understanding of the
Category 15 rr event has dissapeared entirely, as if those facts too
were
nothing to such as he. Much better to keep beggaring the truth of
everything
as some way to justify your own existance? Sloan's lists of things are
longer than there are things to list, which includes various
inventions, as
if from the basis of an improbable understanding of what seems plain
enough
to the vast majority of people. Sloan concludes as if my rating Susan
Polgar
was less than those listed, despite a couple of pretty strong
performances
against ex W Ch Karpov, scoring 50%, a player who could take Sloan's
list on
in a simul. Phil Innes [the usual newsgroups deleted, since Sloan
adds
them back in since the more confusion to his constant calumnys, the
better.
|
|
| |
Date: 09 Oct 2008 17:08:40
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible Answer
|
On Oct 9, 8:01=A0pm, [email protected] wrote:
> samsloan wrote:
> > On Oct 9, 7:03 am, [email protected] wrote:
> > > samsloan wrote:
> > > > On Oct 8, 11:55 pm, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > I hereby move that we create a Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehens=
ible
> > > > > Answer.
>
> > > > > As many people are aware, Our Future President Sarah Palin set so=
me
> > > > > sort of record for Incomprehensible Answer, topping even the infa=
mous
> > > > > answer that Miss Tenn South Carolina gave in the 2007 Miss Teen U=
SA
> > > > > Beauty Contest.
>
> > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dr36Xc0GG4iQ
>
> > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dlj3iNxZ8Dww
>
> > > > > Not only was the answer given by Sarah Palin far more
> > > > > incomprehensible, but Miss Teen South Carolina was not running fo=
r
> > > > > president.
>
> > > > > In honor of the achievement by Our Future President in giving an
> > > > > utterly incomprehensible answer to Katie Couric, we should give o=
ut an
> > > > > award to one of our own, memorializing the same.
>
> > > > > I hereby nominate the recent posting by Phil Innes for the most
> > > > > incomprehensible posting. I urge readers of this forum to find on=
e
> > > > > that can top this. However, to be fair, you are allowed to use ot=
her
> > > > > postings by Phil Innes. As Innes is by far the most incomprehensi=
ble
> > > > > person to post here, it would be unfair to limit the entries to
> > > > > posting by others.
>
> > > > > So, here is the posting that I nominate for this award. Other ent=
ries
> > > > > are welcome:
>
> > > > **Gosh - now Sam Sloan drops the ideas of ratings altogether - as i=
f
> > > > he doesn't understand the issue - and it may seem so, since Sam Slo=
an
> > > > at the same time also snipped the context of the very thing he
> > > > complains about, while providing a ratings list - the dufus-like
> > > > understanding of the Category 15 rr event has dissapeared entirely,=
as
> > > > if those facts too were nothing to such as he. Much better to keep
> > > > beggaring the truth of everything as some way to justify your own
> > > > existance? Sloan's lists of things are longer than there are things=
to
> > > > list, which includes various inventions, as if from the basis of an
> > > > improbable understanding of what seems plain enough to the vast
> > > > majority of people. Sloan concludes as if my rating Susan Polgar wa=
s
> > > > less than those listed, despite a couple of pretty strong performan=
ces
> > > > against ex W Ch Karpov, scoring 50%, a player who could take Sloan'=
s
> > > > list on in a simul. Phil Innes [the usual newsgroups deleted, since
> > > > Sloan adds them back in since the more confusion to his constant
> > > > calumnys, the better.
>
> > > > On Oct 9, 2:58 am, [email protected] wrote:
> > > > > How about giving Sam the Joe Biden Award For Unbelievable Ignoran=
ce,
> > > > > given only to those who say things as stupid as claiming that
> > > > > President Roosevelt appeared on TV in 1929 to explain the stock m=
arket
> > > > > crash?
>
> > > > Certainly the quote by Joe Biden that Roosevelt appeared on TV in 1=
929
> > > > displayed unbelievable ignorance, when Roosevelt did not become
> > > > president until 1933 and TV did not become available in homes befor=
e
> > > > the 1950s.
>
> > > > However, the test here is for incomprehensible answer, not
> > > > unbelievable ignorance.
>
> > > > I am sure Biden's answer is worthy of some kind of award, but not t=
his
> > > > one.
>
> > > > Sam Sloan
>
> > > You do realize, I assume, that the clip is of comedienne Tina Fey (on=
e
> > > of Obama's media poodles) and not Sarah Palin. That being said, I'd
> > > have to agree that Phil's comment has many similarities to an SNL
> > > parody.
>
> > You did not play the entire video. There were two parts. The first
> > part was Tina Fey imitating Sarah Palin. The second part was the Real
> > Sarah Palin. The amazing thing is that for the most part the two were
> > WORD FOR WORD EXACTLY THE SAME. Tina Fey did not have tro make up
> > anything. She just repeated Sarah Palin's exact words.
>
> > Sam Sloan
>
> The Palin part was an edited clip from an interview by another of
> Obama's media poodles. If the legacy media gave the same treatment to
> BO (editing out everything except the ers and ums, making him work
> without a teleprompter), he'd look like an inarticulate buffoon, which
> he clearly is not. An unprincipled opportunist, but hardly
> inarticulate. The lefty media are worried about Palin because she
> resonates with a lot of people who live outside the liberal
> reservations, so they're going after her now. In the long run, I think
> they'll fail, even if BO wins this time
So, you are switching from being a Polgarista to being a Palinista.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 09 Oct 2008 17:01:45
From:
Subject: Re: Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible Answer
|
samsloan wrote:
> On Oct 9, 7:03=EF=BF=BDam, [email protected] wrote:
> > samsloan wrote:
> > > On Oct 8, 11:55 pm, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > I hereby move that we create a Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensib=
le
> > > > Answer.
> >
> > > > As many people are aware, Our Future President Sarah Palin set some
> > > > sort of record for Incomprehensible Answer, topping even the infamo=
us
> > > > answer that Miss Tenn South Carolina gave in the 2007 Miss Teen USA
> > > > Beauty Contest.
> >
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dr36Xc0GG4iQ
> >
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dlj3iNxZ8Dww
> >
> > > > Not only was the answer given by Sarah Palin far more
> > > > incomprehensible, but Miss Teen South Carolina was not running for
> > > > president.
> >
> > > > In honor of the achievement by Our Future President in giving an
> > > > utterly incomprehensible answer to Katie Couric, we should give out=
an
> > > > award to one of our own, memorializing the same.
> >
> > > > I hereby nominate the recent posting by Phil Innes for the most
> > > > incomprehensible posting. I urge readers of this forum to find one
> > > > that can top this. However, to be fair, you are allowed to use othe=
r
> > > > postings by Phil Innes. As Innes is by far the most incomprehensibl=
e
> > > > person to post here, it would be unfair to limit the entries to
> > > > posting by others.
> >
> > > > So, here is the posting that I nominate for this award. Other entri=
es
> > > > are welcome:
> >
> > > =EF=BF=BD**Gosh - now Sam Sloan drops the ideas of ratings altogether=
- as if
> > > he doesn't understand the issue - and it may seem so, since Sam Sloan
> > > at the same time also snipped the context of the very thing he
> > > complains about, while providing a ratings list - the dufus-like
> > > understanding of the Category 15 rr event has dissapeared entirely, a=
s
> > > if those facts too were nothing to such as he. Much better to keep
> > > beggaring the truth of everything as some way to justify your own
> > > existance? Sloan's lists of things are longer than there are things t=
o
> > > list, which includes various inventions, as if from the basis of an
> > > improbable understanding of what seems plain enough to the vast
> > > majority of people. Sloan concludes as if my rating Susan Polgar was
> > > less than those listed, despite a couple of pretty strong performance=
s
> > > against ex W Ch Karpov, scoring 50%, a player who could take Sloan's
> > > list on in a simul. Phil Innes [the usual newsgroups deleted, since
> > > Sloan adds them back in since the more confusion to his constant
> > > calumnys, the better.
> >
> > > On Oct 9, 2:58 am, [email protected] wrote:
> > > > How about giving Sam the Joe Biden Award For Unbelievable Ignorance=
,
> > > > given only to those who say things as stupid as claiming that
> > > > President Roosevelt appeared on TV in 1929 to explain the stock mar=
ket
> > > > crash?
> >
> > > Certainly the quote by Joe Biden that Roosevelt appeared on TV in 192=
9
> > > displayed unbelievable ignorance, when Roosevelt did not become
> > > president until 1933 and TV did not become available in homes before
> > > the 1950s.
> >
> > > However, the test here is for incomprehensible answer, not
> > > unbelievable ignorance.
> >
> > > I am sure Biden's answer is worthy of some kind of award, but not thi=
s
> > > one.
> >
> > > Sam Sloan
> >
> > You do realize, I assume, that the clip is of comedienne Tina Fey (one
> > of Obama's media poodles) and not Sarah Palin. That being said, I'd
> > have to agree that Phil's =EF=BF=BDcomment has many similarities to an =
SNL
> > parody.
>
> You did not play the entire video. There were two parts. The first
> part was Tina Fey imitating Sarah Palin. The second part was the Real
> Sarah Palin. The amazing thing is that for the most part the two were
> WORD FOR WORD EXACTLY THE SAME. Tina Fey did not have tro make up
> anything. She just repeated Sarah Palin's exact words.
>
> Sam Sloan
The Palin part was an edited clip from an interview by another of
Obama's media poodles. If the legacy media gave the same treatment to
BO (editing out everything except the ers and ums, making him work
without a teleprompter), he'd look like an inarticulate buffoon, which
he clearly is not. An unprincipled opportunist, but hardly
inarticulate. The lefty media are worried about Palin because she
resonates with a lot of people who live outside the liberal
reservations, so they're going after her now. In the long run, I think
they'll fail, even if BO wins this time
|
| |
Date: 09 Oct 2008 07:26:46
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible Answer
|
On Oct 9, 7:03=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
> samsloan wrote:
> > On Oct 8, 11:55 pm, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I hereby move that we create a Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible
> > > Answer.
>
> > > As many people are aware, Our Future President Sarah Palin set some
> > > sort of record for Incomprehensible Answer, topping even the infamous
> > > answer that Miss Tenn South Carolina gave in the 2007 Miss Teen USA
> > > Beauty Contest.
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dr36Xc0GG4iQ
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dlj3iNxZ8Dww
>
> > > Not only was the answer given by Sarah Palin far more
> > > incomprehensible, but Miss Teen South Carolina was not running for
> > > president.
>
> > > In honor of the achievement by Our Future President in giving an
> > > utterly incomprehensible answer to Katie Couric, we should give out a=
n
> > > award to one of our own, memorializing the same.
>
> > > I hereby nominate the recent posting by Phil Innes for the most
> > > incomprehensible posting. I urge readers of this forum to find one
> > > that can top this. However, to be fair, you are allowed to use other
> > > postings by Phil Innes. As Innes is by far the most incomprehensible
> > > person to post here, it would be unfair to limit the entries to
> > > posting by others.
>
> > > So, here is the posting that I nominate for this award. Other entries
> > > are welcome:
>
> > =A0**Gosh - now Sam Sloan drops the ideas of ratings altogether - as if
> > he doesn't understand the issue - and it may seem so, since Sam Sloan
> > at the same time also snipped the context of the very thing he
> > complains about, while providing a ratings list - the dufus-like
> > understanding of the Category 15 rr event has dissapeared entirely, as
> > if those facts too were nothing to such as he. Much better to keep
> > beggaring the truth of everything as some way to justify your own
> > existance? Sloan's lists of things are longer than there are things to
> > list, which includes various inventions, as if from the basis of an
> > improbable understanding of what seems plain enough to the vast
> > majority of people. Sloan concludes as if my rating Susan Polgar was
> > less than those listed, despite a couple of pretty strong performances
> > against ex W Ch Karpov, scoring 50%, a player who could take Sloan's
> > list on in a simul. Phil Innes [the usual newsgroups deleted, since
> > Sloan adds them back in since the more confusion to his constant
> > calumnys, the better.
>
> > On Oct 9, 2:58 am, [email protected] wrote:
> > > How about giving Sam the Joe Biden Award For Unbelievable Ignorance,
> > > given only to those who say things as stupid as claiming that
> > > President Roosevelt appeared on TV in 1929 to explain the stock marke=
t
> > > crash?
>
> > Certainly the quote by Joe Biden that Roosevelt appeared on TV in 1929
> > displayed unbelievable ignorance, when Roosevelt did not become
> > president until 1933 and TV did not become available in homes before
> > the 1950s.
>
> > However, the test here is for incomprehensible answer, not
> > unbelievable ignorance.
>
> > I am sure Biden's answer is worthy of some kind of award, but not this
> > one.
>
> > Sam Sloan
>
> You do realize, I assume, that the clip is of comedienne Tina Fey (one
> of Obama's media poodles) and not Sarah Palin. That being said, I'd
> have to agree that Phil's =A0comment has many similarities to an SNL
> parody.
You did not play the entire video. There were two parts. The first
part was Tina Fey imitating Sarah Palin. The second part was the Real
Sarah Palin. The amazing thing is that for the most part the two were
WORD FOR WORD EXACTLY THE SAME. Tina Fey did not have tro make up
anything. She just repeated Sarah Palin's exact words.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 09 Oct 2008 06:40:09
From:
Subject: Re: Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible Answer
|
On Oct 9, 9:27=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
> > On Oct 9, 2:58 am, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > > How about giving Sam the Joe Biden Award For Unbelievable Ignorance,
> > > given only to those who say things as stupid as claiming that
> > > President Roosevelt appeared on TV in 1929 to explain the stock marke=
t
> > > crash?
>
> =A0 That is not an accurate report of what Biden said, as this clip
> shows:
>
> =A0http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DGlrnb_G34E4
>
> > Certainly the quote by Joe Biden that Roosevelt appeared on TV in 1929
> > displayed unbelievable ignorance,
>
> =A0 Biden never said 1929, or any particular year, in the statement in
> question.
>
> > when Roosevelt did not become
> > president until 1933 and TV did not become available in homes before
> > the 1950s.
>
> =A0 Concerning FDR using TV, Biden was wrong. But his main point was
> accurate, that FDR did discuss the economic issues raised by the Great
> Depression candidly with the American people. However, he did it
> mostly by radio, not television, which was then in its infancy.
Apparently this sort of gaffe is not uncommon for Biden, but nobody
much cares:
http://www.slate.com/id/2200302/
|
| |
Date: 09 Oct 2008 06:36:47
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible Answer
|
On Oct 9, 6:03=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
> samsloan wrote:
> > On Oct 8, 11:55 pm, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I hereby move that we create a Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible
> > > Answer.
>
> > > As many people are aware, Our Future President Sarah Palin set some
> > > sort of record for Incomprehensible Answer, topping even the infamous
> > > answer that Miss Tenn South Carolina gave in the 2007 Miss Teen USA
> > > Beauty Contest.
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dr36Xc0GG4iQ
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dlj3iNxZ8Dww
>
> > > Not only was the answer given by Sarah Palin far more
> > > incomprehensible, but Miss Teen South Carolina was not running for
> > > president.
>
> > > In honor of the achievement by Our Future President in giving an
> > > utterly incomprehensible answer to Katie Couric, we should give out a=
n
> > > award to one of our own, memorializing the same.
>
> > > I hereby nominate the recent posting by Phil Innes for the most
> > > incomprehensible posting. I urge readers of this forum to find one
> > > that can top this. However, to be fair, you are allowed to use other
> > > postings by Phil Innes. As Innes is by far the most incomprehensible
> > > person to post here, it would be unfair to limit the entries to
> > > posting by others.
>
> > > So, here is the posting that I nominate for this award. Other entries
> > > are welcome:
>
> > =A0**Gosh - now Sam Sloan drops the ideas of ratings altogether - as if
> > he doesn't understand the issue - and it may seem so, since Sam Sloan
> > at the same time also snipped the context of the very thing he
> > complains about, while providing a ratings list - the dufus-like
> > understanding of the Category 15 rr event has dissapeared entirely, as
> > if those facts too were nothing to such as he. Much better to keep
> > beggaring the truth of everything as some way to justify your own
> > existance? Sloan's lists of things are longer than there are things to
> > list, which includes various inventions, as if from the basis of an
> > improbable understanding of what seems plain enough to the vast
> > majority of people. Sloan concludes as if my rating Susan Polgar was
> > less than those listed, despite a couple of pretty strong performances
> > against ex W Ch Karpov, scoring 50%, a player who could take Sloan's
> > list on in a simul. Phil Innes [the usual newsgroups deleted, since
> > Sloan adds them back in since the more confusion to his constant
> > calumnys, the better.
>
> > On Oct 9, 2:58 am, [email protected] wrote:
> > > How about giving Sam the Joe Biden Award For Unbelievable Ignorance,
> > > given only to those who say things as stupid as claiming that
> > > President Roosevelt appeared on TV in 1929 to explain the stock marke=
t
> > > crash?
>
> > Certainly the quote by Joe Biden that Roosevelt appeared on TV in 1929
> > displayed unbelievable ignorance, when Roosevelt did not become
> > president until 1933 and TV did not become available in homes before
> > the 1950s.
>
> > However, the test here is for incomprehensible answer, not
> > unbelievable ignorance.
>
> > I am sure Biden's answer is worthy of some kind of award, but not this
> > one.
>
> > Sam Sloan
>
> You do realize, I assume, that the clip is of comedienne Tina Fey (one
> of Obama's media poodles) and not Sarah Palin. That being said, I'd
> have to agree that Phil's =A0comment has many similarities to an SNL
> parody.
It's a good comparison, although not perfect. SNL is at times funny.
|
| |
Date: 09 Oct 2008 06:27:30
From:
Subject: Re: Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible Answer
|
> On Oct 9, 2:58 am, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > How about giving Sam the Joe Biden Award For Unbelievable Ignorance,
> > given only to those who say things as stupid as claiming that
> > President Roosevelt appeared on TV in 1929 to explain the stock market
> > crash?
That is not an accurate report of what Biden said, as this clip
shows:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Glrnb_G34E4
> Certainly the quote by Joe Biden that Roosevelt appeared on TV in 1929
> displayed unbelievable ignorance,
Biden never said 1929, or any particular year, in the statement in
question.
> when Roosevelt did not become
> president until 1933 and TV did not become available in homes before
> the 1950s.
Concerning FDR using TV, Biden was wrong. But his main point was
accurate, that FDR did discuss the economic issues raised by the Great
Depression candidly with the American people. However, he did it
mostly by radio, not television, which was then in its infancy.
|
| |
Date: 09 Oct 2008 11:55:25
From: Princeandy
Subject: Re: Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible Answer
|
"samsloan" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:33991df1-7d24-41b8-9bee-a2876eccdbf8@v72g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>I hereby move that we create a Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible
> Answer.
>
> As many people are aware, Our Future President Sarah Palin set some
> sort of record for Incomprehensible Answer, topping even the infamous
> answer that Miss Tenn South Carolina gave in the 2007 Miss Teen USA
> Beauty Contest.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r36Xc0GG4iQ
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww
>
> Not only was the answer given by Sarah Palin far more
> incomprehensible, but Miss Teen South Carolina was not running for
> president.
Lets face it you yanks are gluttons for punishment, and I'm sure the jewish
loby dont mind laying the boots in thick and fast.
http://neoconzionistthreat.com/
Not broke enough yet? Back Mac and palin and you'll have the arse hanging
out of yor apnts.
>
> In honor of the achievement by Our Future President in giving an
> utterly incomprehensible answer to Katie Couric, we should give out an
> award to one of our own, memorializing the same.
>
> I hereby nominate the recent posting by Phil Innes for the most
> incomprehensible posting. I urge readers of this forum to find one
> that can top this. However, to be fair, you are allowed to use other
> postings by Phil Innes. As Innes is by far the most incomprehensible
> person to post here, it would be unfair to limit the entries to
> posting by others.
>
> So, here is the posting that I nominate for this award. Other entries
> are welcome:
>
> **Gosh - now Sam Sloan drops the ideas of ratings altogether - as if
> he
> doesn't understand the issue - and it may seem so, since Sam Sloan at
> the
> same time also snipped the context of the very thing he complains
> about,
> while providing a ratings list - the dufus-like understanding of the
> Category 15 rr event has dissapeared entirely, as if those facts too
> were
> nothing to such as he. Much better to keep beggaring the truth of
> everything
> as some way to justify your own existance? Sloan's lists of things are
> longer than there are things to list, which includes various
> inventions, as
> if from the basis of an improbable understanding of what seems plain
> enough
> to the vast majority of people. Sloan concludes as if my rating Susan
> Polgar
> was less than those listed, despite a couple of pretty strong
> performances
> against ex W Ch Karpov, scoring 50%, a player who could take Sloan's
> list on
> in a simul. Phil Innes [the usual newsgroups deleted, since Sloan
> adds
> them back in since the more confusion to his constant calumnys, the
> better.
|
| |
Date: 09 Oct 2008 04:03:29
From:
Subject: Re: Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible Answer
|
samsloan wrote:
> On Oct 8, 11:55=EF=BF=BDpm, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I hereby move that we create a Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible
> > Answer.
> >
> > As many people are aware, Our Future President Sarah Palin set some
> > sort of record for Incomprehensible Answer, topping even the infamous
> > answer that Miss Tenn South Carolina gave in the 2007 Miss Teen USA
> > Beauty Contest.
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dr36Xc0GG4iQ
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dlj3iNxZ8Dww
> >
> > Not only was the answer given by Sarah Palin far more
> > incomprehensible, but Miss Teen South Carolina was not running for
> > president.
> >
> > In honor of the achievement by Our Future President in giving an
> > utterly incomprehensible answer to Katie Couric, we should give out an
> > award to one of our own, memorializing the same.
> >
> > I hereby nominate the recent posting by Phil Innes for the most
> > incomprehensible posting. I urge readers of this forum to find one
> > that can top this. However, to be fair, you are allowed to use other
> > postings by Phil Innes. As Innes is by far the most incomprehensible
> > person to post here, it would be unfair to limit the entries to
> > posting by others.
> >
> > So, here is the posting that I nominate for this award. Other entries
> > are welcome:
>
> **Gosh - now Sam Sloan drops the ideas of ratings altogether - as if
> he doesn't understand the issue - and it may seem so, since Sam Sloan
> at the same time also snipped the context of the very thing he
> complains about, while providing a ratings list - the dufus-like
> understanding of the Category 15 rr event has dissapeared entirely, as
> if those facts too were nothing to such as he. Much better to keep
> beggaring the truth of everything as some way to justify your own
> existance? Sloan's lists of things are longer than there are things to
> list, which includes various inventions, as if from the basis of an
> improbable understanding of what seems plain enough to the vast
> majority of people. Sloan concludes as if my rating Susan Polgar was
> less than those listed, despite a couple of pretty strong performances
> against ex W Ch Karpov, scoring 50%, a player who could take Sloan's
> list on in a simul. Phil Innes =EF=BF=BD [the usual newsgroups deleted, s=
ince
> Sloan adds them back in since the more confusion to his constant
> calumnys, the better.
>
> On Oct 9, 2:58 am, [email protected] wrote:
> > How about giving Sam the Joe Biden Award For Unbelievable Ignorance,
> > given only to those who say things as stupid as claiming that
> > President Roosevelt appeared on TV in 1929 to explain the stock market
> > crash?
>
> Certainly the quote by Joe Biden that Roosevelt appeared on TV in 1929
> displayed unbelievable ignorance, when Roosevelt did not become
> president until 1933 and TV did not become available in homes before
> the 1950s.
>
> However, the test here is for incomprehensible answer, not
> unbelievable ignorance.
>
> I am sure Biden's answer is worthy of some kind of award, but not this
> one.
>
> Sam Sloan
You do realize, I assume, that the clip is of comedienne Tina Fey (one
of Obama's media poodles) and not Sarah Palin. That being said, I'd
have to agree that Phil's comment has many similarities to an SNL
parody.
|
| |
Date: 09 Oct 2008 02:19:41
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible Answer
|
On Oct 8, 11:55=A0pm, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> I hereby move that we create a Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible
> Answer.
>
> As many people are aware, Our Future President Sarah Palin set some
> sort of record for Incomprehensible Answer, topping even the infamous
> answer that Miss Tenn South Carolina gave in the 2007 Miss Teen USA
> Beauty Contest.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dr36Xc0GG4iQ
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dlj3iNxZ8Dww
>
> Not only was the answer given by Sarah Palin far more
> incomprehensible, but Miss Teen South Carolina was not running for
> president.
>
> In honor of the achievement by Our Future President in giving an
> utterly incomprehensible answer to Katie Couric, we should give out an
> award to one of our own, memorializing the same.
>
> I hereby nominate the recent posting by Phil Innes for the most
> incomprehensible posting. I urge readers of this forum to find one
> that can top this. However, to be fair, you are allowed to use other
> postings by Phil Innes. As Innes is by far the most incomprehensible
> person to post here, it would be unfair to limit the entries to
> posting by others.
>
> So, here is the posting that I nominate for this award. Other entries
> are welcome:
**Gosh - now Sam Sloan drops the ideas of ratings altogether - as if
he doesn't understand the issue - and it may seem so, since Sam Sloan
at the same time also snipped the context of the very thing he
complains about, while providing a ratings list - the dufus-like
understanding of the Category 15 rr event has dissapeared entirely, as
if those facts too were nothing to such as he. Much better to keep
beggaring the truth of everything as some way to justify your own
existance? Sloan's lists of things are longer than there are things to
list, which includes various inventions, as if from the basis of an
improbable understanding of what seems plain enough to the vast
majority of people. Sloan concludes as if my rating Susan Polgar was
less than those listed, despite a couple of pretty strong performances
against ex W Ch Karpov, scoring 50%, a player who could take Sloan's
list on in a simul. Phil Innes =A0 [the usual newsgroups deleted, since
Sloan adds them back in since the more confusion to his constant
calumnys, the better.
On Oct 9, 2:58 am, [email protected] wrote:
> How about giving Sam the Joe Biden Award For Unbelievable Ignorance,
> given only to those who say things as stupid as claiming that
> President Roosevelt appeared on TV in 1929 to explain the stock market
> crash?
Certainly the quote by Joe Biden that Roosevelt appeared on TV in 1929
displayed unbelievable ignorance, when Roosevelt did not become
president until 1933 and TV did not become available in homes before
the 1950s.
However, the test here is for incomprehensible answer, not
unbelievable ignorance.
I am sure Biden's answer is worthy of some kind of award, but not this
one.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 08 Oct 2008 21:45:38
From: =?TIS-620?B?4LSq?=
Subject: Re: Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible Answer. another communist
|
yeahh obama runs for prex and he claimed usa has 57 states. last night
he said a lot of stupid things and even called russia evil and he will
attack pakistan? bullshit. governor palin is more qualified than this
muslim fake christian barack hussein obama.
the country like this we need a strong beautiful leader like her.
those old ogly women scorned like barbara streisand, ophra, katie
curic..yeahh hate and jealous of the governor.
On Oct 8, 10:55=A0pm, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> I hereby move that we create a Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible
> Answer.
>
> As many people are aware, Our Future President Sarah Palin set some
> sort of record for Incomprehensible Answer, topping even the infamous
> answer that Miss Tenn South Carolina gave in the 2007 Miss Teen USA
> Beauty Contest.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dr36Xc0GG4iQ
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dlj3iNxZ8Dww
>
> Not only was the answer given by Sarah Palin far more
> incomprehensible, but Miss Teen South Carolina was not running for
> president.
>
> In honor of the achievement by Our Future President in giving an
> utterly incomprehensible answer to Katie Couric, we should give out an
> award to one of our own, memorializing the same.
>
> I hereby nominate the recent posting by Phil Innes for the most
> incomprehensible posting. I urge readers of this forum to find one
> that can top this. However, to be fair, you are allowed to use other
> postings by Phil Innes. As Innes is by far the most incomprehensible
> person to post here, it would be unfair to limit the entries to
> posting by others.
>
> So, here is the posting that I nominate for this award. Other entries
> are welcome:
>
> **Gosh - now Sam Sloan drops the ideas of ratings altogether - as if
> he
> doesn't understand the issue - and it may seem so, since Sam Sloan at
> the
> same time also snipped the context of the very thing he complains
> about,
> while providing a ratings list - the dufus-like understanding of the
> Category 15 rr event has dissapeared entirely, as if those facts too
> were
> nothing to such as he. Much better to keep beggaring the truth of
> everything
> as some way to justify your own existance? Sloan's lists of things are
> longer than there are things to list, which includes various
> inventions, as
> if from the basis of an improbable understanding of what seems plain
> enough
> to the vast majority of people. Sloan concludes as if my rating Susan
> Polgar
> was less than those listed, despite a couple of pretty strong
> performances
> against ex W Ch Karpov, scoring 50%, a player who could take Sloan's
> list on
> in a simul. Phil Innes =A0 [the usual newsgroups deleted, since Sloan
> adds
> them back in since the more confusion to his constant calumnys, the
> better.
|
| | |
Date: 09 Oct 2008 01:41:02
From: V for Vendicar
Subject: Re: Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible Answer. another communist
|
"???" <[email protected] > wrote
> the country like this we need a strong beautiful leader like her.
You planning to murder McCaine?
|
| |
Date: 08 Oct 2008 21:11:36
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible Answer
|
On Oct 9, 12:06=A0am, The Historian <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Oct 8, 10:55=A0pm, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I hereby move that we create a Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible
> > Answer.
>
> > As many people are aware, Our Future President Sarah Palin set some
> > sort of record for Incomprehensible Answer, topping even the infamous
> > answer that Miss Tenn South Carolina gave in the 2007 Miss Teen USA
> > Beauty Contest.
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dr36Xc0GG4iQ
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dlj3iNxZ8Dww
>
> > Not only was the answer given by Sarah Palin far more
> > incomprehensible, but Miss Teen South Carolina was not running for
> > president.
>
> > In honor of the achievement by Our Future President in giving an
> > utterly incomprehensible answer to Katie Couric, we should give out an
> > award to one of our own, memorializing the same.
>
> > I hereby nominate the recent posting by Phil Innes for the most
> > incomprehensible posting. I urge readers of this forum to find one
> > that can top this. However, to be fair, you are allowed to use other
> > postings by Phil Innes. As Innes is by far the most incomprehensible
> > person to post here, it would be unfair to limit the entries to
> > posting by others.
>
> > So, here is the posting that I nominate for this award. Other entries
> > are welcome:
>
> (Sam Sloan's example snipped.)
>
> Are we restricted to posts from the chess groups? P Innes has posted
> some bizarre grammar-bending stuff to
> humanities.literature.authorship.shakespeare.
All postings anywhere are allowed.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 08 Oct 2008 21:06:28
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible Answer
|
On Oct 8, 10:55=A0pm, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> I hereby move that we create a Sarah Palin Award for Incomprehensible
> Answer.
>
> As many people are aware, Our Future President Sarah Palin set some
> sort of record for Incomprehensible Answer, topping even the infamous
> answer that Miss Tenn South Carolina gave in the 2007 Miss Teen USA
> Beauty Contest.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dr36Xc0GG4iQ
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dlj3iNxZ8Dww
>
> Not only was the answer given by Sarah Palin far more
> incomprehensible, but Miss Teen South Carolina was not running for
> president.
>
> In honor of the achievement by Our Future President in giving an
> utterly incomprehensible answer to Katie Couric, we should give out an
> award to one of our own, memorializing the same.
>
> I hereby nominate the recent posting by Phil Innes for the most
> incomprehensible posting. I urge readers of this forum to find one
> that can top this. However, to be fair, you are allowed to use other
> postings by Phil Innes. As Innes is by far the most incomprehensible
> person to post here, it would be unfair to limit the entries to
> posting by others.
>
> So, here is the posting that I nominate for this award. Other entries
> are welcome:
(Sam Sloan's example snipped.)
Are we restricted to posts from the chess groups? P Innes has posted
some bizarre grammar-bending stuff to
humanities.literature.authorship.shakespeare.
|
|
