| |
Main
Date: 18 Aug 2008 11:42:38
From: Guest
Subject: Sanny: Some test positions for you
|
Sanny;
Here are some standard test positions for you to use with GetClub chess.
The classic Bratko-Kopec test and the Win-At-Chess test. There are many
other test sets, but these are classics that most people use. The
Bratko-Kopec tests are particularly intersting, since they've been around so
long and so many programs have done it. They aren't extensive enough, which
is why people use additional test sets, but they are classics that most
people use.
These are done in fairly basic EPD strings. The first part is the FEN
description, followed by 'bm' which stands for 'best move', followed by an
identification string.
(There are more complicated forms of EPD, that can have a move to avoid or
multiple acceptable moves, etc. But these are fairly simple ones for you.)
FEN starts at A8 and goes across to H8, then A7-H7, etc. Lowercase is
black. Uppercase is white. Numbers are how many blank squares. Slashes
indicate a new row.
This is followed by w/b for side to move, followed by Castling (K=Kingside,
Q=Queenside. Uppercase is white, lower case is black. - means no castling
status. Kkq would mean White kingside, black bothsides.
This is followed by the enpassant square. - means no enpassant possible.
These are optionally follwed by half move clock & full move clock. You wont
have that in these tests.
Simply feed each position into GetClub and have it search, then compare the
result, and report the results. Try searches for 5 seconds, 10 seconds and
30 seconds.
A test script is easy to do. Or you can program the testing stuff into the
program itself. That's what most people do because it makes testing easy
that way. You just say "epdtest filename" and it grabs the test file, runs
the tests, saves the results to a file and when you come back the results
are ready for you. No human participation required.
(Note: These tests have gotten a lot of research done on them. As a
result, there are some who disagree with the results for various moves.
However, the standard results are 'good enough' at this stage. No program
gets all the right answers at the quicker time controls (without being
specifically tuned to do so), so a few positions with different moves aren't
significant right now.)
Here are the classic Bratko-Kopec tests.
****Begin
1k1r4/pp1b1R2/3q2pp/4p3/2B5/4Q3/PPP2B2/2K5 b - - bm Qd1+; id "BK.01";
3r1k2/4npp1/1ppr3p/p6P/P2PPPP1/1NR5/5K2/2R5 w - - bm d5; id "BK.02";
2q1rr1k/3bbnnp/p2p1pp1/2pPp3/PpP1P1P1/1P2BNNP/2BQ1PRK/7R b - - bm f5; id
"BK.03";
rnbqkb1r/p3pppp/1p6/2ppP3/3N4/2P5/PPP1QPPP/R1B1KB1R w KQkq - bm e6; id
"BK.04";
r1b2rk1/2q1b1pp/p2ppn2/1p6/3QP3/1BN1B3/PPP3PP/R4RK1 w - - bm Nd5 a4; id
"BK.05";
2r3k1/pppR1pp1/4p3/4P1P1/5P2/1P4K1/P1P5/8 w - - bm g6; id "BK.06";
1nk1r1r1/pp2n1pp/4p3/q2pPp1N/b1pP1P2/B1P2R2/2P1B1PP/R2Q2K1 w - - bm Nf6; id
"BK.07";
4b3/p3kp2/6p1/3pP2p/2pP1P2/4K1P1/P3N2P/8 w - - bm f5; id "BK.08";
2kr1bnr/pbpq4/2n1pp2/3p3p/3P1P1B/2N2N1Q/PPP3PP/2KR1B1R w - - bm f5; id
"BK.09";
3rr1k1/pp3pp1/1qn2np1/8/3p4/PP1R1P2/2P1NQPP/R1B3K1 b - - bm Ne5; id "BK.10";
2r1nrk1/p2q1ppp/bp1p4/n1pPp3/P1P1P3/2PBB1N1/4QPPP/R4RK1 w - - bm f4; id
"BK.11";
r3r1k1/ppqb1ppp/8/4p1NQ/8/2P5/PP3PPP/R3R1K1 b - - bm Bf5; id "BK.12";
r2q1rk1/4bppp/p2p4/2pP4/3pP3/3Q4/PP1B1PPP/R3R1K1 w - - bm b4; id "BK.13";
rnb2r1k/pp2p2p/2pp2p1/q2P1p2/8/1Pb2NP1/PB2PPBP/R2Q1RK1 w - - bm Qd2 Qe1; id
"BK.14";
2r3k1/1p2q1pp/2b1pr2/p1pp4/6Q1/1P1PP1R1/P1PN2PP/5RK1 w - - bm Qxg7+; id
"BK.15";
r1bqkb1r/4npp1/p1p4p/1p1pP1B1/8/1B6/PPPN1PPP/R2Q1RK1 w kq - bm Ne4; id
"BK.16";
r2q1rk1/1ppnbppp/p2p1nb1/3Pp3/2P1P1P1/2N2N1P/PPB1QP2/R1B2RK1 b - - bm h5; id
"BK.17";
r1bq1rk1/pp2ppbp/2np2p1/2n5/P3PP2/N1P2N2/1PB3PP/R1B1QRK1 b - - bm Nb3; id
"BK.18";
3rr3/2pq2pk/p2p1pnp/8/2QBPP2/1P6/P5PP/4RRK1 b - - bm Rxe4; id "BK.19";
r4k2/pb2bp1r/1p1qp2p/3pNp2/3P1P2/2N3P1/PPP1Q2P/2KRR3 w - - bm g4; id
"BK.20";
3rn2k/ppb2rpp/2ppqp2/5N2/2P1P3/1P5Q/PB3PPP/3RR1K1 w - - bm Nh6; id "BK.21";
2r2rk1/1bqnbpp1/1p1ppn1p/pP6/N1P1P3/P2B1N1P/1B2QPP1/R2R2K1 b - - bm Bxe4; id
"BK.22";
r1bqk2r/pp2bppp/2p5/3pP3/P2Q1P2/2N1B3/1PP3PP/R4RK1 b kq - bm f6; id "BK.23";
r2qnrnk/p2b2b1/1p1p2pp/2pPpp2/1PP1P3/PRNBB3/3QNPPP/5RK1 w - - bm f4; id
"BK.24";
****End
Here are the Win At Chess positions
**Begin
2rr3k/pp3pp1/1nnqbN1p/3pN3/2pP4/2P3Q1/PPB4P/R4RK1 w - - bm Qg6; id
"WAC.001";
8/7p/5k2/5p2/p1p2P2/Pr1pPK2/1P1R3P/8 b - - bm Rxb2; id "WAC.002";
5rk1/1ppb3p/p1pb4/6q1/3P1p1r/2P1R2P/PP1BQ1P1/5RKN w - - bm Rg3; id
"WAC.003";
r1bq2rk/pp3pbp/2p1p1pQ/7P/3P4/2PB1N2/PP3PPR/2KR4 w - - bm Qxh7+; id
"WAC.004";
5k2/6pp/p1qN4/1p1p4/3P4/2PKP2Q/PP3r2/3R4 b - - bm Qc4+; id "WAC.005";
7k/p7/1R5K/6r1/6p1/6P1/8/8 w - - bm Rb7; id "WAC.006";
rnbqkb1r/pppp1ppp/8/4P3/6n1/7P/PPPNPPP1/R1BQKBNR b KQkq - bm Ne3; id
"WAC.007";
r4q1k/p2bR1rp/2p2Q1N/5p2/5p2/2P5/PP3PPP/R5K1 w - - bm Rf7; id "WAC.008";
3q1rk1/p4pp1/2pb3p/3p4/6Pr/1PNQ4/P1PB1PP1/4RRK1 b - - bm Bh2+; id "WAC.009";
2br2k1/2q3rn/p2NppQ1/2p1P3/Pp5R/4P3/1P3PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Rxh7; id
"WAC.010";
r1b1kb1r/3q1ppp/pBp1pn2/8/Np3P2/5B2/PPP3PP/R2Q1RK1 w kq - bm Bxc6; id
"WAC.011";
4k1r1/2p3r1/1pR1p3/3pP2p/3P2qP/P4N2/1PQ4P/5R1K b - - bm Qxf3+; id "WAC.012";
5rk1/pp4p1/2n1p2p/2Npq3/2p5/6P1/P3P1BP/R4Q1K w - - bm Qxf8+; id "WAC.013";
r2rb1k1/pp1q1p1p/2n1p1p1/2bp4/5P2/PP1BPR1Q/1BPN2PP/R5K1 w - - bm Qxh7+; id
"WAC.014";
1R6/1brk2p1/4p2p/p1P1Pp2/P7/6P1/1P4P1/2R3K1 w - - bm Rxb7; id "WAC.015";
r4rk1/ppp2ppp/2n5/2bqp3/8/P2PB3/1PP1NPPP/R2Q1RK1 w - - bm Nc3; id "WAC.016";
1k5r/pppbn1pp/4q1r1/1P3p2/2NPp3/1QP5/P4PPP/R1B1R1K1 w - - bm Ne5; id
"WAC.017";
R7/P4k2/8/8/8/8/r7/6K1 w - - bm Rh8; id "WAC.018";
r1b2rk1/ppbn1ppp/4p3/1QP4q/3P4/N4N2/5PPP/R1B2RK1 w - - bm c6; id "WAC.019";
r2qkb1r/1ppb1ppp/p7/4p3/P1Q1P3/2P5/5PPP/R1B2KNR b kq - bm Bb5; id "WAC.020";
5rk1/1b3p1p/pp3p2/3n1N2/1P6/P1qB1PP1/3Q3P/4R1K1 w - - bm Qh6; id "WAC.021";
r1bqk2r/ppp1nppp/4p3/n5N1/2BPp3/P1P5/2P2PPP/R1BQK2R w KQkq - bm Ba2 Nxf7; id
"WAC.022";
r3nrk1/2p2p1p/p1p1b1p1/2NpPq2/3R4/P1N1Q3/1PP2PPP/4R1K1 w - - bm g4; id
"WAC.023";
6k1/1b1nqpbp/pp4p1/5P2/1PN5/4Q3/P5PP/1B2B1K1 b - - bm Bd4; id "WAC.024";
3R1rk1/8/5Qpp/2p5/2P1p1q1/P3P3/1P2PK2/8 b - - bm Qh4+; id "WAC.025";
3r2k1/1p1b1pp1/pq5p/8/3NR3/2PQ3P/PP3PP1/6K1 b - - bm Bf5; id "WAC.026";
7k/pp4np/2p3p1/3pN1q1/3P4/Q7/1r3rPP/2R2RK1 w - - bm Qf8+; id "WAC.027";
1r1r2k1/4pp1p/2p1b1p1/p3R3/RqBP4/4P3/1PQ2PPP/6K1 b - - bm Qe1+; id
"WAC.028";
r2q2k1/pp1rbppp/4pn2/2P5/1P3B2/6P1/P3QPBP/1R3RK1 w - - bm c6; id "WAC.029";
1r3r2/4q1kp/b1pp2p1/5p2/pPn1N3/6P1/P3PPBP/2QRR1K1 w - - bm Nxd6; id
"WAC.030";
rb3qk1/pQ3ppp/4p3/3P4/8/1P3N2/1P3PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Qxa8 d6 dxe6; id
"WAC.031";
6k1/p4p1p/1p3np1/2q5/4p3/4P1N1/PP3PPP/3Q2K1 w - - bm Qd8+; id "WAC.032";
8/p1q2pkp/2Pr2p1/8/P3Q3/6P1/5P1P/2R3K1 w - - bm Qe5+ Qf4; id "WAC.033";
7k/1b1r2p1/p6p/1p2qN2/3bP3/3Q4/P5PP/1B1R3K b - - bm Bg1; id "WAC.034";
r3r2k/2R3pp/pp1q1p2/8/3P3R/7P/PP3PP1/3Q2K1 w - - bm Rxh7+; id "WAC.035";
3r4/2p1rk2/1pQq1pp1/7p/1P1P4/P4P2/6PP/R1R3K1 b - - bm Re1+; id "WAC.036";
2r5/2rk2pp/1pn1pb2/pN1p4/P2P4/1N2B3/nPR1KPPP/3R4 b - - bm Nxd4+; id
"WAC.037";
4k3/p4prp/1p6/2b5/8/2Q3P1/P2R1PKP/4q3 w - - bm Rd8+; id "WAC.038";
r1br2k1/pp2bppp/2nppn2/8/2P1PB2/2N2P2/PqN1B1PP/R2Q1R1K w - - bm Na4; id
"WAC.039";
3r1r1k/1p4pp/p4p2/8/1PQR4/6Pq/P3PP2/2R3K1 b - - bm Rc8; id "WAC.040";
1k6/5RP1/1P6/1K6/6r1/8/8/8 w - - bm Ka5 Kc5; id "WAC.041";
r1b1r1k1/pp1n1pbp/1qp3p1/3p4/1B1P4/Q3PN2/PP2BPPP/R4RK1 w - - bm Ba5; id
"WAC.042";
r2q3k/p2P3p/1p3p2/3QP1r1/8/B7/P5PP/2R3K1 w - - bm Be7 Qxa8; id "WAC.043";
3rb1k1/pq3pbp/4n1p1/3p4/2N5/2P2QB1/PP3PPP/1B1R2K1 b - - bm dxc4; id
"WAC.044";
7k/2p1b1pp/8/1p2P3/1P3r2/2P3Q1/1P5P/R4qBK b - - bm Qxa1; id "WAC.045";
r1bqr1k1/pp1nb1p1/4p2p/3p1p2/3P4/P1N1PNP1/1PQ2PP1/3RKB1R w K - bm Nb5; id
"WAC.046";
r1b2rk1/pp2bppp/2n1pn2/q5B1/2BP4/2N2N2/PP2QPPP/2R2RK1 b - - bm Nxd4; id
"WAC.047";
1rbq1rk1/p1p1bppp/2p2n2/8/Q1BP4/2N5/PP3PPP/R1B2RK1 b - - bm Rb4; id
"WAC.048";
2b3k1/4rrpp/p2p4/2pP2RQ/1pP1Pp1N/1P3P1P/1q6/6RK w - - bm Qxh7+; id
"WAC.049";
k4r2/1R4pb/1pQp1n1p/3P4/5p1P/3P2P1/r1q1R2K/8 w - - bm Rxb6+; id "WAC.050";
r1bq1r2/pp4k1/4p2p/3pPp1Q/3N1R1P/2PB4/6P1/6K1 w - - bm Rg4+; id "WAC.051";
r1k5/1p3q2/1Qpb4/3N1p2/5Pp1/3P2Pp/PPPK3P/4R3 w - - bm Re7; id "WAC.052";
6k1/6p1/p7/3Pn3/5p2/4rBqP/P4RP1/5QK1 b - - bm Re1; id "WAC.053";
r3kr2/1pp4p/1p1p4/7q/4P1n1/2PP2Q1/PP4P1/R1BB2K1 b q - bm Qh1+; id "WAC.054";
r3r1k1/pp1q1pp1/4b1p1/3p2B1/3Q1R2/8/PPP3PP/4R1K1 w - - bm Qxg7+; id
"WAC.055";
r1bqk2r/pppp1ppp/5n2/2b1n3/4P3/1BP3Q1/PP3PPP/RNB1K1NR b KQkq - bm Bxf2+; id
"WAC.056";
r3q1kr/ppp5/3p2pQ/8/3PP1b1/5R2/PPP3P1/5RK1 w - - bm Rf8+; id "WAC.057";
8/8/2R5/1p2qp1k/1P2r3/2PQ2P1/5K2/8 w - - bm Qd1+; id "WAC.058";
r1b2rk1/2p1qnbp/p1pp2p1/5p2/2PQP3/1PN2N1P/PB3PP1/3R1RK1 w - - bm Nd5; id
"WAC.059";
rn1qr1k1/1p2np2/2p3p1/8/1pPb4/7Q/PB1P1PP1/2KR1B1R w - - bm Qh8+; id
"WAC.060";
3qrbk1/ppp1r2n/3pP2p/3P4/2P4P/1P3Q2/PB6/R4R1K w - - bm Qf7+; id "WAC.061";
6r1/3Pn1qk/p1p1P1rp/2Q2p2/2P5/1P4P1/P3R2P/5RK1 b - - bm Rxg3+; id "WAC.062";
r1brnbk1/ppq2pp1/4p2p/4N3/3P4/P1PB1Q2/3B1PPP/R3R1K1 w - - bm Nxf7; id
"WAC.063";
8/6pp/3q1p2/3n1k2/1P6/3NQ2P/5PP1/6K1 w - - bm g4+; id "WAC.064";
1r1r1qk1/p2n1p1p/bp1Pn1pQ/2pNp3/2P2P1N/1P5B/P6P/3R1RK1 w - - bm Ne7+; id
"WAC.065";
1k1r2r1/ppq5/1bp4p/3pQ3/8/2P2N2/PP4P1/R4R1K b - - bm Qxe5; id "WAC.066";
3r2k1/p2q4/1p4p1/3rRp1p/5P1P/6PK/P3R3/3Q4 w - - bm Rxd5; id "WAC.067";
6k1/5ppp/1q6/2b5/8/2R1pPP1/1P2Q2P/7K w - - bm Qxe3; id "WAC.068";
2k5/pppr4/4R3/4Q3/2pp2q1/8/PPP2PPP/6K1 w - - bm f3 h3; id "WAC.069";
2kr3r/pppq1ppp/3p1n2/bQ2p3/1n1PP3/1PN1BN1P/1PP2PP1/2KR3R b - - bm Na2+; id
"WAC.070";
2kr3r/pp1q1ppp/5n2/1Nb5/2Pp1B2/7Q/P4PPP/1R3RK1 w - - bm Nxa7+; id "WAC.071";
r3r1k1/pp1n1ppp/2p5/4Pb2/2B2P2/B1P5/P5PP/R2R2K1 w - - bm e6; id "WAC.072";
r1q3rk/1ppbb1p1/4Np1p/p3pP2/P3P3/2N4R/1PP1Q1PP/3R2K1 w - - bm Qd2; id
"WAC.073";
5r1k/pp4pp/2p5/2b1P3/4Pq2/1PB1p3/P3Q1PP/3N2K1 b - - bm Qf1+; id "WAC.074";
r3r1k1/pppq1ppp/8/8/1Q4n1/7P/PPP2PP1/RNB1R1K1 b - - bm Qd6; id "WAC.075";
r1b1qrk1/2p2ppp/pb1pnn2/1p2pNB1/3PP3/1BP5/PP2QPPP/RN1R2K1 w - - bm Bxf6; id
"WAC.076";
3r2k1/ppp2ppp/6q1/b4n2/3nQB2/2p5/P4PPP/RN3RK1 b - - bm Ng3; id "WAC.077";
r2q3r/ppp2k2/4nbp1/5Q1p/2P1NB2/8/PP3P1P/3RR1K1 w - - bm Ng5+; id "WAC.078";
r3k2r/pbp2pp1/3b1n2/1p6/3P3p/1B2N1Pq/PP1PQP1P/R1B2RK1 b kq - bm Qxh2+; id
"WAC.079";
r4rk1/p1B1bpp1/1p2pn1p/8/2PP4/3B1P2/qP2QP1P/3R1RK1 w - - bm Ra1; id
"WAC.080";
r4rk1/1bR1bppp/4pn2/1p2N3/1P6/P3P3/4BPPP/3R2K1 b - - bm Bd6; id "WAC.081";
3rr1k1/pp3pp1/4b3/8/2P1B2R/6QP/P3q1P1/5R1K w - - bm Bh7+; id "WAC.082";
3rr1k1/ppqbRppp/2p5/8/3Q1n2/2P3N1/PPB2PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Qxd7; id "WAC.083";
r2q1r1k/2p1b1pp/p1n5/1p1Q1bN1/4n3/1BP1B3/PP3PPP/R4RK1 w - - bm Qg8+; id
"WAC.084";
kr2R3/p4r2/2pq4/2N2p1p/3P2p1/Q5P1/5P1P/5BK1 w - - bm Na6; id "WAC.085";
8/p7/1ppk1n2/5ppp/P1PP4/2P1K1P1/5N1P/8 b - - bm Ng4+; id "WAC.086";
8/p3k1p1/4r3/2ppNpp1/PP1P4/2P3KP/5P2/8 b - - bm Rxe5; id "WAC.087";
r6k/p1Q4p/2p1b1rq/4p3/B3P3/4P3/PPP3P1/4RRK1 b - - bm Rxg2+; id "WAC.088";
1r3b1k/p4rpp/4pp2/3q4/2ppbPPQ/6RK/PP5P/2B1NR2 b - - bm g5; id "WAC.089";
3qrrk1/1pp2pp1/1p2bn1p/5N2/2P5/P1P3B1/1P4PP/2Q1RRK1 w - - bm Nxg7; id
"WAC.090";
2qr2k1/4b1p1/2p2p1p/1pP1p3/p2nP3/PbQNB1PP/1P3PK1/4RB2 b - - bm Be6; id
"WAC.091";
r4rk1/1p2ppbp/p2pbnp1/q7/3BPPP1/2N2B2/PPP4P/R2Q1RK1 b - - bm Bxg4; id
"WAC.092";
r1b1k1nr/pp3pQp/4pq2/3pn3/8/P1P5/2P2PPP/R1B1KBNR w KQkq - bm Bh6; id
"WAC.093";
8/k7/p7/3Qp2P/n1P5/3KP3/1q6/8 b - - bm e4+; id "WAC.094";
2r5/1r6/4pNpk/3pP1qp/8/2P1QP2/5PK1/R7 w - - bm Ng4+; id "WAC.095";
r1b4k/ppp2Bb1/6Pp/3pP3/1qnP1p1Q/8/PPP3P1/1K1R3R w - - bm Qd8+; id "WAC.096";
6k1/5p2/p5np/4B3/3P4/1PP1q3/P3r1QP/6RK w - - bm Qa8+; id "WAC.097";
1r3rk1/5pb1/p2p2p1/Q1n1q2p/1NP1P3/3p1P1B/PP1R3P/1K2R3 b - - bm Nxe4; id
"WAC.098";
r1bq1r1k/1pp1Np1p/p2p2pQ/4R3/n7/8/PPPP1PPP/R1B3K1 w - - bm Rh5; id
"WAC.099";
8/k1b5/P4p2/1Pp2p1p/K1P2P1P/8/3B4/8 w - - bm b6+; id "WAC.100";
5rk1/p5pp/8/8/2Pbp3/1P4P1/7P/4RN1K b - - bm Bc3; id "WAC.101";
2Q2n2/2R4p/1p1qpp1k/8/3P3P/3B2P1/5PK1/r7 w - - bm Qxf8+; id "WAC.102";
6k1/2pb1r1p/3p1PpQ/p1nPp3/1q2P3/2N2P2/PrB5/2K3RR w - - bm Qxg6+; id
"WAC.103";
b4r1k/pq2rp2/1p1bpn1p/3PN2n/2P2P2/P2B3K/1B2Q2N/3R2R1 w - - bm Qxh5; id
"WAC.104";
r2r2k1/pb3ppp/1p1bp3/7q/3n2nP/PP1B2P1/1B1N1P2/RQ2NRK1 b - - bm Qxh4; id
"WAC.105";
4rrk1/pppb4/7p/3P2pq/3Qn3/P5P1/1PP4P/R3RNNK b - - bm Nf2+; id "WAC.106";
5n2/pRrk2p1/P4p1p/4p3/3N4/5P2/6PP/6K1 w - - bm Nb5; id "WAC.107";
r5k1/1q4pp/2p5/p1Q5/2P5/5R2/4RKPP/r7 w - - bm Qe5; id "WAC.108";
rn2k1nr/pbp2ppp/3q4/1p2N3/2p5/QP6/PB1PPPPP/R3KB1R b KQkq - bm c3; id
"WAC.109";
2kr4/bp3p2/p2p2b1/P7/2q5/1N4B1/1PPQ2P1/2KR4 b - - bm Be3; id "WAC.110";
6k1/p5p1/5p2/2P2Q2/3pN2p/3PbK1P/7P/6q1 b - - bm Qf1+; id "WAC.111";
r4kr1/ppp5/4bq1b/7B/2PR1Q1p/2N3P1/PP3P1P/2K1R3 w - - bm Rxe6; id "WAC.112";
rnbqkb1r/1p3ppp/5N2/1p2p1B1/2P5/8/PP2PPPP/R2QKB1R b KQkq - bm Qxf6; id
"WAC.113";
r1b1rnk1/1p4pp/p1p2p2/3pN2n/3P1PPq/2NBPR1P/PPQ5/2R3K1 w - - bm Bxh7+; id
"WAC.114";
4N2k/5rpp/1Q6/p3q3/8/P5P1/1P3P1P/5K2 w - - bm Nd6; id "WAC.115";
r2r2k1/2p2ppp/p7/1p2P1n1/P6q/5P2/1PB1QP1P/R5RK b - - bm Rd2; id "WAC.116";
3r1rk1/q4ppp/p1Rnp3/8/1p6/1N3P2/PP3QPP/3R2K1 b - - bm Ne4; id "WAC.117";
r5k1/pb2rpp1/1p6/2p4q/5R2/2PB2Q1/P1P3PP/5R1K w - - bm Rh4; id "WAC.118";
r2qr1k1/p1p2ppp/2p5/2b5/4nPQ1/3B4/PPP3PP/R1B2R1K b - - bm Qxd3; id
"WAC.119";
r4rk1/1bn2qnp/3p1B1Q/p2P1pP1/1pp5/5N1P/PPB2P2/2KR3R w - - bm g6; id
"WAC.120";
6k1/5p1p/2bP2pb/4p3/2P5/1p1pNPPP/1P1Q1BK1/1q6 b - - bm Bxf3+; id "WAC.121";
1k6/ppp4p/1n2pq2/1N2Rb2/2P2Q2/8/P4KPP/3r1B2 b - - bm Rxf1+; id "WAC.122";
6k1/1b2rp2/1p4p1/3P4/PQ4P1/2N2q2/5P2/3R2K1 b - - bm Bxd5 Rc7; id "WAC.123";
6k1/3r4/2R5/P5P1/1P4p1/8/4rB2/6K1 b - - bm g3; id "WAC.124";
r1bqr1k1/pp3ppp/1bp5/3n4/3B4/2N2P1P/PPP1B1P1/R2Q1RK1 b - - bm Bxd4+; id
"WAC.125";
r5r1/pQ5p/1qp2R2/2k1p3/4P3/2PP4/P1P3PP/6K1 w - - bm Rxc6+; id "WAC.126";
2k4r/1pr1n3/p1p1q2p/5pp1/3P1P2/P1P1P3/1R2Q1PP/1RB3K1 w - - bm Rxb7; id
"WAC.127";
6rk/1pp2Qrp/3p1B2/1pb1p2R/3n1q2/3P4/PPP3PP/R6K w - - bm Qg6; id "WAC.128";
3r1r1k/1b2b1p1/1p5p/2p1Pp2/q1B2P2/4P2P/1BR1Q2K/6R1 b - - bm Bf3; id
"WAC.129";
6k1/1pp3q1/5r2/1PPp4/3P1pP1/3Qn2P/3B4/4R1K1 b - - bm Qh6 Qh8; id "WAC.130";
2rq1bk1/p4p1p/1p4p1/3b4/3B1Q2/8/P4PpP/3RR1K1 w - - bm Re8; id "WAC.131";
4r1k1/5bpp/2p5/3pr3/8/1B3pPq/PPR2P2/2R2QK1 b - - bm Re1; id "WAC.132";
r1b1k2r/1pp1q2p/p1n3p1/3QPp2/8/1BP3B1/P5PP/3R1RK1 w kq - bm Bh4; id
"WAC.133";
3r2k1/p6p/2Q3p1/4q3/2P1p3/P3Pb2/1P3P1P/2K2BR1 b - - bm Rd1+; id "WAC.134";
3r1r1k/N2qn1pp/1p2np2/2p5/2Q1P2N/3P4/PP4PP/3R1RK1 b - - bm Nd4; id
"WAC.135";
6kr/1q2r1p1/1p2N1Q1/5p2/1P1p4/6R1/7P/2R3K1 w - - bm Rc8+; id "WAC.136";
3b1rk1/1bq3pp/5pn1/1p2rN2/2p1p3/2P1B2Q/1PB2PPP/R2R2K1 w - - bm Rd7; id
"WAC.137";
r1bq3r/ppppR1p1/5n1k/3P4/6pP/3Q4/PP1N1PP1/5K1R w - - bm h5; id "WAC.138";
rnb3kr/ppp2ppp/1b6/3q4/3pN3/Q4N2/PPP2KPP/R1B1R3 w - - bm Nf6+; id "WAC.139";
r2b1rk1/pq4p1/4ppQP/3pB1p1/3P4/2R5/PP3PP1/5RK1 w - - bm Rc7; id "WAC.140";
4r1k1/p1qr1p2/2pb1Bp1/1p5p/3P1n1R/1B3P2/PP3PK1/2Q4R w - - bm Qxf4; id
"WAC.141";
r2q3n/ppp2pk1/3p4/5Pr1/2NP1Qp1/2P2pP1/PP3K2/4R2R w - - bm Re8 f6+; id
"WAC.142";
5b2/pp2r1pk/2pp1pRp/4rP1N/2P1P3/1P4QP/P3q1P1/5R1K w - - bm Rxh6+; id
"WAC.143";
r2q1rk1/pp3ppp/2p2b2/8/B2pPPb1/7P/PPP1N1P1/R2Q1RK1 b - - bm d3; id
"WAC.144";
r1bq4/1p4kp/3p1n2/p4pB1/2pQ4/8/1P4PP/4RRK1 w - - bm Re8; id "WAC.145";
8/8/2Kp4/3P1B2/2P2k2/5p2/8/8 w - - bm Bc8; id "WAC.146";
r2r2k1/ppqbppbp/2n2np1/2pp4/6P1/1P1PPNNP/PBP2PB1/R2QK2R b KQ - bm Nxg4; id
"WAC.147";
2r1k3/6pr/p1nBP3/1p3p1p/2q5/2P5/P1R4P/K2Q2R1 w - - bm Rxg7; id "WAC.148";
6k1/6p1/2p4p/4Pp2/4b1qP/2Br4/1P2RQPK/8 b - - bm Bxg2; id "WAC.149";
r3r1k1/5p2/pQ1b2pB/1p6/4p3/6P1/Pq2BP1P/2R3K1 b - - bm Ba3 Bf8 e3; id
"WAC.150";
8/3b2kp/4p1p1/pr1n4/N1N4P/1P4P1/1K3P2/3R4 w - - bm Nc3; id "WAC.151";
1br2rk1/1pqb1ppp/p3pn2/8/1P6/P1N1PN1P/1B3PP1/1QRR2K1 w - - bm Ne4; id
"WAC.152";
2r3k1/q4ppp/p3p3/pnNp4/2rP4/2P2P2/4R1PP/2R1Q1K1 b - - bm Nxd4; id "WAC.153";
r1b2rk1/2p2ppp/p7/1p6/3P3q/1BP3bP/PP3QP1/RNB1R1K1 w - - bm Qxf7+; id
"WAC.154";
5bk1/1rQ4p/5pp1/2pP4/3n1PP1/7P/1q3BB1/4R1K1 w - - bm d6; id "WAC.155";
r1b1qN1k/1pp3p1/p2p3n/4p1B1/8/1BP4Q/PP3KPP/8 w - - bm Qxh6+; id "WAC.156";
5rk1/p4ppp/2p1b3/3Nq3/4P1n1/1p1B2QP/1PPr2P1/1K2R2R w - - bm Ne7+; id
"WAC.157";
5rk1/n1p1R1bp/p2p4/1qpP1QB1/7P/2P3P1/PP3P2/6K1 w - - bm Rxg7+; id "WAC.158";
r1b2r2/5P1p/ppn3pk/2p1p1Nq/1bP1PQ2/3P4/PB4BP/1R3RK1 w - - bm Ne6+; id
"WAC.159";
qn1kr2r/1pRbb3/pP5p/P2pP1pP/3N1pQ1/3B4/3B1PP1/R5K1 w - - bm Qxd7+; id
"WAC.160";
3r3k/3r1P1p/pp1Nn3/2pp4/7Q/6R1/Pq4PP/5RK1 w - - bm Qxd8+; id "WAC.161";
r3kbnr/p4ppp/2p1p3/8/Q1B3b1/2N1B3/PP3PqP/R3K2R w KQkq - bm Bd5; id
"WAC.162";
5rk1/2p4p/2p4r/3P4/4p1b1/1Q2NqPp/PP3P1K/R4R2 b - - bm Qg2+; id "WAC.163";
8/6pp/4p3/1p1n4/1NbkN1P1/P4P1P/1PR3K1/r7 w - - bm Rxc4+; id "WAC.164";
1r5k/p1p3pp/8/8/4p3/P1P1R3/1P1Q1qr1/2KR4 w - - bm Re2; id "WAC.165";
r3r1k1/5pp1/p1p4p/2Pp4/8/q1NQP1BP/5PP1/4K2R b K - bm d4; id "WAC.166";
7Q/ppp2q2/3p2k1/P2Ppr1N/1PP5/7R/5rP1/6K1 b - - bm Rxg2+; id "WAC.167";
r3k2r/pb1q1p2/8/2p1pP2/4p1p1/B1P1Q1P1/P1P3K1/R4R2 b kq - bm Qd2+; id
"WAC.168";
5rk1/1pp3bp/3p2p1/2PPp3/1P2P3/2Q1B3/4q1PP/R5K1 b - - bm Bh6; id "WAC.169";
5r1k/6Rp/1p2p3/p2pBp2/1qnP4/4P3/Q4PPP/6K1 w - - bm Qxc4; id "WAC.170";
2rq4/1b2b1kp/p3p1p1/1p1nNp2/7P/1B2B1Q1/PP3PP1/3R2K1 w - - bm Bh6+; id
"WAC.171";
5r1k/p5pp/8/1P1pq3/P1p2nR1/Q7/5BPP/6K1 b - - bm Qe1+; id "WAC.172";
2r1b3/1pp1qrk1/p1n1P1p1/7R/2B1p3/4Q1P1/PP3PP1/3R2K1 w - - bm Qh6+; id
"WAC.173";
2r2rk1/6p1/p3pq1p/1p1b1p2/3P1n2/PP3N2/3N1PPP/1Q2RR1K b - - bm Nxg2; id
"WAC.174";
r5k1/pppb3p/2np1n2/8/3PqNpP/3Q2P1/PPP5/R4RK1 w - - bm Nh5; id "WAC.175";
r1bq3r/ppp2pk1/3p1pp1/8/2BbPQ2/2NP2P1/PPP4P/R4R1K b - - bm Rxh2+; id
"WAC.176";
r1b3r1/4qk2/1nn1p1p1/3pPp1P/p4P2/1p3BQN/PKPBN3/3R3R b - - bm Qa3+; id
"WAC.177";
3r2k1/p1rn1p1p/1p2pp2/6q1/3PQNP1/5P2/P1P4R/R5K1 w - - bm Nxe6; id "WAC.178";
r1b2r1k/pp4pp/3p4/3B4/8/1QN3Pn/PP3q1P/R3R2K b - - bm Qg1+; id "WAC.179";
r1q2rk1/p3bppb/3p1n1p/2nPp3/1p2P1P1/6NP/PP2QPB1/R1BNK2R b KQ - bm Nxd5; id
"WAC.180";
r3k2r/2p2p2/p2p1n2/1p2p3/4P2p/1PPPPp1q/1P5P/R1N2QRK b kq - bm Ng4; id
"WAC.181";
r1b2rk1/ppqn1p1p/2n1p1p1/2b3N1/2N5/PP1BP3/1B3PPP/R2QK2R w KQ - bm Qh5; id
"WAC.182";
1r2k1r1/5p2/b3p3/1p2b1B1/3p3P/3B4/PP2KP2/2R3R1 w - - bm Bf6; id "WAC.183";
4kn2/r4p1r/p3bQ2/q1nNP1Np/1p5P/8/PPP3P1/2KR3R w - - bm Qe7+; id "WAC.184";
1r1rb1k1/2p3pp/p2q1p2/3PpP1Q/Pp1bP2N/1B5R/1P4PP/2B4K w - - bm Qxh7+; id
"WAC.185";
r5r1/p1q2p1k/1p1R2pB/3pP3/6bQ/2p5/P1P1NPPP/6K1 w - - bm Bf8+; id "WAC.186";
6k1/5p2/p3p3/1p3qp1/2p1Qn2/2P1R3/PP1r1PPP/4R1K1 b - - bm Nh3+; id "WAC.187";
3RNbk1/pp3p2/4rQpp/8/1qr5/7P/P4P2/3R2K1 w - - bm Qg7+; id "WAC.188";
3r1k2/1ppPR1n1/p2p1rP1/3P3p/4Rp1N/5K2/P1P2P2/8 w - - bm Re8+; id "WAC.189";
8/p2b2kp/1q1p2p1/1P1Pp3/4P3/3B2P1/P2Q3P/2Nn3K b - - bm Bh3; id "WAC.190";
2r1Rn1k/1p1q2pp/p7/5p2/3P4/1B4P1/P1P1QP1P/6K1 w - - bm Qc4; id "WAC.191";
r3k3/ppp2Npp/4Bn2/2b5/1n1pp3/N4P2/PPP3qP/R2QKR2 b Qq - bm Nd3+; id
"WAC.192";
5bk1/p4ppp/Qp6/4B3/1P6/Pq2P1P1/2rr1P1P/R4RK1 b - - bm Qxe3; id "WAC.193";
5rk1/ppq2ppp/2p5/4bN2/4P3/6Q1/PPP2PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Nh6+; id "WAC.194";
3r1rk1/1p3p2/p3pnnp/2p3p1/2P2q2/1P5P/PB2QPPN/3RR1K1 w - - bm g3; id
"WAC.195";
rr4k1/p1pq2pp/Q1n1pn2/2bpp3/4P3/2PP1NN1/PP3PPP/R1B1K2R b KQ - bm Nb4; id
"WAC.196";
7k/1p4p1/7p/3P1n2/4Q3/2P2P2/PP3qRP/7K b - - bm Qf1+; id "WAC.197";
2br2k1/ppp2p1p/4p1p1/4P2q/2P1Bn2/2Q5/PP3P1P/4R1RK b - - bm Rd3; id
"WAC.198";
r1br2k1/pp2nppp/2n5/1B1q4/Q7/4BN2/PP3PPP/2R2RK1 w - - bm Bxc6 Rfd1; id
"WAC.199";
2rqrn1k/pb4pp/1p2pp2/n2P4/2P3N1/P2B2Q1/1B3PPP/2R1R1K1 w - - bm Bxf6; id
"WAC.200";
2b2r1k/4q2p/3p2pQ/2pBp3/8/6P1/1PP2P1P/R5K1 w - - bm Ra7; id "WAC.201";
QR2rq1k/2p3p1/3p1pPp/8/4P3/8/P1r3PP/1R4K1 b - - bm Rxa2; id "WAC.202";
r4rk1/5ppp/p3q1n1/2p2NQ1/4n3/P3P3/1B3PPP/1R3RK1 w - - bm Qh6; id "WAC.203";
r1b1qrk1/1p3ppp/p1p5/3Nb3/5N2/P7/1P4PQ/K1R1R3 w - - bm Rxe5; id "WAC.204";
r3rnk1/1pq2bb1/p4p2/3p1Pp1/3B2P1/1NP4R/P1PQB3/2K4R w - - bm Qxg5; id
"WAC.205";
1Qq5/2P1p1kp/3r1pp1/8/8/7P/p4PP1/2R3K1 b - - bm Rc6; id "WAC.206";
r1bq2kr/p1pp1ppp/1pn1p3/4P3/2Pb2Q1/BR6/P4PPP/3K1BNR w - - bm Qxg7+; id
"WAC.207";
3r1bk1/ppq3pp/2p5/2P2Q1B/8/1P4P1/P6P/5RK1 w - - bm Bf7+; id "WAC.208";
4kb1r/2q2p2/r2p4/pppBn1B1/P6P/6Q1/1PP5/2KRR3 w k - bm Rxe5+; id "WAC.209";
3r1rk1/pp1q1ppp/3pn3/2pN4/5PP1/P5PQ/1PP1B3/1K1R4 w - - bm Rh1; id "WAC.210";
r1bqrk2/pp1n1n1p/3p1p2/P1pP1P1Q/2PpP1NP/6R1/2PB4/4RBK1 w - - bm Qxf7+; id
"WAC.211";
rn1qr2Q/pbppk1p1/1p2pb2/4N3/3P4/2N5/PPP3PP/R4RK1 w - - bm Qxg7+; id
"WAC.212";
3r1r1k/1b4pp/ppn1p3/4Pp1R/Pn5P/3P4/4QP2/1qB1NKR1 w - - bm Rxh7+; id
"WAC.213";
r2r2k1/1p2qpp1/1np1p1p1/p3N3/2PPN3/bP5R/4QPPP/4R1K1 w - - bm Ng5; id
"WAC.214";
3r2k1/pb1q1pp1/1p2pb1p/8/3N4/P2QB3/1P3PPP/1Br1R1K1 w - - bm Qh7+; id
"WAC.215";
r2qr1k1/1b1nbppp/p3pn2/1p1pN3/3P1B2/2PB1N2/PP2QPPP/R4RK1 w - - bm Nxf7; id
"WAC.216";
r3kb1r/1pp3p1/p3bp1p/5q2/3QN3/1P6/PBP3P1/3RR1K1 w kq - bm Qd7+; id
"WAC.217";
6k1/pp5p/2p3q1/6BP/2nPr1Q1/8/PP3R1K/8 w - - bm Bh6; id "WAC.218";
7k/p4q1p/1pb5/2p5/4B2Q/2P1B3/P6P/7K b - - bm Qf1+; id "WAC.219";
3rr1k1/ppp2ppp/8/5Q2/4n3/1B5R/PPP1qPP1/5RK1 b - - bm Qxf1+; id "WAC.220";
r3k3/P5bp/2N1bp2/4p3/2p5/6NP/1PP2PP1/3R2K1 w q - bm Rd8+; id "WAC.221";
2r1r2k/1q3ppp/p2Rp3/2p1P3/6QB/p3P3/bP3PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Bf6; id "WAC.222";
r1bqk2r/pp3ppp/5n2/8/1b1npB2/2N5/PP1Q2PP/1K2RBNR w kq - bm Nxe4; id
"WAC.223";
5rk1/p1q3pp/1p1r4/2p1pp1Q/1PPn1P2/3B3P/P2R2P1/3R2K1 b - - bm Rh6 e4; id
"WAC.224";
4R3/4q1kp/6p1/1Q3b2/1P1b1P2/6KP/8/8 b - - bm Qh4+; id "WAC.225";
2b2rk1/p1p4p/2p1p1p1/br2N1Q1/1p2q3/8/PB3PPP/3R1RK1 w - - bm Nf7; id
"WAC.226";
2k1rb1r/ppp3pp/2np1q2/5b2/2B2P2/2P1BQ2/PP1N1P1P/2KR3R b - - bm d5; id
"WAC.227";
r4rk1/1bq1bp1p/4p1p1/p2p4/3BnP2/1N1B3R/PPP3PP/R2Q2K1 w - - bm Bxe4; id
"WAC.228";
8/8/8/1p5r/p1p1k1pN/P2pBpP1/1P1K1P2/8 b - - bm Rxh4 b4; id "WAC.229";
2b5/1r6/2kBp1p1/p2pP1P1/2pP4/1pP3K1/1R3P2/8 b - - bm Rb4; id "WAC.230";
r4rk1/1b1nqp1p/p5p1/1p2PQ2/2p5/5N2/PP3PPP/R1BR2K1 w - - bm Bg5; id
"WAC.231";
1R2rq1k/2p3p1/Q2p1pPp/8/4P3/8/P1r3PP/1R4K1 w - - bm Qb5 Rxe8; id "WAC.232";
5rk1/p1p2r1p/2pp2p1/4p3/PPPnP3/3Pq1P1/1Q1R1R1P/4NK2 b - - bm Nb3; id
"WAC.233";
2kr1r2/p6p/5Pp1/2p5/1qp2Q1P/7R/PP6/1KR5 w - - bm Rb3; id "WAC.234";
5r2/1p1RRrk1/4Qq1p/1PP3p1/8/4B3/1b3P1P/6K1 w - - bm Qxf7+ Rxf7+; id
"WAC.235";
1R6/p5pk/4p2p/4P3/8/2r3qP/P3R1b1/4Q1K1 b - - bm Rc1; id "WAC.236";
r5k1/pQp2qpp/8/4pbN1/3P4/6P1/PPr4P/1K1R3R b - - bm Rc1+; id "WAC.237";
1k1r4/pp1r1pp1/4n1p1/2R5/2Pp1qP1/3P2QP/P4PB1/1R4K1 w - - bm Bxb7; id
"WAC.238";
8/6k1/5pp1/Q6p/5P2/6PK/P4q1P/8 b - - bm Qf1+; id "WAC.239";
2b4k/p1b2p2/2p2q2/3p1PNp/3P2R1/3B4/P1Q2PKP/4r3 w - - bm Qxc6; id "WAC.240";
2rq1rk1/pp3ppp/2n2b2/4NR2/3P4/PB5Q/1P4PP/3R2K1 w - - bm Qxh7+; id "WAC.241";
r1b1r1k1/pp1nqp2/2p1p1pp/8/4N3/P1Q1P3/1P3PPP/1BRR2K1 w - - bm Rxd7; id
"WAC.242";
1r3r1k/3p4/1p1Nn1R1/4Pp1q/pP3P1p/P7/5Q1P/6RK w - - bm Qe2; id "WAC.243";
r6r/pp3ppp/3k1b2/2pb4/B4Pq1/2P1Q3/P5PP/1RBR2K1 w - - bm Qxc5+; id "WAC.244";
4rrn1/ppq3bk/3pPnpp/2p5/2PB4/2NQ1RPB/PP5P/5R1K w - - bm Qxg6+; id "WAC.245";
6R1/4qp1p/ppr1n1pk/8/1P2P1QP/6N1/P4PP1/6K1 w - - bm Qh5+; id "WAC.246";
2k1r3/1p2Bq2/p2Qp3/Pb1p1p1P/2pP1P2/2P5/2P2KP1/1R6 w - - bm Rxb5; id
"WAC.247";
5r1k/1p4pp/3q4/3Pp1R1/8/8/PP4PP/4Q1K1 b - - bm Qc5+; id "WAC.248";
r4rk1/pbq2pp1/1ppbpn1p/8/2PP4/1P1Q1N2/PBB2PPP/R3R1K1 w - - bm c5 d5; id
"WAC.249";
1b5k/7P/p1p2np1/2P2p2/PP3P2/4RQ1R/q2r3P/6K1 w - - bm Re8+; id "WAC.250";
k7/p4p2/P1q1b1p1/3p3p/3Q4/7P/5PP1/1R4K1 w - - bm Qe5 Qf4; id "WAC.251";
1rb1r1k1/p1p2ppp/5n2/2pP4/5P2/2QB4/qNP3PP/2KRB2R b - - bm Re2; id "WAC.252";
k5r1/p4b2/2P5/5p2/3P1P2/4QBrq/P5P1/4R1K1 w - - bm Qe8+; id "WAC.253";
r6k/pp3p1p/2p1bp1q/b3p3/4Pnr1/2PP2NP/PP1Q1PPN/R2B2RK b - - bm Nxh3; id
"WAC.254";
3r3r/p4pk1/5Rp1/3q4/1p1P2RQ/5N2/P1P4P/2b4K w - - bm Rfxg6+; id "WAC.255";
3r1rk1/1pb1qp1p/2p3p1/p7/P2Np2R/1P5P/1BP2PP1/3Q1BK1 w - - bm Nf5; id
"WAC.256";
4r1k1/pq3p1p/2p1r1p1/2Q1p3/3nN1P1/1P6/P1P2P1P/3RR1K1 w - - bm Rxd4; id
"WAC.257";
r3brkn/1p5p/2p2Ppq/2Pp3B/3Pp2Q/4P1R1/6PP/5R1K w - - bm Bxg6; id "WAC.258";
r1bq1rk1/ppp2ppp/2np4/2bN1PN1/2B1P3/3p4/PPP2nPP/R1BQ1K1R w - - bm Qh5; id
"WAC.259";
2r2b1r/p1Nk2pp/3p1p2/N2Qn3/4P3/q6P/P4PP1/1R3K1R w - - bm Qe6+; id "WAC.260";
r5k1/1bp3pp/p2p4/1p6/5p2/1PBP1nqP/1PP3Q1/R4R1K b - - bm Nd4; id "WAC.261";
6k1/p1B1b2p/2b3r1/2p5/4p3/1PP1N1Pq/P2R1P2/3Q2K1 b - - bm Rh6; id "WAC.262";
rnbqr2k/pppp1Qpp/8/b2NN3/2B1n3/8/PPPP1PPP/R1B1K2R w KQ - bm Qg8+; id
"WAC.263";
r2r2k1/1R2qp2/p5pp/2P5/b1PN1b2/P7/1Q3PPP/1B1R2K1 b - - bm Rab8; id
"WAC.264";
2r1k2r/2pn1pp1/1p3n1p/p3PP2/4q2B/P1P5/2Q1N1PP/R4RK1 w k - bm exf6; id
"WAC.265";
r3q2r/2p1k1p1/p5p1/1p2Nb2/1P2nB2/P7/2PNQbPP/R2R3K b - - bm Rxh2+; id
"WAC.266";
2r1kb1r/pp3ppp/2n1b3/1q1N2B1/1P2Q3/8/P4PPP/3RK1NR w Kk - bm Nc7+; id
"WAC.267";
2r3kr/ppp2n1p/7B/5q1N/1bp5/2Pp4/PP2RPPP/R2Q2K1 w - - bm Re8+; id "WAC.268";
2kr2nr/pp1n1ppp/2p1p3/q7/1b1P1B2/P1N2Q1P/1PP1BPP1/R3K2R w KQ - bm axb4; id
"WAC.269";
2r1r1k1/pp1q1ppp/3p1b2/3P4/3Q4/5N2/PP2RPPP/4R1K1 w - - bm Qg4; id "WAC.270";
2kr4/ppp3Pp/4RP1B/2r5/5P2/1P6/P2p4/3K4 w - - bm Rd6; id "WAC.271";
nrq4r/2k1p3/1p1pPnp1/pRpP1p2/P1P2P2/2P1BB2/1R2Q1P1/6K1 w - - bm Bxc5; id
"WAC.272";
2k4B/bpp1qp2/p1b5/7p/1PN1n1p1/2Pr4/P5PP/R3QR1K b - - bm Ng3+; id "WAC.273";
8/1p6/p5R1/k7/Prpp4/K7/1NP5/8 w - - bm Rb6; id "WAC.274";
r1b2rk1/1p1n1ppp/p1p2q2/4p3/P1B1Pn2/1QN2N2/1P3PPP/3R1RK1 b - - bm Nxg2 b5;
id "WAC.275";
r5k1/pp1RR1pp/1b6/6r1/2p5/B6P/P4qPK/3Q4 w - - bm Qd5+; id "WAC.276";
1r4r1/p2kb2p/bq2p3/3p1p2/5P2/2BB3Q/PP4PP/3RKR2 b - - bm Rg3 Rxg2; id
"WAC.277";
r2qkb1r/pppb2pp/2np1n2/5pN1/2BQP3/2N5/PPP2PPP/R1B1K2R w KQkq - bm Bf7+; id
"WAC.278";
r7/4b3/2p1r1k1/1p1pPp1q/1P1P1P1p/PR2NRpP/2Q3K1/8 w - - bm Nxf5; id
"WAC.279";
r1r2bk1/5p1p/pn4p1/N2b4/3Pp3/B3P3/2q1BPPP/RQ3RK1 b - - bm Bxa3; id
"WAC.280";
2R5/2R4p/5p1k/6n1/8/1P2QPPq/r7/6K1 w - - bm Rxh7+; id "WAC.281";
6k1/2p3p1/1p1p1nN1/1B1P4/4PK2/8/2r3b1/7R w - - bm Rh8+; id "WAC.282";
3q1rk1/4bp1p/1n2P2Q/3p1p2/6r1/Pp2R2N/1B4PP/7K w - - bm Ng5; id "WAC.283";
3r3k/pp4pp/8/1P6/3N4/Pn2P1qb/1B1Q2B1/2R3K1 w - - bm Nf5; id "WAC.284";
2rr3k/1b2bppP/p2p1n2/R7/3P4/1qB2P2/1P4Q1/1K5R w - - bm Qxg7+; id "WAC.285";
3r1k2/1p6/p4P2/2pP2Qb/8/1P1KB3/P6r/8 b - - bm Rxd5+; id "WAC.286";
rn3k1r/pp2bBpp/2p2n2/q5N1/3P4/1P6/P1P3PP/R1BQ1RK1 w - - bm Qh5; id
"WAC.287";
r1b2rk1/p4ppp/1p1Qp3/4P2N/1P6/8/P3qPPP/3R1RK1 w - - bm Nf6+; id "WAC.288";
2r3k1/5p1p/p3q1p1/2n3P1/1p1QP2P/1P4N1/PK6/2R5 b - - bm Qe5; id "WAC.289";
2k2r2/2p5/1pq5/p1p1n3/P1P2n1B/1R4Pp/2QR4/6K1 b - - bm Ne2+; id "WAC.290";
5r1k/3b2p1/p6p/1pRpR3/1P1P2q1/P4pP1/5QnP/1B4K1 w - - bm h3; id "WAC.291";
4r3/1Q1qk2p/p4pp1/3Pb3/P7/6PP/5P2/4R1K1 w - - bm d6+; id "WAC.292";
1nbq1r1k/3rbp1p/p1p1pp1Q/1p6/P1pPN3/5NP1/1P2PPBP/R4RK1 w - - bm Nfg5; id
"WAC.293";
3r3k/1r3p1p/p1pB1p2/8/p1qNP1Q1/P6P/1P4P1/3R3K w - - bm Bf8 Nf5 Qf4; id
"WAC.294";
4r3/p4r1p/R1p2pp1/1p1bk3/4pNPP/2P1K3/2P2P2/3R4 w - - bm Rxd5+; id "WAC.295";
3r4/1p2k2p/p1b1p1p1/4Q1Pn/2B3KP/4pP2/PP2R1N1/6q1 b - - bm Rd4+ Rf8; id
"WAC.296";
3r1rk1/p3qp1p/2bb2p1/2p5/3P4/1P6/PBQN1PPP/2R2RK1 b - - bm Bxg2 Bxh2+; id
"WAC.297";
3Q4/p3b1k1/2p2rPp/2q5/4B3/P2P4/7P/6RK w - - bm Qh8+; id "WAC.298";
1n2rr2/1pk3pp/pNn2p2/2N1p3/8/6P1/PP2PPKP/2RR4 w - - bm Nca4; id "WAC.299";
b2b1r1k/3R1ppp/4qP2/4p1PQ/4P3/5B2/4N1K1/8 w - - bm g6; id "WAC.300";
****End
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
|
| |
Date: 22 Aug 2008 08:51:53
From: Sanny
Subject: GetClub Updated Results.
|
A few things were changed at GetClub.
Here us the result after Changes. I am not clear that the
modifications are good or bad as for some positions it gave correct
move while for others it gave wrong result.
Position Best Move by GetClub Beginner Level
2rr3k/pp3pp1/1nnqbN1p/3pN3/2pP4/2P3Q1/PPB4P/R4RK1 w - - bm Qg6; id WAC.
001 N-h5,Score:-0.55
8/7p/5k2/5p2/p1p2P2/Pr1pPK2/1P1R3P/8 b - - bm Rxb2; id WAC.002 P-
c3,Score:2.19
5rk1/1ppb3p/p1pb4/6q1/3P1p1r/2P1R2P/PP1BQ1P1/5RKN w - - bm Rg3; id WAC.
003 R-g3,Score:2.79
r1bq2rk/pp3pbp/2p1p1pQ/7P/3P4/2PB1N2/PP3PPR/2KR4 w - - bm Qxh7 ; id
WAC.004 Q-h7,Score:94.65
5k2/6pp/p1qN4/1p1p4/3P4/2PKP2Q/PP3r2/3R4 b - - bm Qc4 ; id WAC.005 Q-
d6,Score:2.28
7k/p7/1R5K/6r1/6p1/6P1/8/8 w - - bm Rb7; id WAC.006 R-b7,Score:
5.85
rnbqkb1r/pppp1ppp/8/4P3/6n1/7P/PPPNPPP1/R1BQKBNR b KQkq - bm Ne3; id
WAC.007 N-f2,Score:1.43
r4q1k/p2bR1rp/2p2Q1N/5p2/5p2/2P5/PP3PPP/R5K1 w - - bm Rf7; id WAC.008
R-f7,Score:9.71
3q1rk1/p4pp1/2pb3p/3p4/6Pr/1PNQ4/P1PB1PP1/4RRK1 b - - bm Bh2 ; id WAC.
009 Q-b6,Score:-2.25
2br2k1/2q3rn/p2NppQ1/2p1P3/Pp5R/4P3/1P3PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Rxh7; id WAC.
010 R-h7,Score:5.77
r1b1kb1r/3q1ppp/pBp1pn2/8/Np3P2/5B2/PPP3PP/R2Q1RK1 w kq - bm Bxc6; id
WAC.011 B-c5,Score:1.07
4k1r1/2p3r1/1pR1p3/3pP2p/3P2qP/P4N2/1PQ4P/5R1K b - - bm Qxf3 ; id WAC.
012 Q-f3,Score:82.14
5rk1/pp4p1/2n1p2p/2Npq3/2p5/6P1/P3P1BP/R4Q1K w - - bm Qxf8 ; id WAC.
013 B-f3,Score:-1.63
r2rb1k1/pp1q1p1p/2n1p1p1/2bp4/5P2/PP1BPR1Q/1BPN2PP/R5K1 w - - bm
Qxh7 ; id WAC.014 B-f6,Score:2.62
1R6/1brk2p1/4p2p/p1P1Pp2/P7/6P1/1P4P1/2R3K1 w - - bm Rxb7; id WAC.015
K-f2,Score:2.42
r4rk1/ppp2ppp/2n5/2bqp3/8/P2PB3/1PP1NPPP/R2Q1RK1 w - - bm Nc3; id WAC.
016 N-c3,Score:3.05
1k5r/pppbn1pp/4q1r1/1P3p2/2NPp3/1QP5/P4PPP/R1B1R1K1 w - - bm Ne5; id
WAC.017 B-f4,Score:-0.79
R7/P4k2/8/8/8/8/r7/6K1 w - - bm Rh8; id WAC.018 K-f1,Score:2.32
r1b2rk1/ppbn1ppp/4p3/1QP4q/3P4/N4N2/5PPP/R1B2RK1 w - - bm c6; id WAC.
019 P-c6,Score:0.56
r2qkb1r/1ppb1ppp/p7/4p3/P1Q1P3/2P5/5PPP/R1B2KNR b kq - bm Bb5; id WAC.
020 B-e6,Score:3.57
5rk1/1b3p1p/pp3p2/3n1N2/1P6/P1qB1PP1/3Q3P/4R1K1 w - - bm Qh6; id WAC.
021 Q-c3,Score:2.24
r1bqk2r/ppp1nppp/4p3/n5N1/2BPp3/P1P5/2P2PPP/R1BQK2R w KQkq - bm Ba2
Nxf7; id WAC.022 B-b5,Score:0.45
r3nrk1/2p2p1p/p1p1b1p1/2NpPq2/3R4/P1N1Q3/1PP2PPP/4R1K1 w - - bm g4; id
WAC.023 Q-d2,Score:3.67
6k1/1b1nqpbp/pp4p1/5P2/1PN5/4Q3/P5PP/1B2B1K1 b - - bm Bd4; id WAC.024
B-d4,Score:7.12
3R1rk1/8/5Qpp/2p5/2P1p1q1/P3P3/1P2PK2/8 b - - bm Qh4 ; id WAC.025 Q-
h4,Score:11.17
3r2k1/1p1b1pp1/pq5p/8/3NR3/2PQ3P/PP3PP1/6K1 b - - bm Bf5; id WAC.026 Q-
b2,Score:-0.09
7k/pp4np/2p3p1/3pN1q1/3P4/Q7/1r3rPP/2R2RK1 w - - bm Qf8 ; id WAC.027 Q-
f8,Score:85.58
1r1r2k1/4pp1p/2p1b1p1/p3R3/RqBP4/4P3/1PQ2PPP/6K1 b - - bm Qe1 ; id WAC.
028 Q-e1,Score:2.59
r2q2k1/pp1rbppp/4pn2/2P5/1P3B2/6P1/P3QPBP/1R3RK1 w - - bm c6; id WAC.
029 P-c6,Score:3.73
1r3r2/4q1kp/b1pp2p1/5p2/pPn1N3/6P1/P3PPBP/2QRR1K1 w - - bm Nxd6; id
WAC.030 N-g5,Score:1.62
rb3qk1/pQ3ppp/4p3/3P4/8/1P3N2/1P3PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Qxa8 d6 dxe6 g3;
id WAC.031 P-e6,Score:6.36
6k1/p4p1p/1p3np1/2q5/4p3/4P1N1/PP3PPP/3Q2K1 w - - bm Qd8 ; id WAC.032
Q-d8,Score:2.03
8/p1q2pkp/2Pr2p1/8/P3Q3/6P1/5P1P/2R3K1 w - - bm Qe5 Qf4; id WAC.033 R-
c5,Score:2.89
7k/1b1r2p1/p6p/1p2qN2/3bP3/3Q4/P5PP/1B1R3K b - - bm Bg1; id WAC.034 B-
g1,Score:2.53
r3r2k/2R3pp/pp1q1p2/8/3P3R/7P/PP3PP1/3Q2K1 w - - bm Rxh7 ; id WAC.035
Q-c1,Score:1.9
3r4/2p1rk2/1pQq1pp1/7p/1P1P4/P4P2/6PP/R1R3K1 b - - bm Re1 ; id WAC.036
R-e1,Score:2.52
2r5/2rk2pp/1pn1pb2/pN1p4/P2P4/1N2B3/nPR1KPPP/3R4 b - - bm Nxd4 ; id
WAC.037 N-d4,Score:1.62
4k3/p4prp/1p6/2b5/8/2Q3P1/P2R1PKP/4q3 w - - bm Rd8 Qd3; id WAC.038 R-
d8,Score:0.97
r1br2k1/pp2bppp/2nppn2/8/2P1PB2/2N2P2/PqN1B1PP/R2Q1R1K w - - bm Na4;
id WAC.039 N-a4,Score:1.15
3r1r1k/1p4pp/p4p2/8/1PQR4/6Pq/P3PP2/2R3K1 b - - bm Rc8; id WAC.040 R-
c8,Score:4.18
1k6/5RP1/1P6/1K6/6r1/8/8/8 w - - bm Ka5 Kc5 b7; id WAC.041 P-b7,Score:
5.71
r1b1r1k1/pp1n1pbp/1qp3p1/3p4/1B1P4/Q3PN2/PP2BPPP/R4RK1 w - - bm Ba5;
id WAC.042 B-d3,Score:0.66
r2q3k/p2P3p/1p3p2/3QP1r1/8/B7/P5PP/2R3K1 w - - bm Be7 Qxa8; id WAC.043
B-e7,Score:6.27
3rb1k1/pq3pbp/4n1p1/3p4/2N5/2P2QB1/PP3PPP/1B1R2K1 b - - bm dxc4; id
WAC.044 B-b5,Score:-1.76
7k/2p1b1pp/8/1p2P3/1P3r2/2P3Q1/1P5P/R4qBK b - - bm Qxa1; id WAC.045 Q-
a1,Score:5.36
r1bqr1k1/pp1nb1p1/4p2p/3p1p2/3P4/P1N1PNP1/1PQ2PP1/3RKB1R w K - bm Nb5;
id WAC.046 R-c1,Score:1.55
r1b2rk1/pp2bppp/2n1pn2/q5B1/2BP4/2N2N2/PP2QPPP/2R2RK1 b - - bm Nxd4;
id WAC.047 N-d4,Score:-1.43
1rbq1rk1/p1p1bppp/2p2n2/8/Q1BP4/2N5/PP3PPP/R1B2RK1 b - - bm Rb4; id
WAC.048 R-b4,Score:2.04
2b3k1/4rrpp/p2p4/2pP2RQ/1pP1Pp1N/1P3P1P/1q6/6RK w - - bm Qxh7 ; id WAC.
049 N-g2,Score:-0.01
k4r2/1R4pb/1pQp1n1p/3P4/5p1P/3P2P1/r1q1R2K/8 w - - bm Rxb6 ; id WAC.
050 R-g7,Score:0.31
r1bq1r2/pp4k1/4p2p/3pPp1Q/3N1R1P/2PB4/6P1/6K1 w - - bm Rg4 ; id WAC.
051 R-f3,Score:1.11
r1k5/1p3q2/1Qpb4/3N1p2/5Pp1/3P2Pp/PPPK3P/4R3 w - - bm Re7 c4; id WAC.
052 N-b4,Score:1.35
6k1/6p1/p7/3Pn3/5p2/4rBqP/P4RP1/5QK1 b - - bm Re1; id WAC.053 R-
e1,Score:6.17
r3kr2/1pp4p/1p1p4/7q/4P1n1/2PP2Q1/PP4P1/R1BB2K1 b q - bm Qh1 ; id WAC.
054 Q-c5,Score:-0.96
r3r1k1/pp1q1pp1/4b1p1/3p2B1/3Q1R2/8/PPP3PP/4R1K1 w - - bm Qxg7 ; id
WAC.055 R-e3,Score:1.89
r1bqk2r/pppp1ppp/5n2/2b1n3/4P3/1BP3Q1/PP3PPP/RNB1K1NR b KQkq - bm
Bxf2 ; id WAC.056 P-d6,Score:1.15
r3q1kr/ppp5/3p2pQ/8/3PP1b1/5R2/PPP3P1/5RK1 w - - bm Rf8 ; id WAC.057 R-
f8,Score:90.92
8/8/2R5/1p2qp1k/1P2r3/2PQ2P1/5K2/8 w - - bm Qd1 ; id WAC.058 Q-
f3,Score:2.34
r1b2rk1/2p1qnbp/p1pp2p1/5p2/2PQP3/1PN2N1P/PB3PP1/3R1RK1 w - - bm Nd5;
id WAC.059 N-d5,Score:9.05
rn1qr1k1/1p2np2/2p3p1/8/1pPb4/7Q/PB1P1PP1/2KR1B1R w - - bm Qh8 ; id
WAC.060 Q-h7,Score:-0.55
3qrbk1/ppp1r2n/3pP2p/3P4/2P4P/1P3Q2/PB6/R4R1K w - - bm Qf7 ; id WAC.
061 Q-f7,Score:93.69
6r1/3Pn1qk/p1p1P1rp/2Q2p2/2P5/1P4P1/P3R2P/5RK1 b - - bm Rxg3 ; id WAC.
062 R-g5,Score:-4.75
r1brnbk1/ppq2pp1/4p2p/4N3/3P4/P1PB1Q2/3B1PPP/R3R1K1 w - - bm Nxf7; id
WAC.063 N-f7,Score:3.72
8/6pp/3q1p2/3n1k2/1P6/3NQ2P/5PP1/6K1 w - - bm g4 ; id WAC.064 P-
g4,Score:92.79
1r1r1qk1/p2n1p1p/bp1Pn1pQ/2pNp3/2P2P1N/1P5B/P6P/3R1RK1 w - - bm Ne7 ;
id WAC.065 N-e7,Score:2.05
1k1r2r1/ppq5/1bp4p/3pQ3/8/2P2N2/PP4P1/R4R1K b - - bm Qxe5; id WAC.066
Q-e5,Score:5.47
3r2k1/p2q4/1p4p1/3rRp1p/5P1P/6PK/P3R3/3Q4 w - - bm Rxd5; id WAC.067 R-
d5,Score:2.35
6k1/5ppp/1q6/2b5/8/2R1pPP1/1P2Q2P/7K w - - bm Qxe3; id WAC.068 Q-
d3,Score:1.75
2k5/pppr4/4R3/4Q3/2pp2q1/8/PPP2PPP/6K1 w - - bm f3 h3; id WAC.069 P-
f3,Score:2.91
2kr3r/pppq1ppp/3p1n2/bQ2p3/1n1PP3/1PN1BN1P/1PP2PP1/2KR3R b - - bm
Na2 ; id WAC.070 N-a2,Score:4.48
2kr3r/pp1q1ppp/5n2/1Nb5/2Pp1B2/7Q/P4PPP/1R3RK1 w - - bm Nxa7 ; id WAC.
071 Q-f3,Score:0.12
r3r1k1/pp1n1ppp/2p5/4Pb2/2B2P2/B1P5/P5PP/R2R2K1 w - - bm e6; id WAC.
072 P-e6,Score:2.6
r1q3rk/1ppbb1p1/4Np1p/p3pP2/P3P3/2N4R/1PP1Q1PP/3R2K1 w - - bm Qd2; id
WAC.073 N-d5,Score:0.76
5r1k/pp4pp/2p5/2b1P3/4Pq2/1PB1p3/P3Q1PP/3N2K1 b - - bm Qf1 ; id WAC.
074 P-b5,Score:6.03
r3r1k1/pppq1ppp/8/8/1Q4n1/7P/PPP2PP1/RNB1R1K1 b - - bm Qd6; id WAC.075
R-e1,Score:-2.61
r1b1qrk1/2p2ppp/pb1pnn2/1p2pNB1/3PP3/1BP5/PP2QPPP/RN1R2K1 w - - bm
Bxf6; id WAC.076 B-f6,Score:3.05
3r2k1/ppp2ppp/6q1/b4n2/3nQB2/2p5/P4PPP/RN3RK1 b - - bm Ng3; id WAC.077
Q-a6,Score:2.53
r2q3r/ppp2k2/4nbp1/5Q1p/2P1NB2/8/PP3P1P/3RR1K1 w - - bm Ng5 ; id WAC.
078 R-d8,Score:3.99
r3k2r/pbp2pp1/3b1n2/1p6/3P3p/1B2N1Pq/PP1PQP1P/R1B2RK1 b kq - bm Qxh2 ;
id WAC.079 P-g3,Score:2.49
r4rk1/p1B1bpp1/1p2pn1p/8/2PP4/3B1P2/qP2QP1P/3R1RK1 w - - bm Ra1; id
WAC.080 P-d5,Score:1.65
r4rk1/1bR1bppp/4pn2/1p2N3/1P6/P3P3/4BPPP/3R2K1 b - - bm Bd6; id WAC.
081 B-g2,Score:-0.35
3rr1k1/pp3pp1/4b3/8/2P1B2R/6QP/P3q1P1/5R1K w - - bm Bh7 ; id WAC.082 Q-
f4,Score:-1.63
3rr1k1/ppqbRppp/2p5/8/3Q1n2/2P3N1/PPB2PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Qxd7; id WAC.
083 Q-d7,Score:6.01
r2q1r1k/2p1b1pp/p1n5/1p1Q1bN1/4n3/1BP1B3/PP3PPP/R4RK1 w - - bm Qg8 ;
id WAC.084 N-e4,Score:2.12
kr2R3/p4r2/2pq4/2N2p1p/3P2p1/Q5P1/5P1P/5BK1 w - - bm Na6; id WAC.085 R-
b8,Score:2.92
8/p7/1ppk1n2/5ppp/P1PP4/2P1K1P1/5N1P/8 b - - bm Ng4 ; id WAC.086 N-
g4,Score:1.28
8/p3k1p1/4r3/2ppNpp1/PP1P4/2P3KP/5P2/8 b - - bm Rxe5; id WAC.087 P-
b4,Score:3.03
r6k/p1Q4p/2p1b1rq/4p3/B3P3/4P3/PPP3P1/4RRK1 b - - bm Rxg2 ; id WAC.088
Q-g5,Score:-2.51
1r3b1k/p4rpp/4pp2/3q4/2ppbPPQ/6RK/PP5P/2B1NR2 b - - bm g5; id WAC.089
B-d6,Score:7.15
3qrrk1/1pp2pp1/1p2bn1p/5N2/2P5/P1P3B1/1P4PP/2Q1RRK1 w - - bm Nxg7; id
WAC.090 R-f4,Score:1.77
2qr2k1/4b1p1/2p2p1p/1pP1p3/p2nP3/PbQNB1PP/1P3PK1/4RB2 b - - bm Be6; id
WAC.091 N-c2,Score:1.85
r4rk1/1p2ppbp/p2pbnp1/q7/3BPPP1/2N2B2/PPP4P/R2Q1RK1 b - - bm Bxg4; id
WAC.092 B-c4,Score:-0.51
r1b1k1nr/pp3pQp/4pq2/3pn3/8/P1P5/2P2PPP/R1B1KBNR w KQkq - bm Bh6; id
WAC.093 B-h6,Score:2.77
8/k7/p7/3Qp2P/n1P5/3KP3/1q6/8 b - - bm e4 ; id WAC.094 Q-b3,Score:
2.46
2r5/1r6/4pNpk/3pP1qp/8/2P1QP2/5PK1/R7 w - - bm Ng4 ; id WAC.095 Q-
g5,Score:-1.55
r1b4k/ppp2Bb1/6Pp/3pP3/1qnP1p1Q/8/PPP3P1/1K1R3R w - - bm Qd8 ; id WAC.
096 Q-d8,Score:5.49
6k1/5p2/p5np/4B3/3P4/1PP1q3/P3r1QP/6RK w - - bm Qa8 ; id WAC.097 Q-
d5,Score:1.07
1r3rk1/5pb1/p2p2p1/Q1n1q2p/1NP1P3/3p1P1B/PP1R3P/1K2R3 b - - bm Nxe4;
id WAC.098 N-e4,Score:6.38
r1bq1r1k/1pp1Np1p/p2p2pQ/4R3/n7/8/PPPP1PPP/R1B3K1 w - - bm Rh5; id WAC.
099 R-e4,Score:2.87
8/k1b5/P4p2/1Pp2p1p/K1P2P1P/8/3B4/8 w - - bm b6 Be3; id WAC.100 B-
e3,Score:2.95
5rk1/p5pp/8/8/2Pbp3/1P4P1/7P/4RN1K b - - bm Bc3; id WAC.101 P-g6,Score:
0.01
2Q2n2/2R4p/1p1qpp1k/8/3P3P/3B2P1/5PK1/r7 w - - bm Qxf8 ; id WAC.102 R-
f7,Score:5.49
6k1/2pb1r1p/3p1PpQ/p1nPp3/1q2P3/2N2P2/PrB5/2K3RR w - - bm Qxg6 ; id
WAC.103 Q-g6,Score:86.64
b4r1k/pq2rp2/1p1bpn1p/3PN2n/2P2P2/P2B3K/1B2Q2N/3R2R1 w - - bm Qxh5; id
WAC.104 Q-h5,Score:9.51
r2r2k1/pb3ppp/1p1bp3/7q/3n2nP/PP1B2P1/1B1N1P2/RQ2NRK1 b - - bm Qxh4
Bxg3; id WAC.105 N-c6,Score:4.17
4rrk1/pppb4/7p/3P2pq/3Qn3/P5P1/1PP4P/R3RNNK b - - bm Nf2 ; id WAC.106
Q-g6,Score:-1.01
5n2/pRrk2p1/P4p1p/4p3/3N4/5P2/6PP/6K1 w - - bm Nb5; id WAC.107 N-
b5,Score:2.41
r5k1/1q4pp/2p5/p1Q5/2P5/5R2/4RKPP/r7 w - - bm Qe5; id WAC.108 Q-
e5,Score:4.93
rn2k1nr/pbp2ppp/3q4/1p2N3/2p5/QP6/PB1PPPPP/R3KB1R b KQkq - bm c3; id
WAC.109 P-c3,Score:-1.44
2kr4/bp3p2/p2p2b1/P7/2q5/1N4B1/1PPQ2P1/2KR4 b - - bm Be3; id WAC.110 B-
e4,Score:1.37
6k1/p5p1/5p2/2P2Q2/3pN2p/3PbK1P/7P/6q1 b - - bm Qf1 ; id WAC.111 Q-
f1,Score:5.41
r4kr1/ppp5/4bq1b/7B/2PR1Q1p/2N3P1/PP3P1P/2K1R3 w - - bm Rxe6; id WAC.
112 R-e6,Score:6.33
rnbqkb1r/1p3ppp/5N2/1p2p1B1/2P5/8/PP2PPPP/R2QKB1R b KQkq - bm Qxf6; id
WAC.113 P-f6,Score:-4.99
r1b1rnk1/1p4pp/p1p2p2/3pN2n/3P1PPq/2NBPR1P/PPQ5/2R3K1 w - - bm Bxh7 ;
id WAC.114 N-c6,Score:1.46
4N2k/5rpp/1Q6/p3q3/8/P5P1/1P3P1P/5K2 w - - bm Nd6; id WAC.115 N-
d6,Score:-1.29
r2r2k1/2p2ppp/p7/1p2P1n1/P6q/5P2/1PB1QP1P/R5RK b - - bm Rd2; id WAC.
116 N-h3,Score:0.76
3r1rk1/q4ppp/p1Rnp3/8/1p6/1N3P2/PP3QPP/3R2K1 b - - bm Ne4; id WAC.117
N-e4,Score:6.11
r5k1/pb2rpp1/1p6/2p4q/5R2/2PB2Q1/P1P3PP/5R1K w - - bm Rh4; id WAC.118
P-c4,Score:0.19
r2qr1k1/p1p2ppp/2p5/2b5/4nPQ1/3B4/PPP3PP/R1B2R1K b - - bm Qxd3; id WAC.
119 N-f2,Score:1.65
r4rk1/1bn2qnp/3p1B1Q/p2P1pP1/1pp5/5N1P/PPB2P2/2KR3R w - - bm g6 Rhg1;
id WAC.120 B-g7,Score:3.23
6k1/5p1p/2bP2pb/4p3/2P5/1p1pNPPP/1P1Q1BK1/1q6 b - - bm Bxf3 ; id WAC.
121 P-e4,Score:2.38
1k6/ppp4p/1n2pq2/1N2Rb2/2P2Q2/8/P4KPP/3r1B2 b - - bm Rxf1 ; id WAC.122
Q-d8,Score:3.31
6k1/1b2rp2/1p4p1/3P4/PQ4P1/2N2q2/5P2/3R2K1 b - - bm Bxd5 Rc7 Re6; id
WAC.123 R-c7,Score:4.37
6k1/3r4/2R5/P5P1/1P4p1/8/4rB2/6K1 b - - bm g3; id WAC.124 R-d1,Score:
0.37
r1bqr1k1/pp3ppp/1bp5/3n4/3B4/2N2P1P/PPP1B1P1/R2Q1RK1 b - - bm Bxd4 ;
id WAC.125 N-e3,Score:1.71
r5r1/pQ5p/1qp2R2/2k1p3/4P3/2PP4/P1P3PP/6K1 w - - bm Rxc6 ; id WAC.126
Q-f7,Score:3.34
2k4r/1pr1n3/p1p1q2p/5pp1/3P1P2/P1P1P3/1R2Q1PP/1RB3K1 w - - bm Rxb7; id
WAC.127 Q-f1,Score:2.22
6rk/1pp2Qrp/3p1B2/1pb1p2R/3n1q2/3P4/PPP3PP/R6K w - - bm Qg6; id WAC.
128 P-c3,Score:-0.29
3r1r1k/1b2b1p1/1p5p/2p1Pp2/q1B2P2/4P2P/1BR1Q2K/6R1 b - - bm Bf3; id
WAC.129 Q-e8,Score:1.23
6k1/1pp3q1/5r2/1PPp4/3P1pP1/3Qn2P/3B4/4R1K1 b - - bm Qh6 Qh8; id WAC.
130 R-h6,Score:-1.83
2rq1bk1/p4p1p/1p4p1/3b4/3B1Q2/8/P4PpP/3RR1K1 w - - bm Re8; id WAC.131
B-f6,Score:-0.2
4r1k1/5bpp/2p5/3pr3/8/1B3pPq/PPR2P2/2R2QK1 b - - bm Re1; id WAC.132 Q-
f1,Score:3.59
r1b1k2r/1pp1q2p/p1n3p1/3QPp2/8/1BP3B1/P5PP/3R1RK1 w kq - bm Bh4; id
WAC.133 R-f3,Score:3.09
3r2k1/p6p/2Q3p1/4q3/2P1p3/P3Pb2/1P3P1P/2K2BR1 b - - bm Rd1 ; id WAC.
134 R-d1,Score:3.77
3r1r1k/N2qn1pp/1p2np2/2p5/2Q1P2N/3P4/PP4PP/3R1RK1 b - - bm Nd4; id WAC.
135 N-d4,Score:1.61
6kr/1q2r1p1/1p2N1Q1/5p2/1P1p4/6R1/7P/2R3K1 w - - bm Rc8 ; id WAC.136 Q-
f5,Score:4.9
3b1rk1/1bq3pp/5pn1/1p2rN2/2p1p3/2P1B2Q/1PB2PPP/R2R2K1 w - - bm Rd7; id
WAC.137 P-f4,Score:0.26
r1bq3r/ppppR1p1/5n1k/3P4/6pP/3Q4/PP1N1PP1/5K1R w - - bm h5; id WAC.138
Q-e3,Score:0.07
rnb3kr/ppp2ppp/1b6/3q4/3pN3/Q4N2/PPP2KPP/R1B1R3 w - - bm Nf6 ; id WAC.
139 Q-e7,Score:-1.62
r2b1rk1/pq4p1/4ppQP/3pB1p1/3P4/2R5/PP3PP1/5RK1 w - - bm Rc7 Bc7; id
WAC.140 R-c7,Score:13.09
4r1k1/p1qr1p2/2pb1Bp1/1p5p/3P1n1R/1B3P2/PP3PK1/2Q4R w - - bm Qxf4; id
WAC.141 K-f1,Score:-2.39
r2q3n/ppp2pk1/3p4/5Pr1/2NP1Qp1/2P2pP1/PP3K2/4R2R w - - bm Re8 f6 ; id
WAC.142 R-h4,Score:3.8
5b2/pp2r1pk/2pp1pRp/4rP1N/2P1P3/1P4QP/P3q1P1/5R1K w - - bm Rxh6 ; id
WAC.143 Q-f3,Score:-0.35
r2q1rk1/pp3ppp/2p2b2/8/B2pPPb1/7P/PPP1N1P1/R2Q1RK1 b - - bm d3; id WAC.
144 B-e2,Score:2.66
r1bq4/1p4kp/3p1n2/p4pB1/2pQ4/8/1P4PP/4RRK1 w - - bm Re8; id WAC.145 Q-
f6,Score:5.91
8/8/2Kp4/3P1B2/2P2k2/5p2/8/8 w - - bm Bc8 Bd3 Bh3; id WAC.146 B-
d3,Score:4.31
r2r2k1/ppqbppbp/2n2np1/2pp4/6P1/1P1PPNNP/PBP2PB1/R2QK2R b KQ - bm
Nxg4; id WAC.147 N-e4,Score:1.39
2r1k3/6pr/p1nBP3/1p3p1p/2q5/2P5/P1R4P/K2Q2R1 w - - bm Rxg7; id WAC.148
R-g6,Score:1.42
6k1/6p1/2p4p/4Pp2/4b1qP/2Br4/1P2RQPK/8 b - - bm Bxg2; id WAC.149 P-
c5,Score:4.03
r3r1k1/5p2/pQ1b2pB/1p6/4p3/6P1/Pq2BP1P/2R3K1 b - - bm Ba3 Bf8 e3 Be5;
id WAC.150 B-f8,Score:6.59
8/3b2kp/4p1p1/pr1n4/N1N4P/1P4P1/1K3P2/3R4 w - - bm Nc3; id WAC.151 N-
c3,Score:-0.49
1br2rk1/1pqb1ppp/p3pn2/8/1P6/P1N1PN1P/1B3PP1/1QRR2K1 w - - bm Ne4; id
WAC.152 N-d5,Score:2.07
2r3k1/q4ppp/p3p3/pnNp4/2rP4/2P2P2/4R1PP/2R1Q1K1 b - - bm Nxd4; id WAC.
153 R-c5,Score:2.57
r1b2rk1/2p2ppp/p7/1p6/3P3q/1BP3bP/PP3QP1/RNB1R1K1 w - - bm Qxf7 ; id
WAC.154 Q-f3,Score:1.78
5bk1/1rQ4p/5pp1/2pP4/3n1PP1/7P/1q3BB1/4R1K1 w - - bm d6; id WAC.155 P-
d6,Score:2.15
r1b1qN1k/1pp3p1/p2p3n/4p1B1/8/1BP4Q/PP3KPP/8 w - - bm Qxh6 ; id WAC.
156 N-e6,Score:-2.59
5rk1/p4ppp/2p1b3/3Nq3/4P1n1/1p1B2QP/1PPr2P1/1K2R2R w - - bm Ne7 ; id
WAC.157 Q-f3,Score:-4.35
5rk1/n1p1R1bp/p2p4/1qpP1QB1/7P/2P3P1/PP3P2/6K1 w - - bm Rxg7 ; id WAC.
158 Q-e6,Score:3.89
r1b2r2/5P1p/ppn3pk/2p1p1Nq/1bP1PQ2/3P4/PB4BP/1R3RK1 w - - bm Ne6 ; id
WAC.159 B-e5,Score:5.95
qn1kr2r/1pRbb3/pP5p/P2pP1pP/3N1pQ1/3B4/3B1PP1/R5K1 w - - bm Qxd7 ; id
WAC.160 Q-e6,Score:8.05
3r3k/3r1P1p/pp1Nn3/2pp4/7Q/6R1/Pq4PP/5RK1 w - - bm Qxd8 ; id WAC.161 R-
g6,Score:4.38
r3kbnr/p4ppp/2p1p3/8/Q1B3b1/2N1B3/PP3PqP/R3K2R w KQkq - bm Bd5; id WAC.
162 B-d5,Score:5.0
5rk1/2p4p/2p4r/3P4/4p1b1/1Q2NqPp/PP3P1K/R4R2 b - - bm Qg2 ; id WAC.163
P-d5,Score:4.12
8/6pp/4p3/1p1n4/1NbkN1P1/P4P1P/1PR3K1/r7 w - - bm Rxc4 ; id WAC.164 R-
d2,Score:5.94
1r5k/p1p3pp/8/8/4p3/P1P1R3/1P1Q1qr1/2KR4 w - - bm Re2; id WAC.165 Q-
d8,Score:0.73
r3r1k1/5pp1/p1p4p/2Pp4/8/q1NQP1BP/5PP1/4K2R b K - bm d4; id WAC.166 Q-
c1,Score:0.96
7Q/ppp2q2/3p2k1/P2Ppr1N/1PP5/7R/5rP1/6K1 b - - bm Rxg2 ; id WAC.167 R-
f1,Score:2.41
r3k2r/pb1q1p2/8/2p1pP2/4p1p1/B1P1Q1P1/P1P3K1/R4R2 b kq - bm Qd2 ; id
WAC.168 R-h3,Score:2.97
5rk1/1pp3bp/3p2p1/2PPp3/1P2P3/2Q1B3/4q1PP/R5K1 b - - bm Bh6; id WAC.
169 P-c5,Score:0.24
5r1k/6Rp/1p2p3/p2pBp2/1qnP4/4P3/Q4PPP/6K1 w - - bm Qxc4; id WAC.170 R-
f7,Score:-1.97
2rq4/1b2b1kp/p3p1p1/1p1nNp2/7P/1B2B1Q1/PP3PP1/3R2K1 w - - bm Bh6 ; id
WAC.171 B-d4,Score:0.53
5r1k/p5pp/8/1P1pq3/P1p2nR1/Q7/5BPP/6K1 b - - bm Qe1 ; id WAC.172 N-
e2,Score:4.41
2r1b3/1pp1qrk1/p1n1P1p1/7R/2B1p3/4Q1P1/PP3PP1/3R2K1 w - - bm Qh6 ; id
WAC.173 Q-h6,Score:7.89
2r2rk1/6p1/p3pq1p/1p1b1p2/3P1n2/PP3N2/3N1PPP/1Q2RR1K b - - bm Nxg2; id
WAC.174 P-g5,Score:2.21
r5k1/pppb3p/2np1n2/8/3PqNpP/3Q2P1/PPP5/R4RK1 w - - bm Nh5; id WAC.175
Q-e4,Score:-3.35
r1bq3r/ppp2pk1/3p1pp1/8/2BbPQ2/2NP2P1/PPP4P/R4R1K b - - bm Rxh2 ; id
WAC.176 K-g8,Score:-0.67
r1b3r1/4qk2/1nn1p1p1/3pPp1P/p4P2/1p3BQN/PKPBN3/3R3R b - - bm Qa3 ; id
WAC.177 N-c4,Score:0.42
3r2k1/p1rn1p1p/1p2pp2/6q1/3PQNP1/5P2/P1P4R/R5K1 w - - bm Nxe6; id WAC.
178 Q-h7,Score:1.42
r1b2r1k/pp4pp/3p4/3B4/8/1QN3Pn/PP3q1P/R3R2K b - - bm Qg1 ; id WAC.179
B-g4,Score:3.02
r1q2rk1/p3bppb/3p1n1p/2nPp3/1p2P1P1/6NP/PP2QPB1/R1BNK2R b KQ - bm
Nxd5; id WAC.180 Q-a6,Score:2.26
r3k2r/2p2p2/p2p1n2/1p2p3/4P2p/1PPPPp1q/1P5P/R1N2QRK b kq - bm Ng4; id
WAC.181 N-g4,Score:9.95
r1b2rk1/ppqn1p1p/2n1p1p1/2b3N1/2N5/PP1BP3/1B3PPP/R2QK2R w KQ - bm Qh5;
id WAC.182 B-e4,Score:2.91
1r2k1r1/5p2/b3p3/1p2b1B1/3p3P/3B4/PP2KP2/2R3R1 w - - bm Bf6; id WAC.
183 P-a4,Score:-1.36
4kn2/r4p1r/p3bQ2/q1nNP1Np/1p5P/8/PPP3P1/2KR3R w - - bm Qe7 ; id WAC.
184 N-h7,Score:5.68
1r1rb1k1/2p3pp/p2q1p2/3PpP1Q/Pp1bP2N/1B5R/1P4PP/2B4K w - - bm Qxh7 ;
id WAC.185 Q-f3,Score:-2.45
r5r1/p1q2p1k/1p1R2pB/3pP3/6bQ/2p5/P1P1NPPP/6K1 w - - bm Bf8 ; id WAC.
186 Q-g4,Score:3.29
6k1/5p2/p3p3/1p3qp1/2p1Qn2/2P1R3/PP1r1PPP/4R1K1 b - - bm Nh3 ; id WAC.
187 Q-e4,Score:-0.2
3RNbk1/pp3p2/4rQpp/8/1qr5/7P/P4P2/3R2K1 w - - bm Qg7 ; id WAC.188 Q-
f3,Score:-3.18
3r1k2/1ppPR1n1/p2p1rP1/3P3p/4Rp1N/5K2/P1P2P2/8 w - - bm Re8 ; id WAC.
189 K-g2,Score:5.87
8/p2b2kp/1q1p2p1/1P1Pp3/4P3/3B2P1/P2Q3P/2Nn3K b - - bm Bh3; id WAC.190
N-f2,Score:3.85
2r1Rn1k/1p1q2pp/p7/5p2/3P4/1B4P1/P1P1QP1P/6K1 w - - bm Qc4; id WAC.191
R-c8,Score:2.87
r3k3/ppp2Npp/4Bn2/2b5/1n1pp3/N4P2/PPP3qP/R2QKR2 b Qq - bm Nd3 ; id WAC.
192 P-e3,Score:2.1
5bk1/p4ppp/Qp6/4B3/1P6/Pq2P1P1/2rr1P1P/R4RK1 b - - bm Qxe3; id WAC.193
Q-d5,Score:2.0
5rk1/ppq2ppp/2p5/4bN2/4P3/6Q1/PPP2PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Nh6 ; id WAC.194
Q-d3,Score:0.85
3r1rk1/1p3p2/p3pnnp/2p3p1/2P2q2/1P5P/PB2QPPN/3RR1K1 w - - bm g3; id
WAC.195 B-f6,Score:0.25
rr4k1/p1pq2pp/Q1n1pn2/2bpp3/4P3/2PP1NN1/PP3PPP/R1B1K2R b KQ - bm Nb4;
id WAC.196 R-b6,Score:1.53
7k/1p4p1/7p/3P1n2/4Q3/2P2P2/PP3qRP/7K b - - bm Qf1 ; id WAC.197 Q-
f1,Score:84.97
2br2k1/ppp2p1p/4p1p1/4P2q/2P1Bn2/2Q5/PP3P1P/4R1RK b - - bm Rd3; id WAC.
198 Q-h4,Score:-1.07
r1br2k1/pp2nppp/2n5/1B1q4/Q7/4BN2/PP3PPP/2R2RK1 w - - bm Bxc6 Rfd1
Rcd1; id WAC.199 R-c5,Score:1.88
2rqrn1k/pb4pp/1p2pp2/n2P4/2P3N1/P2B2Q1/1B3PPP/2R1R1K1 w - - bm Bxf6;
id WAC.200 Q-f3,Score:1.91
2b2r1k/4q2p/3p2pQ/2pBp3/8/6P1/1PP2P1P/R5K1 w - - bm Ra7; id WAC.201 R-
a7,Score:12.18
QR2rq1k/2p3p1/3p1pPp/8/4P3/8/P1r3PP/1R4K1 b - - bm Rxa2; id WAC.202 R-
a2,Score:1.25
r4rk1/5ppp/p3q1n1/2p2NQ1/4n3/P3P3/1B3PPP/1R3RK1 w - - bm Qh6; id WAC.
203 N-g7,Score:-0.25
r1b1qrk1/1p3ppp/p1p5/3Nb3/5N2/P7/1P4PQ/K1R1R3 w - - bm Rxe5; id WAC.
204 Q-h5,Score:-3.44
r3rnk1/1pq2bb1/p4p2/3p1Pp1/3B2P1/1NP4R/P1PQB3/2K4R w - - bm Qxg5; id
WAC.205 K-b1,Score:1.32
1Qq5/2P1p1kp/3r1pp1/8/8/7P/p4PP1/2R3K1 b - - bm Rc6; id WAC.206 Q-
b8,Score:-4.93
r1bq2kr/p1pp1ppp/1pn1p3/4P3/2Pb2Q1/BR6/P4PPP/3K1BNR w - - bm Qxg7 ; id
WAC.207 P-f4,Score:-3.64
3r1bk1/ppq3pp/2p5/2P2Q1B/8/1P4P1/P6P/5RK1 w - - bm Bf7 ; id WAC.208 R-
f2,Score:2.31
4kb1r/2q2p2/r2p4/pppBn1B1/P6P/6Q1/1PP5/2KRR3 w k - bm Rxe5 ; id WAC.
209 P-b5,Score:4.25
3r1rk1/pp1q1ppp/3pn3/2pN4/5PP1/P5PQ/1PP1B3/1K1R4 w - - bm Rh1; id WAC.
210 R-h1,Score:-1.2
r1bqrk2/pp1n1n1p/3p1p2/P1pP1P1Q/2PpP1NP/6R1/2PB4/4RBK1 w - - bm Qxf7 ;
id WAC.211 N-f2,Score:3.82
rn1qr2Q/pbppk1p1/1p2pb2/4N3/3P4/2N5/PPP3PP/R4RK1 w - - bm Qxg7 ; id
WAC.212 Q-h5,Score:0.76
3r1r1k/1b4pp/ppn1p3/4Pp1R/Pn5P/3P4/4QP2/1qB1NKR1 w - - bm Rxh7 ; id
WAC.213 Q-e3,Score:-6.78
r2r2k1/1p2qpp1/1np1p1p1/p3N3/2PPN3/bP5R/4QPPP/4R1K1 w - - bm Ng5; id
WAC.214 Q-e3,Score:2.83
3r2k1/pb1q1pp1/1p2pb1p/8/3N4/P2QB3/1P3PPP/1Br1R1K1 w - - bm Qh7 ; id
WAC.215 Q-h7,Score:2.27
r2qr1k1/1b1nbppp/p3pn2/1p1pN3/3P1B2/2PB1N2/PP2QPPP/R4RK1 w - - bm Nxf7
a4; id WAC.216 N-g5,Score:3.11
r3kb1r/1pp3p1/p3bp1p/5q2/3QN3/1P6/PBP3P1/3RR1K1 w kq - bm Qd7 ; id WAC.
217 R-e3,Score:0.18
6k1/pp5p/2p3q1/6BP/2nPr1Q1/8/PP3R1K/8 w - - bm Bh6; id WAC.218 P-
g6,Score:1.94
7k/p4q1p/1pb5/2p5/4B2Q/2P1B3/P6P/7K b - - bm Qf1 ; id WAC.219 Q-
f1,Score:89.97
3rr1k1/ppp2ppp/8/5Q2/4n3/1B5R/PPP1qPP1/5RK1 b - - bm Qxf1 ; id WAC.220
N-f6,Score:1.87
r3k3/P5bp/2N1bp2/4p3/2p5/6NP/1PP2PP1/3R2K1 w q - bm Rd8 ; id WAC.221 R-
d8,Score:8.49
2r1r2k/1q3ppp/p2Rp3/2p1P3/6QB/p3P3/bP3PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Bf6; id WAC.
222 P-a3,Score:1.01
r1bqk2r/pp3ppp/5n2/8/1b1npB2/2N5/PP1Q2PP/1K2RBNR w kq - bm Nxe4; id
WAC.223 B-e5,Score:-0.79
5rk1/p1q3pp/1p1r4/2p1pp1Q/1PPn1P2/3B3P/P2R2P1/3R2K1 b - - bm Rh6 e4;
id WAC.224 P-f4,Score:2.11
4R3/4q1kp/6p1/1Q3b2/1P1b1P2/6KP/8/8 b - - bm Qh4 ; id WAC.225 Q-
d6,Score:3.21
2b2rk1/p1p4p/2p1p1p1/br2N1Q1/1p2q3/8/PB3PPP/3R1RK1 w - - bm Nf7; id
WAC.226 R-d8,Score:-0.08
2k1rb1r/ppp3pp/2np1q2/5b2/2B2P2/2P1BQ2/PP1N1P1P/2KR3R b - - bm d5; id
WAC.227 Q-e7,Score:-0.38
r4rk1/1bq1bp1p/4p1p1/p2p4/3BnP2/1N1B3R/PPP3PP/R2Q2K1 w - - bm Bxe4; id
WAC.228 B-e4,Score:1.61
8/8/8/1p5r/p1p1k1pN/P2pBpP1/1P1K1P2/8 b - - bm Rxh4 b4; id WAC.229 R-
e5,Score:2.19
2b5/1r6/2kBp1p1/p2pP1P1/2pP4/1pP3K1/1R3P2/8 b - - bm Rb4; id WAC.230 P-
a4,Score:1.79
r4rk1/1b1nqp1p/p5p1/1p2PQ2/2p5/5N2/PP3PPP/R1BR2K1 w - - bm Bg5; id WAC.
231 R-d7,Score:5.15
1R2rq1k/2p3p1/Q2p1pPp/8/4P3/8/P1r3PP/1R4K1 w - - bm Qb5 Rxe8; id WAC.
232 Q-b7,Score:-1.76
5rk1/p1p2r1p/2pp2p1/4p3/PPPnP3/3Pq1P1/1Q1R1R1P/4NK2 b - - bm Nb3; id
WAC.233 N-b3,Score:9.91
2kr1r2/p6p/5Pp1/2p5/1qp2Q1P/7R/PP6/1KR5 w - - bm Rb3; id WAC.234 R-
b3,Score:4.36
5r2/1p1RRrk1/4Qq1p/1PP3p1/8/4B3/1b3P1P/6K1 w - - bm Qxf7 Rxf7 Qe4; id
WAC.235 R-f7,Score:5.61
1R6/p5pk/4p2p/4P3/8/2r3qP/P3R1b1/4Q1K1 b - - bm Rc1; id WAC.236 Q-
e1,Score:1.45
r5k1/pQp2qpp/8/4pbN1/3P4/6P1/PPr4P/1K1R3R b - - bm Rc1 ; id WAC.237 R-
c6,Score:-1.75
1k1r4/pp1r1pp1/4n1p1/2R5/2Pp1qP1/3P2QP/P4PB1/1R4K1 w - - bm Bxb7; id
WAC.238 Q-f4,Score:0.65
8/6k1/5pp1/Q6p/5P2/6PK/P4q1P/8 b - - bm Qf1 ; id WAC.239 Q-f1,Score:
0.35
2b4k/p1b2p2/2p2q2/3p1PNp/3P2R1/3B4/P1Q2PKP/4r3 w - - bm Qxc6; id WAC.
240 Q-c6,Score:1.79
2rq1rk1/pp3ppp/2n2b2/4NR2/3P4/PB5Q/1P4PP/3R2K1 w - - bm Qxh7 ; id WAC.
241 B-f7,Score:2.33
r1b1r1k1/pp1nqp2/2p1p1pp/8/4N3/P1Q1P3/1P3PPP/1BRR2K1 w - - bm Rxd7; id
WAC.242 N-d6,Score:3.14
1r3r1k/3p4/1p1Nn1R1/4Pp1q/pP3P1p/P7/5Q1P/6RK w - - bm Qe2; id WAC.243
Q-f1,Score:4.85
r6r/pp3ppp/3k1b2/2pb4/B4Pq1/2P1Q3/P5PP/1RBR2K1 w - - bm Qxc5 ; id WAC.
244 R-d5,Score:3.92
4rrn1/ppq3bk/3pPnpp/2p5/2PB4/2NQ1RPB/PP5P/5R1K w - - bm Qxg6 ; id WAC.
245 B-f6,Score:3.87
6R1/4qp1p/ppr1n1pk/8/1P2P1QP/6N1/P4PP1/6K1 w - - bm Qh5 ; id WAC.246 P-
e5,Score:4.93
2k1r3/1p2Bq2/p2Qp3/Pb1p1p1P/2pP1P2/2P5/2P2KP1/1R6 w - - bm Rxb5; id
WAC.247 B-g5,Score:0.91
5r1k/1p4pp/3q4/3Pp1R1/8/8/PP4PP/4Q1K1 b - - bm Qc5 ; id WAC.248 Q-
c5,Score:-0.71
r4rk1/pbq2pp1/1ppbpn1p/8/2PP4/1P1Q1N2/PBB2PPP/R3R1K1 w - - bm c5 d5;
id WAC.249 N-e5,Score:1.2
1b5k/7P/p1p2np1/2P2p2/PP3P2/4RQ1R/q2r3P/6K1 w - - bm Re8 ; id WAC.250
Q-g3,Score:0.67
k7/p4p2/P1q1b1p1/3p3p/3Q4/7P/5PP1/1R4K1 w - - bm Qe5 Qf4; id WAC.251 R-
b7,Score:2.81
1rb1r1k1/p1p2ppp/5n2/2pP4/5P2/2QB4/qNP3PP/2KRB2R b - - bm Re2; id WAC.
252 N-d5,Score:4.71
k5r1/p4b2/2P5/5p2/3P1P2/4QBrq/P5P1/4R1K1 w - - bm Qe8 ; id WAC.253 K-
f1,Score:-2.93
r6k/pp3p1p/2p1bp1q/b3p3/4Pnr1/2PP2NP/PP1Q1PPN/R2B2RK b - - bm Nxh3; id
WAC.254 N-h3,Score:1.8
3r3r/p4pk1/5Rp1/3q4/1p1P2RQ/5N2/P1P4P/2b4K w - - bm Rfxg6 ; id WAC.255
R-g6,Score:-2.15
3r1rk1/1pb1qp1p/2p3p1/p7/P2Np2R/1P5P/1BP2PP1/3Q1BK1 w - - bm Nf5; id
WAC.256 Q-g4,Score:1.43
4r1k1/pq3p1p/2p1r1p1/2Q1p3/3nN1P1/1P6/P1P2P1P/3RR1K1 w - - bm Rxd4; id
WAC.257 R-d4,Score:4.5
r3brkn/1p5p/2p2Ppq/2Pp3B/3Pp2Q/4P1R1/6PP/5R1K w - - bm Bxg6; id WAC.
258 R-b1,Score:-0.6
r1bq1rk1/ppp2ppp/2np4/2bN1PN1/2B1P3/3p4/PPP2nPP/R1BQ1K1R w - - bm Qh5;
id WAC.259 Q-d3,Score:-4.71
2r2b1r/p1Nk2pp/3p1p2/N2Qn3/4P3/q6P/P4PP1/1R3K1R w - - bm Qe6 ; id WAC.
260 N-e6,Score:2.66
r5k1/1bp3pp/p2p4/1p6/5p2/1PBP1nqP/1PP3Q1/R4R1K b - - bm Nd4; id WAC.
261 N-d4,Score:9.95
6k1/p1B1b2p/2b3r1/2p5/4p3/1PP1N1Pq/P2R1P2/3Q2K1 b - - bm Rh6; id WAC.
262 R-h6,Score:-0.41
rnbqr2k/pppp1Qpp/8/b2NN3/2B1n3/8/PPPP1PPP/R1B1K2R w KQ - bm Qg8 ; id
WAC.263 Q-h5,Score:2.5
r2r2k1/1R2qp2/p5pp/2P5/b1PN1b2/P7/1Q3PPP/1B1R2K1 b - - bm Rab8; id WAC.
264 Q-e5,Score:2.53
2r1k2r/2pn1pp1/1p3n1p/p3PP2/4q2B/P1P5/2Q1N1PP/R4RK1 w k - bm exf6; id
WAC.265 Q-e4,Score:0.99
r3q2r/2p1k1p1/p5p1/1p2Nb2/1P2nB2/P7/2PNQbPP/R2R3K b - - bm Rxh2 ; id
WAC.266 N-c3,Score:-4.72
2r1kb1r/pp3ppp/2n1b3/1q1N2B1/1P2Q3/8/P4PPP/3RK1NR w Kk - bm Nc7 ; id
WAC.267 P-a3,Score:0.0
2r3kr/ppp2n1p/7B/5q1N/1bp5/2Pp4/PP2RPPP/R2Q2K1 w - - bm Re8 ; id WAC.
268 R-e3,Score:0.41
2kr2nr/pp1n1ppp/2p1p3/q7/1b1P1B2/P1N2Q1P/1PP1BPP1/R3K2R w KQ - bm
axb4; id WAC.269 K-g1,Score:2.87
2r1r1k1/pp1q1ppp/3p1b2/3P4/3Q4/5N2/PP2RPPP/4R1K1 w - - bm Qg4; id WAC.
270 Q-d3,Score:1.13
2kr4/ppp3Pp/4RP1B/2r5/5P2/1P6/P2p4/3K4 w - - bm Rd6; id WAC.271 B-
g5,Score:-0.69
nrq4r/2k1p3/1p1pPnp1/pRpP1p2/P1P2P2/2P1BB2/1R2Q1P1/6K1 w - - bm Bxc5;
id WAC.272 P-g4,Score:3.7
2k4B/bpp1qp2/p1b5/7p/1PN1n1p1/2Pr4/P5PP/R3QR1K b - - bm Ng3 g3; id WAC.
273 Q-e6,Score:1.32
8/1p6/p5R1/k7/Prpp4/K7/1NP5/8 w - - bm Rb6; id WAC.274 R-b6,Score:
2.15
r1b2rk1/1p1n1ppp/p1p2q2/4p3/P1B1Pn2/1QN2N2/1P3PPP/3R1RK1 b - - bm Nxg2
b5 Nc5; id WAC.275 N-c5,Score:-0.13
r5k1/pp1RR1pp/1b6/6r1/2p5/B6P/P4qPK/3Q4 w - - bm Qd5 ; id WAC.276 R-
g7,Score:-4.71
1r4r1/p2kb2p/bq2p3/3p1p2/5P2/2BB3Q/PP4PP/3RKR2 b - - bm Rg3 Rxg2; id
WAC.277 B-d3,Score:0.07
r2qkb1r/pppb2pp/2np1n2/5pN1/2BQP3/2N5/PPP2PPP/R1B1K2R w KQkq - bm
Bf7 ; id WAC.278 B-f7,Score:5.09
r7/4b3/2p1r1k1/1p1pPp1q/1P1P1P1p/PR2NRpP/2Q3K1/8 w - - bm Nxf5 Rc3; id
WAC.279 R-c3,Score:1.42
r1r2bk1/5p1p/pn4p1/N2b4/3Pp3/B3P3/2q1BPPP/RQ3RK1 b - - bm Bxa3; id WAC.
280 B-a3,Score:1.07
2R5/2R4p/5p1k/6n1/8/1P2QPPq/r7/6K1 w - - bm Rxh7 ; id WAC.281 R-
c2,Score:1.89
6k1/2p3p1/1p1p1nN1/1B1P4/4PK2/8/2r3b1/7R w - - bm Rh8 ; id WAC.282 R-
h8,Score:-3.82
3q1rk1/4bp1p/1n2P2Q/3p1p2/6r1/Pp2R2N/1B4PP/7K w - - bm Ng5; id WAC.283
R-b3,Score:-2.82
3r3k/pp4pp/8/1P6/3N4/Pn2P1qb/1B1Q2B1/2R3K1 w - - bm Nf5; id WAC.284 Q-
f2,Score:-3.59
2rr3k/1b2bppP/p2p1n2/R7/3P4/1qB2P2/1P4Q1/1K5R w - - bm Qxg7 ; id WAC.
285 R-a3,Score:-6.93
3r1k2/1p6/p4P2/2pP2Qb/8/1P1KB3/P6r/8 b - - bm Rxd5 ; id WAC.286 B-
e2,Score:-0.79
rn3k1r/pp2bBpp/2p2n2/q5N1/3P4/1P6/P1P3PP/R1BQ1RK1 w - - bm Qh5 Qg4; id
WAC.287 B-d2,Score:3.77
r1b2rk1/p4ppp/1p1Qp3/4P2N/1P6/8/P3qPPP/3R1RK1 w - - bm Nf6 ; id WAC.
288 N-f4,Score:1.13
2r3k1/5p1p/p3q1p1/2n3P1/1p1QP2P/1P4N1/PK6/2R5 b - - bm Qe5; id WAC.289
Q-e5,Score:3.57
2k2r2/2p5/1pq5/p1p1n3/P1P2n1B/1R4Pp/2QR4/6K1 b - - bm Ne2 ; id WAC.290
N-g2,Score:2.79
5r1k/3b2p1/p6p/1pRpR3/1P1P2q1/P4pP1/5QnP/1B4K1 w - - bm h3; id WAC.291
B-a2,Score:1.65
4r3/1Q1qk2p/p4pp1/3Pb3/P7/6PP/5P2/4R1K1 w - - bm d6 ; id WAC.292 R-
b1,Score:-1.37
1nbq1r1k/3rbp1p/p1p1pp1Q/1p6/P1pPN3/5NP1/1P2PPBP/R4RK1 w - - bm Nfg5;
id WAC.293 N-c3,Score:2.48
3r3k/1r3p1p/p1pB1p2/8/p1qNP1Q1/P6P/1P4P1/3R3K w - - bm Bf8 Nf5 Qf4; id
WAC.294 P-e5,Score:4.31
4r3/p4r1p/R1p2pp1/1p1bk3/4pNPP/2P1K3/2P2P2/3R4 w - - bm Rxd5 ; id WAC.
295 N-d5,Score:3.79
3r4/1p2k2p/p1b1p1p1/4Q1Pn/2B3KP/4pP2/PP2R1N1/6q1 b - - bm Rd4 Rf8; id
WAC.296 B-d5,Score:0.68
3r1rk1/p3qp1p/2bb2p1/2p5/3P4/1P6/PBQN1PPP/2R2RK1 b - - bm Bxg2 Bxh2 ;
id WAC.297 Q-e2,Score:-0.38
3Q4/p3b1k1/2p2rPp/2q5/4B3/P2P4/7P/6RK w - - bm Qh8 ; id WAC.298 Q-
e8,Score:2.89
1n2rr2/1pk3pp/pNn2p2/2N1p3/8/6P1/PP2PPKP/2RR4 w - - bm Nca4; id WAC.
299 N-d7,Score:3.7
b2b1r1k/3R1ppp/4qP2/4p1PQ/4P3/5B2/4N1K1/8 w - - bm g6; id WAC.300 P-
g7,Score:0.81
Bye
Sanny
Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
| | |
Date: 22 Aug 2008 22:08:35
From: Sanny
Subject: Re: GetClub Updated Results.
|
In first 100 Positions I found 44 out of 100 were correct.
So The improvement made it 44% correct. Up from 39% previously.
So the new improvement is in correct direction. But I find it missed a
few Mate in 3/ 4. I will see more games and if the error persist
remove the new modifications.
Beginner: 44% correct result How good is this result?
Bye
Sanny
Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
| | |
Date: 22 Aug 2008 21:58:21
From: Sanny
Subject: Re: GetClub Updated Results.
|
In first 100 Positions I found 44 out of 100 were correct.
So The improvement made it 44% correct. Up from 30% previously.
I will count the old record too and see if the improvement is positive
or negative.
If the improvement is negative I will replace the new modifications
with old once.
Bye
Sanny
Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
| | |
Date: 22 Aug 2008 12:39:59
From: Guest
Subject: Re: GetClub Updated Results.
|
"Sanny" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>A few things were changed at GetClub.
>
> Here us the result after Changes. I am not clear that the
> modifications are good or bad as for some positions it gave correct
> move while for others it gave wrong result.
You tell whether a modification is good or bad by the overall results. By:
1) playing lots of tests games and comparing the total wins / loss / draws.
2) You run lots of test positions and you go for the higher number of solved
positions without making any blunders.
I'm only looking at the first 20 positions at the moment...
I know I said that I was okay with GC's results for the beginner level, but
I after sleeping on it, I really should modify that statement a little.
You shouldn't be missing any mate-in-2 positions. None.
I can accept that a beginner wouldn't be able to find a mate in 5 or mate in
7, etc. I don't mind a beginner level in a program missing those.
A mate in 3 or 4... I don't know... Might be okay if it's a complicated
position.
But a mate-in-2 definetly should not be missed.
You really need to fix that because it shows some serious issues with your
program's tactical abilities.
There are four mate-in-2's in just the first 20 positions and you are only
getting two of them.
You are also getting the mate-in-4, but the score shows it doesn't know it.
I think I can live with that for a beginner level.
But I think you should fix the mate in two problems.
The best positional play in the world doesn't mean anything if you miss
major tactical issues. After all, checkmating your opponent is the object
of the game.
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| |
Date: 20 Aug 2008 04:56:39
From: Sanny
Subject: Beginner Level Results
|
I played 300 Postions from WAC and I am writing below the Move played
by GetClub along with Score given by GetClub to that move.
Please analyze and tell what do you think about the below results.
For each Test Position Best Move by GetClub Beginner Level along with
score is written.
-----------------------------
For Example:
8/7p/5k2/5p2/p1p2P2/Pr1pPK2/1P1R3P/8 b - - bm Rxb2; id WAC.002 P-
c3,Score:1.84
It means WAC says best move is Rxb2 But Beginner Level played P-c3 and
it gives an advantage of 1.84 to its move.
---------------------------
If Score is +ve it means GetClub thinks its position is strong and if
Score is -ve GetClub thinks its position is weak.
After you see the result for each position I will test the Easy Level
also.
It took me 2 hours to test all 300 moves through automation.
It will take 8-10 hours for Easy Level Testing.
The score is better than what I predicted. I was thinking none of them
will match but I find 20% moves are correct while other 80% are not
Matching for Beginner Level.
If I get good suggestions from you I will try the Easy Level. Let me
know if the Scores given by GetClub for its move is correct or not.
Beginner: 15-20 sec / move [Test done in 2 hours.]
Easy: 1-2 min / move [Test will need 8-10 hours]
GETCLUB BEGINNER LEVEL RESULTS.
-----------------------------------------------------
2rr3k/pp3pp1/1nnqbN1p/3pN3/2pP4/2P3Q1/PPB4P/R4RK1 w - - bm Qg6; id WAC.
001 Q-g6,Score:87.65
8/7p/5k2/5p2/p1p2P2/Pr1pPK2/1P1R3P/8 b - - bm Rxb2; id WAC.002 P-
c3,Score:1.84
5rk1/1ppb3p/p1pb4/6q1/3P1p1r/2P1R2P/PP1BQ1P1/5RKN w - - bm Rg3; id WAC.
003 Q-c4,Score:-1.11
r1bq2rk/pp3pbp/2p1p1pQ/7P/3P4/2PB1N2/PP3PPR/2KR4 w - - bm Qxh7 ; id
WAC.004 Q-e3,Score:2.53
5k2/6pp/p1qN4/1p1p4/3P4/2PKP2Q/PP3r2/3R4 b - - bm Qc4 ; id WAC.005 Q-
d6,Score:2.47
7k/p7/1R5K/6r1/6p1/6P1/8/8 w - - bm Rb7; id WAC.006 R-b7,Score:
5.1
rnbqkb1r/pppp1ppp/8/4P3/6n1/7P/PPPNPPP1/R1BQKBNR b KQkq - bm Ne3; id
WAC.007 Q-h4,Score:-1.27
r4q1k/p2bR1rp/2p2Q1N/5p2/5p2/2P5/PP3PPP/R5K1 w - - bm Rf7; id WAC.008
R-f7,Score:10.92
3q1rk1/p4pp1/2pb3p/3p4/6Pr/1PNQ4/P1PB1PP1/4RRK1 b - - bm Bh2 ; id WAC.
009 Q-b6,Score:-2.73
2br2k1/2q3rn/p2NppQ1/2p1P3/Pp5R/4P3/1P3PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Rxh7; id WAC.
010 R-h7,Score:4.47
r1b1kb1r/3q1ppp/pBp1pn2/8/Np3P2/5B2/PPP3PP/R2Q1RK1 w kq - bm Bxc6; id
WAC.011 R-e1,Score:1.58
4k1r1/2p3r1/1pR1p3/3pP2p/3P2qP/P4N2/1PQ4P/5R1K b - - bm Qxf3 ; id WAC.
012 R-f8,Score:-4.04
5rk1/pp4p1/2n1p2p/2Npq3/2p5/6P1/P3P1BP/R4Q1K w - - bm Qxf8 ; id WAC.
013 B-f3,Score:-1.78
r2rb1k1/pp1q1p1p/2n1p1p1/2bp4/5P2/PP1BPR1Q/1BPN2PP/R5K1 w - - bm
Qxh7 ; id WAC.014 B-f6,Score:2.45
1R6/1brk2p1/4p2p/p1P1Pp2/P7/6P1/1P4P1/2R3K1 w - - bm Rxb7; id WAC.015
R-b7,Score:5.82
r4rk1/ppp2ppp/2n5/2bqp3/8/P2PB3/1PP1NPPP/R2Q1RK1 w - - bm Nc3; id WAC.
016 N-c3,Score:2.75
1k5r/pppbn1pp/4q1r1/1P3p2/2NPp3/1QP5/P4PPP/R1B1R1K1 w - - bm Ne5; id
WAC.017 B-f4,Score:-0.42
R7/P4k2/8/8/8/8/r7/6K1 w - - bm Rh8; id WAC.018 K-f1,Score:2.35
r1b2rk1/ppbn1ppp/4p3/1QP4q/3P4/N4N2/5PPP/R1B2RK1 w - - bm c6; id WAC.
019 B-e3,Score:0.24
r2qkb1r/1ppb1ppp/p7/4p3/P1Q1P3/2P5/5PPP/R1B2KNR b kq - bm Bb5; id WAC.
020 B-b5,Score:9.75
5rk1/1b3p1p/pp3p2/3n1N2/1P6/P1qB1PP1/3Q3P/4R1K1 w - - bm Qh6; id WAC.
021 Q-c3,Score:2.46
r1bqk2r/ppp1nppp/4p3/n5N1/2BPp3/P1P5/2P2PPP/R1BQK2R w KQkq - bm Ba2
Nxf7; id WAC.022 B-a2,Score:0.08
r3nrk1/2p2p1p/p1p1b1p1/2NpPq2/3R4/P1N1Q3/1PP2PPP/4R1K1 w - - bm g4; id
WAC.023 Q-c1,Score:3.59
6k1/1b1nqpbp/pp4p1/5P2/1PN5/4Q3/P5PP/1B2B1K1 b - - bm Bd4; id WAC.024
B-d4,Score:7.01
3R1rk1/8/5Qpp/2p5/2P1p1q1/P3P3/1P2PK2/8 b - - bm Qh4 ; id WAC.025 Q-
h4,Score:11.3
3r2k1/1p1b1pp1/pq5p/8/3NR3/2PQ3P/PP3PP1/6K1 b - - bm Bf5; id WAC.026 Q-
b2,Score:-0.15
7k/pp4np/2p3p1/3pN1q1/3P4/Q7/1r3rPP/2R2RK1 w - - bm Qf8 ; id WAC.027 N-
f7,Score:-3.79
1r1r2k1/4pp1p/2p1b1p1/p3R3/RqBP4/4P3/1PQ2PPP/6K1 b - - bm Qe1 ; id WAC.
028 Q-e1,Score:2.6
r2q2k1/pp1rbppp/4pn2/2P5/1P3B2/6P1/P3QPBP/1R3RK1 w - - bm c6; id WAC.
029 P-c6,Score:3.12
1r3r2/4q1kp/b1pp2p1/5p2/pPn1N3/6P1/P3PPBP/2QRR1K1 w - - bm Nxd6; id
WAC.030 N-d6,Score:1.91
rb3qk1/pQ3ppp/4p3/3P4/8/1P3N2/1P3PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Qxa8 d6 dxe6 g3;
id WAC.031 P-e6,Score:7.2
6k1/p4p1p/1p3np1/2q5/4p3/4P1N1/PP3PPP/3Q2K1 w - - bm Qd8 ; id WAC.032
Q-d8,Score:2.75
8/p1q2pkp/2Pr2p1/8/P3Q3/6P1/5P1P/2R3K1 w - - bm Qe5 Qf4; id WAC.033 Q-
e8,Score:2.63
7k/1b1r2p1/p6p/1p2qN2/3bP3/3Q4/P5PP/1B1R3K b - - bm Bg1; id WAC.034 K-
g8,Score:-2.61
r3r2k/2R3pp/pp1q1p2/8/3P3R/7P/PP3PP1/3Q2K1 w - - bm Rxh7 ; id WAC.035
Q-b1,Score:2.34
3r4/2p1rk2/1pQq1pp1/7p/1P1P4/P4P2/6PP/R1R3K1 b - - bm Re1 ; id WAC.036
R-e1,Score:1.96
2r5/2rk2pp/1pn1pb2/pN1p4/P2P4/1N2B3/nPR1KPPP/3R4 b - - bm Nxd4 ; id
WAC.037 R-b7,Score:-1.48
4k3/p4prp/1p6/2b5/8/2Q3P1/P2R1PKP/4q3 w - - bm Rd8 Qd3; id WAC.038 R-
d8,Score:1.17
r1br2k1/pp2bppp/2nppn2/8/2P1PB2/2N2P2/PqN1B1PP/R2Q1R1K w - - bm Na4;
id WAC.039 N-a4,Score:0.62
3r1r1k/1p4pp/p4p2/8/1PQR4/6Pq/P3PP2/2R3K1 b - - bm Rc8; id WAC.040 R-
d4,Score:1.41
1k6/5RP1/1P6/1K6/6r1/8/8/8 w - - bm Ka5 Kc5 b7; id WAC.041 P-b7,Score:
5.91
r1b1r1k1/pp1n1pbp/1qp3p1/3p4/1B1P4/Q3PN2/PP2BPPP/R4RK1 w - - bm Ba5;
id WAC.042 B-a5,Score:3.11
r2q3k/p2P3p/1p3p2/3QP1r1/8/B7/P5PP/2R3K1 w - - bm Be7 Qxa8; id WAC.043
B-e7,Score:3.89
3rb1k1/pq3pbp/4n1p1/3p4/2N5/2P2QB1/PP3PPP/1B1R2K1 b - - bm dxc4; id
WAC.044 B-c6,Score:-2.18
7k/2p1b1pp/8/1p2P3/1P3r2/2P3Q1/1P5P/R4qBK b - - bm Qxa1; id WAC.045 Q-
a1,Score:5.85
r1bqr1k1/pp1nb1p1/4p2p/3p1p2/3P4/P1N1PNP1/1PQ2PP1/3RKB1R w K - bm Nb5;
id WAC.046 B-d3,Score:1.95
r1b2rk1/pp2bppp/2n1pn2/q5B1/2BP4/2N2N2/PP2QPPP/2R2RK1 b - - bm Nxd4;
id WAC.047 N-d4,Score:-1.37
1rbq1rk1/p1p1bppp/2p2n2/8/Q1BP4/2N5/PP3PPP/R1B2RK1 b - - bm Rb4; id
WAC.048 P-c5,Score:-1.07
2b3k1/4rrpp/p2p4/2pP2RQ/1pP1Pp1N/1P3P1P/1q6/6RK w - - bm Qxh7 ; id WAC.
049 Q-h6,Score:0.12
k4r2/1R4pb/1pQp1n1p/3P4/5p1P/3P2P1/r1q1R2K/8 w - - bm Rxb6 ; id WAC.
050 R-c2,Score:-2.54
r1bq1r2/pp4k1/4p2p/3pPp1Q/3N1R1P/2PB4/6P1/6K1 w - - bm Rg4 ; id WAC.
051 P-g4,Score:0.97
r1k5/1p3q2/1Qpb4/3N1p2/5Pp1/3P2Pp/PPPK3P/4R3 w - - bm Re7 c4; id WAC.
052 P-c4,Score:1.71
6k1/6p1/p7/3Pn3/5p2/4rBqP/P4RP1/5QK1 b - - bm Re1; id WAC.053 P-
a5,Score:2.26
r3kr2/1pp4p/1p1p4/7q/4P1n1/2PP2Q1/PP4P1/R1BB2K1 b q - bm Qh1 ; id WAC.
054 R-g8,Score:-0.56
r3r1k1/pp1q1pp1/4b1p1/3p2B1/3Q1R2/8/PPP3PP/4R1K1 w - - bm Qxg7 ; id
WAC.055 Q-e5,Score:1.43
r1bqk2r/pppp1ppp/5n2/2b1n3/4P3/1BP3Q1/PP3PPP/RNB1K1NR b KQkq - bm
Bxf2 ; id WAC.056 Q-e7,Score:1.0
r3q1kr/ppp5/3p2pQ/8/3PP1b1/5R2/PPP3P1/5RK1 w - - bm Rf8 ; id WAC.057 R-
f8,Score:88.69
8/8/2R5/1p2qp1k/1P2r3/2PQ2P1/5K2/8 w - - bm Qd1 ; id WAC.058 Q-
f3,Score:6.36
r1b2rk1/2p1qnbp/p1pp2p1/5p2/2PQP3/1PN2N1P/PB3PP1/3R1RK1 w - - bm Nd5;
id WAC.059 N-d5,Score:8.11
rn1qr1k1/1p2np2/2p3p1/8/1pPb4/7Q/PB1P1PP1/2KR1B1R w - - bm Qh8 ; id
WAC.060 Q-h7,Score:85.37
3qrbk1/ppp1r2n/3pP2p/3P4/2P4P/1P3Q2/PB6/R4R1K w - - bm Qf7 ; id WAC.
061 Q-g2,Score:4.43
6r1/3Pn1qk/p1p1P1rp/2Q2p2/2P5/1P4P1/P3R2P/5RK1 b - - bm Rxg3 ; id WAC.
062 R-g4,Score:-4.66
r1brnbk1/ppq2pp1/4p2p/4N3/3P4/P1PB1Q2/3B1PPP/R3R1K1 w - - bm Nxf7; id
WAC.063 Q-e3,Score:2.97
8/6pp/3q1p2/3n1k2/1P6/3NQ2P/5PP1/6K1 w - - bm g4 ; id WAC.064 P-
g4,Score:92.65
1r1r1qk1/p2n1p1p/bp1Pn1pQ/2pNp3/2P2P1N/1P5B/P6P/3R1RK1 w - - bm Ne7 ;
id WAC.065 N-e7,Score:11.46
1k1r2r1/ppq5/1bp4p/3pQ3/8/2P2N2/PP4P1/R4R1K b - - bm Qxe5; id WAC.066
R-g3,Score:3.23
3r2k1/p2q4/1p4p1/3rRp1p/5P1P/6PK/P3R3/3Q4 w - - bm Rxd5; id WAC.067 R-
d5,Score:2.52
6k1/5ppp/1q6/2b5/8/2R1pPP1/1P2Q2P/7K w - - bm Qxe3; id WAC.068 Q-
e3,Score:6.47
2k5/pppr4/4R3/4Q3/2pp2q1/8/PPP2PPP/6K1 w - - bm f3 h3; id WAC.069 P-
f3,Score:2.59
2kr3r/pppq1ppp/3p1n2/bQ2p3/1n1PP3/1PN1BN1P/1PP2PP1/2KR3R b - - bm
Na2 ; id WAC.070 N-a2,Score:4.26
2kr3r/pp1q1ppp/5n2/1Nb5/2Pp1B2/7Q/P4PPP/1R3RK1 w - - bm Nxa7 ; id WAC.
071 Q-b3,Score:0.29
r3r1k1/pp1n1ppp/2p5/4Pb2/2B2P2/B1P5/P5PP/R2R2K1 w - - bm e6; id WAC.
072 P-e6,Score:2.55
r1q3rk/1ppbb1p1/4Np1p/p3pP2/P3P3/2N4R/1PP1Q1PP/3R2K1 w - - bm Qd2; id
WAC.073 N-d5,Score:0.47
5r1k/pp4pp/2p5/2b1P3/4Pq2/1PB1p3/P3Q1PP/3N2K1 b - - bm Qf1 ; id WAC.
074 Q-e4,Score:5.82
r3r1k1/pppq1ppp/8/8/1Q4n1/7P/PPP2PP1/RNB1R1K1 b - - bm Qd6; id WAC.075
Q-d4,Score:-2.52
r1b1qrk1/2p2ppp/pb1pnn2/1p2pNB1/3PP3/1BP5/PP2QPPP/RN1R2K1 w - - bm
Bxf6; id WAC.076 B-f6,Score:4.2
3r2k1/ppp2ppp/6q1/b4n2/3nQB2/2p5/P4PPP/RN3RK1 b - - bm Ng3; id WAC.077
N-g3,Score:7.24
r2q3r/ppp2k2/4nbp1/5Q1p/2P1NB2/8/PP3P1P/3RR1K1 w - - bm Ng5 ; id WAC.
078 R-d8,Score:5.48
r3k2r/pbp2pp1/3b1n2/1p6/3P3p/1B2N1Pq/PP1PQP1P/R1B2RK1 b kq - bm Qxh2 ;
id WAC.079 P-g3,Score:1.99
r4rk1/p1B1bpp1/1p2pn1p/8/2PP4/3B1P2/qP2QP1P/3R1RK1 w - - bm Ra1; id
WAC.080 P-d5,Score:1.93
r4rk1/1bR1bppp/4pn2/1p2N3/1P6/P3P3/4BPPP/3R2K1 b - - bm Bd6; id WAC.
081 B-g2,Score:0.18
3rr1k1/pp3pp1/4b3/8/2P1B2R/6QP/P3q1P1/5R1K w - - bm Bh7 ; id WAC.082 B-
h7,Score:1.67
3rr1k1/ppqbRppp/2p5/8/3Q1n2/2P3N1/PPB2PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Qxd7; id WAC.
083 Q-d7,Score:8.01
r2q1r1k/2p1b1pp/p1n5/1p1Q1bN1/4n3/1BP1B3/PP3PPP/R4RK1 w - - bm Qg8 ;
id WAC.084 N-e4,Score:2.13
kr2R3/p4r2/2pq4/2N2p1p/3P2p1/Q5P1/5P1P/5BK1 w - - bm Na6; id WAC.085 Q-
e3,Score:2.89
8/p7/1ppk1n2/5ppp/P1PP4/2P1K1P1/5N1P/8 b - - bm Ng4 ; id WAC.086 P-
a6,Score:0.95
8/p3k1p1/4r3/2ppNpp1/PP1P4/2P3KP/5P2/8 b - - bm Rxe5; id WAC.087 P-
b4,Score:3.1
r6k/p1Q4p/2p1b1rq/4p3/B3P3/4P3/PPP3P1/4RRK1 b - - bm Rxg2 ; id WAC.088
Q-g5,Score:-0.88
1r3b1k/p4rpp/4pp2/3q4/2ppbPPQ/6RK/PP5P/2B1NR2 b - - bm g5; id WAC.089
P-c3,Score:7.87
3qrrk1/1pp2pp1/1p2bn1p/5N2/2P5/P1P3B1/1P4PP/2Q1RRK1 w - - bm Nxg7; id
WAC.090 R-f4,Score:1.69
2qr2k1/4b1p1/2p2p1p/1pP1p3/p2nP3/PbQNB1PP/1P3PK1/4RB2 b - - bm Be6; id
WAC.091 B-e6,Score:1.44
r4rk1/1p2ppbp/p2pbnp1/q7/3BPPP1/2N2B2/PPP4P/R2Q1RK1 b - - bm Bxg4; id
WAC.092 Q-c7,Score:0.28
r1b1k1nr/pp3pQp/4pq2/3pn3/8/P1P5/2P2PPP/R1B1KBNR w KQkq - bm Bh6; id
WAC.093 B-b5,Score:-1.12
8/k7/p7/3Qp2P/n1P5/3KP3/1q6/8 b - - bm e4 ; id WAC.094 Q-b3,Score:
3.45
2r5/1r6/4pNpk/3pP1qp/8/2P1QP2/5PK1/R7 w - - bm Ng4 ; id WAC.095 Q-
g5,Score:-1.77
r1b4k/ppp2Bb1/6Pp/3pP3/1qnP1p1Q/8/PPP3P1/1K1R3R w - - bm Qd8 ; id WAC.
096 Q-d8,Score:4.47
6k1/5p2/p5np/4B3/3P4/1PP1q3/P3r1QP/6RK w - - bm Qa8 ; id WAC.097 Q-
c6,Score:3.97
1r3rk1/5pb1/p2p2p1/Q1n1q2p/1NP1P3/3p1P1B/PP1R3P/1K2R3 b - - bm Nxe4;
id WAC.098 N-e4,Score:3.83
r1bq1r1k/1pp1Np1p/p2p2pQ/4R3/n7/8/PPPP1PPP/R1B3K1 w - - bm Rh5; id WAC.
099 R-h5,Score:89.5
8/k1b5/P4p2/1Pp2p1p/K1P2P1P/8/3B4/8 w - - bm b6 Be3; id WAC.100 K-
b3,Score:2.78
5rk1/p5pp/8/8/2Pbp3/1P4P1/7P/4RN1K b - - bm Bc3; id WAC.101 P-e3,Score:
0.05
2Q2n2/2R4p/1p1qpp1k/8/3P3P/3B2P1/5PK1/r7 w - - bm Qxf8 ; id WAC.102 R-
f7,Score:6.07
6k1/2pb1r1p/3p1PpQ/p1nPp3/1q2P3/2N2P2/PrB5/2K3RR w - - bm Qxg6 ; id
WAC.103 R-g6,Score:-0.71
b4r1k/pq2rp2/1p1bpn1p/3PN2n/2P2P2/P2B3K/1B2Q2N/3R2R1 w - - bm Qxh5; id
WAC.104 Q-h5,Score:14.53
r2r2k1/pb3ppp/1p1bp3/7q/3n2nP/PP1B2P1/1B1N1P2/RQ2NRK1 b - - bm Qxh4
Bxg3; id WAC.105 Q-h4,Score:6.8
4rrk1/pppb4/7p/3P2pq/3Qn3/P5P1/1PP4P/R3RNNK b - - bm Nf2 ; id WAC.106
N-f2,Score:0.73
5n2/pRrk2p1/P4p1p/4p3/3N4/5P2/6PP/6K1 w - - bm Nb5; id WAC.107 N-
b5,Score:2.51
r5k1/1q4pp/2p5/p1Q5/2P5/5R2/4RKPP/r7 w - - bm Qe5; id WAC.108 R-
e7,Score:1.26
rn2k1nr/pbp2ppp/3q4/1p2N3/2p5/QP6/PB1PPPPP/R3KB1R b KQkq - bm c3; id
WAC.109 N-f6,Score:-0.74
2kr4/bp3p2/p2p2b1/P7/2q5/1N4B1/1PPQ2P1/2KR4 b - - bm Be3; id WAC.110 R-
e8,Score:0.35
6k1/p5p1/5p2/2P2Q2/3pN2p/3PbK1P/7P/6q1 b - - bm Qf1 ; id WAC.111 Q-
f1,Score:5.25
r4kr1/ppp5/4bq1b/7B/2PR1Q1p/2N3P1/PP3P1P/2K1R3 w - - bm Rxe6; id WAC.
112 R-e6,Score:5.81
rnbqkb1r/1p3ppp/5N2/1p2p1B1/2P5/8/PP2PPPP/R2QKB1R b KQkq - bm Qxf6; id
WAC.113 Q-f6,Score:1.2
r1b1rnk1/1p4pp/p1p2p2/3pN2n/3P1PPq/2NBPR1P/PPQ5/2R3K1 w - - bm Bxh7 ;
id WAC.114 N-c6,Score:2.31
4N2k/5rpp/1Q6/p3q3/8/P5P1/1P3P1P/5K2 w - - bm Nd6; id WAC.115 N-
d6,Score:-0.57
r2r2k1/2p2ppp/p7/1p2P1n1/P6q/5P2/1PB1QP1P/R5RK b - - bm Rd2; id WAC.
116 N-h3,Score:0.83
3r1rk1/q4ppp/p1Rnp3/8/1p6/1N3P2/PP3QPP/3R2K1 b - - bm Ne4; id WAC.117
N-e4,Score:2.35
r5k1/pb2rpp1/1p6/2p4q/5R2/2PB2Q1/P1P3PP/5R1K w - - bm Rh4; id WAC.118
R-f6,Score:0.55
r2qr1k1/p1p2ppp/2p5/2b5/4nPQ1/3B4/PPP3PP/R1B2R1K b - - bm Qxd3; id WAC.
119 N-f2,Score:1.05
r4rk1/1bn2qnp/3p1B1Q/p2P1pP1/1pp5/5N1P/PPB2P2/2KR3R w - - bm g6 Rhg1;
id WAC.120 R-e1,Score:2.55
6k1/5p1p/2bP2pb/4p3/2P5/1p1pNPPP/1P1Q1BK1/1q6 b - - bm Bxf3 ; id WAC.
121 P-e4,Score:4.18
1k6/ppp4p/1n2pq2/1N2Rb2/2P2Q2/8/P4KPP/3r1B2 b - - bm Rxf1 ; id WAC.122
Q-d8,Score:3.29
6k1/1b2rp2/1p4p1/3P4/PQ4P1/2N2q2/5P2/3R2K1 b - - bm Bxd5 Rc7 Re6; id
WAC.123 R-c7,Score:4.23
6k1/3r4/2R5/P5P1/1P4p1/8/4rB2/6K1 b - - bm g3; id WAC.124 R-b2,Score:
0.2
r1bqr1k1/pp3ppp/1bp5/3n4/3B4/2N2P1P/PPP1B1P1/R2Q1RK1 b - - bm Bxd4 ;
id WAC.125 B-d4,Score:3.76
r5r1/pQ5p/1qp2R2/2k1p3/4P3/2PP4/P1P3PP/6K1 w - - bm Rxc6 ; id WAC.126
Q-f7,Score:2.93
2k4r/1pr1n3/p1p1q2p/5pp1/3P1P2/P1P1P3/1R2Q1PP/1RB3K1 w - - bm Rxb7; id
WAC.127 P-g5,Score:2.84
6rk/1pp2Qrp/3p1B2/1pb1p2R/3n1q2/3P4/PPP3PP/R6K w - - bm Qg6; id WAC.
128 Q-g6,Score:1.2
3r1r1k/1b2b1p1/1p5p/2p1Pp2/q1B2P2/4P2P/1BR1Q2K/6R1 b - - bm Bf3; id
WAC.129 B-e4,Score:1.17
6k1/1pp3q1/5r2/1PPp4/3P1pP1/3Qn2P/3B4/4R1K1 b - - bm Qh6 Qh8; id WAC.
130 Q-h8,Score:-0.99
2rq1bk1/p4p1p/1p4p1/3b4/3B1Q2/8/P4PpP/3RR1K1 w - - bm Re8; id WAC.131
Q-e5,Score:-3.19
4r1k1/5bpp/2p5/3pr3/8/1B3pPq/PPR2P2/2R2QK1 b - - bm Re1; id WAC.132 Q-
f1,Score:3.43
r1b1k2r/1pp1q2p/p1n3p1/3QPp2/8/1BP3B1/P5PP/3R1RK1 w kq - bm Bh4; id
WAC.133 R-d3,Score:3.23
3r2k1/p6p/2Q3p1/4q3/2P1p3/P3Pb2/1P3P1P/2K2BR1 b - - bm Rd1 ; id WAC.
134 R-d1,Score:5.85
3r1r1k/N2qn1pp/1p2np2/2p5/2Q1P2N/3P4/PP4PP/3R1RK1 b - - bm Nd4; id WAC.
135 N-d4,Score:2.12
6kr/1q2r1p1/1p2N1Q1/5p2/1P1p4/6R1/7P/2R3K1 w - - bm Rc8 ; id WAC.136 Q-
f5,Score:3.71
3b1rk1/1bq3pp/5pn1/1p2rN2/2p1p3/2P1B2Q/1PB2PPP/R2R2K1 w - - bm Rd7; id
WAC.137 R-d4,Score:0.33
r1bq3r/ppppR1p1/5n1k/3P4/6pP/3Q4/PP1N1PP1/5K1R w - - bm h5; id WAC.138
Q-e3,Score:0.66
rnb3kr/ppp2ppp/1b6/3q4/3pN3/Q4N2/PPP2KPP/R1B1R3 w - - bm Nf6 ; id WAC.
139 Q-e7,Score:-1.15
r2b1rk1/pq4p1/4ppQP/3pB1p1/3P4/2R5/PP3PP1/5RK1 w - - bm Rc7 Bc7; id
WAC.140 R-c7,Score:13.43
4r1k1/p1qr1p2/2pb1Bp1/1p5p/3P1n1R/1B3P2/PP3PK1/2Q4R w - - bm Qxf4; id
WAC.141 K-f1,Score:-1.58
r2q3n/ppp2pk1/3p4/5Pr1/2NP1Qp1/2P2pP1/PP3K2/4R2R w - - bm Re8 f6 ; id
WAC.142 R-h4,Score:3.4
5b2/pp2r1pk/2pp1pRp/4rP1N/2P1P3/1P4QP/P3q1P1/5R1K w - - bm Rxh6 ; id
WAC.143 N-f6,Score:0.97
r2q1rk1/pp3ppp/2p2b2/8/B2pPPb1/7P/PPP1N1P1/R2Q1RK1 b - - bm d3; id WAC.
144 B-e2,Score:2.58
r1bq4/1p4kp/3p1n2/p4pB1/2pQ4/8/1P4PP/4RRK1 w - - bm Re8; id WAC.145 B-
f6,Score:5.67
8/8/2Kp4/3P1B2/2P2k2/5p2/8/8 w - - bm Bc8 Bd3 Bh3; id WAC.146 B-
h3,Score:3.69
r2r2k1/ppqbppbp/2n2np1/2pp4/6P1/1P1PPNNP/PBP2PB1/R2QK2R b KQ - bm
Nxg4; id WAC.147 Q-a5,Score:1.37
2r1k3/6pr/p1nBP3/1p3p1p/2q5/2P5/P1R4P/K2Q2R1 w - - bm Rxg7; id WAC.148
R-g7,Score:3.9
6k1/6p1/2p4p/4Pp2/4b1qP/2Br4/1P2RQPK/8 b - - bm Bxg2; id WAC.149 R-
d7,Score:3.01
r3r1k1/5p2/pQ1b2pB/1p6/4p3/6P1/Pq2BP1P/2R3K1 b - - bm Ba3 Bf8 e3 Be5;
id WAC.150 Q-e2,Score:4.95
8/3b2kp/4p1p1/pr1n4/N1N4P/1P4P1/1K3P2/3R4 w - - bm Nc3; id WAC.151 N-
e5,Score:-0.94
1br2rk1/1pqb1ppp/p3pn2/8/1P6/P1N1PN1P/1B3PP1/1QRR2K1 w - - bm Ne4; id
WAC.152 N-e4,Score:1.61
2r3k1/q4ppp/p3p3/pnNp4/2rP4/2P2P2/4R1PP/2R1Q1K1 b - - bm Nxd4; id WAC.
153 R-c5,Score:2.65
r1b2rk1/2p2ppp/p7/1p6/3P3q/1BP3bP/PP3QP1/RNB1R1K1 w - - bm Qxf7 ; id
WAC.154 B-f7,Score:0.91
5bk1/1rQ4p/5pp1/2pP4/3n1PP1/7P/1q3BB1/4R1K1 w - - bm d6; id WAC.155 Q-
d8,Score:1.94
r1b1qN1k/1pp3p1/p2p3n/4p1B1/8/1BP4Q/PP3KPP/8 w - - bm Qxh6 ; id WAC.
156 N-e6,Score:-3.14
5rk1/p4ppp/2p1b3/3Nq3/4P1n1/1p1B2QP/1PPr2P1/1K2R2R w - - bm Ne7 ; id
WAC.157 N-e7,Score:-3.65
5rk1/n1p1R1bp/p2p4/1qpP1QB1/7P/2P3P1/PP3P2/6K1 w - - bm Rxg7 ; id WAC.
158 Q-e6,Score:2.62
r1b2r2/5P1p/ppn3pk/2p1p1Nq/1bP1PQ2/3P4/PB4BP/1R3RK1 w - - bm Ne6 ; id
WAC.159 B-e5,Score:6.38
qn1kr2r/1pRbb3/pP5p/P2pP1pP/3N1pQ1/3B4/3B1PP1/R5K1 w - - bm Qxd7 ; id
WAC.160 P-e6,Score:8.62
3r3k/3r1P1p/pp1Nn3/2pp4/7Q/6R1/Pq4PP/5RK1 w - - bm Qxd8 ; id WAC.161 N-
e8,Score:0.95
r3kbnr/p4ppp/2p1p3/8/Q1B3b1/2N1B3/PP3PqP/R3K2R w KQkq - bm Bd5; id WAC.
162 B-d5,Score:-0.54
5rk1/2p4p/2p4r/3P4/4p1b1/1Q2NqPp/PP3P1K/R4R2 b - - bm Qg2 ; id WAC.163
P-d5,Score:4.38
8/6pp/4p3/1p1n4/1NbkN1P1/P4P1P/1PR3K1/r7 w - - bm Rxc4 ; id WAC.164 N-
d5,Score:4.52
1r5k/p1p3pp/8/8/4p3/P1P1R3/1P1Q1qr1/2KR4 w - - bm Re2; id WAC.165 Q-
f2,Score:-2.85
r3r1k1/5pp1/p1p4p/2Pp4/8/q1NQP1BP/5PP1/4K2R b K - bm d4; id WAC.166 Q-
c1,Score:2.24
7Q/ppp2q2/3p2k1/P2Ppr1N/1PP5/7R/5rP1/6K1 b - - bm Rxg2 ; id WAC.167 R-
f1,Score:1.27
r3k2r/pb1q1p2/8/2p1pP2/4p1p1/B1P1Q1P1/P1P3K1/R4R2 b kq - bm Qd2 ; id
WAC.168 R-h3,Score:3.24
5rk1/1pp3bp/3p2p1/2PPp3/1P2P3/2Q1B3/4q1PP/R5K1 b - - bm Bh6; id WAC.
169 P-c5,Score:0.13
5r1k/6Rp/1p2p3/p2pBp2/1qnP4/4P3/Q4PPP/6K1 w - - bm Qxc4; id WAC.170 Q-
c4,Score:8.05
2rq4/1b2b1kp/p3p1p1/1p1nNp2/7P/1B2B1Q1/PP3PP1/3R2K1 w - - bm Bh6 ; id
WAC.171 R-d4,Score:1.39
5r1k/p5pp/8/1P1pq3/P1p2nR1/Q7/5BPP/6K1 b - - bm Qe1 ; id WAC.172 N-
e2,Score:5.1
2r1b3/1pp1qrk1/p1n1P1p1/7R/2B1p3/4Q1P1/PP3PP1/3R2K1 w - - bm Qh6 ; id
WAC.173 Q-h6,Score:8.25
2r2rk1/6p1/p3pq1p/1p1b1p2/3P1n2/PP3N2/3N1PPP/1Q2RR1K b - - bm Nxg2; id
WAC.174 R-d8,Score:3.57
r5k1/pppb3p/2np1n2/8/3PqNpP/3Q2P1/PPP5/R4RK1 w - - bm Nh5; id WAC.175
N-h5,Score:1.54
r1bq3r/ppp2pk1/3p1pp1/8/2BbPQ2/2NP2P1/PPP4P/R4R1K b - - bm Rxh2 ; id
WAC.176 K-g8,Score:-0.49
r1b3r1/4qk2/1nn1p1p1/3pPp1P/p4P2/1p3BQN/PKPBN3/3R3R b - - bm Qa3 ; id
WAC.177 N-c4,Score:-0.35
3r2k1/p1rn1p1p/1p2pp2/6q1/3PQNP1/5P2/P1P4R/R5K1 w - - bm Nxe6; id WAC.
178 Q-h7,Score:2.12
r1b2r1k/pp4pp/3p4/3B4/8/1QN3Pn/PP3q1P/R3R2K b - - bm Qg1 ; id WAC.179
B-f5,Score:1.91
r1q2rk1/p3bppb/3p1n1p/2nPp3/1p2P1P1/6NP/PP2QPB1/R1BNK2R b KQ - bm
Nxd5; id WAC.180 N-d5,Score:3.23
r3k2r/2p2p2/p2p1n2/1p2p3/4P2p/1PPPPp1q/1P5P/R1N2QRK b kq - bm Ng4; id
WAC.181 Q-f1,Score:3.23
r1b2rk1/ppqn1p1p/2n1p1p1/2b3N1/2N5/PP1BP3/1B3PPP/R2QK2R w KQ - bm Qh5;
id WAC.182 Q-h5,Score:2.12
1r2k1r1/5p2/b3p3/1p2b1B1/3p3P/3B4/PP2KP2/2R3R1 w - - bm Bf6; id WAC.
183 P-h5,Score:-0.65
4kn2/r4p1r/p3bQ2/q1nNP1Np/1p5P/8/PPP3P1/2KR3R w - - bm Qe7 ; id WAC.
184 N-b4,Score:5.51
1r1rb1k1/2p3pp/p2q1p2/3PpP1Q/Pp1bP2N/1B5R/1P4PP/2B4K w - - bm Qxh7 ;
id WAC.185 Q-f3,Score:-2.65
r5r1/p1q2p1k/1p1R2pB/3pP3/6bQ/2p5/P1P1NPPP/6K1 w - - bm Bf8 ; id WAC.
186 B-g5,Score:2.34
6k1/5p2/p3p3/1p3qp1/2p1Qn2/2P1R3/PP1r1PPP/4R1K1 b - - bm Nh3 ; id WAC.
187 Q-e4,Score:-0.63
3RNbk1/pp3p2/4rQpp/8/1qr5/7P/P4P2/3R2K1 w - - bm Qg7 ; id WAC.188 Q-
f3,Score:-3.13
3r1k2/1ppPR1n1/p2p1rP1/3P3p/4Rp1N/5K2/P1P2P2/8 w - - bm Re8 ; id WAC.
189 K-e2,Score:5.49
8/p2b2kp/1q1p2p1/1P1Pp3/4P3/3B2P1/P2Q3P/2Nn3K b - - bm Bh3; id WAC.190
N-f2,Score:4.19
2r1Rn1k/1p1q2pp/p7/5p2/3P4/1B4P1/P1P1QP1P/6K1 w - - bm Qc4; id WAC.191
Q-c4,Score:86.91
r3k3/ppp2Npp/4Bn2/2b5/1n1pp3/N4P2/PPP3qP/R2QKR2 b Qq - bm Nd3 ; id WAC.
192 P-d3,Score:5.11
5bk1/p4ppp/Qp6/4B3/1P6/Pq2P1P1/2rr1P1P/R4RK1 b - - bm Qxe3; id WAC.193
Q-e3,Score:2.19
5rk1/ppq2ppp/2p5/4bN2/4P3/6Q1/PPP2PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Nh6 ; id WAC.194
P-f4,Score:0.93
3r1rk1/1p3p2/p3pnnp/2p3p1/2P2q2/1P5P/PB2QPPN/3RR1K1 w - - bm g3; id
WAC.195 R-d8,Score:-0.51
rr4k1/p1pq2pp/Q1n1pn2/2bpp3/4P3/2PP1NN1/PP3PPP/R1B1K2R b KQ - bm Nb4;
id WAC.196 R-b6,Score:1.34
7k/1p4p1/7p/3P1n2/4Q3/2P2P2/PP3qRP/7K b - - bm Qf1 ; id WAC.197 Q-
f1,Score:-5.31
2br2k1/ppp2p1p/4p1p1/4P2q/2P1Bn2/2Q5/PP3P1P/4R1RK b - - bm Rd3; id WAC.
198 N-e2,Score:1.27
r1br2k1/pp2nppp/2n5/1B1q4/Q7/4BN2/PP3PPP/2R2RK1 w - - bm Bxc6 Rfd1
Rcd1; id WAC.199 R-c5,Score:1.83
2rqrn1k/pb4pp/1p2pp2/n2P4/2P3N1/P2B2Q1/1B3PPP/2R1R1K1 w - - bm Bxf6;
id WAC.200 P-c5,Score:1.93
2b2r1k/4q2p/3p2pQ/2pBp3/8/6P1/1PP2P1P/R5K1 w - - bm Ra7; id WAC.201 P-
c4,Score:1.47
QR2rq1k/2p3p1/3p1pPp/8/4P3/8/P1r3PP/1R4K1 b - - bm Rxa2; id WAC.202 R-
a2,Score:0.82
r4rk1/5ppp/p3q1n1/2p2NQ1/4n3/P3P3/1B3PPP/1R3RK1 w - - bm Qh6; id WAC.
203 Q-h6,Score:90.51
r1b1qrk1/1p3ppp/p1p5/3Nb3/5N2/P7/1P4PQ/K1R1R3 w - - bm Rxe5; id WAC.
204 N-b6,Score:-0.38
r3rnk1/1pq2bb1/p4p2/3p1Pp1/3B2P1/1NP4R/P1PQB3/2K4R w - - bm Qxg5; id
WAC.205 K-b1,Score:1.11
1Qq5/2P1p1kp/3r1pp1/8/8/7P/p4PP1/2R3K1 b - - bm Rc6; id WAC.206 R-
c6,Score:1.23
r1bq2kr/p1pp1ppp/1pn1p3/4P3/2Pb2Q1/BR6/P4PPP/3K1BNR w - - bm Qxg7 ; id
WAC.207 B-d3,Score:-3.31
3r1bk1/ppq3pp/2p5/2P2Q1B/8/1P4P1/P6P/5RK1 w - - bm Bf7 ; id WAC.208 P-
b4,Score:2.25
4kb1r/2q2p2/r2p4/pppBn1B1/P6P/6Q1/1PP5/2KRR3 w k - bm Rxe5 ; id WAC.
209 P-b5,Score:3.28
3r1rk1/pp1q1ppp/3pn3/2pN4/5PP1/P5PQ/1PP1B3/1K1R4 w - - bm Rh1; id WAC.
210 B-d3,Score:-0.87
r1bqrk2/pp1n1n1p/3p1p2/P1pP1P1Q/2PpP1NP/6R1/2PB4/4RBK1 w - - bm Qxf7 ;
id WAC.211 N-h6,Score:3.62
rn1qr2Q/pbppk1p1/1p2pb2/4N3/3P4/2N5/PPP3PP/R4RK1 w - - bm Qxg7 ; id
WAC.212 Q-h5,Score:1.36
3r1r1k/1b4pp/ppn1p3/4Pp1R/Pn5P/3P4/4QP2/1qB1NKR1 w - - bm Rxh7 ; id
WAC.213 R-g7,Score:-8.05
r2r2k1/1p2qpp1/1np1p1p1/p3N3/2PPN3/bP5R/4QPPP/4R1K1 w - - bm Ng5; id
WAC.214 Q-d1,Score:2.32
3r2k1/pb1q1pp1/1p2pb1p/8/3N4/P2QB3/1P3PPP/1Br1R1K1 w - - bm Qh7 ; id
WAC.215 Q-h7,Score:85.97
r2qr1k1/1b1nbppp/p3pn2/1p1pN3/3P1B2/2PB1N2/PP2QPPP/R4RK1 w - - bm Nxf7
a4; id WAC.216 B-g5,Score:2.44
r3kb1r/1pp3p1/p3bp1p/5q2/3QN3/1P6/PBP3P1/3RR1K1 w kq - bm Qd7 ; id WAC.
217 N-g3,Score:3.27
6k1/pp5p/2p3q1/6BP/2nPr1Q1/8/PP3R1K/8 w - - bm Bh6; id WAC.218 P-
g6,Score:-0.03
7k/p4q1p/1pb5/2p5/4B2Q/2P1B3/P6P/7K b - - bm Qf1 ; id WAC.219 Q-
f1,Score:89.97
3rr1k1/ppp2ppp/8/5Q2/4n3/1B5R/PPP1qPP1/5RK1 b - - bm Qxf1 ; id WAC.220
N-f6,Score:1.68
r3k3/P5bp/2N1bp2/4p3/2p5/6NP/1PP2PP1/3R2K1 w q - bm Rd8 ; id WAC.221 N-
h5,Score:8.11
2r1r2k/1q3ppp/p2Rp3/2p1P3/6QB/p3P3/bP3PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Bf6; id WAC.
222 R-d7,Score:1.89
r1bqk2r/pp3ppp/5n2/8/1b1npB2/2N5/PP1Q2PP/1K2RBNR w kq - bm Nxe4; id
WAC.223 N-e4,Score:-0.39
5rk1/p1q3pp/1p1r4/2p1pp1Q/1PPn1P2/3B3P/P2R2P1/3R2K1 b - - bm Rh6 e4;
id WAC.224 P-e4,Score:2.96
4R3/4q1kp/6p1/1Q3b2/1P1b1P2/6KP/8/8 b - - bm Qh4 ; id WAC.225 Q-
f6,Score:3.15
2b2rk1/p1p4p/2p1p1p1/br2N1Q1/1p2q3/8/PB3PPP/3R1RK1 w - - bm Nf7; id
WAC.226 R-e1,Score:-1.07
2k1rb1r/ppp3pp/2np1q2/5b2/2B2P2/2P1BQ2/PP1N1P1P/2KR3R b - - bm d5; id
WAC.227 K-b8,Score:-0.28
r4rk1/1bq1bp1p/4p1p1/p2p4/3BnP2/1N1B3R/PPP3PP/R2Q2K1 w - - bm Bxe4; id
WAC.228 B-e5,Score:1.66
8/8/8/1p5r/p1p1k1pN/P2pBpP1/1P1K1P2/8 b - - bm Rxh4 b4; id WAC.229 R-
e5,Score:2.15
2b5/1r6/2kBp1p1/p2pP1P1/2pP4/1pP3K1/1R3P2/8 b - - bm Rb4; id WAC.230 P-
a4,Score:1.89
r4rk1/1b1nqp1p/p5p1/1p2PQ2/2p5/5N2/PP3PPP/R1BR2K1 w - - bm Bg5; id WAC.
231 R-d7,Score:2.38
1R2rq1k/2p3p1/Q2p1pPp/8/4P3/8/P1r3PP/1R4K1 w - - bm Qb5 Rxe8; id WAC.
232 Q-b7,Score:-1.51
5rk1/p1p2r1p/2pp2p1/4p3/PPPnP3/3Pq1P1/1Q1R1R1P/4NK2 b - - bm Nb3; id
WAC.233 R-f6,Score:5.43
2kr1r2/p6p/5Pp1/2p5/1qp2Q1P/7R/PP6/1KR5 w - - bm Rb3; id WAC.234 R-
c3,Score:1.46
5r2/1p1RRrk1/4Qq1p/1PP3p1/8/4B3/1b3P1P/6K1 w - - bm Qxf7 Rxf7 Qe4; id
WAC.235 R-f7,Score:4.52
1R6/p5pk/4p2p/4P3/8/2r3qP/P3R1b1/4Q1K1 b - - bm Rc1; id WAC.236 Q-
e1,Score:1.32
r5k1/pQp2qpp/8/4pbN1/3P4/6P1/PPr4P/1K1R3R b - - bm Rc1 ; id WAC.237 R-
h2,Score:0.67
1k1r4/pp1r1pp1/4n1p1/2R5/2Pp1qP1/3P2QP/P4PB1/1R4K1 w - - bm Bxb7; id
WAC.238 Q-f4,Score:0.77
8/6k1/5pp1/Q6p/5P2/6PK/P4q1P/8 b - - bm Qf1 ; id WAC.239 Q-f1,Score:
0.18
2b4k/p1b2p2/2p2q2/3p1PNp/3P2R1/3B4/P1Q2PKP/4r3 w - - bm Qxc6; id WAC.
240 Q-c6,Score:-0.53
2rq1rk1/pp3ppp/2n2b2/4NR2/3P4/PB5Q/1P4PP/3R2K1 w - - bm Qxh7 ; id WAC.
241 N-f7,Score:2.62
r1b1r1k1/pp1nqp2/2p1p1pp/8/4N3/P1Q1P3/1P3PPP/1BRR2K1 w - - bm Rxd7; id
WAC.242 N-d6,Score:2.55
1r3r1k/3p4/1p1Nn1R1/4Pp1q/pP3P1p/P7/5Q1P/6RK w - - bm Qe2; id WAC.243
Q-e2,Score:4.25
r6r/pp3ppp/3k1b2/2pb4/B4Pq1/2P1Q3/P5PP/1RBR2K1 w - - bm Qxc5 ; id WAC.
244 R-d5,Score:4.23
4rrn1/ppq3bk/3pPnpp/2p5/2PB4/2NQ1RPB/PP5P/5R1K w - - bm Qxg6 ; id WAC.
245 N-b5,Score:5.32
6R1/4qp1p/ppr1n1pk/8/1P2P1QP/6N1/P4PP1/6K1 w - - bm Qh5 ; id WAC.246 P-
e5,Score:4.82
2k1r3/1p2Bq2/p2Qp3/Pb1p1p1P/2pP1P2/2P5/2P2KP1/1R6 w - - bm Rxb5; id
WAC.247 Q-c5,Score:1.51
5r1k/1p4pp/3q4/3Pp1R1/8/8/PP4PP/4Q1K1 b - - bm Qc5 ; id WAC.248 Q-
d5,Score:-0.21
r4rk1/pbq2pp1/1ppbpn1p/8/2PP4/1P1Q1N2/PBB2PPP/R3R1K1 w - - bm c5 d5;
id WAC.249 N-e5,Score:0.83
1b5k/7P/p1p2np1/2P2p2/PP3P2/4RQ1R/q2r3P/6K1 w - - bm Re8 ; id WAC.250
Q-g3,Score:0.75
k7/p4p2/P1q1b1p1/3p3p/3Q4/7P/5PP1/1R4K1 w - - bm Qe5 Qf4; id WAC.251 Q-
b4,Score:3.69
1rb1r1k1/p1p2ppp/5n2/2pP4/5P2/2QB4/qNP3PP/2KRB2R b - - bm Re2; id WAC.
252 Q-a1,Score:2.2
k5r1/p4b2/2P5/5p2/3P1P2/4QBrq/P5P1/4R1K1 w - - bm Qe8 ; id WAC.253 R-
e2,Score:-5.4
r6k/pp3p1p/2p1bp1q/b3p3/4Pnr1/2PP2NP/PP1Q1PPN/R2B2RK b - - bm Nxh3; id
WAC.254 R-g6,Score:0.57
3r3r/p4pk1/5Rp1/3q4/1p1P2RQ/5N2/P1P4P/2b4K w - - bm Rfxg6 ; id WAC.255
Q-g3,Score:-2.6
3r1rk1/1pb1qp1p/2p3p1/p7/P2Np2R/1P5P/1BP2PP1/3Q1BK1 w - - bm Nf5; id
WAC.256 Q-g4,Score:0.23
4r1k1/pq3p1p/2p1r1p1/2Q1p3/3nN1P1/1P6/P1P2P1P/3RR1K1 w - - bm Rxd4; id
WAC.257 N-g5,Score:2.5
r3brkn/1p5p/2p2Ppq/2Pp3B/3Pp2Q/4P1R1/6PP/5R1K w - - bm Bxg6; id WAC.
258 R-b1,Score:-1.12
r1bq1rk1/ppp2ppp/2np4/2bN1PN1/2B1P3/3p4/PPP2nPP/R1BQ1K1R w - - bm Qh5;
id WAC.259 Q-h5,Score:-1.79
2r2b1r/p1Nk2pp/3p1p2/N2Qn3/4P3/q6P/P4PP1/1R3K1R w - - bm Qe6 ; id WAC.
260 N-a6,Score:2.93
r5k1/1bp3pp/p2p4/1p6/5p2/1PBP1nqP/1PP3Q1/R4R1K b - - bm Nd4; id WAC.
261 Q-g2,Score:3.19
6k1/p1B1b2p/2b3r1/2p5/4p3/1PP1N1Pq/P2R1P2/3Q2K1 b - - bm Rh6; id WAC.
262 R-h6,Score:1.37
rnbqr2k/pppp1Qpp/8/b2NN3/2B1n3/8/PPPP1PPP/R1B1K2R w KQ - bm Qg8 ; id
WAC.263 Q-h5,Score:2.4
r2r2k1/1R2qp2/p5pp/2P5/b1PN1b2/P7/1Q3PPP/1B1R2K1 b - - bm Rab8; id WAC.
264 Q-e5,Score:2.73
2r1k2r/2pn1pp1/1p3n1p/p3PP2/4q2B/P1P5/2Q1N1PP/R4RK1 w k - bm exf6; id
WAC.265 Q-e4,Score:3.47
r3q2r/2p1k1p1/p5p1/1p2Nb2/1P2nB2/P7/2PNQbPP/R2R3K b - - bm Rxh2 ; id
WAC.266 B-g3,Score:-3.37
2r1kb1r/pp3ppp/2n1b3/1q1N2B1/1P2Q3/8/P4PPP/3RK1NR w Kk - bm Nc7 ; id
WAC.267 P-a3,Score:-0.96
2r3kr/ppp2n1p/7B/5q1N/1bp5/2Pp4/PP2RPPP/R2Q2K1 w - - bm Re8 ; id WAC.
268 R-e1,Score:-0.19
2kr2nr/pp1n1ppp/2p1p3/q7/1b1P1B2/P1N2Q1P/1PP1BPP1/R3K2R w KQ - bm
axb4; id WAC.269 K-g1,Score:2.87
2r1r1k1/pp1q1ppp/3p1b2/3P4/3Q4/5N2/PP2RPPP/4R1K1 w - - bm Qg4; id WAC.
270 Q-d3,Score:0.74
2kr4/ppp3Pp/4RP1B/2r5/5P2/1P6/P2p4/3K4 w - - bm Rd6; id WAC.271 P-
a3,Score:-0.63
nrq4r/2k1p3/1p1pPnp1/pRpP1p2/P1P2P2/2P1BB2/1R2Q1P1/6K1 w - - bm Bxc5;
id WAC.272 R-b3,Score:3.62
2k4B/bpp1qp2/p1b5/7p/1PN1n1p1/2Pr4/P5PP/R3QR1K b - - bm Ng3 g3; id WAC.
273 B-d5,Score:0.71
8/1p6/p5R1/k7/Prpp4/K7/1NP5/8 w - - bm Rb6; id WAC.274 R-g5,Score:
3.22
r1b2rk1/1p1n1ppp/p1p2q2/4p3/P1B1Pn2/1QN2N2/1P3PPP/3R1RK1 b - - bm Nxg2
b5 Nc5; id WAC.275 N-c5,Score:-0.52
r5k1/pp1RR1pp/1b6/6r1/2p5/B6P/P4qPK/3Q4 w - - bm Qd5 ; id WAC.276 R-
g7,Score:-6.57
1r4r1/p2kb2p/bq2p3/3p1p2/5P2/2BB3Q/PP4PP/3RKR2 b - - bm Rg3 Rxg2; id
WAC.277 B-d3,Score:0.64
r2qkb1r/pppb2pp/2np1n2/5pN1/2BQP3/2N5/PPP2PPP/R1B1K2R w KQkq - bm
Bf7 ; id WAC.278 B-f7,Score:4.05
r7/4b3/2p1r1k1/1p1pPp1q/1P1P1P1p/PR2NRpP/2Q3K1/8 w - - bm Nxf5 Rc3; id
WAC.279 R-c3,Score:1.5
r1r2bk1/5p1p/pn4p1/N2b4/3Pp3/B3P3/2q1BPPP/RQ3RK1 b - - bm Bxa3; id WAC.
280 Q-e2,Score:1.02
2R5/2R4p/5p1k/6n1/8/1P2QPPq/r7/6K1 w - - bm Rxh7 ; id WAC.281 R-
c2,Score:-0.49
6k1/2p3p1/1p1p1nN1/1B1P4/4PK2/8/2r3b1/7R w - - bm Rh8 ; id WAC.282 R-
h8,Score:-3.6
3q1rk1/4bp1p/1n2P2Q/3p1p2/6r1/Pp2R2N/1B4PP/7K w - - bm Ng5; id WAC.283
R-g3,Score:-3.96
3r3k/pp4pp/8/1P6/3N4/Pn2P1qb/1B1Q2B1/2R3K1 w - - bm Nf5; id WAC.284 N-
f5,Score:-0.39
2rr3k/1b2bppP/p2p1n2/R7/3P4/1qB2P2/1P4Q1/1K5R w - - bm Qxg7 ; id WAC.
285 R-a3,Score:-7.0
3r1k2/1p6/p4P2/2pP2Qb/8/1P1KB3/P6r/8 b - - bm Rxd5 ; id WAC.286 B-
e2,Score:0.07
rn3k1r/pp2bBpp/2p2n2/q5N1/3P4/1P6/P1P3PP/R1BQ1RK1 w - - bm Qh5 Qg4; id
WAC.287 Q-d3,Score:4.99
r1b2rk1/p4ppp/1p1Qp3/4P2N/1P6/8/P3qPPP/3R1RK1 w - - bm Nf6 ; id WAC.
288 N-f4,Score:1.05
2r3k1/5p1p/p3q1p1/2n3P1/1p1QP2P/1P4N1/PK6/2R5 b - - bm Qe5; id WAC.289
Q-e5,Score:3.13
2k2r2/2p5/1pq5/p1p1n3/P1P2n1B/1R4Pp/2QR4/6K1 b - - bm Ne2 ; id WAC.290
N-e6,Score:3.84
5r1k/3b2p1/p6p/1pRpR3/1P1P2q1/P4pP1/5QnP/1B4K1 w - - bm h3; id WAC.291
R-d5,Score:2.18
4r3/1Q1qk2p/p4pp1/3Pb3/P7/6PP/5P2/4R1K1 w - - bm d6 ; id WAC.292 P-
d6,Score:3.0
1nbq1r1k/3rbp1p/p1p1pp1Q/1p6/P1pPN3/5NP1/1P2PPBP/R4RK1 w - - bm Nfg5;
id WAC.293 P-b5,Score:2.92
3r3k/1r3p1p/p1pB1p2/8/p1qNP1Q1/P6P/1P4P1/3R3K w - - bm Bf8 Nf5 Qf4; id
WAC.294 Q-f4,Score:5.81
4r3/p4r1p/R1p2pp1/1p1bk3/4pNPP/2P1K3/2P2P2/3R4 w - - bm Rxd5 ; id WAC.
295 N-d5,Score:-1.8
3r4/1p2k2p/p1b1p1p1/4Q1Pn/2B3KP/4pP2/PP2R1N1/6q1 b - - bm Rd4 Rf8; id
WAC.296 R-f8,Score:2.43
3r1rk1/p3qp1p/2bb2p1/2p5/3P4/1P6/PBQN1PPP/2R2RK1 b - - bm Bxg2 Bxh2 ;
id WAC.297 Q-h4,Score:-0.67
3Q4/p3b1k1/2p2rPp/2q5/4B3/P2P4/7P/6RK w - - bm Qh8 ; id WAC.298 Q-
e8,Score:2.46
1n2rr2/1pk3pp/pNn2p2/2N1p3/8/6P1/PP2PPKP/2RR4 w - - bm Nca4; id WAC.
299 N-a8,Score:6.68
b2b1r1k/3R1ppp/4qP2/4p1PQ/4P3/5B2/4N1K1/8 w - - bm g6; id WAC.300 P-
g7,Score:0.8
|
| | |
Date: 21 Aug 2008 02:40:27
From: Sanny
Subject: New Beginner Results very good.
|
The new result after improvements is very good.
Earlier 20% Results were correct. After improvement Beginner Level
gave 30% correct Result.
Example:
------------------------
8/7p/5k2/5p2/p1p2P2/Pr1pPK2/1P1R3P/8 b - - bm Rxb2; id WAC.002 P-
c3,Score:1.99
Here according to WAC best move is Rxb2 but GetClub played P-c3 with a
score of 1.99
--------------------------
Do you think now GetClub is much stronger as Beginner thinking for 15
sec/ move gave 30% correct results.
Best Move by GetClub Beginner Level
2rr3k/pp3pp1/1nnqbN1p/3pN3/2pP4/2P3Q1/PPB4P/R4RK1 w - - bm Qg6; id WAC.
001 Q-g6,Score:87.12
8/7p/5k2/5p2/p1p2P2/Pr1pPK2/1P1R3P/8 b - - bm Rxb2; id WAC.002 P-
c3,Score:1.99
5rk1/1ppb3p/p1pb4/6q1/3P1p1r/2P1R2P/PP1BQ1P1/5RKN w - - bm Rg3; id WAC.
003 R-g3,Score:2.47
r1bq2rk/pp3pbp/2p1p1pQ/7P/3P4/2PB1N2/PP3PPR/2KR4 w - - bm Qxh7 ; id
WAC.004 Q-e3,Score:2.19
5k2/6pp/p1qN4/1p1p4/3P4/2PKP2Q/PP3r2/3R4 b - - bm Qc4 ; id WAC.005 Q-
d6,Score:3.13
7k/p7/1R5K/6r1/6p1/6P1/8/8 w - - bm Rb7; id WAC.006 R-b7,Score:
5.68
rnbqkb1r/pppp1ppp/8/4P3/6n1/7P/PPPNPPP1/R1BQKBNR b KQkq - bm Ne3; id
WAC.007 N-e5,Score:-0.57
r4q1k/p2bR1rp/2p2Q1N/5p2/5p2/2P5/PP3PPP/R5K1 w - - bm Rf7; id WAC.008
R-f7,Score:13.32
3q1rk1/p4pp1/2pb3p/3p4/6Pr/1PNQ4/P1PB1PP1/4RRK1 b - - bm Bh2 ; id WAC.
009 Q-b6,Score:-2.75
2br2k1/2q3rn/p2NppQ1/2p1P3/Pp5R/4P3/1P3PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Rxh7; id WAC.
010 R-h7,Score:5.05
r1b1kb1r/3q1ppp/pBp1pn2/8/Np3P2/5B2/PPP3PP/R2Q1RK1 w kq - bm Bxc6; id
WAC.011 R-e1,Score:1.94
4k1r1/2p3r1/1pR1p3/3pP2p/3P2qP/P4N2/1PQ4P/5R1K b - - bm Qxf3 ; id WAC.
012 R-f7,Score:-3.33
5rk1/pp4p1/2n1p2p/2Npq3/2p5/6P1/P3P1BP/R4Q1K w - - bm Qxf8 ; id WAC.
013 Q-e1,Score:-1.71
r2rb1k1/pp1q1p1p/2n1p1p1/2bp4/5P2/PP1BPR1Q/1BPN2PP/R5K1 w - - bm
Qxh7 ; id WAC.014 B-f6,Score:2.55
1R6/1brk2p1/4p2p/p1P1Pp2/P7/6P1/1P4P1/2R3K1 w - - bm Rxb7; id WAC.015
K-f2,Score:2.49
r4rk1/ppp2ppp/2n5/2bqp3/8/P2PB3/1PP1NPPP/R2Q1RK1 w - - bm Nc3; id WAC.
016 N-c3,Score:2.31
1k5r/pppbn1pp/4q1r1/1P3p2/2NPp3/1QP5/P4PPP/R1B1R1K1 w - - bm Ne5; id
WAC.017 B-d2,Score:-0.15
R7/P4k2/8/8/8/8/r7/6K1 w - - bm Rh8; id WAC.018 K-f1,Score:2.32
r1b2rk1/ppbn1ppp/4p3/1QP4q/3P4/N4N2/5PPP/R1B2RK1 w - - bm c6; id WAC.
019 B-e3,Score:1.01
r2qkb1r/1ppb1ppp/p7/4p3/P1Q1P3/2P5/5PPP/R1B2KNR b kq - bm Bb5; id WAC.
020 B-b5,Score:9.3
5rk1/1b3p1p/pp3p2/3n1N2/1P6/P1qB1PP1/3Q3P/4R1K1 w - - bm Qh6; id WAC.
021 Q-h6,Score:4.63
r1bqk2r/ppp1nppp/4p3/n5N1/2BPp3/P1P5/2P2PPP/R1BQK2R w KQkq - bm Ba2
Nxf7; id WAC.022 B-a2,Score:0.53
r3nrk1/2p2p1p/p1p1b1p1/2NpPq2/3R4/P1N1Q3/1PP2PPP/4R1K1 w - - bm g4; id
WAC.023 Q-c1,Score:3.39
6k1/1b1nqpbp/pp4p1/5P2/1PN5/4Q3/P5PP/1B2B1K1 b - - bm Bd4; id WAC.024
B-d4,Score:6.61
3R1rk1/8/5Qpp/2p5/2P1p1q1/P3P3/1P2PK2/8 b - - bm Qh4 ; id WAC.025 Q-
h4,Score:11.53
3r2k1/1p1b1pp1/pq5p/8/3NR3/2PQ3P/PP3PP1/6K1 b - - bm Bf5; id WAC.026 Q-
b2,Score:0.05
7k/pp4np/2p3p1/3pN1q1/3P4/Q7/1r3rPP/2R2RK1 w - - bm Qf8 ; id WAC.027 N-
f7,Score:-4.69
1r1r2k1/4pp1p/2p1b1p1/p3R3/RqBP4/4P3/1PQ2PPP/6K1 b - - bm Qe1 ; id WAC.
028 Q-e1,Score:1.68
r2q2k1/pp1rbppp/4pn2/2P5/1P3B2/6P1/P3QPBP/1R3RK1 w - - bm c6; id WAC.
029 P-c6,Score:3.57
1r3r2/4q1kp/b1pp2p1/5p2/pPn1N3/6P1/P3PPBP/2QRR1K1 w - - bm Nxd6; id
WAC.030 Q-c3,Score:2.03
rb3qk1/pQ3ppp/4p3/3P4/8/1P3N2/1P3PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Qxa8 d6 dxe6 g3;
id WAC.031 P-d6,Score:5.47
6k1/p4p1p/1p3np1/2q5/4p3/4P1N1/PP3PPP/3Q2K1 w - - bm Qd8 ; id WAC.032
Q-d8,Score:1.57
8/p1q2pkp/2Pr2p1/8/P3Q3/6P1/5P1P/2R3K1 w - - bm Qe5 Qf4; id WAC.033 R-
c5,Score:3.65
7k/1b1r2p1/p6p/1p2qN2/3bP3/3Q4/P5PP/1B1R3K b - - bm Bg1; id WAC.034 P-
b4,Score:-1.93
r3r2k/2R3pp/pp1q1p2/8/3P3R/7P/PP3PP1/3Q2K1 w - - bm Rxh7 ; id WAC.035
Q-b1,Score:1.83
3r4/2p1rk2/1pQq1pp1/7p/1P1P4/P4P2/6PP/R1R3K1 b - - bm Re1 ; id WAC.036
R-e1,Score:1.97
2r5/2rk2pp/1pn1pb2/pN1p4/P2P4/1N2B3/nPR1KPPP/3R4 b - - bm Nxd4 ; id
WAC.037 N-d4,Score:0.93
4k3/p4prp/1p6/2b5/8/2Q3P1/P2R1PKP/4q3 w - - bm Rd8 Qd3; id WAC.038 R-
d8,Score:-1.35
r1br2k1/pp2bppp/2nppn2/8/2P1PB2/2N2P2/PqN1B1PP/R2Q1R1K w - - bm Na4;
id WAC.039 N-a4,Score:1.73
3r1r1k/1p4pp/p4p2/8/1PQR4/6Pq/P3PP2/2R3K1 b - - bm Rc8; id WAC.040 R-
d4,Score:1.78
1k6/5RP1/1P6/1K6/6r1/8/8/8 w - - bm Ka5 Kc5 b7; id WAC.041 P-b7,Score:
5.67
r1b1r1k1/pp1n1pbp/1qp3p1/3p4/1B1P4/Q3PN2/PP2BPPP/R4RK1 w - - bm Ba5;
id WAC.042 B-a5,Score:4.05
r2q3k/p2P3p/1p3p2/3QP1r1/8/B7/P5PP/2R3K1 w - - bm Be7 Qxa8; id WAC.043
B-e7,Score:3.85
3rb1k1/pq3pbp/4n1p1/3p4/2N5/2P2QB1/PP3PPP/1B1R2K1 b - - bm dxc4; id
WAC.044 B-c6,Score:-1.45
7k/2p1b1pp/8/1p2P3/1P3r2/2P3Q1/1P5P/R4qBK b - - bm Qxa1; id WAC.045 Q-
a1,Score:5.45
r1bqr1k1/pp1nb1p1/4p2p/3p1p2/3P4/P1N1PNP1/1PQ2PP1/3RKB1R w K - bm Nb5;
id WAC.046 B-d3,Score:2.14
r1b2rk1/pp2bppp/2n1pn2/q5B1/2BP4/2N2N2/PP2QPPP/2R2RK1 b - - bm Nxd4;
id WAC.047 N-d4,Score:-1.16
1rbq1rk1/p1p1bppp/2p2n2/8/Q1BP4/2N5/PP3PPP/R1B2RK1 b - - bm Rb4; id
WAC.048 R-b7,Score:-0.57
2b3k1/4rrpp/p2p4/2pP2RQ/1pP1Pp1N/1P3P1P/1q6/6RK w - - bm Qxh7 ; id WAC.
049 N-f5,Score:0.69
k4r2/1R4pb/1pQp1n1p/3P4/5p1P/3P2P1/r1q1R2K/8 w - - bm Rxb6 ; id WAC.
050 R-c2,Score:-2.81
r1bq1r2/pp4k1/4p2p/3pPp1Q/3N1R1P/2PB4/6P1/6K1 w - - bm Rg4 ; id WAC.
051 R-f3,Score:0.54
r1k5/1p3q2/1Qpb4/3N1p2/5Pp1/3P2Pp/PPPK3P/4R3 w - - bm Re7 c4; id WAC.
052 N-c3,Score:2.81
6k1/6p1/p7/3Pn3/5p2/4rBqP/P4RP1/5QK1 b - - bm Re1; id WAC.053 N-
d3,Score:3.37
r3kr2/1pp4p/1p1p4/7q/4P1n1/2PP2Q1/PP4P1/R1BB2K1 b q - bm Qh1 ; id WAC.
054 R-g8,Score:-0.38
r3r1k1/pp1q1pp1/4b1p1/3p2B1/3Q1R2/8/PPP3PP/4R1K1 w - - bm Qxg7 ; id
WAC.055 P-c4,Score:1.48
r1bqk2r/pppp1ppp/5n2/2b1n3/4P3/1BP3Q1/PP3PPP/RNB1K1NR b KQkq - bm
Bxf2 ; id WAC.056 N-g4,Score:1.23
r3q1kr/ppp5/3p2pQ/8/3PP1b1/5R2/PPP3P1/5RK1 w - - bm Rf8 ; id WAC.057 R-
f8,Score:90.92
8/8/2R5/1p2qp1k/1P2r3/2PQ2P1/5K2/8 w - - bm Qd1 ; id WAC.058 Q-
f3,Score:3.09
r1b2rk1/2p1qnbp/p1pp2p1/5p2/2PQP3/1PN2N1P/PB3PP1/3R1RK1 w - - bm Nd5;
id WAC.059 N-d5,Score:7.96
rn1qr1k1/1p2np2/2p3p1/8/1pPb4/7Q/PB1P1PP1/2KR1B1R w - - bm Qh8 ; id
WAC.060 Q-h7,Score:86.25
3qrbk1/ppp1r2n/3pP2p/3P4/2P4P/1P3Q2/PB6/R4R1K w - - bm Qf7 ; id WAC.
061 Q-e4,Score:5.27
6r1/3Pn1qk/p1p1P1rp/2Q2p2/2P5/1P4P1/P3R2P/5RK1 b - - bm Rxg3 ; id WAC.
062 R-g4,Score:-3.94
r1brnbk1/ppq2pp1/4p2p/4N3/3P4/P1PB1Q2/3B1PPP/R3R1K1 w - - bm Nxf7; id
WAC.063 R-a2,Score:3.37
8/6pp/3q1p2/3n1k2/1P6/3NQ2P/5PP1/6K1 w - - bm g4 ; id WAC.064 P-
g4,Score:92.79
1r1r1qk1/p2n1p1p/bp1Pn1pQ/2pNp3/2P2P1N/1P5B/P6P/3R1RK1 w - - bm Ne7 ;
id WAC.065 N-e7,Score:9.7
1k1r2r1/ppq5/1bp4p/3pQ3/8/2P2N2/PP4P1/R4R1K b - - bm Qxe5; id WAC.066
Q-e5,Score:3.78
3r2k1/p2q4/1p4p1/3rRp1p/5P1P/6PK/P3R3/3Q4 w - - bm Rxd5; id WAC.067 R-
d5,Score:2.53
6k1/5ppp/1q6/2b5/8/2R1pPP1/1P2Q2P/7K w - - bm Qxe3; id WAC.068 Q-
e3,Score:6.28
2k5/pppr4/4R3/4Q3/2pp2q1/8/PPP2PPP/6K1 w - - bm f3 h3; id WAC.069 P-
f3,Score:3.68
2kr3r/pppq1ppp/3p1n2/bQ2p3/1n1PP3/1PN1BN1P/1PP2PP1/2KR3R b - - bm
Na2 ; id WAC.070 N-a2,Score:3.81
2kr3r/pp1q1ppp/5n2/1Nb5/2Pp1B2/7Q/P4PPP/1R3RK1 w - - bm Nxa7 ; id WAC.
071 Q-d7,Score:-0.46
r3r1k1/pp1n1ppp/2p5/4Pb2/2B2P2/B1P5/P5PP/R2R2K1 w - - bm e6; id WAC.
072 P-e6,Score:3.3
r1q3rk/1ppbb1p1/4Np1p/p3pP2/P3P3/2N4R/1PP1Q1PP/3R2K1 w - - bm Qd2; id
WAC.073 Q-g4,Score:1.79
5r1k/pp4pp/2p5/2b1P3/4Pq2/1PB1p3/P3Q1PP/3N2K1 b - - bm Qf1 ; id WAC.
074 Q-e4,Score:5.82
r3r1k1/pppq1ppp/8/8/1Q4n1/7P/PPP2PP1/RNB1R1K1 b - - bm Qd6; id WAC.075
Q-d4,Score:-2.2
r1b1qrk1/2p2ppp/pb1pnn2/1p2pNB1/3PP3/1BP5/PP2QPPP/RN1R2K1 w - - bm
Bxf6; id WAC.076 B-f6,Score:1.34
3r2k1/ppp2ppp/6q1/b4n2/3nQB2/2p5/P4PPP/RN3RK1 b - - bm Ng3; id WAC.077
N-g3,Score:7.61
r2q3r/ppp2k2/4nbp1/5Q1p/2P1NB2/8/PP3P1P/3RR1K1 w - - bm Ng5 ; id WAC.
078 R-d8,Score:5.65
r3k2r/pbp2pp1/3b1n2/1p6/3P3p/1B2N1Pq/PP1PQP1P/R1B2RK1 b kq - bm Qxh2 ;
id WAC.079 K-c8,Score:0.24
r4rk1/p1B1bpp1/1p2pn1p/8/2PP4/3B1P2/qP2QP1P/3R1RK1 w - - bm Ra1; id
WAC.080 P-d5,Score:1.67
r4rk1/1bR1bppp/4pn2/1p2N3/1P6/P3P3/4BPPP/3R2K1 b - - bm Bd6; id WAC.
081 B-g2,Score:-0.87
3rr1k1/pp3pp1/4b3/8/2P1B2R/6QP/P3q1P1/5R1K w - - bm Bh7 ; id WAC.082 B-
h7,Score:-1.55
3rr1k1/ppqbRppp/2p5/8/3Q1n2/2P3N1/PPB2PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Qxd7; id WAC.
083 R-d7,Score:6.22
r2q1r1k/2p1b1pp/p1n5/1p1Q1bN1/4n3/1BP1B3/PP3PPP/R4RK1 w - - bm Qg8 ;
id WAC.084 N-e4,Score:0.58
kr2R3/p4r2/2pq4/2N2p1p/3P2p1/Q5P1/5P1P/5BK1 w - - bm Na6; id WAC.085 R-
b8,Score:2.81
8/p7/1ppk1n2/5ppp/P1PP4/2P1K1P1/5N1P/8 b - - bm Ng4 ; id WAC.086 P-
a6,Score:0.85
8/p3k1p1/4r3/2ppNpp1/PP1P4/2P3KP/5P2/8 b - - bm Rxe5; id WAC.087 P-
b4,Score:2.97
r6k/p1Q4p/2p1b1rq/4p3/B3P3/4P3/PPP3P1/4RRK1 b - - bm Rxg2 ; id WAC.088
Q-g5,Score:-1.77
1r3b1k/p4rpp/4pp2/3q4/2ppbPPQ/6RK/PP5P/2B1NR2 b - - bm g5; id WAC.089
P-d3,Score:6.86
3qrrk1/1pp2pp1/1p2bn1p/5N2/2P5/P1P3B1/1P4PP/2Q1RRK1 w - - bm Nxg7; id
WAC.090 B-h4,Score:1.79
2qr2k1/4b1p1/2p2p1p/1pP1p3/p2nP3/PbQNB1PP/1P3PK1/4RB2 b - - bm Be6; id
WAC.091 B-e6,Score:1.57
r4rk1/1p2ppbp/p2pbnp1/q7/3BPPP1/2N2B2/PPP4P/R2Q1RK1 b - - bm Bxg4; id
WAC.092 Q-d8,Score:-0.03
r1b1k1nr/pp3pQp/4pq2/3pn3/8/P1P5/2P2PPP/R1B1KBNR w KQkq - bm Bh6; id
WAC.093 B-b5,Score:0.15
8/k7/p7/3Qp2P/n1P5/3KP3/1q6/8 b - - bm e4 ; id WAC.094 Q-b3,Score:
3.39
2r5/1r6/4pNpk/3pP1qp/8/2P1QP2/5PK1/R7 w - - bm Ng4 ; id WAC.095 Q-
g5,Score:-1.56
r1b4k/ppp2Bb1/6Pp/3pP3/1qnP1p1Q/8/PPP3P1/1K1R3R w - - bm Qd8 ; id WAC.
096 Q-d8,Score:4.84
6k1/5p2/p5np/4B3/3P4/1PP1q3/P3r1QP/6RK w - - bm Qa8 ; id WAC.097 Q-
c6,Score:0.92
1r3rk1/5pb1/p2p2p1/Q1n1q2p/1NP1P3/3p1P1B/PP1R3P/1K2R3 b - - bm Nxe4;
id WAC.098 N-e4,Score:7.6
r1bq1r1k/1pp1Np1p/p2p2pQ/4R3/n7/8/PPPP1PPP/R1B3K1 w - - bm Rh5; id WAC.
099 R-h5,Score:89.91
8/k1b5/P4p2/1Pp2p1p/K1P2P1P/8/3B4/8 w - - bm b6 Be3; id WAC.100 B-
e3,Score:2.85
5rk1/p5pp/8/8/2Pbp3/1P4P1/7P/4RN1K b - - bm Bc3; id WAC.101 P-g6,Score:
0.39
2Q2n2/2R4p/1p1qpp1k/8/3P3P/3B2P1/5PK1/r7 w - - bm Qxf8 ; id WAC.102 R-
c4,Score:4.2
6k1/2pb1r1p/3p1PpQ/p1nPp3/1q2P3/2N2P2/PrB5/2K3RR w - - bm Qxg6 ; id
WAC.103 R-g6,Score:3.1
b4r1k/pq2rp2/1p1bpn1p/3PN2n/2P2P2/P2B3K/1B2Q2N/3R2R1 w - - bm Qxh5; id
WAC.104 Q-h5,Score:9.83
r2r2k1/pb3ppp/1p1bp3/7q/3n2nP/PP1B2P1/1B1N1P2/RQ2NRK1 b - - bm Qxh4
Bxg3; id WAC.105 Q-h4,Score:5.03
4rrk1/pppb4/7p/3P2pq/3Qn3/P5P1/1PP4P/R3RNNK b - - bm Nf2 ; id WAC.106
N-f2,Score:1.7
5n2/pRrk2p1/P4p1p/4p3/3N4/5P2/6PP/6K1 w - - bm Nb5; id WAC.107 N-
b5,Score:2.47
r5k1/1q4pp/2p5/p1Q5/2P5/5R2/4RKPP/r7 w - - bm Qe5; id WAC.108 R-
d2,Score:-0.05
rn2k1nr/pbp2ppp/3q4/1p2N3/2p5/QP6/PB1PPPPP/R3KB1R b KQkq - bm c3; id
WAC.109 P-c3,Score:-0.68
2kr4/bp3p2/p2p2b1/P7/2q5/1N4B1/1PPQ2P1/2KR4 b - - bm Be3; id WAC.110 B-
c5,Score:0.68
6k1/p5p1/5p2/2P2Q2/3pN2p/3PbK1P/7P/6q1 b - - bm Qf1 ; id WAC.111 Q-
h2,Score:6.57
r4kr1/ppp5/4bq1b/7B/2PR1Q1p/2N3P1/PP3P1P/2K1R3 w - - bm Rxe6; id WAC.
112 R-e6,Score:6.2
rnbqkb1r/1p3ppp/5N2/1p2p1B1/2P5/8/PP2PPPP/R2QKB1R b KQkq - bm Qxf6; id
WAC.113 Q-f6,Score:0.61
r1b1rnk1/1p4pp/p1p2p2/3pN2n/3P1PPq/2NBPR1P/PPQ5/2R3K1 w - - bm Bxh7 ;
id WAC.114 N-c6,Score:3.11
4N2k/5rpp/1Q6/p3q3/8/P5P1/1P3P1P/5K2 w - - bm Nd6; id WAC.115 N-
d6,Score:-1.54
r2r2k1/2p2ppp/p7/1p2P1n1/P6q/5P2/1PB1QP1P/R5RK b - - bm Rd2; id WAC.
116 N-h3,Score:1.09
3r1rk1/q4ppp/p1Rnp3/8/1p6/1N3P2/PP3QPP/3R2K1 b - - bm Ne4; id WAC.117
N-e4,Score:4.11
r5k1/pb2rpp1/1p6/2p4q/5R2/2PB2Q1/P1P3PP/5R1K w - - bm Rh4; id WAC.118
R-c4,Score:0.09
r2qr1k1/p1p2ppp/2p5/2b5/4nPQ1/3B4/PPP3PP/R1B2R1K b - - bm Qxd3; id WAC.
119 N-f2,Score:0.98
r4rk1/1bn2qnp/3p1B1Q/p2P1pP1/1pp5/5N1P/PPB2P2/2KR3R w - - bm g6 Rhg1;
id WAC.120 B-g7,Score:4.51
6k1/5p1p/2bP2pb/4p3/2P5/1p1pNPPP/1P1Q1BK1/1q6 b - - bm Bxf3 ; id WAC.
121 P-e4,Score:2.71
1k6/ppp4p/1n2pq2/1N2Rb2/2P2Q2/8/P4KPP/3r1B2 b - - bm Rxf1 ; id WAC.122
B-d3,Score:3.83
6k1/1b2rp2/1p4p1/3P4/PQ4P1/2N2q2/5P2/3R2K1 b - - bm Bxd5 Rc7 Re6; id
WAC.123 R-c7,Score:4.1
6k1/3r4/2R5/P5P1/1P4p1/8/4rB2/6K1 b - - bm g3; id WAC.124 P-g3,Score:
2.6
r1bqr1k1/pp3ppp/1bp5/3n4/3B4/2N2P1P/PPP1B1P1/R2Q1RK1 b - - bm Bxd4 ;
id WAC.125 N-f4,Score:1.43
r5r1/pQ5p/1qp2R2/2k1p3/4P3/2PP4/P1P3PP/6K1 w - - bm Rxc6 ; id WAC.126
R-f7,Score:4.65
2k4r/1pr1n3/p1p1q2p/5pp1/3P1P2/P1P1P3/1R2Q1PP/1RB3K1 w - - bm Rxb7; id
WAC.127 P-g5,Score:3.39
6rk/1pp2Qrp/3p1B2/1pb1p2R/3n1q2/3P4/PPP3PP/R6K w - - bm Qg6; id WAC.
128 R-g1,Score:-1.22
3r1r1k/1b2b1p1/1p5p/2p1Pp2/q1B2P2/4P2P/1BR1Q2K/6R1 b - - bm Bf3; id
WAC.129 Q-e8,Score:1.11
6k1/1pp3q1/5r2/1PPp4/3P1pP1/3Qn2P/3B4/4R1K1 b - - bm Qh6 Qh8; id WAC.
130 P-c6,Score:-0.88
2rq1bk1/p4p1p/1p4p1/3b4/3B1Q2/8/P4PpP/3RR1K1 w - - bm Re8; id WAC.131
Q-e5,Score:-3.53
4r1k1/5bpp/2p5/3pr3/8/1B3pPq/PPR2P2/2R2QK1 b - - bm Re1; id WAC.132 Q-
f1,Score:3.76
r1b1k2r/1pp1q2p/p1n3p1/3QPp2/8/1BP3B1/P5PP/3R1RK1 w kq - bm Bh4; id
WAC.133 R-f3,Score:3.15
3r2k1/p6p/2Q3p1/4q3/2P1p3/P3Pb2/1P3P1P/2K2BR1 b - - bm Rd1 ; id WAC.
134 K-f8,Score:0.57
3r1r1k/N2qn1pp/1p2np2/2p5/2Q1P2N/3P4/PP4PP/3R1RK1 b - - bm Nd4; id WAC.
135 N-d4,Score:2.11
6kr/1q2r1p1/1p2N1Q1/5p2/1P1p4/6R1/7P/2R3K1 w - - bm Rc8 ; id WAC.136 P-
h3,Score:4.5
3b1rk1/1bq3pp/5pn1/1p2rN2/2p1p3/2P1B2Q/1PB2PPP/R2R2K1 w - - bm Rd7; id
WAC.137 N-d6,Score:0.41
r1bq3r/ppppR1p1/5n1k/3P4/6pP/3Q4/PP1N1PP1/5K1R w - - bm h5; id WAC.138
Q-e3,Score:0.07
rnb3kr/ppp2ppp/1b6/3q4/3pN3/Q4N2/PPP2KPP/R1B1R3 w - - bm Nf6 ; id WAC.
139 Q-d3,Score:-1.98
r2b1rk1/pq4p1/4ppQP/3pB1p1/3P4/2R5/PP3PP1/5RK1 w - - bm Rc7 Bc7; id
WAC.140 R-c7,Score:14.9
4r1k1/p1qr1p2/2pb1Bp1/1p5p/3P1n1R/1B3P2/PP3PK1/2Q4R w - - bm Qxf4; id
WAC.141 K-f1,Score:0.78
r2q3n/ppp2pk1/3p4/5Pr1/2NP1Qp1/2P2pP1/PP3K2/4R2R w - - bm Re8 f6 ; id
WAC.142 R-h4,Score:3.59
5b2/pp2r1pk/2pp1pRp/4rP1N/2P1P3/1P4QP/P3q1P1/5R1K w - - bm Rxh6 ; id
WAC.143 R-f3,Score:-0.94
r2q1rk1/pp3ppp/2p2b2/8/B2pPPb1/7P/PPP1N1P1/R2Q1RK1 b - - bm d3; id WAC.
144 B-e2,Score:1.99
r1bq4/1p4kp/3p1n2/p4pB1/2pQ4/8/1P4PP/4RRK1 w - - bm Re8; id WAC.145 Q-
f6,Score:4.71
8/8/2Kp4/3P1B2/2P2k2/5p2/8/8 w - - bm Bc8 Bd3 Bh3; id WAC.146 B-
h3,Score:4.08
r2r2k1/ppqbppbp/2n2np1/2pp4/6P1/1P1PPNNP/PBP2PB1/R2QK2R b KQ - bm
Nxg4; id WAC.147 P-d4,Score:0.99
2r1k3/6pr/p1nBP3/1p3p1p/2q5/2P5/P1R4P/K2Q2R1 w - - bm Rxg7; id WAC.148
R-g7,Score:3.93
6k1/6p1/2p4p/4Pp2/4b1qP/2Br4/1P2RQPK/8 b - - bm Bxg2; id WAC.149 B-
g2,Score:6.12
r3r1k1/5p2/pQ1b2pB/1p6/4p3/6P1/Pq2BP1P/2R3K1 b - - bm Ba3 Bf8 e3 Be5;
id WAC.150 B-g3,Score:5.59
8/3b2kp/4p1p1/pr1n4/N1N4P/1P4P1/1K3P2/3R4 w - - bm Nc3; id WAC.151 N-
e5,Score:0.25
1br2rk1/1pqb1ppp/p3pn2/8/1P6/P1N1PN1P/1B3PP1/1QRR2K1 w - - bm Ne4; id
WAC.152 N-e4,Score:2.0
2r3k1/q4ppp/p3p3/pnNp4/2rP4/2P2P2/4R1PP/2R1Q1K1 b - - bm Nxd4; id WAC.
153 Q-b8,Score:2.13
r1b2rk1/2p2ppp/p7/1p6/3P3q/1BP3bP/PP3QP1/RNB1R1K1 w - - bm Qxf7 ; id
WAC.154 Q-f3,Score:2.32
5bk1/1rQ4p/5pp1/2pP4/3n1PP1/7P/1q3BB1/4R1K1 w - - bm d6; id WAC.155 Q-
d8,Score:1.45
r1b1qN1k/1pp3p1/p2p3n/4p1B1/8/1BP4Q/PP3KPP/8 w - - bm Qxh6 ; id WAC.
156 N-e6,Score:-2.73
5rk1/p4ppp/2p1b3/3Nq3/4P1n1/1p1B2QP/1PPr2P1/1K2R2R w - - bm Ne7 ; id
WAC.157 N-e7,Score:-4.43
5rk1/n1p1R1bp/p2p4/1qpP1QB1/7P/2P3P1/PP3P2/6K1 w - - bm Rxg7 ; id WAC.
158 Q-e6,Score:5.07
r1b2r2/5P1p/ppn3pk/2p1p1Nq/1bP1PQ2/3P4/PB4BP/1R3RK1 w - - bm Ne6 ; id
WAC.159 Q-f6,Score:3.12
qn1kr2r/1pRbb3/pP5p/P2pP1pP/3N1pQ1/3B4/3B1PP1/R5K1 w - - bm Qxd7 ; id
WAC.160 P-e6,Score:7.35
3r3k/3r1P1p/pp1Nn3/2pp4/7Q/6R1/Pq4PP/5RK1 w - - bm Qxd8 ; id WAC.161 N-
e8,Score:3.23
r3kbnr/p4ppp/2p1p3/8/Q1B3b1/2N1B3/PP3PqP/R3K2R w KQkq - bm Bd5; id WAC.
162 B-d5,Score:3.29
5rk1/2p4p/2p4r/3P4/4p1b1/1Q2NqPp/PP3P1K/R4R2 b - - bm Qg2 ; id WAC.163
P-d5,Score:5.75
8/6pp/4p3/1p1n4/1NbkN1P1/P4P1P/1PR3K1/r7 w - - bm Rxc4 ; id WAC.164 R-
d2,Score:6.25
1r5k/p1p3pp/8/8/4p3/P1P1R3/1P1Q1qr1/2KR4 w - - bm Re2; id WAC.165 Q-
f2,Score:-2.69
r3r1k1/5pp1/p1p4p/2Pp4/8/q1NQP1BP/5PP1/4K2R b K - bm d4; id WAC.166 Q-
c1,Score:1.06
7Q/ppp2q2/3p2k1/P2Ppr1N/1PP5/7R/5rP1/6K1 b - - bm Rxg2 ; id WAC.167 R-
g5,Score:1.54
r3k2r/pb1q1p2/8/2p1pP2/4p1p1/B1P1Q1P1/P1P3K1/R4R2 b kq - bm Qd2 ; id
WAC.168 R-h3,Score:4.01
5rk1/1pp3bp/3p2p1/2PPp3/1P2P3/2Q1B3/4q1PP/R5K1 b - - bm Bh6; id WAC.
169 P-c5,Score:-0.03
5r1k/6Rp/1p2p3/p2pBp2/1qnP4/4P3/Q4PPP/6K1 w - - bm Qxc4; id WAC.170 Q-
c4,Score:6.51
2rq4/1b2b1kp/p3p1p1/1p1nNp2/7P/1B2B1Q1/PP3PP1/3R2K1 w - - bm Bh6 ; id
WAC.171 N-f3,Score:0.75
5r1k/p5pp/8/1P1pq3/P1p2nR1/Q7/5BPP/6K1 b - - bm Qe1 ; id WAC.172 R-
f5,Score:3.27
2r1b3/1pp1qrk1/p1n1P1p1/7R/2B1p3/4Q1P1/PP3PP1/3R2K1 w - - bm Qh6 ; id
WAC.173 Q-h6,Score:6.09
2r2rk1/6p1/p3pq1p/1p1b1p2/3P1n2/PP3N2/3N1PPP/1Q2RR1K b - - bm Nxg2; id
WAC.174 R-d8,Score:2.17
r5k1/pppb3p/2np1n2/8/3PqNpP/3Q2P1/PPP5/R4RK1 w - - bm Nh5; id WAC.175
Q-e4,Score:-2.99
r1bq3r/ppp2pk1/3p1pp1/8/2BbPQ2/2NP2P1/PPP4P/R4R1K b - - bm Rxh2 ; id
WAC.176 R-h3,Score:-2.36
r1b3r1/4qk2/1nn1p1p1/3pPp1P/p4P2/1p3BQN/PKPBN3/3R3R b - - bm Qa3 ; id
WAC.177 N-c4,Score:-0.33
3r2k1/p1rn1p1p/1p2pp2/6q1/3PQNP1/5P2/P1P4R/R5K1 w - - bm Nxe6; id WAC.
178 Q-h7,Score:1.79
r1b2r1k/pp4pp/3p4/3B4/8/1QN3Pn/PP3q1P/R3R2K b - - bm Qg1 ; id WAC.179
Q-d2,Score:2.46
r1q2rk1/p3bppb/3p1n1p/2nPp3/1p2P1P1/6NP/PP2QPB1/R1BNK2R b KQ - bm
Nxd5; id WAC.180 P-b3,Score:1.86
r3k2r/2p2p2/p2p1n2/1p2p3/4P2p/1PPPPp1q/1P5P/R1N2QRK b kq - bm Ng4; id
WAC.181 Q-f1,Score:2.3
r1b2rk1/ppqn1p1p/2n1p1p1/2b3N1/2N5/PP1BP3/1B3PPP/R2QK2R w KQ - bm Qh5;
id WAC.182 Q-h5,Score:2.7
1r2k1r1/5p2/b3p3/1p2b1B1/3p3P/3B4/PP2KP2/2R3R1 w - - bm Bf6; id WAC.
183 R-c6,Score:0.36
4kn2/r4p1r/p3bQ2/q1nNP1Np/1p5P/8/PPP3P1/2KR3R w - - bm Qe7 ; id WAC.
184 N-h7,Score:6.38
1r1rb1k1/2p3pp/p2q1p2/3PpP1Q/Pp1bP2N/1B5R/1P4PP/2B4K w - - bm Qxh7 ;
id WAC.185 Q-d1,Score:-2.36
r5r1/p1q2p1k/1p1R2pB/3pP3/6bQ/2p5/P1P1NPPP/6K1 w - - bm Bf8 ; id WAC.
186 N-c3,Score:3.07
6k1/5p2/p3p3/1p3qp1/2p1Qn2/2P1R3/PP1r1PPP/4R1K1 b - - bm Nh3 ; id WAC.
187 N-d3,Score:-0.73
3RNbk1/pp3p2/4rQpp/8/1qr5/7P/P4P2/3R2K1 w - - bm Qg7 ; id WAC.188 Q-
f3,Score:-1.51
3r1k2/1ppPR1n1/p2p1rP1/3P3p/4Rp1N/5K2/P1P2P2/8 w - - bm Re8 ; id WAC.
189 K-g2,Score:5.86
8/p2b2kp/1q1p2p1/1P1Pp3/4P3/3B2P1/P2Q3P/2Nn3K b - - bm Bh3; id WAC.190
N-f2,Score:4.43
2r1Rn1k/1p1q2pp/p7/5p2/3P4/1B4P1/P1P1QP1P/6K1 w - - bm Qc4; id WAC.191
Q-c4,Score:88.88
r3k3/ppp2Npp/4Bn2/2b5/1n1pp3/N4P2/PPP3qP/R2QKR2 b Qq - bm Nd3 ; id WAC.
192 P-d3,Score:2.52
5bk1/p4ppp/Qp6/4B3/1P6/Pq2P1P1/2rr1P1P/R4RK1 b - - bm Qxe3; id WAC.193
Q-e3,Score:2.84
5rk1/ppq2ppp/2p5/4bN2/4P3/6Q1/PPP2PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Nh6 ; id WAC.194
P-f4,Score:1.05
3r1rk1/1p3p2/p3pnnp/2p3p1/2P2q2/1P5P/PB2QPPN/3RR1K1 w - - bm g3; id
WAC.195 R-d8,Score:-0.11
rr4k1/p1pq2pp/Q1n1pn2/2bpp3/4P3/2PP1NN1/PP3PPP/R1B1K2R b KQ - bm Nb4;
id WAC.196 N-g4,Score:-0.03
7k/1p4p1/7p/3P1n2/4Q3/2P2P2/PP3qRP/7K b - - bm Qf1 ; id WAC.197 Q-
f1,Score:-5.63
2br2k1/ppp2p1p/4p1p1/4P2q/2P1Bn2/2Q5/PP3P1P/4R1RK b - - bm Rd3; id WAC.
198 N-e2,Score:0.26
r1br2k1/pp2nppp/2n5/1B1q4/Q7/4BN2/PP3PPP/2R2RK1 w - - bm Bxc6 Rfd1
Rcd1; id WAC.199 R-c2,Score:0.46
2rqrn1k/pb4pp/1p2pp2/n2P4/2P3N1/P2B2Q1/1B3PPP/2R1R1K1 w - - bm Bxf6;
id WAC.200 Q-f3,Score:2.87
2b2r1k/4q2p/3p2pQ/2pBp3/8/6P1/1PP2P1P/R5K1 w - - bm Ra7; id WAC.201 P-
c4,Score:1.15
QR2rq1k/2p3p1/3p1pPp/8/4P3/8/P1r3PP/1R4K1 b - - bm Rxa2; id WAC.202 R-
a2,Score:0.88
r4rk1/5ppp/p3q1n1/2p2NQ1/4n3/P3P3/1B3PPP/1R3RK1 w - - bm Qh6; id WAC.
203 Q-h6,Score:90.27
r1b1qrk1/1p3ppp/p1p5/3Nb3/5N2/P7/1P4PQ/K1R1R3 w - - bm Rxe5; id WAC.
204 N-b6,Score:-1.79
r3rnk1/1pq2bb1/p4p2/3p1Pp1/3B2P1/1NP4R/P1PQB3/2K4R w - - bm Qxg5; id
WAC.205 B-c5,Score:1.34
1Qq5/2P1p1kp/3r1pp1/8/8/7P/p4PP1/2R3K1 b - - bm Rc6; id WAC.206 R-
c6,Score:1.36
r1bq2kr/p1pp1ppp/1pn1p3/4P3/2Pb2Q1/BR6/P4PPP/3K1BNR w - - bm Qxg7 ; id
WAC.207 P-f4,Score:-3.64
3r1bk1/ppq3pp/2p5/2P2Q1B/8/1P4P1/P6P/5RK1 w - - bm Bf7 ; id WAC.208 R-
f4,Score:2.73
4kb1r/2q2p2/r2p4/pppBn1B1/P6P/6Q1/1PP5/2KRR3 w k - bm Rxe5 ; id WAC.
209 P-b5,Score:5.05
3r1rk1/pp1q1ppp/3pn3/2pN4/5PP1/P5PQ/1PP1B3/1K1R4 w - - bm Rh1; id WAC.
210 B-d3,Score:-1.25
r1bqrk2/pp1n1n1p/3p1p2/P1pP1P1Q/2PpP1NP/6R1/2PB4/4RBK1 w - - bm Qxf7 ;
id WAC.211 Q-h7,Score:4.23
rn1qr2Q/pbppk1p1/1p2pb2/4N3/3P4/2N5/PPP3PP/R4RK1 w - - bm Qxg7 ; id
WAC.212 Q-h5,Score:0.79
3r1r1k/1b4pp/ppn1p3/4Pp1R/Pn5P/3P4/4QP2/1qB1NKR1 w - - bm Rxh7 ; id
WAC.213 Q-e3,Score:-6.45
r2r2k1/1p2qpp1/1np1p1p1/p3N3/2PPN3/bP5R/4QPPP/4R1K1 w - - bm Ng5; id
WAC.214 Q-e3,Score:3.24
3r2k1/pb1q1pp1/1p2pb1p/8/3N4/P2QB3/1P3PPP/1Br1R1K1 w - - bm Qh7 ; id
WAC.215 Q-h7,Score:0.64
r2qr1k1/1b1nbppp/p3pn2/1p1pN3/3P1B2/2PB1N2/PP2QPPP/R4RK1 w - - bm Nxf7
a4; id WAC.216 R-e1,Score:2.97
r3kb1r/1pp3p1/p3bp1p/5q2/3QN3/1P6/PBP3P1/3RR1K1 w kq - bm Qd7 ; id WAC.
217 Q-c4,Score:1.11
6k1/pp5p/2p3q1/6BP/2nPr1Q1/8/PP3R1K/8 w - - bm Bh6; id WAC.218 P-
g6,Score:0.56
7k/p4q1p/1pb5/2p5/4B2Q/2P1B3/P6P/7K b - - bm Qf1 ; id WAC.219 B-
e4,Score:-1.75
3rr1k1/ppp2ppp/8/5Q2/4n3/1B5R/PPP1qPP1/5RK1 b - - bm Qxf1 ; id WAC.220
N-f6,Score:1.59
r3k3/P5bp/2N1bp2/4p3/2p5/6NP/1PP2PP1/3R2K1 w q - bm Rd8 ; id WAC.221 R-
d6,Score:8.0
2r1r2k/1q3ppp/p2Rp3/2p1P3/6QB/p3P3/bP3PPP/3R2K1 w - - bm Bf6; id WAC.
222 P-a3,Score:0.99
r1bqk2r/pp3ppp/5n2/8/1b1npB2/2N5/PP1Q2PP/1K2RBNR w kq - bm Nxe4; id
WAC.223 R-d1,Score:-3.19
5rk1/p1q3pp/1p1r4/2p1pp1Q/1PPn1P2/3B3P/P2R2P1/3R2K1 b - - bm Rh6 e4;
id WAC.224 P-f4,Score:2.19
4R3/4q1kp/6p1/1Q3b2/1P1b1P2/6KP/8/8 b - - bm Qh4 ; id WAC.225 Q-
f7,Score:4.01
2b2rk1/p1p4p/2p1p1p1/br2N1Q1/1p2q3/8/PB3PPP/3R1RK1 w - - bm Nf7; id
WAC.226 P-h4,Score:-2.73
2k1rb1r/ppp3pp/2np1q2/5b2/2B2P2/2P1BQ2/PP1N1P1P/2KR3R b - - bm d5; id
WAC.227 P-d5,Score:1.67
r4rk1/1bq1bp1p/4p1p1/p2p4/3BnP2/1N1B3R/PPP3PP/R2Q2K1 w - - bm Bxe4; id
WAC.228 B-e4,Score:3.6
8/8/8/1p5r/p1p1k1pN/P2pBpP1/1P1K1P2/8 b - - bm Rxh4 b4; id WAC.229 R-
e5,Score:2.32
2b5/1r6/2kBp1p1/p2pP1P1/2pP4/1pP3K1/1R3P2/8 b - - bm Rb4; id WAC.230 P-
a4,Score:1.99
r4rk1/1b1nqp1p/p5p1/1p2PQ2/2p5/5N2/PP3PPP/R1BR2K1 w - - bm Bg5; id WAC.
231 Q-d7,Score:4.35
1R2rq1k/2p3p1/Q2p1pPp/8/4P3/8/P1r3PP/1R4K1 w - - bm Qb5 Rxe8; id WAC.
232 Q-b7,Score:-1.96
5rk1/p1p2r1p/2pp2p1/4p3/PPPnP3/3Pq1P1/1Q1R1R1P/4NK2 b - - bm Nb3; id
WAC.233 Q-d2,Score:4.18
2kr1r2/p6p/5Pp1/2p5/1qp2Q1P/7R/PP6/1KR5 w - - bm Rb3; id WAC.234 Q-
g4,Score:1.31
5r2/1p1RRrk1/4Qq1p/1PP3p1/8/4B3/1b3P1P/6K1 w - - bm Qxf7 Rxf7 Qe4; id
WAC.235 Q-f6,Score:6.03
1R6/p5pk/4p2p/4P3/8/2r3qP/P3R1b1/4Q1K1 b - - bm Rc1; id WAC.236 Q-
e1,Score:1.53
r5k1/pQp2qpp/8/4pbN1/3P4/6P1/PPr4P/1K1R3R b - - bm Rc1 ; id WAC.237 Q-
e8,Score:0.25
1k1r4/pp1r1pp1/4n1p1/2R5/2Pp1qP1/3P2QP/P4PB1/1R4K1 w - - bm Bxb7; id
WAC.238 Q-f4,Score:1.06
8/6k1/5pp1/Q6p/5P2/6PK/P4q1P/8 b - - bm Qf1 ; id WAC.239 Q-f1,Score:
0.75
2b4k/p1b2p2/2p2q2/3p1PNp/3P2R1/3B4/P1Q2PKP/4r3 w - - bm Qxc6; id WAC.
240 Q-c6,Score:1.89
2rq1rk1/pp3ppp/2n2b2/4NR2/3P4/PB5Q/1P4PP/3R2K1 w - - bm Qxh7 ; id WAC.
241 Q-f3,Score:1.81
r1b1r1k1/pp1nqp2/2p1p1pp/8/4N3/P1Q1P3/1P3PPP/1BRR2K1 w - - bm Rxd7; id
WAC.242 B-d3,Score:2.67
1r3r1k/3p4/1p1Nn1R1/4Pp1q/pP3P1p/P7/5Q1P/6RK w - - bm Qe2; id WAC.243
Q-e3,Score:4.98
r6r/pp3ppp/3k1b2/2pb4/B4Pq1/2P1Q3/P5PP/1RBR2K1 w - - bm Qxc5 ; id WAC.
244 R-d5,Score:5.91
4rrn1/ppq3bk/3pPnpp/2p5/2PB4/2NQ1RPB/PP5P/5R1K w - - bm Qxg6 ; id WAC.
245 N-b5,Score:5.26
6R1/4qp1p/ppr1n1pk/8/1P2P1QP/6N1/P4PP1/6K1 w - - bm Qh5 ; id WAC.246 Q-
e2,Score:4.33
2k1r3/1p2Bq2/p2Qp3/Pb1p1p1P/2pP1P2/2P5/2P2KP1/1R6 w - - bm Rxb5; id
WAC.247 B-g5,Score:0.74
5r1k/1p4pp/3q4/3Pp1R1/8/8/PP4PP/4Q1K1 b - - bm Qc5 ; id WAC.248 Q-
d5,Score:0.07
r4rk1/pbq2pp1/1ppbpn1p/8/2PP4/1P1Q1N2/PBB2PPP/R3R1K1 w - - bm c5 d5;
id WAC.249 N-e5,Score:0.77
1b5k/7P/p1p2np1/2P2p2/PP3P2/4RQ1R/q2r3P/6K1 w - - bm Re8 ; id WAC.250
R-e1,Score:1.32
k7/p4p2/P1q1b1p1/3p3p/3Q4/7P/5PP1/1R4K1 w - - bm Qe5 Qf4; id WAC.251 R-
b7,Score:2.1
1rb1r1k1/p1p2ppp/5n2/2pP4/5P2/2QB4/qNP3PP/2KRB2R b - - bm Re2; id WAC.
252 Q-a1,Score:2.03
k5r1/p4b2/2P5/5p2/3P1P2/4QBrq/P5P1/4R1K1 w - - bm Qe8 ; id WAC.253 R-
e2,Score:-1.69
r6k/pp3p1p/2p1bp1q/b3p3/4Pnr1/2PP2NP/PP1Q1PPN/R2B2RK b - - bm Nxh3; id
WAC.254 R-g6,Score:1.12
3r3r/p4pk1/5Rp1/3q4/1p1P2RQ/5N2/P1P4P/2b4K w - - bm Rfxg6 ; id WAC.255
R-g6,Score:0.26
3r1rk1/1pb1qp1p/2p3p1/p7/P2Np2R/1P5P/1BP2PP1/3Q1BK1 w - - bm Nf5; id
WAC.256 Q-g4,Score:1.27
4r1k1/pq3p1p/2p1r1p1/2Q1p3/3nN1P1/1P6/P1P2P1P/3RR1K1 w - - bm Rxd4; id
WAC.257 N-g5,Score:1.18
r3brkn/1p5p/2p2Ppq/2Pp3B/3Pp2Q/4P1R1/6PP/5R1K w - - bm Bxg6; id WAC.
258 Q-g4,Score:-0.88
r1bq1rk1/ppp2ppp/2np4/2bN1PN1/2B1P3/3p4/PPP2nPP/R1BQ1K1R w - - bm Qh5;
id WAC.259 Q-h5,Score:-2.75
2r2b1r/p1Nk2pp/3p1p2/N2Qn3/4P3/q6P/P4PP1/1R3K1R w - - bm Qe6 ; id WAC.
260 N-a6,Score:3.51
r5k1/1bp3pp/p2p4/1p6/5p2/1PBP1nqP/1PP3Q1/R4R1K b - - bm Nd4; id WAC.
261 Q-g2,Score:5.03
6k1/p1B1b2p/2b3r1/2p5/4p3/1PP1N1Pq/P2R1P2/3Q2K1 b - - bm Rh6; id WAC.
262 R-f6,Score:-0.46
rnbqr2k/pppp1Qpp/8/b2NN3/2B1n3/8/PPPP1PPP/R1B1K2R w KQ - bm Qg8 ; id
WAC.263 Q-f4,Score:2.95
r2r2k1/1R2qp2/p5pp/2P5/b1PN1b2/P7/1Q3PPP/1B1R2K1 b - - bm Rab8; id WAC.
264 R-d4,Score:2.23
2r1k2r/2pn1pp1/1p3n1p/p3PP2/4q2B/P1P5/2Q1N1PP/R4RK1 w k - bm exf6; id
WAC.265 Q-e4,Score:1.23
r3q2r/2p1k1p1/p5p1/1p2Nb2/1P2nB2/P7/2PNQbPP/R2R3K b - - bm Rxh2 ; id
WAC.266 B-g3,Score:-1.55
2r1kb1r/pp3ppp/2n1b3/1q1N2B1/1P2Q3/8/P4PPP/3RK1NR w Kk - bm Nc7 ; id
WAC.267 P-a3,Score:-0.57
2r3kr/ppp2n1p/7B/5q1N/1bp5/2Pp4/PP2RPPP/R2Q2K1 w - - bm Re8 ; id WAC.
268 R-e4,Score:0.89
2kr2nr/pp1n1ppp/2p1p3/q7/1b1P1B2/P1N2Q1P/1PP1BPP1/R3K2R w KQ - bm
axb4; id WAC.269 B-c1,Score:2.0
2r1r1k1/pp1q1ppp/3p1b2/3P4/3Q4/5N2/PP2RPPP/4R1K1 w - - bm Qg4; id WAC.
270 Q-d3,Score:0.9
2kr4/ppp3Pp/4RP1B/2r5/5P2/1P6/P2p4/3K4 w - - bm Rd6; id WAC.271 B-
g5,Score:-0.52
nrq4r/2k1p3/1p1pPnp1/pRpP1p2/P1P2P2/2P1BB2/1R2Q1P1/6K1 w - - bm Bxc5;
id WAC.272 R-b3,Score:5.61
2k4B/bpp1qp2/p1b5/7p/1PN1n1p1/2Pr4/P5PP/R3QR1K b - - bm Ng3 g3; id WAC.
273 Q-e6,Score:1.19
8/1p6/p5R1/k7/Prpp4/K7/1NP5/8 w - - bm Rb6; id WAC.274 R-g5,Score:
4.09
r1b2rk1/1p1n1ppp/p1p2q2/4p3/P1B1Pn2/1QN2N2/1P3PPP/3R1RK1 b - - bm Nxg2
b5 Nc5; id WAC.275 Q-h6,Score:-1.11
r5k1/pp1RR1pp/1b6/6r1/2p5/B6P/P4qPK/3Q4 w - - bm Qd5 ; id WAC.276 R-
g7,Score:-5.05
1r4r1/p2kb2p/bq2p3/3p1p2/5P2/2BB3Q/PP4PP/3RKR2 b - - bm Rg3 Rxg2; id
WAC.277 B-d3,Score:0.08
r2qkb1r/pppb2pp/2np1n2/5pN1/2BQP3/2N5/PPP2PPP/R1B1K2R w KQkq - bm
Bf7 ; id WAC.278 Q-e3,Score:1.41
r7/4b3/2p1r1k1/1p1pPp1q/1P1P1P1p/PR2NRpP/2Q3K1/8 w - - bm Nxf5 Rc3; id
WAC.279 R-c3,Score:1.67
r1r2bk1/5p1p/pn4p1/N2b4/3Pp3/B3P3/2q1BPPP/RQ3RK1 b - - bm Bxa3; id WAC.
280 Q-e2,Score:1.42
2R5/2R4p/5p1k/6n1/8/1P2QPPq/r7/6K1 w - - bm Rxh7 ; id WAC.281 R-
c2,Score:0.67
6k1/2p3p1/1p1p1nN1/1B1P4/4PK2/8/2r3b1/7R w - - bm Rh8 ; id WAC.282 R-
h8,Score:-3.52
3q1rk1/4bp1p/1n2P2Q/3p1p2/6r1/Pp2R2N/1B4PP/7K w - - bm Ng5; id WAC.283
P-f7,Score:-2.45
3r3k/pp4pp/8/1P6/3N4/Pn2P1qb/1B1Q2B1/2R3K1 w - - bm Nf5; id WAC.284 N-
f5,Score:-0.46
2rr3k/1b2bppP/p2p1n2/R7/3P4/1qB2P2/1P4Q1/1K5R w - - bm Qxg7 ; id WAC.
285 R-a3,Score:-7.62
3r1k2/1p6/p4P2/2pP2Qb/8/1P1KB3/P6r/8 b - - bm Rxd5 ; id WAC.286 P-
b6,Score:-0.3
rn3k1r/pp2bBpp/2p2n2/q5N1/3P4/1P6/P1P3PP/R1BQ1RK1 w - - bm Qh5 Qg4; id
WAC.287 B-c4,Score:5.29
r1b2rk1/p4ppp/1p1Qp3/4P2N/1P6/8/P3qPPP/3R1RK1 w - - bm Nf6 ; id WAC.
288 P-f3,Score:0.39
2r3k1/5p1p/p3q1p1/2n3P1/1p1QP2P/1P4N1/PK6/2R5 b - - bm Qe5; id WAC.289
Q-e5,Score:4.97
2k2r2/2p5/1pq5/p1p1n3/P1P2n1B/1R4Pp/2QR4/6K1 b - - bm Ne2 ; id WAC.290
N-e6,Score:3.11
5r1k/3b2p1/p6p/1pRpR3/1P1P2q1/P4pP1/5QnP/1B4K1 w - - bm h3; id WAC.291
R-d5,Score:1.67
4r3/1Q1qk2p/p4pp1/3Pb3/P7/6PP/5P2/4R1K1 w - - bm d6 ; id WAC.292 P-
d6,Score:-0.33
1nbq1r1k/3rbp1p/p1p1pp1Q/1p6/P1pPN3/5NP1/1P2PPBP/R4RK1 w - - bm Nfg5;
id WAC.293 P-b5,Score:2.67
3r3k/1r3p1p/p1pB1p2/8/p1qNP1Q1/P6P/1P4P1/3R3K w - - bm Bf8 Nf5 Qf4; id
WAC.294 Q-f4,Score:5.6
4r3/p4r1p/R1p2pp1/1p1bk3/4pNPP/2P1K3/2P2P2/3R4 w - - bm Rxd5 ; id WAC.
295 N-d5,Score:2.22
3r4/1p2k2p/p1b1p1p1/4Q1Pn/2B3KP/4pP2/PP2R1N1/6q1 b - - bm Rd4 Rf8; id
WAC.296 B-d5,Score:1.57
3r1rk1/p3qp1p/2bb2p1/2p5/3P4/1P6/PBQN1PPP/2R2RK1 b - - bm Bxg2 Bxh2 ;
id WAC.297 Q-e2,Score:-0.15
3Q4/p3b1k1/2p2rPp/2q5/4B3/P2P4/7P/6RK w - - bm Qh8 ; id WAC.298 Q-
e8,Score:2.95
1n2rr2/1pk3pp/pNn2p2/2N1p3/8/6P1/PP2PPKP/2RR4 w - - bm Nca4; id WAC.
299 N-c4,Score:3.36
b2b1r1k/3R1ppp/4qP2/4p1PQ/4P3/5B2/4N1K1/8 w - - bm g6; id WAC.300 P-
g7,Score:0.69
|
| | | |
Date: 21 Aug 2008 13:17:07
From: Guest
Subject: Re: New Beginner Results very good.
|
"Sanny" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> The new result after improvements is very good.
>
> Earlier 20% Results were correct. After improvement Beginner Level
> gave 30% correct Result.
I'm going to say that's probably pretty good for a beginner level.
That's not to say I'm agreeing with all your chosen moves. But for a
beginner level, I think it's pretty good.
I'm defining a "Beginner Level" as a level suitable for a person who does
not normally play chess, who thinks only one or two moves head under most
conditions, who des not play in tournaments but if they did, would have a
rating of no more than 1200 or so. And probably well under that rating.
For that level of player, I think the computer should take no more than 10
seconds. That level of play just doesn't need much computation, and todays
computers are fast enough that any more than 10 seconds a move would be
considered slow. You don't want it much faster though because beginners can
get a little bothered when the computer keeps moving instantly. Say maybe
at least 5 and never more than 15 seconds?
Allowing for your program being in Java, I'm going to say that as long as it
never takes more than 20 seconds and usually under 10 seconds a move, it's
okay.
You did miss some mates, but a beginner might miss them too. They usually
miss a lot of tactical stuff. It's a bit of a fuzzy area... I don't think
a chess program should miss mates that obvious, but if you are explicitly
targeting a beginner, then it's sort of okay for it to miss them.
For computers, you have to reduce both the positional knowledge as well as
the tactical ability. It's more than just reducing the search depth. So....
This is really a subjective call.... But I'm going to say that for a
beginner level (rating under 1200), you are doing okay. You might need to
work on the time aspect, but other than that I'll say it's okay.
Now, for your Easy Level, which takes an average of 60 seconds a move....
I've got some issues. Mostly speed.
First, considering how MicroMax and GNU Chess 4 perform on the test at just
5 and 10 seconds per test position, you've got your work cut out for you.
(The online "Bayesian Elo Ratinglist WBEC Ridderkerk after edition 15" gives
MicroMax a rating of 1845 +-140 and GNUChess 4 at 2207 +-25. I can't find
any well known programs at more reasonably lower ratings to compare against
your program. TSCP can't set up positions, so it can't do any of these
tests.)
On my old 700mhz P3, Micromax at 5 seconds per position gets 61% even while
I'm doing other things on the computer.
At 10 seconds, it gets 68%.
On my laptop, Micromax at 5 seconds a move gets71% and at 10 seconds per
position it gets 77%.
(So figure a factor of 4 in performance (slow desktop to fast laptop) gets
about 10% more of the test.
GNU Chess 4 on my laptop gets 94% at 5 seconds per move and 95% at 10
seconds per move. (At this point you are getting to the point where the
missed ones could be the contested 'best move' in the test.)
The point is, strong programs do very well even at fast time settings.
Programs are very tactical and the WAC test does have a lot of tactical
positions, just like regular chess.
Moderate programs (micromax, which is 1700-1980) also do fairly well
Micromax is mostly tactical with only a little positional knowledge.
By the time you've dropped down to just 5 seconds per move, there's not
really a lot of playing strength left to either of them. Cut off maybe a
couple hundred points in playing strength? (Just a guess with no solid data
to back that up with. And allowing for differences in the computer running
the program, it's really hard to estimate.)
For micromax, might be 1600-1800 and GNUChess 4 might be 2000.
So I think your 'Easy Level' should be getting at least 50% in no more than
30 seconds per position. I'm allowing 30 seconds per position only because
your program is in Java rathe than in compiled code.
Even that would be a bit slow. But for an 'easy level', that kind of
percentage would be okay and might take you up to 1600 or so. (Just a
guess.)
(If anybody disagrees with these guesses, please speak up. I'm doing a lot
of semi-educated guessing on these ratings estimates.)
To save time, I'd suggest just running the first 20 positions until you can
get most of them in a reasonable time (under 30 seconds). Then you can run
the rest of them. Saves testing time.
Once you get up to this point, you'll need to work on your tactical ability
& speed and that should bring you up to 90% plus in under 30 seconds. Then
we'll need to find another test suite.
But that's the future. Right now you've got quite a bit of work to do.
You've got some serious work to do on your speed and your tactics.
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| | |
Date: 20 Aug 2008 23:43:37
From: Sanny
Subject: I will again test the Beginner Level as GetClub was Twice improved
|
Today GetClub was Twice improved. So I will retest the 300 Positions
today to see if it passes out more tests.
Lets see todays improvement is seen the results or not.
I will be testing the Beginner Level again and post the results soon.
Bye
Sanny
Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
| | | |
Date: 21 Aug 2008 13:17:22
From: Guest
Subject: Re: I will again test the Beginner Level as GetClub was Twice improved today.
|
"Sanny" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Today GetClub was Twice improved. So I will retest the 300 Positions
> today to see if it passes out more tests.
>
> Lets see todays improvement is seen the results or not.
>
> I will be testing the Beginner Level again and post the results soon.
Aren't test positions wonderful?!
It gives you a solid way to see a problem and then test to see if you
actually fixed it.
You should also look around for some other types of testing positions.
Basic mating positions. Mate in 1, 2, 3, up to 5 or so. (If your search
was more advanced, I'd even suggest a few mates in 10+.)
Drawing positions. Where the best move is a draw by repetition or
stalemate.
Basic tactical moves. Like winning a queen in a couple moves.
Pawn promotion tests. To make sure that it'll promote the pawn at the right
time, or to avoid promoting the pawn if it can be immediately captured.
And so on.
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| | |
Date: 20 Aug 2008 14:13:31
From: Guest
Subject: Re: Beginner Level Results
|
"Sanny" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:b448381e-338d-46d5-9016-dfbad7a0e739@p10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>I played 300 Postions from WAC and I am writing below the Move played
> by GetClub along with Score given by GetClub to that move.
>
> Please analyze and tell what do you think about the below results.
I would suggest you buy Reinfeld's book 'win at chess'. It actually gives
details why the move is prefered, etc.
Just the kind of stuff you need.
I'm sure HelpBot will respond, but the book might be a better choice.
You could get it used from Amazon fairly cheap. Even with shipping, I'd
expect it about $5. Your local bookstore might have it too.
There are several versions, but I think the newest reprint is from 2001.
There are, of course, many other 'testing' style chess books you could get
from your bookstore. That way you could actually look at them and see if
the stuff is the kind you are wanting.
> After you see the result for each position I will test the Easy Level
> also.
>
> It took me 2 hours to test all 300 moves through automation.
>
> It will take 8-10 hours for Easy Level Testing.
I wouldn't go beyond that. I wouldn't even bother with 'easy level',
actually.
You'd be better off working on getting higher results at the faster speeds.
The WAC test is not exactly the most difficult test suite around. Most
programmers give far less time than what you are.
Just to give you some comparison data, I used the 'epd2wb' program to send
the test to some other engines.
Specifically, Crafty20.14 and micromax 4.8. I used just 10 seconds for the
thinking time.
Crafty on my 2ghz laptop (like a ~3ghz P4) got 247 out of 300. That's 82%.
MicroMax 4.8 was run on my desktop (an old slow P3) because Crafty was
running on my fast laptop. Also, Micromax wasn't taking the full 10
seconds. It would usually move in 5 seoncs or less. (EPD2WB is not the
most compatable of testing programs....)
It got the first half or so very well (more than 80%)because those are
rather tactical, but it missed many of the later ones. It got a 206 out of
the 300. 68%.
I can't get TSCP or other versions of MicroMax to run reliably with epd2wb,
so no results. (They kept locking up around 22-24 moves and many moves
immediately failed, without any thinking time. I think they aren't winboard
enough that buggy epd2wb can deal with.)
I don't know of any other small, simple chess programs to compare results
to.
> The score is better than what I predicted. I was thinking none of them
> will match but I find 20% moves are correct while other 80% are not
> Matching for Beginner Level.
Not too bad considering this is your very first test suite you've ever run.
Considering you've never done any testing at all, 20% isn't bad.
But rather than going for longer time controls, you need to start working on
the tactical stuff that it's missing in WAC.
> If I get good suggestions from you I will try the Easy Level. Let me
> know if the Scores given by GetClub for its move is correct or not.
I'm sure HelpBot will give you some suggestions, but I still think getting
the book is a good idea.
Right off hand, I don't know of any electronic copy on the web. No pdf copy
or web site that describes each move in detail.
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| | | |
Date: 20 Aug 2008 21:45:48
From: Bjoern
Subject: Re: Beginner Level Results
|
Guest wrote:
> "Sanny" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:b448381e-338d-46d5-9016-dfbad7a0e739@p10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
>>I played 300 Postions from WAC and I am writing below the Move played
>>by GetClub along with Score given by GetClub to that move.
>>
>>Please analyze and tell what do you think about the below results.
> Crafty on my 2ghz laptop (like a ~3ghz P4) got 247 out of 300. That's 82%.
>
> MicroMax 4.8 was run on my desktop (an old slow P3) because Crafty was
> running on my fast laptop. Also, Micromax wasn't taking the full 10
> seconds. It would usually move in 5 seoncs or less. (EPD2WB is not the
> most compatable of testing programs....)
>
> It got the first half or so very well (more than 80%)because those are
> rather tactical, but it missed many of the later ones. It got a 206 out of
> the 300. 68%.
I think that's something else that Sanny's output should ideally
provide: how many times the program matched the solution.
On the first few problems it looks like about 1/3 later on maybe 1/5?!
|
| | | | |
Date: 20 Aug 2008 15:21:25
From: Guest
Subject: Re: Beginner Level Results
|
"Bjoern" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Guest wrote:
>> It got the first half or so very well (more than 80%)because those are
>> rather tactical, but it missed many of the later ones. It got a 206 out
>> of the 300. 68%.
>
> I think that's something else that Sanny's output should ideally provide:
> how many times the program matched the solution.
>
> On the first few problems it looks like about 1/3 later on maybe 1/5?!
His own private output might show that.
But it's to be expected that the later ones have a lower success rate. They
are harder positions.
Also, the reality is there are some contested moves in the WAC test. There
are several 'revised' versions. It seems like every couple years somebody
comes along and does a deep 8 hour search or something and says that some
position should have a different move answer.
I'm not even sure that's really valid though. I mean if it takes 8 hours
with a state of the art program to see something, then why would you expect
it to be detected with a quick xyz second test? That's kind of like
complaining that a master can't see something in 3 minutes that a
GrandMaster can see if he spends a week studying the same position.
To me, I'm willing to just accept the book answers and live with the fact
tha some answers might be wrong, but that if my program is only scoring 20%
with several minutes to think, then I have bigger worries.
His results are not bad for a very first test run.
And his program is in Java, so it does run slower.
But his results do need to be improved....
And now he's got positions to work with.
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| |
Date: 19 Aug 2008 05:18:31
From: Sanny
Subject: I will test them later.
|
Here is what I think. Here is my guess work
Beginner Level will not be able to find any of the correct moves
Easy Level will solve 30% of them correctly.
Normal Level will solve 60% of them.
Master Level will solve 80% of them
Rybka will solve 90% of them.
Before I test them, tell me what is the validity that the above
results are correct. And they are the only moves that GetClub should
play?
It may happen the best move is wrong. Who has checked that these
results are OK?
In opening both e4 and d4 are correct So what if the GetClub chose
another correct alternatives?
Are the best moves the only move that has to be played in these
positions?
r1r2bk1/5p1p/pn4p1/N2b4/3Pp3/B3P3/2q1BPPP/RQ3RK1 b - - bm Bxa3; id
"WAC.280";
here b - - means Black to play and No Chastling allowed. And best move
is Bxa3.
If Black plays something else how much bad will be that.
What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 30% ?
What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 40% ?
What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 50% ?
What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 60% ?
What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 70% ?
What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 80% ?
What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 90% ?
What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 100% ?
Is this the way to find the correct ratings?
How much time should GetClub be given to solve these positions?
10 sec or 1 min or 5 min???
Bye
Sanny
Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
| | |
Date: 20 Aug 2008 02:58:51
From: Sanny
Subject: Automated Testing Developed.
|
> =A0 I suspect that Sanny will not attempt
> to automate the testing process, and
> that as a result, there will be... human
> error.
Automated program was created today. I will test all 300 positions
with Beginner Level and display the result.
I will only tes WAC positions I think that will be enough. Do I need
to test the other positions as well?
Bye
Sanny
Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
| | | |
Date: 20 Aug 2008 11:27:25
From: Guest
Subject: Re: Automated Testing Developed.
|
"Sanny" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>Automated program was created today. I will test all 300 positions
>with Beginner Level and display the result.
Congratulations.
Automated testing is a lot easier than doing it manually!
>I will only tes WAC positions I think that will be enough. Do I need
>to test the other positions as well?
The WAC positions are good enough. Better actually.
Eventually you'll outgrow them, but for now, they are fine and it's okay to
ignore the Bratko-Kopec positions too.
I'd suggest you going over to amazon.com or your local book store and
picking up a copy of Reinfeld's "Win At Chess" book, too. (There are
several versions. I think the most recent printing was in 2001.) I'd guess
total cost would be $5 including shipping.
That way you get to read the text for each position and why a particular
move is considered best, etc.
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| | |
Date: 20 Aug 2008 00:03:17
From: help bot
Subject: Re: I will test them later.
|
[email protected] wrote:
> > You can still do the basic testing and report the results though. =EF=
=BF=BDAs a way
> > of showing how many your engine gets right / wrong.
>
> Do you seriously expect Sanny actually to do this, and if he does,
> to report the results accurately? Given his long-running disregard for
> factual truth, I don't.
Often times, Sanny has reported nonsense.
But you have to admit, he now is somewhat
consistent in reporting that his program just
loses to Rybka (shocker), although his
attempts at describing such games are
ludicrous.
As far as what little I saw of the Bratco-
Lopec positions, they are much too
difficult for our purposes. But if in fact the
test positions included 300 from Fred
Reinfeld's old book, I think we could find
the results somewhat useful. The problem
is that Sanny's program has, and has
always had, a serious problem with tactics.
It is akin to a weak human player, only
slower. Yet it now resigns well in advance
of being checkmated, so when there are
fewer men remaining on the board, it can
calculate better.
I favor a complete re-write, focusing on
tactics and speed. Only when tactics
are fully under control should attempts
be made to, say, factor in the doubling
of pawns and the like. As it is, these
attempts seem to have failed miserably,
perhaps even causing the gross tactical
weaknesses we have seen.
I suspect that Sanny will not attempt
to automate the testing process, and
that as a result, there will be... human
error.
-- help bot
|
| | | |
Date: 20 Aug 2008 10:53:49
From: Guest
Subject: Re: I will test them later.
|
"help bot" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:cc289465-71a8-48dc-be82-a796f2080343@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>loses to Rybka (shocker), although his
>attempts at describing such games are
>ludicrous.
That could just be due to him not being a chess player.
He has readily admitted numerous times that he isn't a good player.
For that matter, neither am I. Personally, I find chess programming to be
far more interesting than the game itself. I was interested in chess in my
earlier days, but once I saw computers playing chess, my interest in playing
chess disapeared.
> As far as what little I saw of the Bratco-
>Lopec positions, they are much too
>difficult for our purposes. But if in fact the
Since there are only 24 tests, there has to be a wide range of difficulty.
12 are tactical (with one mate position) and 12 are positional.
Even low end players should be able to get at least 3-4 right.
It's simply related to having so few positions.
(Speaking of which, I found another test like the BK test. I knew I had
seen it recently but couldn't remember where. I findally found it and was
about to post it when I read more carefully... The score formula is utterly
bogus! Even if you get none right you still get a rating of 2000.)
>test positions included 300 from Fred
>Reinfeld's old book, I think we could find
>the results somewhat useful. The problem
>is that Sanny's program has, and has
>always had, a serious problem with tactics.
I've heard that mentioned lots of times, but he's never explained it.
I'm wonder if it's just a bad q-search or some sort of selective search.
> I favor a complete re-write, focusing on
>tactics and speed. Only when tactics
>are fully under control should attempts
If you do a very basic chess program (like TSCP, CPWEngine, or even
MicroMax), then tactics are pretty much guaranteed. It'd just be a matter
of refining the q-search for even fancier stuff.
That's why I've wondered if maybe his program is somewhat like a selective
search.
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| | | | |
Date: 20 Aug 2008 19:52:17
From: Andy Walker
Subject: Re: I will test them later.
|
In article <[email protected] >, Guest <[email protected]> wrote:
>"help bot" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:cc289465-71a8-48dc-be82-a796f2080343@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>> [...] The problem
>>is that Sanny's program has, and has
>>always had, a serious problem with tactics.
>I've heard that mentioned lots of times, but he's never explained it.
>I'm wonder if it's just a bad q-search or some sort of selective search.
Well, his results give us a little insight! In the first
few WAC positions [and I'm certainly not going to look through any
more], his program overlooks two mates in 2, and a winning pin of
the queen. So that's either a Very Serious bug or else a selective
search that is never going to find moves that are apparently bad
at depth one or two. Either way, it explains the utter tactical
incompetence of his program.
At this stage, he doesn't need to worry about why his program
didn't find the rook sacrifice to get a pair of advanced passed pawns.
He just needs to find out why his program doesn't spot mate in 2 and
correct that. After that, he needs to find out why his program thinks
it is a pawn up on move 2 of the Sicilian ....
--
Andy Walker
Nottingham
|
| | | | | |
Date: 20 Aug 2008 15:23:30
From: Guest
Subject: Re: I will test them later.
|
"Andy Walker" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>, Guest <[email protected]> wrote:
>>"help bot" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:cc289465-71a8-48dc-be82-a796f2080343@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>> [...] The problem
>>>is that Sanny's program has, and has
>>>always had, a serious problem with tactics.
>>I've heard that mentioned lots of times, but he's never explained it.
>>I'm wonder if it's just a bad q-search or some sort of selective search.
>
> Well, his results give us a little insight! In the first
> few WAC positions [and I'm certainly not going to look through any
> more], his program overlooks two mates in 2, and a winning pin of
(cough).... No comment there....
> the queen. So that's either a Very Serious bug or else a selective
> search that is never going to find moves that are apparently bad
I am still curious. I have a feeling there's a good dose of selectivity in
the search. That maybe he's even patterened it on MacHack 6 or something.
It may not be what is classically called "selective search", but I don't
think it's a full width brute force search.
He said he's never done real research into computer chess, so it's possible
he based his on the same kind of ideas that were done in MacHack 6. It's
possible he heard about it and thought that was the way to go....?
> at depth one or two. Either way, it explains the utter tactical
> incompetence of his program.
Aren't test suites wonderfull....
If you don't test, then you don't know. And if you don't know, you can't
fix it.
I think it's safe to say that everybody in here is glad that Sanny is
finally doing some real tests.
Something objective.
Maybe we need to find a few more test suites.
Basic mates and drawing moves, basic tactical moves, and that kind of
thing....
Or he can. After all, it's not my program I'm debugging.
But at least he's finally running some real tests!
> At this stage, he doesn't need to worry about why his program
> didn't find the rook sacrifice to get a pair of advanced passed pawns.
> He just needs to find out why his program doesn't spot mate in 2 and
> correct that. After that, he needs to find out why his program thinks
> it is a pawn up on move 2 of the Sicilian ....
>
> --
> Andy Walker
> Nottingham
>
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| | |
Date: 19 Aug 2008 11:11:14
From:
Subject: Re: I will test them later.
|
On Aug 19, 1:34=A0pm, "Guest" <[email protected] > wrote:
>
> You can still do the basic testing and report the results though. =A0As a=
way
> of showing how many your engine gets right / wrong.
Do you seriously expect Sanny actually to do this, and if he does,
to report the results accurately? Given his long-running disregard for
factual truth, I don't.
|
| | |
Date: 19 Aug 2008 09:59:56
From: Sanny
Subject: Re: I will test them later.
|
> > 10 sec or 1 min or 5 min???
>
> For the total test positions I sent (24 Bratko-Kopec and 300 Win-At-Chess),
> I'd suggest first doing it at 5 seconds, then probably 10 and probably 30
> seconds.
GetClub program only has 5 levels to choose. And time taken varies
with position.
Beginner: 5-20 sec / move
Easy: 30-80 sec / move
Normal: 2-5 min / move
Master: 5-10 min / move.
Average time
Beginner: 15 sec / move
Easy: 60 sec / move
Normal: 4 min / move
Master: 15 min / move
I will just play each position with different levels.
Then I will tell you the results. It will take 2-3 weeks for these
testing.
Bye
Sanny
Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
| | | |
Date: 19 Aug 2008 12:34:38
From: Guest
Subject: Re: I will test them later.
|
"Sanny" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:cd0f9f57-bb77-4974-b6b2-c3af176051d0@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
>> > 10 sec or 1 min or 5 min???
>>
>> For the total test positions I sent (24 Bratko-Kopec and 300
>> Win-At-Chess),
>> I'd suggest first doing it at 5 seconds, then probably 10 and probably 30
>> seconds.
>
> GetClub program only has 5 levels to choose. And time taken varies
> with position.
>
> I will just play each position with different levels.
Okay.
You can still do the basic testing and report the results though. As a way
of showing how many your engine gets right / wrong.
Just run the tests at each time setting you want to check. It doesn't have
to be 5, 10 and 30 seconds. Those are just common settings that are quick
enough that people can run their programs through a lot of test positions
without taking too much time.
To do any sort of time based testing and get a pseudo Bratko-Kopec rating,
you'll have to do this manually, provided GC has a way to show the move it
is currently considering 'best'.
Put GC on a high enough level so it'll take at least two minutes (normal
level?) and then manually write down the suggested move at 30, 60, 90 and
120 seconds. Then simply abort GC and go on to the next move.
But this kind of testing is very awkward and annoying to do. It'd be easier
if you could automate it and do it by time.
I'm not sure if we could get any sort of valid results at the lower levels.
Maybe the easy level.
> Then I will tell you the results. It will take 2-3 weeks for these
> testing.
If you were to add some code to GC, the tests would could be done very
easily overnight when you aren't using the computer.
And you could even do the faster test settings at any time. Get an
urge....? Run them while you are eating supper. And so on.
If you were to automate it, I'd suggest running both the BK & the WAC test
suites, if not even more. At the suggested time limits (5, 10 and 30
seconds) you could run hundreds of positions overnight.
You could do it every week just as a check to see what improvements or
regressions have been made.
But that requires automation.
Since you can't do it by time, like most people do, you'd have to do it by
level. That's okay. Odd, but okay.
(You really should fix that time issue. So people or tests could be done
for a certain time per move or game. I'm assuming its a side effect of you
searching only full plies?)
>
> Bye
> Sanny
>
> Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
>
>
>
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| | |
Date: 19 Aug 2008 11:23:33
From: Guest
Subject: Re: I will test them later.
|
"Sanny" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:6ce7ddcc-5488-4a47-964c-f299324ddcfc@i20g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> Here is what I think. Here is my guess work
>
> Beginner Level will not be able to find any of the correct moves
>
> Easy Level will solve 30% of them correctly.
>
> Normal Level will solve 60% of them.
>
> Master Level will solve 80% of them
>
> Rybka will solve 90% of them.
We'll find out what GC can do....
Having never played GC, I can't judge what its actually capable of doing.
That's what testing is for.
> Before I test them, tell me what is the validity that the above
> results are correct. And they are the only moves that GetClub should
> play?
>
> It may happen the best move is wrong. Who has checked that these
> results are OK?
It happens.
As my message said, there is some disagreement about some of the positions.
More analysis and drastically deeper searches have suggested different
'best' moves.
But with so many positions, even if 10% are wrong (and I seriously doubt
that many of the WAC are), it wont significantly effect your results.
But, if you wish to get current information on test suites and which ones
are best, I'd suggest going over to the computer chess club forums and
asking.
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewforum.php?start=0&f=7&topic_view=flat
Those people are a lot more knowledgeable than I am about current research
into test positions. Both wider variety and positions that have contested
moves.
Be aware though that they wont tolerate your constant advertising of GC
chess or your regular ratings claims without any testing to back it up.
Unless you want to get flamed, you probably shouldn't mention you use only
Rybka as a test opponent and are gettings ratings estimate from it.
As long as you don't brag about GC (without testing results to back it up,
of course) and just ask questions, you'll be welcomed.
> In opening both e4 and d4 are correct So what if the GetClub chose
> another correct alternatives?
Opening positions aren't part of the test suites.
Besides, that's what opening books are for.
> Are the best moves the only move that has to be played in these
> positions?
In most of these positions (I think in all the ones I sent you), the best
move is 'best' for a reason.
Other moves are not the winning move. They are either just average or
actually losing moves.
But generally, the idea in these tests are there is only one best /
reasonable move
> r1r2bk1/5p1p/pn4p1/N2b4/3Pp3/B3P3/2q1BPPP/RQ3RK1 b - - bm Bxa3; id
> "WAC.280";
>
> here b - - means Black to play and No Chastling allowed. And best move
> is Bxa3.
Right.
> If Black plays something else how much bad will be that.
Nothing.
These tests are done as "Get the right move" and count it as a point, or get
no point at all.
Most tests aren't about mediocre moves. It's about picking the one right
move. The winning move. Not the delaying move or the loosing move.
These are not random positions from games. They were chosen to have "a"
right move.
> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 30% ?
> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 40% ?
> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 50% ?
> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 60% ?
> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 70% ?
> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 80% ?
> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 90% ?
> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 100% ?
These tests are *NOT* about what ELO rating you get.
As I've told you before, that can only come from actual games played. Like
if you let your game play via the free chess servers.
These tests are about finding flaws in your program, finding what kind of
positions it doesn't know how to deal with. And then regularly re-running
them to make sure you don't have any regressions.
It's a way to measure improvement in your program. The better it is, the
more it can do right.
You can compare your results to others. And that can give an idea of
whether your program is significantly weaker or about the same as another
program.
But it can't give ratings.
Yes, the Bratko-Kopec test was originally done to give ratings. But it has
been shown to be way too high. At least 200 to 250 points too high. And
even then, there are too few positions to give a *reliable* rating.
Still, if you wanted to get a BK rating, post the results and I'll calculate
it with the revised method, and you can tell people that you got a "BK
Rating" of xyz at abc level. It will *NOT* be the same as a real elo rating
though. But still, it could be something to brag about and compare to other
programs. (The same could be said about the WAC positions. That you got
xyz and program ABC got only JFK right.)
To do a computer version of the BK test, do each of the 24 BK positions (Not
the 300 WAC positions, but just the 24 BK positions) and record what the
'best move' your program indicates at 30, 60, 90, and 120 seconds.
Post those results and I'll run them through the recalibrated BK test that
Kopec published.
You'll have to do that for each level you want to test with GC.
Again, be aware that this will not be entirely accurate.
> How much time should GetClub be given to solve these positions?
>
> 10 sec or 1 min or 5 min???
For the total test positions I sent (24 Bratko-Kopec and 300 Win-At-Chess),
I'd suggest first doing it at 5 seconds, then probably 10 and probably 30
seconds.
That would give you an idea of how much your program improves with longer
search times.
You could certainly do longer, but with 300 WAC positions, the extra time
can start to be inconvenient.
It would also allow you to compare other programs at comparable time
controls.
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| | |
Date: 19 Aug 2008 05:55:50
From: help bot
Subject: Re: I will test them later.
|
Sanny wrote:
> Here is what I think. Here is my guess work
>
> Beginner Level will not be able to find any of the correct moves
>
> Easy Level will solve 30% of them correctly.
>
> Normal Level will solve 60% of them.
>
> Master Level will solve 80% of them
>
> Rybka will solve 90% of them.
>
> Before I test them, tell me what is the validity that the above
> results are correct.
I have not seen but a couple of these types
of test positions being discussed by others,
but I believe you may find that they are far
too difficult for GetClub to handle well.
Rybka, on the other hand, could be used as
a fair guide to which test answers are dubious;
just make sure you allow plenty of thinking
time so she can zoom up to speed (~3000).
> And they are the only moves that GetClub should
> play?
>
> It may happen the best move is wrong. Who has checked that these
> results are OK?
I read that some of the answers were, as
they termed it, controversial. In other words,
the "correct" answer was decided by a measly
International Master, before the advent of really
strong chess engines.
> In opening both e4 and d4 are correct So what if the GetClub chose
> another correct alternatives?
The starting position will hopefully not be one
of the test questions.
> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 30% ?
I found some information about this by
simply doing a google search on "Bratco-
Kopec test". Unfortunately, to actually
take the test on screen, you had to be a
member.
> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 40% ?
>
> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 50% ?
>
> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 60% ?
>
> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 70% ?
I wouldn't worry about that.
> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 100% ?
That would indeed be scary; it would indicate
that you had specifically fine-tuned your GC
engine for this crude test, and succeeded!!
> Is this the way to find the correct ratings?
No.
> How much time should GetClub be given to solve these positions?
This was all explained in the original post in
this thread. The test I saw discussed on the
Web had a strict limit of two minutes per
test position, and the problems were very
complex. In fact, their scale for the various
test results did not go above the level of the
test's designer (i.e. IM), and as I recall, the
lower limit was not useful for our purposes
here.
In my opinion, you need a test suite which
has lots of different types of positions, and
which can tell you if your program is a USCF
1200, a 1500 or an 1800. The Kopec test is
simply in the wrong range of strengths.
-- help bot
|
| | | |
Date: 19 Aug 2008 11:24:30
From: Guest
Subject: Re: I will test them later.
|
"help bot" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:bc17afc3-beda-46b4-8e8a-4d00d618ac3f@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Sanny wrote:
>
>> Here is what I think. Here is my guess work
>>
>> Beginner Level will not be able to find any of the correct moves
>>
>> Easy Level will solve 30% of them correctly.
>>
>> Normal Level will solve 60% of them.
>>
>> Master Level will solve 80% of them
>>
>> Rybka will solve 90% of them.
>>
>> Before I test them, tell me what is the validity that the above
>> results are correct.
>
>
> I have not seen but a couple of these types
> of test positions being discussed by others,
> but I believe you may find that they are far
> too difficult for GetClub to handle well.
>
> Rybka, on the other hand, could be used as
> a fair guide to which test answers are dubious;
> just make sure you allow plenty of thinking
> time so she can zoom up to speed (~3000).
It would be far far better if he went over to the TalkChess forum and asked
there.
There are already people who have done deep searches on these positions and
have studied them etc.
>
>
>> And they are the only moves that GetClub should
>> play?
>>
>> It may happen the best move is wrong. Who has checked that these
>> results are OK?
>
>
> I read that some of the answers were, as
> they termed it, controversial. In other words,
> the "correct" answer was decided by a measly
> International Master, before the advent of really
> strong chess engines.
That's true.
But even now, not all computers doing deep searches will agree.
>
>
>> In opening both e4 and d4 are correct So what if the GetClub chose
>> another correct alternatives?
>
>
> The starting position will hopefully not be one
> of the test questions.
>
>
>> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 30% ?
>
>
> I found some information about this by
> simply doing a google search on "Bratco-
> Kopec test". Unfortunately, to actually
> take the test on screen, you had to be a
> member.
No.
The paper was published long long ago.
It's not some modern web thingie he came up with.
>
>
>> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 40% ?
>>
>> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 50% ?
>>
>> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 60% ?
>>
>> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 70% ?
>
>
> I wouldn't worry about that.
>
>
>> What should the rating of GetClub if GetClub score 100% ?
>
>
> That would indeed be scary; it would indicate
> that you had specifically fine-tuned your GC
> engine for this crude test, and succeeded!!
It happens.
Not just with BK test, but with any limited number of positions being
tested.
Somebody gets fixated on using one thing as a guide to judge the quality of
their program and they tune it to do great on it with the result that games
and other positions are terrible.
That's why you need variety.
>
>
>> Is this the way to find the correct ratings?
>
>
> No.
>
>
>> How much time should GetClub be given to solve these positions?
>
>
> This was all explained in the original post in
> this thread. The test I saw discussed on the
> Web had a strict limit of two minutes per
> test position, and the problems were very
> complex. In fact, their scale for the various
> test results did not go above the level of the
> test's designer (i.e. IM), and as I recall, the
> lower limit was not useful for our purposes
> here.
>
> In my opinion, you need a test suite which
> has lots of different types of positions, and
> which can tell you if your program is a USCF
> 1200, a 1500 or an 1800. The Kopec test is
> simply in the wrong range of strengths.
>
>
> -- help bot
>
>
>
>
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| |
Date: 19 Aug 2008 01:05:46
From: Sanny
Subject: Big Bug found.
|
I will try them next week as I need to convert them to the format
which GetClub understands.
Today a big bug was found and removed.
Now it will not show awkward scores.
I was very worried it used to show +2 benefit in equal positions. Now
it show 0.02 in equal position.
So the Scores will be correct as per the position of the board.
That was a great Bug which give 2 pawn losses in equal positions.
Thats why GetClub used to sacrifice its pawns for no reasions.
Having corrected that I feel GetClub will play stronger moves.
Bye
Sanny
Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
| |
Date: 18 Aug 2008 18:51:11
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Sanny: Some test positions for you
|
Guest wrote:
> Sanny;
>
> Here are some standard test positions for you to use with GetClub chess.
>
> The classic Bratko-Kopec test and the Win-At-Chess test. There are many
> other test sets, but these are classics that most people use. The
> Bratko-Kopec tests are particularly intersting, since they've been around so
> long and so many programs have done it. They aren't extensive enough, which
> is why people use additional test sets, but they are classics that most
> people use.
I did a google search on "Bratko-Kopec test" and
learned a little bit about this. One issue was the
small number of test positions, and another was
the fact that their results always came out nearly
a class too high, relative to superior methods.
But here is where I have a real beef with this
approach: apparently, some of the positions were
snatched from the latest fads in openings theory,
and if you have read some ultra-narrow analysis of
the lines in question and could recall everything,
you will pick the "correct" answer. Otherwise,
you're just out of luck, since nobody -- but nobody
-- can figure all this stuff out in the allotted two
minutes.
That, my friends, is not true chess skill. Bring
Emanuel Lasker forth from the grave and have
him answer whether or not White's Queen can
be trapped in some peculiar line from /New In
Chess/ magazine circa 1988, and he will of
course fail. Yet he would make mincemeat of
all these IMs and FMs who construct their tests
to closely match their own, peculiar chess
knowledge of the latest openings theory or even
the supposedly "proper" pawn lever in some
position or other.
Sanny's program requires easier questions--
far easier, I would say. And what's more, you
can't score answers with this simplistic right/
wrong approach; you need to penalize losing
moves and reward good-enough answers by
comparison, just as in real-world play. In fact,
it seems to me that a well-programmed chess
engine might be a good way to figure out the
real strength of Sanny's program, provided it
can reasonably weaken its own play all the
way down to GetClub's low level.
Suppose for a moment that Fritz's "limit
playing strength" function worked like magic,
perfectly simulating the various playing
strengths from zero to infinity. All you would
have to do is have it play the GC program a
large number of games at various settings,
and look to see where the results evened
out, where it won and lost equally. That
would tell you it's actual strength, based on
entire games-- not just a few, peculiar chess
positions. There would be no opportunity for
controversy over whether or not any
particular "answer" was correct, for the
games' results would settle the issue
objectively, based on a very large number
of chess decisions in all sorts of positions.
It seems to me, from what little I saw (for
free) of these Kopec positions, they are
quite simply the sort of thing that Sanny's
program could not solve, except perhaps
by dumb luck; they are too advanced for
weak programs. What is needed is a test
of simple, straight-forward tactics, where
one may win a piece, force checkmate,
that sort of thing. Start with one-movers,
then have some questions that require
seeing two full moves ahead, then three
and then four.
-- help bot
|
| | |
Date: 22 Aug 2008 23:35:22
From: Sanny
Subject: Re: Sanny: Some test positions for you
|
Though after improvement GetClub scored 44% it missed some Mate
Positions So I revert back to original.
I will again test in the evening to see if the new score.
Beginner Solving 39% is good enough. It means Easy Level will sove
arround 60% of them.
Bye
Sanny
|
| | | |
Date: 23 Aug 2008 10:24:27
From: Guest
Subject: Re: Sanny: Some test positions for you
|
"Sanny" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:66edad66-dd80-42e1-8756-ce2a53c0e093@l33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> Though after improvement GetClub scored 44% it missed some Mate
> Positions So I revert back to original.
>
> I will again test in the evening to see if the new score.
>
> Beginner Solving 39% is good enough. It means Easy Level will sove
> arround 60% of them.
Maybe, maybe not.
You need to be careful how much time you take, though.
A beginner level should take very little time (considering how well GC does
on the test at that level.)
So Easy Level shouldn't take much longer. No more than 30 seconds, I'd say.
It's really a judgement call, but a strong program is going to get a high
percentage of the WAC test suite very quickly.
What I'm saying is, at 30 seconds per move (no matter what you call that
level), you should get nearly all of them. 90% or so. (That's allowing for
contested solutions, etc.)
So you need to make sure you aren't taking too long, as well as getting a
good percentage of them.
Once you can get most of these positions at a good time setting, I'll
introduce you to some difficult test sets. The WAC set is pretty much a
beginner's testing suite.
>
> Bye
> Sanny
>
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| | |
Date: 22 Aug 2008 13:51:35
From:
Subject: Re: Sanny: Some test positions for you
|
On 19 Aug., 03:51, help bot <[email protected] > wrote:
> Guest wrote:
What is needed is a test
> of simple, straight-forward tactics, where
> one may win a piece, forcecheckmate,
> that sort of thing. =A0Start with one-movers,
> then have some questions that require
> seeing two full moves ahead, then three
> and then four.
Hello,
my quest=EDon:
Where can I find
those easy tasks
with easy results?
Thanks!
Greetings!
|
| | | |
Date: 22 Aug 2008 17:40:58
From: Guest
Subject: Re: Sanny: Some test positions for you
|
<[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On 19 Aug., 03:51, help bot <[email protected] > wrote:
> Guest wrote:
>>What is needed is a test
>> of simple, straight-forward tactics, where
>> one may win a piece, forcecheckmate,
>> that sort of thing. Start with one-movers,
>> then have some questions that require
>> seeing two full moves ahead, then three
>> and then four.
>Hello,
>my quest�on:
>Where can I find
>those easy tasks
>with easy results?
Unfortunately I don't know of a good set of debugging positions.
Most authors just create their own and find what they can.
Sorry.
If you are still wanting some, you could go over to TalkChess.com and ask in
the programmer's forum.
Occasionally people will ask about that, but usually most people just
suggest WAC and so on.
Maybe this time they'll have a better answer.
>Thanks!
>Greetings!
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| | |
Date: 21 Aug 2008 02:45:48
From: Sanny
Subject: Re: Help Bot, Should I cancel your game So that you may start a new
|
On Aug 21, 11:57=A0am, help bot <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Aug 21, 1:18=A0am, Sanny <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > > =A0 The Master level was moving at a reasonable
> > > rate of speed until I played Qxe5, reaching the
> > > current position. =A0Now, it refuses to move, period.
> > > I am up two pawns for nothing-- a simple win if I
> > > avoid opposite colored Bishops (as in a recent
> > > OTB game where I believed I could win anyway,
> > > but was proved wrong by a mere 1600 player!).
> > > The normal pattern thus far has been an
> > > unexpected "cancellation" of all such games
> > > where I was winning, so why should this time
> > > be any different?
>
> > What do you say? Try once more and see it plays. if not I will remove
> > this game.
>
> > A move by master level takes 320 sec - 5120 sec
>
> > So Max time for a move by Master Level is 5120 sec thats roughly 1.5
> > hours. Just open the game let it think for 1.5 hours and see if it
> > goes ahead.
>
> =A0 Last night I let it run again for many hours,
> to no avail. =A0This time I cut it off after only a
> few hours, as it obviously is in an infinite
> loop.
>
> =A0 The claim that the maximum time is a
> mere 5120 seconds is obviously wrong. =A0I
> find it strange that when the program is
> winning, there is never a lock-up; yet in the
> multitude of positions where I am winning,
> there are numerous "malfunctions" of every
> imaginable sort-- each of which make it
> impossible to continue play. =A0I am
> reminded of Gary Kasparov and his fits
> when losing to DeepBlue. =A0And then there
> was that other fellow, Bob... er, um, Fish-
> something, who always "had a cow" if
> things did not go his way. =A0Is it possible
> yourchessengine just can't handle
> losing like a carrot?
>
Should I remove this game? I do not understand why it do not make its
move. When such things happen forst restart the computer and then play
the game again. Sometimes some errors pop up which can only be removed
by restarting the computer.
Just restart your computer and give it 1.5 hours to think and I
bilieve it will play its move in 1.5 hours. As Master always think
between 320 sec - 5120 sec.
If it does not I will reset this game. Try playing lower levels. Now,
Normal Level will play as good as Master Level as yesterday there was
Twice improvement done in game.
Bye
Sanny
Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
| | |
Date: 20 Aug 2008 23:57:33
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Help Bot, Should I cancel your game So that you may start a new
|
On Aug 21, 1:18=A0am, Sanny <[email protected] > wrote:
> > =A0 The Master level was moving at a reasonable
> > rate of speed until I played Qxe5, reaching the
> > current position. =A0Now, it refuses to move, period.
> > I am up two pawns for nothing-- a simple win if I
> > avoid opposite colored Bishops (as in a recent
> > OTB game where I believed I could win anyway,
> > but was proved wrong by a mere 1600 player!).
> > The normal pattern thus far has been an
> > unexpected "cancellation" of all such games
> > where I was winning, so why should this time
> > be any different?
>
> What do you say? Try once more and see it plays. if not I will remove
> this game.
>
> A move by master level takes 320 sec - 5120 sec
>
> So Max time for a move by Master Level is 5120 sec thats roughly 1.5
> hours. Just open the game let it think for 1.5 hours and see if it
> goes ahead.
Last night I let it run again for many hours,
to no avail. This time I cut it off after only a
few hours, as it obviously is in an infinite
loop.
The claim that the maximum time is a
mere 5120 seconds is obviously wrong. I
find it strange that when the program is
winning, there is never a lock-up; yet in the
multitude of positions where I am winning,
there are numerous "malfunctions" of every
imaginable sort-- each of which make it
impossible to continue play. I am
reminded of Gary Kasparov and his fits
when losing to DeepBlue. And then there
was that other fellow, Bob... er, um, Fish-
something, who always "had a cow" if
things did not go his way. Is it possible
your chess engine just can't handle
losing like a carrot?
-- help bot
|
| | |
Date: 20 Aug 2008 22:18:09
From: Sanny
Subject: Re: Help Bot, Should I cancel your game So that you may start a new
|
> =A0 The Master level was moving at a reasonable
> rate of speed until I played Qxe5, reaching the
> current position. =A0Now, it refuses to move, period.
> I am up two pawns for nothing-- a simple win if I
> avoid opposite colored Bishops (as in a recent
> OTB game where I believed I could win anyway,
> but was proved wrong by a mere 1600 player!).
> The normal pattern thus far has been an
> unexpected "cancellation" of all such games
> where I was winning, so why should this time
> be any different?
What do you say? Try once more and see it plays. if not I will remove
this game.
A move by master level takes 320 sec - 5120 sec
So Max time for a move by Master Level is 5120 sec thats roughly 1.5
hours. Just open the game let it think for 1.5 hours and see if it
goes ahead.
Bye
Sanny
Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
| | |
Date: 20 Aug 2008 16:13:37
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Help Bot, Should I cancel your game So that you may start a new
|
On Aug 20, 12:09=A0pm, Sanny <[email protected] > wrote:
> The game you are playing with Master Level is taking 5 days. Still not
> complete.
>
> Should I cancel your game with Master Level So that you can start a
> new game? Try playing the Normal & Easy Level instead?
>
> There was a big Bug 2 days back So Master Level played badly. Now even
> the Normal Level will play a very strong game.
The Master level was moving at a reasonable
rate of speed until I played Qxe5, reaching the
current position. Now, it refuses to move, period.
I am up two pawns for nothing-- a simple win if I
avoid opposite colored Bishops (as in a recent
OTB game where I believed I could win anyway,
but was proved wrong by a mere 1600 player!).
The normal pattern thus far has been an
unexpected "cancellation" of all such games
where I was winning, so why should this time
be any different?
-- help bot
|
| | |
Date: 20 Aug 2008 09:09:46
From: Sanny
Subject: Help Bot, Should I cancel your game So that you may start a new game?
|
The game you are playing with Master Level is taking 5 days. Still not
complete.
Should I cancel your game with Master Level So that you can start a
new game? Try playing the Normal & Easy Level instead?
There was a big Bug 2 days back So Master Level played badly. Now even
the Normal Level will play a very strong game.
Bye
Sanny
Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
| | |
Date: 18 Aug 2008 22:04:59
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Sanny: Some test positions for you
|
Guest wrote:
> > the fact that their results always came out nearly
> > a class too high, relative to superior methods.
>
> As I told Sanny a long time ago, the ratings numbers are bogus. I warned
> him about that months ago. I should have warned him again, but I doubted he
> would have actually tried it. (And to be honest... even if he had, I
> suspect those numbers would have still been lower than what he advertises.)
True, but why not re-calibrate the test scores
so that they are in better accord with reality?
> Even with a couple 'recalibrations' / revistation's over the years, the
> ratings numbers aren't really accurate.
>
> That's not what's being tested here.
>
> What's being tested is solely whether or not GC can find the accepted move.
Ah, but the answers to those few problems
are *not* accepted. Some are disputed, and
when you consider the time frame, a few are
probably wrong, which means the scoring
system penalizes you for not agreeing with
it, rather than for not finding the best moves.
> No matter how bad your program is, with today's hardware, you should be able
> to get at least half right.
>
> Less than that suggests serious issues with the program.
We already know that Sanny's program has
serious issues. What we don't know is just
what sort of rating all those issues, combined
together, will net. Will it be 1200? 1700?
> > But here is where I have a real beef with this
> > approach: apparently, some of the positions were
> > snatched from the latest fads in openings theory,
> > and if you have read some ultra-narrow analysis of
>
> Computers don't have to worry about reading... They calculate everything.
My point, exactly. The latest fads may well
have it wrong, and if a 1988 /New in Chess/
shows 19. ...h6!!! is best against the hyper-Borg
Attack, it may well be that in 2007 Rybka 2.0c
finds a mate-in-twenty refutation to Kopec's
"correct" answer.
> The tests have been widely used in the computer chess world since the report
> was done.
Okay. Are you trying to suggest that wide-
spread adoption -- as with the Ptolemaic model
of the Universe -- is somehow proof of correct-
ness?
> Even though everybody knew the numbers were bogus and the positions not the
> best, it was still a standard test that everybody could share and compare.
>
> That's why I bothered to suggest it.
>
> And if you'll notice, at no time did I ever say the BK or WAC test suites
> were the best. I said they were classics that most people use.
But Sanny's program is relatively weak.
Why do you want him to use a test suite
that gives his engine no real chance of
finding the supposedly correct answers?
A short article I read implied that the test
suite was designed to see if strong chess
programs of that era could find the "right"
moves or ideas that masters or IMs may
find. This is way, way out of Sanny's
league; his program may well score a
big, fat zero on every level, barring dumb
luck answer-matches by sheer chance.
What useful information would such a
result provide-- that the program is not a
grandmaster? (We already know this!)
> But we don't treat the BK test like they originally intended.
>
> You either find the right move and get a +1 score, or you get it wrong and
> you get a zero.
>
> Nothing more.
That's just plain silly. If a chess engine
plays a terrible move, that fact needs to be
factored into the score, just as if it finds
another viable move which is not an exact
match to Brat-Kopec, there should be no
penalty.
> I could have left out the BK test. But the big reason I did suggest it is
> because it's been used for so long that there are results available for a
> number of classic chess programs.
>
> Sargon 2.5, Sargon 4, Sargon 5, Awit, Chaos, Belle, CrayBlitz, Deep Thought,
> HiTech, And others. Those are just some I happen to know of off hand.
And they also just happen to be among the
strongest chess programs of their eras. Why
are you intent on rating GetClub on a scale
so high that it's score will be "off the chart"?
> I could have also posted other test sets, but I figured two were enough.
> We'd be lucky if Sanny even did one single position.
I somehow doubt that he will even understand
your explanation of the complex notation.
> > comparison, just as in real-world play. In fact,
> > it seems to me that a well-programmed chess
> > engine might be a good way to figure out the
> > real strength of Sanny's program, provided it
> > can reasonably weaken its own play all the
> > way down to GetClub's low level.
>
> No.
>
> There are significant problems in computer vs. computer play.
>
> It makes it very hard to actually determine the strength of the new program.
>
> For example, the one with the deeper search is likely to win. Regardless of
> whether its the stronger program when playing humans.
This commentary seems to completely
ignore the gist of my idea: playing Fritz set
to perfectly emulate a 1200 player is *not*
the same as a match between GetClub and
Fritz; the issues you describe do not just
carry over.
> Computer vs. computer is just not the same human vs. human or computer vs.
> human.
>
> Hyatt has also noticed that doing too few different starting positions can
> lead to some very eratic testing results in computer vs. computer. Even
> with lots of games (thousands to millions) the results are still eratic from
> one batch to the next. (Has to do with timing fluctuations and limited
> variability of starting positions.)
That sort of testing is not practical, as
nobody is going to sit down and manually
play GetClub against some other 1200-
rated computers.
> He's done testing for a year and a half and the eratic nature is quite
> repeatable. Most people just don't do enough games to notice or do their
> testing in a different way.
Maybe there is something wrong with
the way he is doing this; sometimes
people can be blinded to even the most
obvious of things. (Take that one fellow
who played with a sting ray, for instance;
do you think for one moment he did not
know that he was swimming within
striking range? Maybe he thought his
quick reflexes would allow him to jump
out of the way, as when a gator strikes.)
> Second, you need to play more than just one or two programs. Sanny playing
> only against Rybka and coming up with ratings is definetly wrong.
I repeat: not only is it meaningless to test
GetClub against Rybka, but any test suite
that is designed for a set level, such as
Expert/Master/SM, is just as wrongheaded.
We already know that Sanny's program is
well below those levels; what we don't know
is where among the Class B/C/D/E sections
it fits, exactly. The test questions need to
tackle everything from the simplest tactics
to more difficult problems-- and Mr. Kopec's
seem to miss this aim by a country mile.
> Third, for a quality program to actually weaken its play down to a specific
> level is actually harder than you might think. It's more than just
> weakening the eval and making the occasional tactical blunder because at
> other times, the search is going to see so much that most of its moves will
> still be too strong.
I know that; this is why I postulated a
supposedly perfect emulation instead of
suggesting that any such thing actually
exists.
> The point is, it's difficult to get realistic reduced playing strengths. It
> can be done, but it's not easy. Any program that gives reduced ratings
> levels should be looked at with suspicion unless there is testing to back it
> up.
Such as the testing that showed the Kopec
test results to be about a full class off base?
> To do computer vs. computer testing reliably and get a reasonable rating,
> you'd need several programs with reliable strengths and you'd need lots of
> games for each time control of interest. You need to automate it. You need
> lots of different opening positions, so opening books aren't being judged.
This goes right back to my criticism of a
few of the Kopec test questions, which one
article related were based on one's familiarity
with then recently-published and dubious
openings theory. I would just as soon avoid
the issue of openings /opinions/ and focus
instead on what is known as fact. Including
dubious opinions into such tests is pretty
much counter-productive, while adding a
variety of questions -- to which the answers
are indisputable -- would serve to improve
the process immensely.
-- help bot
|
| | | |
Date: 19 Aug 2008 11:20:35
From: Guest
Subject: Re: Sanny: Some test positions for you
|
"help bot" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:7c88647a-cd00-4309-b88e-d7572aee7c7c@v57g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
>> As I told Sanny a long time ago, the ratings numbers are bogus. I warned
>> him about that months ago. I should have warned him again, but I doubted
>> he
>> would have actually tried it. (And to be honest... even if he had, I
>> suspect those numbers would have still been lower than what he
>> advertises.)
>
> True, but why not re-calibrate the test scores
> so that they are in better accord with reality?
Because there is considerable doubt that so few positions can even give an
accurate rating, even allowing for a couple hundred point downward
adjustment and a couple hundred points width in ratings aproximation..
There just isn't enough variety. It is possible that more positions
(several hundred) might be able to give a more accurate rating estimate, but
I'm not aware of any research into developing such a test & rating scale.
Don't misunderstand me, I have no objection to the *idea* of running a quick
test suite and using that to calculate an aproximate playing ability. I
think it'd be quite handy.
It's just that to my knowledge, there has been no more research into
developing such a test, and there's no proof that such test results are
reliable.
It is true that strong programs tend to do tolerably well on the tests. But
that doesn't mean the other direction is true. That if you do well on the
test the program will actually play reasonably well. The program could end
up being tuned for that test and be terrible in other positions.
>> Even with a couple 'recalibrations' / revistation's over the years, the
>> ratings numbers aren't really accurate.
>>
>> That's not what's being tested here.
>>
>> What's being tested is solely whether or not GC can find the accepted
>> move.
>
>
> Ah, but the answers to those few problems
> are *not* accepted. Some are disputed, and
> when you consider the time frame, a few are
A lot of answers are disputed in all the common tests.
That's one of the big problems with test suites, and one of the reasons that
you can't easily make a ratings estimation from them.
Depending on how you play, you might actually prefer a different move.
Depending on who you are playing (and their skill and techniques) you might
prefer a different move. For example, wasn't it Tal who loved to get into
very risky tactical positions, and overwhelm his opponents? He did that
because his opponents were uncomfortable with those positions. He certainly
couldn't do that with any computer chess program. So even *who* you are
playing can effect what's considered the 'best' move.
With deeper investigation (or searching) it's possible that an accepted move
is found to be less than expected.
That's the risk you take with any sort of testing. Whether it's testing
positions or testing games.
In my first message in this thread, I did point out that very possibility.
But I also pointed out that at least with WAC, a few missed moves aren't
going to significantly effect his score.
There are newer versions of the WAC test suite with 'revised' answers.
Answers that are based on current research and deep computer searches. But
even those could be disputed.
> We already know that Sanny's program has
> serious issues. What we don't know is just
> what sort of rating all those issues, combined
> together, will net. Will it be 1200? 1700?
But with test positions, *he* can see that his program has a problem with a
particular position that other programs easily get.
>> Computers don't have to worry about reading... They calculate
>> everything.
>
>
> My point, exactly. The latest fads may well
> have it wrong, and if a 1988 /New in Chess/
> shows 19. ...h6!!! is best against the hyper-Borg
> Attack, it may well be that in 2007 Rybka 2.0c
> finds a mate-in-twenty refutation to Kopec's
> "correct" answer.
Possibly
Things do change as positions get analyzed more & more.
But that's true of opening theory that people use to play games. And
endgame theory that people use.
But usually that doesn't happen because a particular move is 'best' for a
reason.
So it's not really any different from with humans.
>> The tests have been widely used in the computer chess world since the
>> report
>> was done.
>
>
> Okay. Are you trying to suggest that wide-
> spread adoption -- as with the Ptolemaic model
> of the Universe -- is somehow proof of correct-
> ness?
Who said anything about every move being correct? In fact, in my original
message I went out of my way to point out that some positions have contested
moves.
But the idea of a good test suite is that there tends to be only one 'best'
move, even if there are several 'good' moves. Many of them are 'best' for a
particular reason, not because of any fad.
The idea here is that test positions are something he can use and judge by,
and something that he can accurately report. Or would you rather his next
message say that now beginner level has reached 2800 elo?
>> Even though everybody knew the numbers were bogus and the positions not
>> the
>> best, it was still a standard test that everybody could share and
>> compare.
>>
>> That's why I bothered to suggest it.
>>
>> And if you'll notice, at no time did I ever say the BK or WAC test suites
>> were the best. I said they were classics that most people use.
>
> But Sanny's program is relatively weak.
> Why do you want him to use a test suite
> that gives his engine no real chance of
> finding the supposedly correct answers?
He does have a chance. Not to solve all of the positions, but that's kind
of the point. You don't want a test where you can solve them all.
The test suites I suggested are not the hardest around.
They are actually fairly basic. And the time controls I suggested are
actually fairly generous. Many people use 5 seconds a move for their
programs in these suites. I suggested he try 5, 10 and 30 seconds. He can
even go to one minute if he wants to spend that much time. Just as long as
he does so consistantly.
They are often used in the early stages of chess programming.
Remember, computer chess searching is a lot different from the way humans
play. So programs can actually find quite a few of these positions simply
because of their tactical search.
But hey, if *you* don't like these test suites, feel free to suggest some of
your own.
I have absolutely no problem with that.
> A short article I read implied that the test
> suite was designed to see if strong chess
Not sure which test you are talking about.
Win-At-Chess test suite is, of course, from a chess teaching book called
"Win At Chess"
The Bratko-Kopec test was also derived from several teaching chess books,
although I can't remember their names.
Incidentally, if you want to read the original paper on the BK test,
http://spider.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~kopec/Publications/P_index.html
http://spider.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~kopec/Publications/Publications/O_42_C.pdf
There are several papers about the BK test, but I don't happen to have a
handy link to them. One is "The Bratko-Kopec test Revisited" by T.
Marsland, and another is "The Bratko-Kopec Test Recalibrated" by Benn &^
Kopec. And a couple others that I can't find.
> programs of that era could find the "right"
> moves or ideas that masters or IMs may
> find. This is way, way out of Sanny's
Many of the 'best moves' are actually done for tactical reasons that
computers can do.
For the positional ones, he'll get some right and some wrong.
For the tactical ones, he'll miss some, too.
And then he'll have some idea of where his program is failing and where to
improve it. That's what test positions are all about.
> league; his program may well score a
> big, fat zero on every level, barring dumb
Bet not.
I wouldn't be at all surprised if TSCP (or the CPW clone) or micromax could
solve quite a few of them.
Remember, chess is tactics and because of that, many 'best moves' are done
for eventual tactical reasons.
Tactics are something computers are pretty good at.
But no, I don't expect him to score as well as many other programs.
That doesn't matter. These tests give solid answers rather than the vague
kind of testing he's been doing.
>> But we don't treat the BK test like they originally intended.
>>
>> You either find the right move and get a +1 score, or you get it wrong
>> and
>> you get a zero.
>>
>> Nothing more.
>
>
> That's just plain silly. If a chess engine
> plays a terrible move, that fact needs to be
> factored into the score, just as if it finds
> another viable move which is not an exact
> match to Brat-Kopec, there should be no
> penalty.
There are some tests that do have 'avoid' moves.
But those are harder tests.
Let's keep things simple for him and just give him points for the ones he
gets right. For the ones he doesn't, he needs to work on.
Remember, most of these have only one best move for a reason. Implicitly if
you don't choose it, you made a terrible move.
(Not all are like that, but we can pretend that for now.)
>> I could have left out the BK test. But the big reason I did suggest it
>> is
>> because it's been used for so long that there are results available for a
>> number of classic chess programs.
>>
>> Sargon 2.5, Sargon 4, Sargon 5, Awit, Chaos, Belle, CrayBlitz, Deep
>> Thought,
>> HiTech, And others. Those are just some I happen to know of off hand.
>
>
> And they also just happen to be among the
> strongest chess programs of their eras. Why
> are you intent on rating GetClub on a scale
> so high that it's score will be "off the chart"?
(shaking head....)
You really don't get how much computer performance effects things.
With modern hardware, even a *SIMPLE* program like MicroMax has a higher
rating that Sargon 2.5 / 4 / 5 or Awit or Chaos did back in their prime.
I think TSCP can score around 1800. Faile over 2000. Neither of those are
complicated programs.
Even a semi-smart program easily has a higher rating than Belle or
CrayBlitz. By today's standards, the early CrayBlitz is an idiot running on
slower hardware than many PDA's have.
Modern hardware is *FAST* and it really helps.
I once had a discussion with Sanny about the "Technology curve". About how
much faster hardware can help your play and ratings. Going from the
hardware from back then (such as sargon 2.5) to now is going to really help!
So his scores should be comparable to what the Sargons could do. (I said
should... not would...)
If he improves his program, then he can compare to Belle, CrayBlitz, etc.
Kind of scary, huh?
>> I could have also posted other test sets, but I figured two were enough.
>> We'd be lucky if Sanny even did one single position.
>
>
> I somehow doubt that he will even understand
> your explanation of the complex notation.
(shrug)
I tried.
Feel free to offer him other, supposedly better test suites.
> This commentary seems to completely
> ignore the gist of my idea: playing Fritz set
> to perfectly emulate a 1200 player is *not*
> the same as a match between GetClub and
> Fritz; the issues you describe do not just
> carry over.
Then I misunderstood what you were trying to say.
> That sort of testing is not practical, as
> nobody is going to sit down and manually
> play GetClub against some other 1200-
> rated computers.
That's why it needs some way to do automatic testing.
But I don't think he's going to do that.
>> He's done testing for a year and a half and the eratic nature is quite
>> repeatable. Most people just don't do enough games to notice or do their
>> testing in a different way.
>
> Maybe there is something wrong with
> the way he is doing this; sometimes
There has been a lot more discussion going on and even a mathematician
joined in.
To put it simply
1) the computer clock introduces a lot of randomness in the game. Doing a
timed game is different from doing a fixed number of nodes or plies. Hyatt
has shown that even doing a few hundred nodes more or less can lead to
radically different games with different results. A few hundred nodes can
be enough to determine whether the computer picks a great move or an okay
move or even a blunder but didn't have time enough to notice. (Note: This
has been comfirmed by others.)
2) You need an adequate number of opponents.
3) You need to have enough opening positions to test from. Hyatt had been
using 40 standard positions and that isn't enough. You need more but it's
not sure yet how many are enough.
4) You need lots of games, since the clock introduces some randomness. It's
not yet determined how many games you need to get reliable results.
Most people simply don't do enough testing to be able to notice these
variations. You make a change in your program, you run a few simple tests
and you decide to keep it or throw it out.
Most people just assumed the method was valid. They never did the scale of
testing Hyatt has to verify it.
It's not. Or at least it can easily be invalid.
It's still being investigated as to the best way to do reliable testing with
reasonable error bounds.
> people can be blinded to even the most
> obvious of things. (Take that one fellow
> who played with a sting ray, for instance;
Stingings aren't too uncommon because they can get steped on. Fatalities
are rare though.
However, stingrays are actually pretty gentle creatures unless you startle
or harrass them.
Leave them alone and don't startle them, and they don't care about you.
> do you think for one moment he did not
> know that he was swimming within
> striking range? Maybe he thought his
> quick reflexes would allow him to jump
> out of the way, as when a gator strikes.)
You are talking about Irwin, and the couple of others who were stung very
shortly after that.
No, he was leaving it alone. Swiming near it observing it, but leaving it
alone. The same thing thousands of other divers do every year.
The problem was, he somehow startled it. And by sheer chance the barb went
into his heart. The odds are good that if he had left the barb in, he
would have survived.
I agree the guy was a bit of a nut, but not because of the stingray.
>> Second, you need to play more than just one or two programs. Sanny
>> playing
>> only against Rybka and coming up with ratings is definetly wrong.
>
>
> I repeat: not only is it meaningless to test
> GetClub against Rybka, but any test suite
> that is designed for a set level, such as
> Expert/Master/SM, is just as wrongheaded.
Then feel free to offer your own choices to Sanny....
> We already know that Sanny's program is
> well below those levels; what we don't know
> is where among the Class B/C/D/E sections
> it fits, exactly. The test questions need to
> tackle everything from the simplest tactics
> to more difficult problems-- and Mr. Kopec's
> seem to miss this aim by a country mile.
Half of them are tactical positions.
Most chess programs should be able to do pretty well on that part.
Bu they, I'm not saying the BK or WAC test is best, either.
>> The point is, it's difficult to get realistic reduced playing strengths.
>> It
>> can be done, but it's not easy. Any program that gives reduced ratings
>> levels should be looked at with suspicion unless there is testing to back
>> it
>> up.
>
> Such as the testing that showed the Kopec
> test results to be about a full class off base?
For computers, it's far more than that.
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| | |
Date: 18 Aug 2008 22:00:45
From: Guest
Subject: Re: Sanny: Some test positions for you
|
"help bot" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> I did a google search on "Bratko-Kopec test" and
> learned a little bit about this. One issue was the
> small number of test positions, and another was
Definetly.
> the fact that their results always came out nearly
> a class too high, relative to superior methods.
As I told Sanny a long time ago, the ratings numbers are bogus. I warned
him about that months ago. I should have warned him again, but I doubted he
would have actually tried it. (And to be honest... even if he had, I
suspect those numbers would have still been lower than what he advertises.)
Even with a couple 'recalibrations' / revistation's over the years, the
ratings numbers aren't really accurate.
That's not what's being tested here.
What's being tested is solely whether or not GC can find the accepted move.
No matter how bad your program is, with today's hardware, you should be able
to get at least half right.
Less than that suggests serious issues with the program.
And any program that misses the first position has *major* problems.
> But here is where I have a real beef with this
> approach: apparently, some of the positions were
> snatched from the latest fads in openings theory,
> and if you have read some ultra-narrow analysis of
Computers don't have to worry about reading... They calculate everything.
> the lines in question and could recall everything,
> you will pick the "correct" answer. Otherwise,
> you're just out of luck, since nobody -- but nobody
> -- can figure all this stuff out in the allotted two
> minutes.
The tests have been widely used in the computer chess world since the report
was done. (In fact, the original testing method was essentially impossible
to do on computers because it required 2nd & 3rd best lines. But computer
chess people long since ignored that.)
Even though everybody knew the numbers were bogus and the positions not the
best, it was still a standard test that everybody could share and compare.
That's why I bothered to suggest it.
And if you'll notice, at no time did I ever say the BK or WAC test suites
were the best. I said they were classics that most people use.
I think there is some confusion here...
You are taking the Bratko-Kopec test as they originally intended. As Bratko
still advertises it as if it's valid.
That's not what computer chess people do. And I didn't suggest he do that.
We treat it like any other test suite of positions. The big difference is
that instead of it being a private collection of test positions, these are
public.
And for whatever reason, the positions themselves began to be used as a way
to test chess programs and to compare chess programs.
Since then, other sets have also become very popular. Such as the
Win-At-Chess set, which I also suggested. (I guess everybody has a set of
'favorites', but BK & WAC are certainly among the most common test suites
used.)
But we don't treat the BK test like they originally intended.
You either find the right move and get a +1 score, or you get it wrong and
you get a zero.
Nothing more.
I could have left out the BK test. But the big reason I did suggest it is
because it's been used for so long that there are results available for a
number of classic chess programs.
Sargon 2.5, Sargon 4, Sargon 5, Awit, Chaos, Belle, CrayBlitz, Deep Thought,
HiTech, And others. Those are just some I happen to know of off hand.
(Plus, of course, any current program can be easily tested with a mere 24
positions of the BK test suite.)
It was a way to get some results that could be compared to other, older
programs. Some people in here have compared GC to Sargon, Super Connie,
etc.
I could have also posted other test sets, but I figured two were enough.
We'd be lucky if Sanny even did one single position.
> comparison, just as in real-world play. In fact,
> it seems to me that a well-programmed chess
> engine might be a good way to figure out the
> real strength of Sanny's program, provided it
> can reasonably weaken its own play all the
> way down to GetClub's low level.
No.
There are significant problems in computer vs. computer play.
It makes it very hard to actually determine the strength of the new program.
For example, the one with the deeper search is likely to win. Regardless of
whether its the stronger program when playing humans.
Computer vs. computer is just not the same human vs. human or computer vs.
human.
Hyatt has also noticed that doing too few different starting positions can
lead to some very eratic testing results in computer vs. computer. Even
with lots of games (thousands to millions) the results are still eratic from
one batch to the next. (Has to do with timing fluctuations and limited
variability of starting positions.)
He's done testing for a year and a half and the eratic nature is quite
repeatable. Most people just don't do enough games to notice or do their
testing in a different way.
Yes, computer vs. computer tournaments are often done.
There are often a problem though. First, most tournaments have far too few
rounds. You just can't get enough accuracy playing a few dozen games
against several other opponents. (The World computer chess championship and
all the older similar tournaments were perpitrators of such limited games.)
Second, you need to play more than just one or two programs. Sanny playing
only against Rybka and coming up with ratings is definetly wrong.
Third, for a quality program to actually weaken its play down to a specific
level is actually harder than you might think. It's more than just
weakening the eval and making the occasional tactical blunder because at
other times, the search is going to see so much that most of its moves will
still be too strong.
The point is, it's difficult to get realistic reduced playing strengths. It
can be done, but it's not easy. Any program that gives reduced ratings
levels should be looked at with suspicion unless there is testing to back it
up.
To do computer vs. computer testing reliably and get a reasonable rating,
you'd need several programs with reliable strengths and you'd need lots of
games for each time control of interest. You need to automate it. You need
lots of different opening positions, so opening books aren't being judged.
Etc.
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
|
