Main
Date: 02 Feb 2009 08:17:18
From: fake name
Subject: Rumor has it that
Rumor has it that Dylan Loeb McClain is headed for the chopping block.

Two or three little birds have got the attention of the powers that be.
Who are very unhappy we aligned ourselves with the Sloan, loon Roberts,
license-free Lafferty, harasser-of-little-girls Parker, privacy-abuser
Motterhead and Bogner with whom we should never have dealt. McClain's
monochromatic coverage brings shame upon our heads. It's only a matter
of time before the Post and other competitors get hold of the totally
sordid nature of this story and the unwitting role of the Times, due
to McClain's unilateral action, as being a co-sponsor of the terrorism
and hate campaign against two hardworking immigrants who strived, not
having the advantages of McClain's privileged upbringing, to make it
and live the American dream. So sorry for the hit job and our fifteen
month long smear. There is not long to wait. Change is coming. The
Times is not a platform for such unfairness.

McClain's style of gutter journalism is better suited to the National
Enquirer. He can apply to be their chess and mary-jane correspondent.
Though he is a colleague I only know him through his column, but that
is all I need.

Posted from a terminal at the New York Times building using a remailer
and https with settings to obscure the time of sending but not the IP.





 
Date: 02 Feb 2009 08:11:06
From: None
Subject: Re: Rumor has it that
On Feb 2, 10:30=A0am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Feb 2, 10:17=A0am, "fake name" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Rumor has it that Dylan Loeb McClain is headed for the chopping block.
>
> > Two or three little birds have got the attention of the powers that be.
> > Who are very unhappy we aligned ourselves with the Sloan, loon Roberts,
> > license-free Lafferty, harasser-of-little-girls Parker, privacy-abuser
> > Motterhead and Bogner with whom we should never have dealt. =A0McClain'=
s
> > monochromatic coverage brings shame upon our heads. =A0It's only a matt=
er
> > of time before the Post and other competitors get hold of the totally
> > sordid nature of this story and the unwitting role of the Times, due
> > to McClain's unilateral action, as being a co-sponsor of the terrorism
> > and hate campaign against two hardworking immigrants who strived, not
> > having the advantages of McClain's privileged upbringing, to make it
> > and live the American dream. =A0So sorry for the hit job and our fiftee=
n
> > month long smear. =A0There is not long to wait. =A0Change is coming. =
=A0The
> > Times is not a platform for such unfairness.
>
> > McClain's style of gutter journalism is better suited to the National
> > Enquirer. =A0He can apply to be their chess and mary-jane correspondent=
.
> > Though he is a colleague I only know him through his column, but that
> > is all I need.
>
> > Posted from a terminal at the New York Times building using a remailer
> > and https with settings to obscure the time of sending but not the IP.
>
> Would you kindly give a specific example of the "hate campaign" by the
> New York Times "against two hardworking immigrants"?
>
> By the way, what is the job of the "two hardworking immigrants"?
>
> Sam Sloan- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

To prove that "mainstreaming" should be rethought?


 
Date: 02 Feb 2009 07:30:11
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Rumor has it that
On Feb 2, 10:17=A0am, "fake name" <[email protected] > wrote:
> Rumor has it that Dylan Loeb McClain is headed for the chopping block.
>
> Two or three little birds have got the attention of the powers that be.
> Who are very unhappy we aligned ourselves with the Sloan, loon Roberts,
> license-free Lafferty, harasser-of-little-girls Parker, privacy-abuser
> Motterhead and Bogner with whom we should never have dealt. =A0McClain's
> monochromatic coverage brings shame upon our heads. =A0It's only a matter
> of time before the Post and other competitors get hold of the totally
> sordid nature of this story and the unwitting role of the Times, due
> to McClain's unilateral action, as being a co-sponsor of the terrorism
> and hate campaign against two hardworking immigrants who strived, not
> having the advantages of McClain's privileged upbringing, to make it
> and live the American dream. =A0So sorry for the hit job and our fifteen
> month long smear. =A0There is not long to wait. =A0Change is coming. =A0T=
he
> Times is not a platform for such unfairness.
>
> McClain's style of gutter journalism is better suited to the National
> Enquirer. =A0He can apply to be their chess and mary-jane correspondent.
> Though he is a colleague I only know him through his column, but that
> is all I need.
>
> Posted from a terminal at the New York Times building using a remailer
> and https with settings to obscure the time of sending but not the IP.

Would you kindly give a specific example of the "hate campaign" by the
New York Times "against two hardworking immigrants"?

By the way, what is the job of the "two hardworking immigrants"?

Sam Sloan