| |
Main
Date: 12 Nov 2008 20:23:14
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Polgar Hires Firm Known For Criminal Defense Work
|
And files notice of removal to Federal Court.
NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT FILED BY DEFENDANT
POLGAR, SUSAN , AN INDIVIDUAL--November 12, 2008
She is represented by http://www.gonzalezleigh.com/
|
|
| |
Date: 12 Nov 2008 13:04:20
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Polgar Hires Firm Known For Criminal Defense Work
|
On Nov 12, 3:23=A0pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected] > wrote:
> And files notice of removal to Federal Court.
>
> NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT FILED BY DEFENDANT
> POLGAR, SUSAN , AN INDIVIDUAL--November 12, 2008
>
> She is represented byhttp://www.gonzalezleigh.com/
Sounds like this case is right up their alley.
Let us hope that they successfully negotiate a plea agreement for her.
Criminal Defense
Our criminal defense practice is comprehensive and effective. We
defend against misdemeanor and felony charges in both state and
federal courts=97handling matters at all stages, from initial arrest
through trial.
We have defended clients against criminal charges ranging from petty
theft to murder, from driving under the influence to securities law
violations.
Areas of criminal defense representation include:
* State felonies and misdemeanors
* Federal crimes
* Juvenile jurisdictional proceedings (pursuant to Welfare and
Institution Code section 602)
* State and federal grand jury proceedings
|
| | |
Date: 12 Nov 2008 21:51:11
From: foad
Subject: Re: Polgar Hires Firm Known For Criminal Defense Work
|
"samsloan" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:eb734160-ff7a-4f7d-8b60-e9d41ef0ec27@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 12, 3:23 pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected] > wrote:
> And files notice of removal to Federal Court.
>
> NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT FILED BY DEFENDANT
> POLGAR, SUSAN , AN INDIVIDUAL--November 12, 2008
>
> She is represented byhttp://www.gonzalezleigh.com/
Sounds like this case is right up their alley.
Let us hope that they successfully negotiate a plea agreement for her.
====
She hasn't been charged with a crime, simpleton. She's being sued for
damages.
Gonzalez was Ralph Nadir's [sic] running mate. The firm is not "Known For
Criminal Defense Work" any more than it's known for anything else. Other
than that you compulsive liars have it nearly all correct.
|
| | | |
Date: 14 Nov 2008 07:37:52
From: Slurp...
Subject: Re: Polgar Hires Firm Known For Criminal Defense Work
|
George Orwell wrote:
> Sloan at least had a motive, though illegitimate, when as a young innocent
> teenager the GM robustly rejected the unwanted or criminal advances and
> attempted sexual assaults or physical invasions by him.
He gotta hand in her panties, a finger in her slot -
and after that, they really bonked a lot...
>
> You had no motive for your disgusting actions. Any inability to sustain a
> normal erection can serve as no excuse for your malice to a perfect
> stranger and her family.
>
> Who better than Gonzalez Leigh to motivate a DA to level charges against
> your RICO-mobsters? A DA's respect for a retired commissioner who routinely
> publicly advocates citizens to "go fuck yourself in your dead asshole" can
> expect very sympathetic treatment. Yeah, right.
>
> Fuck you, Brian Lafferty. The very fact of your continued existence, you
> despicable cockroach, is deeply offensive to right-thinking folk. You are
> known forever by your allies, netl00n and netk00k Gordon Roy Parker (guru
> at seduction technique, self-styled, but still virgin except for blow-up
> dolls at 40), kiddie-fucker (terminology trademarked by William Brock) Sam
> and Howlin' Mad Marcus, goatfucking Ambassador of Queen Elizardbeast.
>
> Good legacy, Brian. Your grandkids will spit on you, you fucking asshole.
>
> (shakes head sadly again, moves on, vows not to return)
>
> Il mittente di questo messaggio
|
| | | |
Date: 13 Nov 2008 08:58:15
From: George Orwell
Subject: Re: Polgar Hires Firm Known For Criminal Defense Work
|
On Wed 12 Nov 2008 17:29:08 EDT, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected] >
wrote:
> foad wrote:
> >
> > "samsloan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> She is represented by http://www.gonzalezleigh.com/
> > She hasn't been charged with a crime, simpleton. She's being sued for
> > damages.
> >
> > Gonzalez was Ralph Nadir's [sic] running mate. The firm is not "Known
> > For Criminal Defense Work" any more than it's known for anything else.
> > Other than that you compulsive liars have it nearly all correct.
>
> Your ignorance knows no bounds. It is alleged in the San Francisco
> civil action that she and Gregory Alexander violated federal and
> California criminal statutes, statutes that give the victim a right to
> seek civil damages. Jog your memory and recall if you will that there is
> a parallel Secret Service investigation presently in progress regarding
> the same matter.
>
> As to the firm she has hired, IIRC, both attorneys are well seasoned
> criminal defense lawyers having spent many years of practice as public
> defenders. I have to strongly suspect that she retained them for that
> expertise. Now go fuck yourself in your dead asshole.
Brian, against my better judgement I looked at this remailer-overrun NG
again. You have once again erred, once again overlooked the obvious. (Do
you even know the moves of chess? If you did, can you recall them?)
You are correct that Gonzalez Leigh are very competent at criminal work.
The reason for their being retained is that they are very competent at
criminal work.
They are coming for you and Sloan. Your RICO-mobsters has incited at least
one (other) mentally ill person to threaten GM Susan Polgar's family with
violence. Your RICO-mobsters has perpetrated or encouraged or commissioned
a longterm campaign of criminal libel (yes, it is still on the statute
books) and harassment of the most evil and vicious type against GM Susan
Polgar and her family.
Sloan at least had a motive, though illegitimate, when as a young innocent
teenager the GM robustly rejected the unwanted or criminal advances and
attempted sexual assaults or physical invasions by him.
You had no motive for your disgusting actions. Any inability to sustain a
normal erection can serve as no excuse for your malice to a perfect
stranger and her family.
Who better than Gonzalez Leigh to motivate a DA to level charges against
your RICO-mobsters? A DA's respect for a retired commissioner who routinely
publicly advocates citizens to "go fuck yourself in your dead asshole" can
expect very sympathetic treatment. Yeah, right.
Fuck you, Brian Lafferty. The very fact of your continued existence, you
despicable cockroach, is deeply offensive to right-thinking folk. You are
known forever by your allies, netl00n and netk00k Gordon Roy Parker (guru
at seduction technique, self-styled, but still virgin except for blow-up
dolls at 40), kiddie-fucker (terminology trademarked by William Brock) Sam
and Howlin' Mad Marcus, goatfucking Ambassador of Queen Elizardbeast.
Good legacy, Brian. Your grandkids will spit on you, you fucking asshole.
(shakes head sadly again, moves on, vows not to return)
Il mittente di questo messaggio
|
| | | |
Date: 12 Nov 2008 22:29:04
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Polgar Hires Firm Known For Criminal Defense Work
|
foad wrote:
>
> "samsloan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:eb734160-ff7a-4f7d-8b60-e9d41ef0ec27@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 12, 3:23 pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> And files notice of removal to Federal Court.
>>
>> NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT FILED BY DEFENDANT
>> POLGAR, SUSAN , AN INDIVIDUAL--November 12, 2008
>>
>> She is represented byhttp://www.gonzalezleigh.com/
>
> Sounds like this case is right up their alley.
>
> Let us hope that they successfully negotiate a plea agreement for her.
>
> ====
>
> She hasn't been charged with a crime, simpleton. She's being sued for
> damages.
>
> Gonzalez was Ralph Nadir's [sic] running mate. The firm is not "Known
> For Criminal Defense Work" any more than it's known for anything else.
> Other than that you compulsive liars have it nearly all correct.
Your ignorance knows no bounds. It is alleged in the San Francisco
civil action that she and Gregory Alexander violated federal and
California criminal statutes, statutes that give the victim a right to
seek civil damages. Jog your memory and recall if you will that there is
a parallel Secret Service investigation presently in progress regarding
the same matter.
As to the firm she has hired, IIRC, both attorneys are well seasoned
criminal defense lawyers having spent many years of practice as public
defenders. I have to strongly suspect that she retained them for that
expertise. Now go fuck yourself in your dead asshole.
|
| | | | |
Date: 13 Nov 2008 02:43:52
From: foad
Subject: Re: Polgar Hires Firm Known For Criminal Defense Work
|
"B. Lafferty" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> foad wrote:
>>
>> "samsloan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:eb734160-ff7a-4f7d-8b60-e9d41ef0ec27@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
>> On Nov 12, 3:23 pm, "B. Lafferty" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> And files notice of removal to Federal Court.
>>>
>>> NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT FILED BY DEFENDANT
>>> POLGAR, SUSAN , AN INDIVIDUAL--November 12, 2008
>>>
>>> She is represented byhttp://www.gonzalezleigh.com/
>>
>> Sounds like this case is right up their alley.
>>
>> Let us hope that they successfully negotiate a plea agreement for her.
>>
>> ====
>>
>> She hasn't been charged with a crime, simpleton. She's being sued for
>> damages.
>>
>> Gonzalez was Ralph Nadir's [sic] running mate. The firm is not "Known For
>> Criminal Defense Work" any more than it's known for anything else. Other
>> than that you compulsive liars have it nearly all correct.
>
> Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Do tell.
> It is alleged in the San Francisco civil action that she and Gregory
> Alexander violated federal and California criminal statutes, statutes that
> give the victim a right to seek civil damages.
So to recap. It's a civil case, not a criminal case, no charges are filed,
no charges are pending, and no plea bargain is possible. For someone whose
ignorance knows no bounds it seems I got it pretty spot fucking on so far.
> Jog your memory and recall if you will that there is a parallel Secret
> Service investigation presently in progress regarding the same matter.
Wait, there's allegedly an alleged investigation? Gosh, that soun--
Zzzzzzzzzzz. Sorry, I dozed off a moment. If an when she's indicted by a
grand jury, give me a call. Until then you and your xenophobic misogynistic
defendants have bupkis but lies, slander, and innuendo.
> As to the firm she has hired, IIRC,
If I recall correctly: the last refuge of a guy caught talking out his ass.
> both attorneys are well seasoned criminal defense lawyers having spent
> many years of practice as public defenders.
Yes, they both were PDs. BFD. Leigh's bio states "Mr. Leigh represented
businesses and individuals in a wide variety of civil litigation matters."
Gonzalez is a leftist political gadfly rainmaker, not a criminal defense
specialist.
And in fact neither does the firm advertise itself as being known for its
criminal defense work. Rather, their website states on the very page you
linked to that they're litigations specialists and "Unlike many civil
litigation firms . . ." they represents plaintiffs and defendants. Odd that
a firm allegedly "Known For Criminal Defense Work" would describe itself as
a civil litigation firm, and then add one sentence on their alleged
speciality two paragraphs later: "We also represent clients in state and
federal criminal defense matters." Kind of odd don't you think? I'd figure
that a firm "Known For Criminal Defense Work" would come right out the gate
and say that they're defense specialists, rather than adding one sentence
about their alleged specialty after three paragraphs about their civil work,
which is described in pretty close detail: "representing individuals and
businesses in federal and state courts, mediation, arbitration, and
administrative proceedings before state and federal regulatory bodies.
Unlike many civil litigation firms, we represent both plaintiffs and
defendants. Our practice includes complex business and commercial matters,
personal injury and mass torts, civil rights, employment and government
law." Quite the laundry list of civil litigation matters for a well known
criminal firm. Seemingly an odd way to go about advertising your speciality.
But that's just me. Probably you and the legal genyious Sam Sloan know
better.
> I have to strongly suspect that she retained them for that expertise.
Is there anything other than your urge to slander Polgar because she has
breasts and is a better chess player than you on which you base your
"strong" suspicion that she retained a "firm well known criminal defense
work" that advertises itself as a civil litigation firm to represent her in
a civil case?
> Now go fuck yourself in your dead asshole.
Golly that's hurtful. If it's any comfort, you're not the first lamebrained
judge whose thin skin I've gotten under. Not a real judge, an ALJ, right?
but still, I bet you have a nice wig and everything.
|
|
