| |
Main
Date: 28 Jan 2009 11:28:14
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: NY Tims Weighs In With Judge Patel
|
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzewuo9u/publicdocuments/
|
|
| |
Date: 28 Jan 2009 04:29:58
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: NY Tims Weighs In With Judge Patel
|
On Jan 28, 6:28=A0am, "B. Lafferty " <[email protected] > wrote:
> http://mysite.verizon.net/vzewuo9u/publicdocuments/
Did you notice the error on the date:
January 27, 2008
|
| | |
Date: 28 Jan 2009 12:58:10
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: NY Tims Weighs In With Judge Patel
|
samsloan wrote:
> On Jan 28, 6:28 am, "B. Lafferty " <[email protected]> wrote:
>> http://mysite.verizon.net/vzewuo9u/publicdocuments/
>
> Did you notice the error on the date:
>
> January 27, 2008
The letter is dated 1/27. The motion to seal documents will not be
heard until early February. Where's the error?
|
| | | |
Date: 28 Jan 2009 13:07:03
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: NY Times Weighs In With Judge Patel
|
B. Lafferty wrote:
> samsloan wrote:
>> On Jan 28, 6:28 am, "B. Lafferty " <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> http://mysite.verizon.net/vzewuo9u/publicdocuments/
>>
>> Did you notice the error on the date:
>>
>> January 27, 2008
> The letter is dated 1/27. The motion to seal documents will not be
> heard until early February. Where's the error?
Just caught it. I guess the Times is just well ahead of the curve.
|
|
