Main
Date: 12 Dec 2008 07:30:18
From: samsloan
Subject: Letter from Paul Truong to Jerome Hanken
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 10:19 AM, <[email protected] > wrote:

Mr. Hanken,

You seem to know quite a bit about everything. Would you mind
enlighten all of us where you got your information from? Who shared
them with you? Please name specific names. Please also enlighten all
USCF members about the criminal investigations you discussed. What was
reported? Who made the reports? Which agency? Please feel free to be
very specific. A chess journalist of your caliber would never say
anything that is untrue or cannot be backed up, right? Surely you are
dying to tell the whole world how credible your sources are. You may
even stand to win the journalist of the year award. I am anxiously
waiting to read everything you have to say. I am sure many others are
also quite interested.

Thank you.
Paul

In a message dated 12/12/2008 2:02:56 A.M. Central Standard Time,
JerryHanken writes:

It never ceases to amaze me how delusional Sam can be, even
when the cold water of truth and reality are thrown in his face! It
makes no dent in the litany of fantasy and self created myth Sam
entertains and to which he stubbornly clings .Of course he is quite
right about the dynamic duo EB members who are determined to kill the
USCF and pick at its' bones! They are failing badly at this and are
quite desperate as they face real life criminal investigations which
USCF could not stop even if it wanted to. All that considered, Sam
would be, as he was, a very BAD EB member. I say this, even though I
like Sam personally and respect his historical chess knowledge.
Jerry Hanken




 
Date: 12 Dec 2008 09:26:21
From:
Subject: Re: Letter from Paul Truong to Jerome Hanken
On Dec 12, 11:29=A0am, The Historian <[email protected] >
wrote:
> On Dec 12, 11:11=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > Assuming that Truong did write to Hanken, my advice to Mr. Truong
> > would be to contact your bankruptcy attorney for bankruptcy
> > information. But why do that? =A0Truong knows what he did. =A0I suspect
> > it's Fifth Amendment time for Mr. Truong--Sue also. Truong could also
> > contact the Secret Service Electronic Crimes Task Force in San
> > Francisco and voluntarity talk to them. =A0He could arrange to go with
> > Gregory Alexander.
>
> How is it that a third party has such information? Your posting
> reminds me of the Brattleboro Bedlam's various claims that the FBI was
> 'investigating' newsgroup posts.

The Secret Service investigation has been in the NY Times. Court
documents from California, the Polgar, Alexander defendants action.
All is public record. I have been in communication with the
authorities involved in the Truong bankruptcy matter in-as-much-as it
was me who brought it to their attention. I've been posting here long
enough that you should know I ain't no BB.


 
Date: 12 Dec 2008 08:29:46
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: Letter from Paul Truong to Jerome Hanken
On Dec 12, 11:11=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
> Assuming that Truong did write to Hanken, my advice to Mr. Truong
> would be to contact your bankruptcy attorney for bankruptcy
> information. But why do that? =A0Truong knows what he did. =A0I suspect
> it's Fifth Amendment time for Mr. Truong--Sue also. Truong could also
> contact the Secret Service Electronic Crimes Task Force in San
> Francisco and voluntarity talk to them. =A0He could arrange to go with
> Gregory Alexander.

How is it that a third party has such information? Your posting
reminds me of the Brattleboro Bedlam's various claims that the FBI was
'investigating' newsgroup posts.


 
Date: 12 Dec 2008 08:11:53
From:
Subject: Re: Letter from Paul Truong to Jerome Hanken
Assuming that Truong did write to Hanken, my advice to Mr. Truong
would be to contact your bankruptcy attorney for bankruptcy
information. But why do that? Truong knows what he did. I suspect
it's Fifth Amendment time for Mr. Truong--Sue also. Truong could also
contact the Secret Service Electronic Crimes Task Force in San
Francisco and voluntarity talk to them. He could arrange to go with
Gregory Alexander.


On Dec 12, 10:30=A0am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 10:19 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> =A0 =A0 Mr. Hanken,
>
> =A0 =A0 You seem to know quite a bit about everything. Would you mind
> enlighten all of us where you got your information from? Who shared
> them with you? Please name specific names. Please also enlighten all
> USCF members about the criminal investigations you discussed. What was
> reported? Who made the reports? Which agency? Please feel free to be
> very specific. A chess journalist of your caliber would never say
> anything that is untrue or cannot be backed up, right? Surely you are
> dying to tell the whole world how credible your sources are. You may
> even stand to win the journalist of the year award. I am anxiously
> waiting to read everything you have to say. I am sure many others are
> also quite interested.
>
> =A0 =A0 Thank you.
> =A0 =A0 Paul
>
> =A0 =A0 In a message dated 12/12/2008 2:02:56 A.M. Central Standard Time,
>
> JerryHanken writes:
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 It never ceases to amaze me how delusional Sam can be, ev=
en
> when the cold water of truth and reality are thrown in his face! =A0It
> makes no dent in the litany of fantasy and self created myth Sam
> entertains and to which he stubbornly clings .Of course he is quite
> right about the dynamic duo EB members who are determined to kill the
> USCF and pick at its' bones! They are failing badly at this and are
> quite desperate as they face real life criminal investigations which
> USCF could not stop even if it wanted to. All that considered, Sam
> would be, as he was, a very BAD EB member. I say this, even though I
> like Sam personally and respect his historical chess knowledge.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Jerry Hanken