| |
Main
Date: 12 Oct 2008 08:18:00
From: Casual
Subject: Is playing chess for money wrong.
|
Is playing chess for money wrong? I came across a site that says, no
only is playing chess for money not wrong, but vital to the popularit
of the game.
They believe that, the more money attached to chess, the more non
chess players will take an interest in the game.
What say you?
http://pawnshark.com/index.asp
--
Casual
|
|
| |
Date: 12 Oct 2008 14:00:39
From: Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (Wlod)
Subject: Re: Is playing chess for money wrong.
|
On Oct 12, 12:18 am, Casual <[email protected] > wrote:
> Is playing chess for money wrong? I came across a site that says, not
> only is playing chess for money not wrong, but vital to the popularity
> of the game.
> They believe that, the more money attached to chess, the more none
> chess players will take an interest in the game.
> What say you?http://pawnshark.com/index.aspx
>
> --
> Casual
Go, play for money.
Wlod
|
| | |
Date: 12 Oct 2008 14:26:12
From: SBD
Subject: Re: Is playing chess for money wrong.
|
On Oct 12, 4:00=A0pm, "Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (Wlod)"
<[email protected] > wrote:
> On Oct 12, 12:18 am, Casual <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Is playing chess for money wrong? I came across a site that says, not
> > only is playing chess for money not wrong, but vital to the popularity
> > of the game.
> > They believe that, the more money attached to chess, the more none
> > chess players will take an interest in the game.
> > What say you?http://pawnshark.com/index.aspx
>
> > --
> > Casual
>
> Go, play for money.
>
> =A0 =A0 Wlod
Wasn't it Duchamp who said that chess seems to be unaffected by money?
|
|
