|
Main
Date: 07 Apr 2008 23:47:50
From: Sanny
Subject: Help Bot Still at the Top !!!
|
Help bot is now at Top at GetClub Chess. He Won: 346 and Lost: 25 and has got Highest Rating of 1528. Chess Played at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html Any there one who can beat "Help Bot"s Record??? He played all games without taking help from any Computer and beat records of all players and reached the Top Ranking. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
|
|
Date: 11 Apr 2008 10:40:37
From: Sanny
Subject: Re: Help Bot Still at the Top !!!
|
bbb
|
|
Date: 11 Apr 2008 08:32:40
From: Sanny
Subject: Re: Help Bot Still at the Top !!!
|
> =A0 My recent improvement in results is > probably the result of the fact that my > "good" eye is functioning again; for a > while, I was playing with that eye held > shut, using powerful reading glasses to > aid the weaker eye in seeing the board. Yesterday the Game was inproved a lot. Play a game with Easy Level and lets see how you face it. Yes, Beginner is still a kid for you. Lets see how you face the Improved game. Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html > =A0 I am also trying very hard not to take > the program lightly; that attitude leads > to careless blunders, such as my piece > hang in the game you misidentified as > the Rybka QN-odds game. =A0(I actually > saw that one coming, decided to trade > pieces, then changed my mind when I > couldn't see a clear way out of a > possible perpetual-check. =A0I won easily, > despite hanging my Knight.) Now you have to play with even more thinking as yesterday the Game was improved. Lets see if you can beat the Beginner Level the way you used to. Now I think Beginner will win in 1/ 4 Games. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
|
Date: 10 Apr 2008 21:02:33
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Help Bot Still at the Top !!!
|
On Apr 10, 3:20 am, Sanny <[email protected] > wrote: > You are having fun with Beginner Level. But a few things about the > games you play. What is the Big drawback you see with Beginner Levels > game play. > > 1. Is it weak in Tactics? Yes. One weakness which should not exist in any chess engine is *moving into check*. The GetClub program does this routinely at the end of the game, when it's losing. > Then I suppost Higher Levels can provide > better Tactics. Even the weakest level should try to avoid being checkmated; try to delay the loss as long as possible, to give the opponent the opportunity to err; this is how most games are won-- by merely providing many such opportunities, not unlike a mine field. > 2. Is it weak in Strategy Formation? Yes. However, this is to be expected. > 3. Is it weak in defending the King? Yes. And because checkmate (or, put another way, trapping the King) is the object of the game, this is critical. > What do you think is the big weakness of Beginner Level that you feel > it can be easily beaten? In the endgame, the program plays at a level which is perhaps 1000 rating points weaker than in the middle-game. It also is not handling tactics properly; in general, a computer should come out on top in almost every tactical skirmish with lowly humans; yours doesn't. > If Tactics is weak I can do nothing Only thing I will say is try > higher Levels. How about fixing the problem whereby the program moves its King into check? > If Strategy / Defence is weak let me know I may improve the game > further. Strategy is not a biggie; I often find myself outplayed strategically, then go on to win anyway due to my vast tactical superiority. Once you gain the upper-hand in tactics, then you can worry about such trivial things. : >D > After playing so many games with Beginner Level can you tell me the > moves where Beginner played very bad move? So that I may see what > weakness it has. The biggest problems are the horrible endgame, not defending its King when attacked, and fairly simple tactics. It's true that the tactics have been improved, but there is no good reason a computer cannot calculate checks and exchanges to the very end; to a "quiet position", or one that has no checks and no captures. My recent improvement in results is probably the result of the fact that my "good" eye is functioning again; for a while, I was playing with that eye held shut, using powerful reading glasses to aid the weaker eye in seeing the board. I am also trying very hard not to take the program lightly; that attitude leads to careless blunders, such as my piece hang in the game you misidentified as the Rybka QN-odds game. (I actually saw that one coming, decided to trade pieces, then changed my mind when I couldn't see a clear way out of a possible perpetual-check. I won easily, despite hanging my Knight.) -- help bot
|
|
Date: 10 Apr 2008 01:47:25
From: Sanny
Subject: Game further Improved.
|
Today after studing 10-12 games of Beginner Level against Help Bot, I found earlier GetClub was not defend its King properly. So a few improvements were done in GetClub Chess to Save its King. As I saw Help Bot easily taking the GetClubs King While Beginner was moving its pieces at wromg places. The game was much improved after this modification. Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html As an Example I played Against Rybka. Easy Level usually looses in 40 Moves against Rybka but this time It struggled till 50-60 Moves. The game was unable to Complete as Rybka hanged after 48 Move. Still I feel the game could have continued till 60 Moves. Playing 60 Moves against Rybka is very difficult for any Player. Usually Rybka Knocks you down in just 40 Moves. Still Easy Level mantained good Position till 50-60 Moves That was Great. Here is the Game Game Played between Rybka and easy at GetClub.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rybka : (White) easy: (Black) Game Played at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html View Recorded Game: http://www.getclub.com/playgame.php?id=DM19111&game=Chess -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- White -- Black (Rybka) -- (easy) 1. d2-d4{10} Ng8-f6{0} 2. c2-c4{14} e7-e6{0} 3. Ng1-f3{16} Nf6-e4{22} 4. Qd1-d3{26} d7-d5{38} 5. Nb1-c3{282} Bf8-b4{0} 6. g2-g3{14} Nb8-c6{24} 7. Bf1-g2{18} Bc8-d7{42} 8. c4-d5{22} e6-d5{28} 9. Ke1-g1{16} Bb4-c3{24} 10. b2-c3{18} Ke8-g8{34} 11. Nf3-d2{20} f7-f5{30} 12. Nd2-e4{20} f5-e4{28} 13. Qd3-b5{16} Rf8-f5{22} 14. Qb5-b7{26} Ra8-b8{36} 15. Qb7-a6{18} Qd8-f8{42} 16. Qa6-a4{24} Qf8-f7{20} 17. Qa4-c2{28} Bd7-e6{30} 18. Ra1-b1{20} Rb8-e8{38} 19. h2-h4{28} h7-h6{24} 20. Rb1-b5{20} Rf5-f6{22} 21. Bc1-e3{30} Re8-c8{32} 22. c3-c4{20} Nc6-e7{34} 23. Be3-f4{24} Rf6-f4{22} 24. g3-f4{28} Qf7-f4{26} 25. c4-d5{14} Be6-d5{40} 26. Rb5-a5{16} Qf4-h4{22} 27. Ra5-a7{32} Ne7-c6{52} 28. Qc2-c5{24} Qh4-d8{22} 29. Ra7-a6{34} Nc6-b8{24} 30. Ra6-g6{22} Qd8-d7{40} 31. Bg2-h3{34} Qd7-f7{30} 32. Rg6-d6{24} c7-d6{22} 33. Qc5-c8{14} Qf7-f8{28} 34. Rf1-c1{18} e4-e3{24} 35. Qc8-f8{20} Kg8-f8{24} 36. Rc1-c8{12} Kf8-e7{20} 37. Rc8-b8{30} g7-g6{28} 38. a2-a4{20} Bd5-c6{20} 39. a4-a5{22} g6-g5{30} 40. Rb8-h8{22} h6-h5{26} 41. Rh8-h5{28} Ke7-f6{20} 42. Rh5-h6{22} Kf6-e7{38} 43. Rh6-e6{28} Ke7-d8{20} 44. Re6-d6{26} Kd8-c7{34} 45. Rd6-g6{18} g5-g4{38} 46. Bh3-g4{16} Bc6-e4{34} 47. Rg6-g7{16} Kc7-c6{34} 48. Bg4-d7{26} Kc6-d6{34} {Rybka Hanged So I have to stop the Game here} {I think Rybka would have continued till 60 Moves to win the Game.} -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rybka : (White) easy: (Black) Game Played at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html View Recorded Game: http://www.getclub.com/playgame.php?id=DM19111&game=Chess So now Help Bot will find much more Opposition from even the Beginner Level. Help Bot, Tell me do you found the game getting a bit Tough now? Are you now finding Beginner Level giving great challenge to you or not. Incase you still find any problem in game let me know. For me this improvement will make GetClub play much shatper than it used to earlier. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
|
Date: 10 Apr 2008 00:20:13
From: Sanny
Subject: Re: Help Bot Still at the Top !!!
|
> =A0 But against the Beginner level, I can have > fun and gain rating points at the same time! > Maybe *you* should play the higher levels, > to get the ratings more in line with reality. You are having fun with Beginner Level. But a few things about the games you play. What is the Big drawback you see with Beginner Levels game play. 1. Is it weak in Tactics? Then I suppost Higher Levels can provide better Tactics. 2. Is it weak in Strategy Formation? 3. Is it weak in defending the King? What do you think is the big weakness of Beginner Level that you feel it can be easily beaten? Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html If Tactics is weak I can do nothing Only thing I will say is try higher Levels. If Strategy / Defence is weak let me know I may improve the game further. After playing so many games with Beginner Level can you tell me the moves where Beginner played very bad move? So that I may see what weakness it has. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
|
Date: 09 Apr 2008 01:57:12
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Help Bot Still at the Top !!!
|
On Apr 9, 3:55 am, Sanny <[email protected] > wrote: > I do not like the idea of Playing with Riik odds. Why not you play > with Normal & Master Level without use of Computer. Lets see how you > score against the Normal/ Master Level. Those levels have very low ratings; I prefer to play the best. ; >D > I feel it would be much difficult to win them as they now play much > good game. It takes me all night to play a single game against one of the top levels, and if I draw it gets scored as a loss for me. The only way I know to win against, say, the Advance level, is to hide behind a wall of locked center pawns, waiting for stupid mistakes. But against the Beginner level, I can have fun and gain rating points at the same time! Maybe *you* should play the higher levels, to get the ratings more in line with reality. Seriously, my notebook's cooling fan cranks at top speed all night long when I play the higher levels, and every disconnect means I have to reconnect and let the program think another hour to get back to where I was. I know the quality of play will go down the toilet when we reach the endgame, so I tend to trade down to drawable positions-- a bad habit to get into. I will play the top levels once in a while, it you *truly* believe there is some fantastic "improvement" which makes me lose like a carrot. But 99.9% of those comments amount to nothing but hot air-- say, do you know a player named nearly-IMnes? ; >D I did not play at QN-odds to ridicule the GetClub program. As I said, the program held its piece advantage for a while, and where it lost the piece back there were immense complications. I also played out your game against Ivan from the lost position after ...Bh4+, just to see if a top chess engine could salvage something. It turned out that Fritz 5.32 only drew the "easy win"! Going back in time, we know that the Fritz 5.32 engine was considered to be grandmaster strength; but today's best engines are so strong that even a "weak GM" cannot stand the heat. Even so, I recently discovered a *simple* chess position where the top programs don't have a clue-- unless they are connected to the endgame table-bases, that is. The reason for these odds games is to display the "miracles" such programs can often pull off, as well as to highlight the immense differences in strength even at such high levels where both programs might crush 95%+ of human opponents. -- help bot
|
|
Date: 09 Apr 2008 00:55:28
From: Sanny
Subject: Re: Help Bot Still at the Top !!!
|
> =A0 I believe it would be reasonable to play a > Rook-odds game or match between these > programs, but hanging the Rook is not so > easy to accomplish in the first few moves. > Ideally, the Rook would be removed before > play begins, and it is customary to place > White's QR-pawn on a3 instead of a2 > (where it would be undefended due to the > gambit Rook). I do not like the idea of Playing with Riik odds. Why not you play with Normal & Master Level without use of Computer. Lets see how you score against the Normal/ Master Level. Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html I feel it would be much difficult to win them as they now play much good game. GetClub Program is only for Human Opponents. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
|
Date: 09 Apr 2008 00:08:37
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Help Bot Still at the Top !!!
|
On Apr 9, 2:37 am, Sanny <[email protected] > wrote: > > Here is a link to the correct game: > > >http://www.getclub.com/playgame.php?id=DM18202&game=Chess > > So you used Computers help in that Game. No. What I did in that game was attempt to simulate a real QN-odds game between the GetClub program and a top commercial chess engine. I did not interfere except in three ways: 1. I decided the setting for the program's contempt factor. 2. I invented the moves by which the program would "hang" its Queen's Knight. 3. I decided when to play the move displayed, the cut-off time. There is a BIG difference between being a mere computer operator, and playing "with the aid of" a computer. For instance, I hated it when the program captured the pawn on e5, because it meant that two more pieces were going to get traded off "evenly". But... that decision was not mine to make, as I was just the operator. > Thats why I though how you > played so fast as with Beginner Level you think 1-2 min/ move So for > Normal Level you will think 3-4 min/ move at Complex Position. But you > took just 1-2 min against Normal Level. In this odds game, I considered it unfair to press the program to move quickly; instead, I gave it plenty of time. Had the odds been, say, a pawn, I would have set a limit to give the GetClub program a fair chance; perhaps one or two seconds. But such small odds are pointless; why not instead just give time odds? > I was surprised to see your giving the Knight for no reasions. In a normal QN-odds game, that piece is simply removed before play begins; both programs would then be "out of book", and it is customary for the odds-giver to move first (as White). I believe it would be reasonable to play a Rook-odds game or match between these programs, but hanging the Rook is not so easy to accomplish in the first few moves. Ideally, the Rook would be removed before play begins, and it is customary to place White's QR-pawn on a3 instead of a2 (where it would be undefended due to the gambit Rook). -- help bot
|
|
Date: 08 Apr 2008 23:37:05
From: Sanny
Subject: Re: Help Bot Still at the Top !!!
|
> > > =A0 Actually, after failing in my attempt to create a > > > second account (it said I already had an account > > > with the nomorechess email address), I decided > > > to risk my own incredible rating in a test of what > > > would happen in a QN odds game against a top > > > commercial program. > > =A0 Here is a link to the correct game: > > http://www.getclub.com/playgame.php?id=3DDM18202&game=3DChess So you used Computers help in that Game. Thats why I though how you played so fast as with Beginner Level you think 1-2 min/ move So for Normal Level you will think 3-4 min/ move at Complex Position. But you took just 1-2 min against Normal Level. I was surprised to see your giving the Knight for no reasions. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
|
Date: 08 Apr 2008 21:44:55
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Help Bot Still at the Top !!!
|
On Apr 8, 10:16 am, Sanny <[email protected] > wrote: > > Actually, after failing in my attempt to create a > > second account (it said I already had an account > > with the nomorechess email address), I decided > > to risk my own incredible rating in a test of what > > would happen in a QN odds game against a top > > commercial program. Here is a link to the correct game: http://www.getclub.com/playgame.php?id=DM18202&game=Chess -- help bot
|
|
Date: 08 Apr 2008 20:46:01
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Help Bot Still at the Top !!!
|
On Apr 8, 10:16 am, Sanny <[email protected] > wrote: > > Actually, after failing in my attempt to create a > > second account (it said I already had an account > > with the nomorechess email address), I decided > > to risk my own incredible rating in a test of what > > would happen in a QN odds game against a top > > commercial program. > > Here is that Gamehttp://www.getclub.com/playgame.php?id=DM19012&game=Chess > > I am unable to see how it got a Extra Knight. Actually it lost its > bishop after the 12th move. Wrong game. I will find the game myself and post a link here. Note that there is only one game where I played Nc3-b5-a7, deliberately giving away the Knight. I only have control of one side, so I can't do a "proper" QN-odds game, in which the piece is simply removed before play begins. In this game, Black got in the moves: 1. ...d5 2. ...a6 However, the capture 3. ...Rxa7 is an inconvenience to Black. > > Much to my surprise, the GetClub program > > held its piece advantage for a while, before > > suddenly succumbing to a complex combination > > which regained the piece for a pawn or two. > > After that, it was no contest. This game can be > > found by searching through my games looking > > for the unique opening sequence: > > > 1. Nc3 d5 > > 2. Nb5 a6 > > 3. Na7!! The game posted here by Sanny seems to indicate that he is not familiar with algebraic notation; instead of my Nc3 he found a recent game in which I played Nf3, for instance. -- help bot
|
|
Date: 08 Apr 2008 07:16:25
From: Sanny
Subject: Re: Help Bot Still at the Top !!!
|
> =A0 Actually, after failing in my attempt to create a > second account (it said I already had an account > with the nomorechess email address), I decided > to risk my own incredible rating in a test of what > would happen in a QN odds game against a top > commercial program. Here is that Game http://www.getclub.com/playgame.php?id=3DDM19012&game=3DChess I am unable to see how it got a Extra Knight. Actually it lost its bishop after the 12th move. > > =A0 Much to my surprise, the GetClub program > held its piece advantage for a while, before > suddenly succumbing to a complex combination > which regained the piece for a pawn or two. > After that, it was no contest. =A0This game can be > found by searching through my games looking > for the unique opening sequence: > > =A01. Nc3 =A0d5 > =A02. Nb5 =A0a6 > =A03. Na7!! This is the Worst Opening ever played by GetClub Chess. Looking at the Game I found it played its first move in (16) seconds. So it do not follow the opening Book. Instead It was playing without Opening. Many times I have seen It do not play through the Opening, Looks like there is some bug. Here is the complete game. The game was Over at 12th Move only. As It was going a Bishop down for 2 pawns. Game Played between help bot and beginner at GetClub.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---- help bot: (Black) beginner: (White) Game Played at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html View Recorded Game: http://www.getclub.com/playgame.php?id=3DDM19012&game=3D= Chess ----------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---- White -- Black (beginner) -- (help bot) 1. Ng1-f3{16} c7-c5{4} 2. Nb1-c3{6} d7-d5{4} 3. e2-e4{8} d5-d4{6} 4. Nc3-d5{6} e7-e6{4} 5. Nd5-f4{8} Nb8-c6{8} 6. Bf1-b5{12} Qd8-c7{6} 7. e4-e5{8} Bc8-d7{22} 8. Qd1-e2{14} a7-a6{48} 9. Bb5-d3{0} Bf8-e7{54} 10. Qe2-e4{6} Nc6-b4{16} 11. Nf4-h5{8} g7-g6{20} 12. Nh5-f4{8} c5-c4{28} {Game Finished here only as White is Bishop up for Pawns.} 13. Nf3-d4{6} c4-d3{8} 14. c2-d3{8} Bd7-c6{22} 15. Qe4-e3{10} Ke8-c8{50} 16. Ke1-g1{10} Rd8-d4{20} 17. Qe3-d4{6} Nb4-c2{4} 18. Qd4-c3{8} Nc2-a1{20} 19. b2-b4{0} Qc7-b6{66} 20. d3-d4{8} Be7-b4{50} 21. Qc3-a1{6} Ng8-e7{8} 22. Rf1-d1{8} Rh8-d8{18} 23. Bc1-b2{0} Bc6-d5{46} 24. a2-a3{6} Bb4-a5{10} 25. d2-d3{20} Kc8-d7{20} 26. Qa1-b1{6} Rd8-c8{10} 27. Rd1-c1{10} Rc8-c6{44} 28. h2-h3{12} Ba5-d2{12} 29. Nf4-d5{6} Ne7-d5{40} 30. Rc1-c6{0} Qb6-c6{14} 31. Qb1-d1{12} Bd2-a5{76} 32. g2-g4{12} Nd5-f4{18} 33. d4-d5{6} Qc6-d5{20} 34. Qd1-a4{6} b7-b5{40} 35. Qa4-f4{12} Kd7-e8{24} 36. Qf4-e4{0} Qd5-e4{8} 37. d3-e4{6} Ke8-d7{10} 38. h3-h4{8} Kd7-c6{4} 39. f2-f3{6} Kc6-c5{4} 40. f3-f4{12} Ba5-d2{22} 41. f4-f5{6} Bd2-e3{8} 42. Kg1-g2{6} Be3-d4{2} 43. f5-e6{6} f7-e6{8} 44. Bb2-c1{18} Bd4-e5{12} 45. Kg2-f3{8} Kc5-c4{6} 46. a3-a4{6} b5-b4{10} 47. h4-h5{8} b4-b3{14} 48. h5-g6{30} h7-g6{4} 49. Kf3-e3{8} b3-b2{12} 50. Bc1-b2{6} Be5-b2{4} 51. Ke3-f4{6} Bb2-f6{8} 52. e4-e5{8} g6-g5{8} 53. Kf4-e4{18} Bf6-d8{10} 54. Ke4-e3{6} Kc4-d5{12} 55. Ke3-f2{12} Kd5-e5{6} 56. Kf2-f3{8} Bd8-b6{6} 57. Kf3-e2{16} Ke5-f4{6} 58. Ke2-d3{6} Kf4-g4{6} 59. Kd3-e4{6} Bb6-c7{4} 60. Ke4-e3{8} Kg4-f5{6} 61. Ke3-d4{12} Bc7-d6{10} 62. a4-a5{10} g5-g4{4} 63. Kd4-d3{6} g4-g3{6} 64. Kd3-e3{6} Kf5-g4{20} 65. Ke3-d3{6} Kg4-f3{8} 66. Kd3-c2{26} g3-g2{8} 67. Kc2-c1{6} Qg2-g1{Q}{6} 68. Kc1-b2{8} Qg1-e3{10} 69. Kb2-c3{6} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---- help bot: (Black) beginner: (White) Game Played at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html View Recorded Game: http://www.getclub.com/playgame.php?id=3DDM19012&game=3D= Chess In this game both White and Black made lots of mistake. As both lost their pieces because of weak Tactics. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
|
Date: 08 Apr 2008 03:07:36
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Help Bot Still at the Top !!!
|
Sanny wrote: > Help bot is now at Top at GetClub Chess. > > He Won: 346 and Lost: 25 and has got Highest Rating of 1528. Actually, several of my "losses" were draws, but hey, your expert programming team can't be expected to know *everything* about the game of chess. As I recall, I gave up on trying to get the bogus "losses" corrected, after watching what TK had to go through to protect his "perfect" record. > Any there one who can beat "Help Bot"s Record??? > > He played all games without taking help from any Computer and beat > records of all players and reached the Top Ranking. Actually, after failing in my attempt to create a second account (it said I already had an account with the nomorechess email address), I decided to risk my own incredible rating in a test of what would happen in a QN odds game against a top commercial program. Much to my surprise, the GetClub program held its piece advantage for a while, before suddenly succumbing to a complex combination which regained the piece for a pawn or two. After that, it was no contest. This game can be found by searching through my games looking for the unique opening sequence: 1. Nc3 d5 2. Nb5 a6 3. Na7!! At least I hope it is unique... . -- help bot
|
|