|
Main
Date: 13 Feb 2008 13:39:25
From: samsloan
Subject: First Draft: Re: Blue Book Encyclopedia of Chess
|
The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess http://www.amazon.com/dp/0923891927 This book was originally published in 1956 as "The Official Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess". In reprinting this book, the word "Official" has been deleted because the official rules in this book have been superseded. I considered calling it "The Original Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess" but finally decided against it. There have been many changes in the official rules. Most of these changes are the result of the development of new kinds of chess clocks, plus the development of computers which are stronger than any human chess player. The rules have been changed because of the advent of Fischer Clocks, Bronstein Clocks, and Time Delay Clocks, plus new brands of clocks such as the Chronos Clock. Currently, the "Official" rules of chess are to be found in United States Chess Federation's Official Rules of Chess, Fifth Edition ISBN 0812935594, by Tim Just and Dan Berg published in 2003. The inside flap copy of The U.S. Chess Federation's Official Rules of Chess says, "This is the only official rulebook for chess". Needless to say, that is not true. There are other official rulebooks of chess. Probably the most official "Official" rulebook of chess is the FIDE Handbook. Every two years, the FIDE Rules Commission meets to decide on changes in the rules. They still cannot agree on how to move the knight. However, the United States Chess Federation's Official Rules of Chess, Fifth Edition rules are no longer official either. There are many rule changes which have become necessary due to the advent of computer cheating. The big money tournaments now require that the players agree in advance to submit to a search, if asked. Some directors use scanners for radio waves to detect incoming or outgoing radio emissions. In India, a player was caught with a computer in his turban. In the 2006 World Open in Philadelphia with $350,000 in prizes, two players were caught computer cheating. One wore a big floppy hat with flaps that came down over his ears. The other wore a fake hearing aid that was in reality a radio receiver. It is now standard to require suspicious players to remove their shoes. This is the Brave New World of Computer Cheating. Players could type in the moves with their toes and then receive the answers back the same way. In a recent match for the World Chess Championship, both sides accused the other of computer cheating. A controversial new tournament rule passed by FIDE is that a player is no longer allowed to write down a move on his score sheet before playing it. The pretext for this change was that it constitutes note taking. The real reason was the possibility of cheating on computerized score sheets or when connected to a computerized display board. After FIDE passed this rule, the USCF Delegates barely passed it too as Rule 15A at the meeting in Oak Brook Illinois on August 12, 2006. This caused a tremendous uproar (I voted against it) because many chess coaches teach their students to write down their moves and think about it again before making the move on the board. The purpose of this is to slow the kids down, because children often move too quickly without thinking through the consequences of their moves. As a result of this rule change, there was a great movement especially among the scholastic chess coaches to change the rule back. This reversal of Rule 15A was finally passed at the USCF Delegate's meeting in Cherry Hill, New Jersey on August 5, 2007. So, now you can again write a move on your score sheet before playing it. Meanwhile, the FIDE rules, which only apply to international competitions usually involving grandmasters, still prohibit a player from writing down a move before playing it. However, there is no penalty, other than a warning, for breaking this rule. This is just one example of how the rules are in constant flux. Meanwhile, Eric Schiller has published his own rules of chess, which he calls "The Official Rules of Chess" ISBN 1580420923 . Those are not really the official rules of chess either, of course. Today, I called Joe Lux, one of the top tournament directors in the United States and asked him if he knew anything about the rules of chess. "A little", was his reply. Seriously, the top tournament directors often make rulings which are proven wrong and have to be corrected. These disputes usually involve time pressure situations. Nowadays, there are no longer adjournments and sealed moves. This is because computers have become so powerful that in a sealed move situation the players would just go home and turn on their computers to find the best next moves. Therefore, all games are now played to their conclusion in one sitting. Since it is necessary to have the pairings ready for the next round, tournament directors need to know that there will be a time certain when all of the games will be finished. Thus, there are sudden death time controls. For example, the time control might be 40 moves in two hours and game in one hour thereafter. This means that a player will have a maximum of three hours to complete all of the moves in his game. Even if the player is a queen ahead and has mate on the next move, if his flag falls, he will have lost the game. Nowadays, tournaments are often played with a 5-second delay. This means that a players clock does not start running until five seconds after it is his turn to move. Since most games are over within 40 moves and it is relatively rare for a game to go beyond 60 moves, directors say that if a five second delay is used then both players should take 5 minutes off their clocks. This means that as long as a player is able to complete his move in five seconds or less, he will never lose on time. This usually ends the upsetting situations where a player who is two queens ahead loses on time. If a player can prove that his opponent has "no winning chances", he can call the director and declare the game drawn. He can also claim a draw if his opponent has made "no progress". In these situations, a tournament director will be called to observe the moves and rule whether there is a "no winning chances" or a "no progress" situation. Sometimes the tournament directors are not strong players themselves, so they have to call over a grandmaster and get him to tell the tournament director what is going on in the game. That is one reason why I decided to reprint The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess, because this book clearly explains that the knight moves two up and one over or one up and two over. Simple, see! Nothing about Fischer Clocks, Bronstein Clocks, or Time Delay Clocks, or Cats in the Hat who wear big floppy hats to receive their moves. The big difference in the new rules is the need to accommodate the huge number of children who play chess. The US Super-National Championships now have more than four thousand kids playing. Some of these kids do not know the rules well. For example, they sometimes cannot tell the difference between checkmate and stalemate. The now standard rule that was first introduced by Attorney Harry Sabine at the first Super-Nationals is that the directors do not tell the players whether they are in checkmate or not. It is up to the players to negotiate between themselves and decide who won the game, although the director will guide them in their negotiations. It is now standard that there should be one assistant director for every 40 or 50 kids or one assistant director for every 100 adults playing. Thus, in a World Open with 1500 players, there should be on average 15 floor TDs. Kenneth Harkness (1896-1972) was a gigantic figure in the World of Chess. According to International Master Norman T. Whitaker (who hated him), Harkness first got to America by jumping ship. He was from Scotland. He took over the fledging publication "Chess Review" magazine. He became the editor and co-publisher of Chess Review magazine in May, 1941. He was last listed as "Editor and Publisher" of Chess Review in the August 1948 issue. He had a falling out with Al Horowitz, but later they became friends again. He developed the first chess rating system, which was known as the Harkness System. In 1952, he was appointed the Business Manager and Membership Secretary of the United States Chess Federation. He established the first USCF Office in 1956. Prior to that, the federation was run out of people's homes or offices. It was Harkness who brought about the popularization of the Swiss System. Harkness virtually invented the weekend Swiss. Previously, tournaments were run as round robins. The first ads for "100% USCF Rated" weekend tournaments appeared in the ch 5, 1953 issue of Chess Life. Because he received little or no salary while working for the USCF, Kenneth Harkness made his living traveling around to cities running weekend Swisses, an idea that he had introduced, plus selling chess books and equipment. Harkness introduced the radical idea of pairing players in Swiss Systems by their USCF Rating, which he had developed, rather than by lottery. All of these ideas, first developed by Kenneth Harkness, are now standard around the world today. The terms "Harkness Rating System" and "Harkness Pairing System" were commonly used for what are now the standard methods. After Harkness had retired, Glenn Hartleb, at a speech at the conclusion of the 1960 US Open Championship in St. Louis, said, "Kenneth Harkness was not able to do everything he said that was going to do because, if he had been able to do everything he said that he was going to do, we would all be Millionaires." Ken Harkness was a big thinker. In the August 20, 1952 issue of Chess Life newspaper, in an article entitled "USCF PLANS FOR THE FUTURE", his big expansion plans were explained. It became known as "The Harkness Plan", or "HP" for short. When he took over as USCF Business Manager, Harkness worked out of his apartment at 93 Barrow Street, Greenwich Village, New York City. He divided his apartment into one section for living space for himself and his wife Sybilla and the other half for USCF business. By 1955, he had moved to a building next door at 81 Bedford Street. By the end of the 1955 fiscal year, his salary (or "commission" as it was called) had risen to the princely sum of $600.40 PER YEAR. This was more than the Chess Life Editor Montgomery Major, who seems to have received nothing at all. In 1956, Harkness was able to move the USCF out of his own apartment and into an office building at 80 East 11th Street, New York NY. That move was announced in the October 5, 1956 issue of Chess Life. (That building is now the home of Fred Wilson's Chess Book Store, although on a different floor.) The last issue of Chess Life that listed Kenneth Harkness as Business Manager was the issue for August 5, 1959. In the following issue, which was for August 20, 1959, Frank Brady was listed as business manager. Brady had already been the Acting Business Manager for some time. In the February 20, 1959 issue of Chess Life, Frank Brady was for the first time listed as the "Assistant Business Manager". However, only two weeks later, Harkness left for a round-the-world trip, leaving Brady in charge. Brady says that he was terrified. He had no idea what to do, or where to start. However, Harkness had left an instruction: "Organize as many chess tournaments as you can". Therefore, Brady started organizing chess tournaments all over the Eastern Seaboard, from Boston to Washington DC (which is how I first met Frank Brady in 1960). Brady learned his job the hard way, on the job. He says that this was instrumental in establishing his career which he has followed ever since. Dr. Brady is now Chairman of the Department of Mass Communications, Journalism, Television and Film at St. John's University, New York. He is Professor of Communication Arts and Journalism at that university. The headline of the August 5, 1959 issue of Chess Life announced "Harkness Retires - Brady In". Apparently it was not really true that Harkness was retiring because he was in a "physically run-down condition". In addition to writing the still-popular book "An Invitation to Chess" with Irving Chernev, Harkness had also written "An Invitation to Bridge". Harkness was stronger at bridge than he was at chess. Harkness was tall, 6 feet 2 inches, and was an impressive, good looking man. He often took jobs as the director of ocean cruises where he would give bridge lessons to wealthy widows. One of the wealthy women he met in this way convinced him to divorce his wife and ry her. Harkness thereafter lived in a luxurious apartment on Fifth Avenue near Twelfth Street, across the street from the New School for Social Research, and did not have to work any more. His abandoned wife, Sybilla, continued to work for the USCF as its membership secretary until the USCF moved from 80 East 11th Street to its new headquarters in Newburgh New York in November 1967. Sybilla lived in the shall Chess Club at 23 West 10th Street. The club gave her a small room to live in after her husband, Kenneth Harkness, had abandoned her. Sybilla Harkness died in July 1971 at age 73 (SSN 105-26-2426). No obituary was published. After Kenneth Harkness left the employment of the United States Chess Federation effective June 30, 1959, it seems that he went to Yugoslavia, because the January 5, 1960 issue of Chess Life contains an article by Harkness reporting from Belgrade the results of the 1959 candidates tournament in Belgrade, that had been won by Tal. When Harkness left the USCF in June, 1959, there was an editorial by Jerry Spann, the USCF President, who lived in Oklahoma, welcoming Frank Brady as the new Business Manager and Editor of Chess Life, wrote, in effect, that from now on the Business Manager and Chess Life Editor will obey instructions received from the elected officials. The article states: "During the past two years, we have "suggested" rather than "requested" as a matter of policy. Actually, this has been no great problem, as Ken has been quite cooperative. But the difference, though subtle, is vital! Ken's retirement, therefore, signalizes the restoration of USCF policy making to the directors and elected officers, where it belongs, with final authority and responsibility vested in the Federation's chief executive. I will now fully assume this responsibility." The above quote tells the real story. USCF President Jerry Spann would sweep in from the Badlands of Oklahoma, arrive at the USCF Office, tell Harkness to do this and not that or the other thing and then go back. These sort of things always happen in and quasi-governmental body. The people who have to actually do the work do not always see eye-to-eye with those who want to issue the orders. It would not by surprising to learn that a strong, active and dynamic person like Kenneth Harkness would have constant run-ins with the elected but relatively inactive board members. A perfect example of this is this book, the "The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess". For years, the USCF Officials had talked about writing a book of tournament rules. However, they could not agree and had never gotten around to doing it. Finally, Harkness got tired of this and just wrote the rules in the book himself, without receiving permission for anyone. It was published, became a great success, and established a standard for the rules. The USCF Tournament Rules chapter in the Blue Book is 42 pages long, pages 53-95. However, the current edition of the Official USCF Tournament Rules is 416 pages. Yet the rules are basically the same. The reason the current rules are so long is that they must deal with situations involving time delay clocks, sudden death time limits, pairings, protests and appeals. The best way to avoid having to deal with these rules is simply do not get into time trouble. Leave adequate time on your clock so that your flag never falls. Another way is simply do not play in tournaments with $300,000 in guaranteed prizes, because it is those big money tournaments where these disputes usually arise. A book review published on Amazon of the Official USCF Rules states: Whereas, "THE USCF OFFICIAL RULES OF CHESS" is written for tournament directors and experienced tournament players to understand, a book for the newcomer to chess is needed that covers: 1. Helping the newcomer focus on what is important for practical use in tournament play. The USCF rulebook has so much material it is impossible to know what is important and what is not so important for a tournament player to learn. Help is needed in the massive maze of material! 2. Some more detail to explain the meanings of some of the rules in more simple language for the newcomer. 3. Are there certain rules that often create problems? What are these rules and how can a player protect his or herself? For the reviewer above, this Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess is the answer, because this book does all of those things, and is short and readable. The Blue Book covers a lot of material not readily available elsewhere, such as the history of establishment of the first international titles, the Russian Rating System, the Harkness Pairing System, the Harkness Rating System, the various tie-breaking systems and their relative merits. There are sections that are definitely out of date, such as the names and addresses of chess clubs and chess publications around the country. However, these are retained for their historical value. Not much is known about what happened to Kenneth Harkness after he left the USCF. Perhaps he got a real, paying job. The obituary by Fred Cramer states that he died in Yugoslavia of a heart attack while riding on a train on his way to the 1972 World Chess Olympiad in Skopje where he was to be an arbiter. He had been living in Boca Raton Florida.However, another source states that Harkness was actually in the Belgrade Train Station carrying several heavy suitcases of documents he was going to present to the FIDE Congress in Skopje, when suddenly he dropped dead. His successor was Frank Brady who, in January 1961, converted Chess Life from a bi-weekly newspaper to a slick cover magazine. This was a risky move, as it went into head-to-head competition with "Chess Review" magazine, but it proved to be a success. Brady was both the business manager and the editor of Chess Life, starting with the January 1961 issue. Fred Wren retired as editor of the Chess Life newspaper in the last issue, which was dated December 20, 1960. Previously, Montgomery Major had been editor of Chess Life from the beginning of that newspaper until the last issue of 1957. In the December 20, 1957 issue of Chess Like, Montgomery Major wrote an article entitled "At Last We Cry 30", "30" meaning THE END. It seemed that Major assumed that Chess Life would cease publication, perhaps because he was not getting paid and he assumed that nobody else would work for free. However, Fred Wren, who liked to call himself "The Old Woodpusher" and who lived some of the time in Maine and some of the time in Nova Scotia, Canada, came out of retirement and took over. Fred Wren was the editor for exactly three years, from the first issue of 1958 until the last issue of 1960. Montgomery Major was definitely not fired although many assumed that he had been. The USCF management was shocked when Major quit. Had Fred Wren not jumped in, the USCF would have been in real trouble. Major was a contentious person who is not well remembered by those old enough to remember him. At the 1960 USCF Business Meeting in St. Louis, the Harkness Rating System was replaced by the Elo Rating System, developed by Arpad Elo, a Professor of Statistics at quette University who had also been the Wisconsin State Champion. I was there as the delegate from the State of Virginia (since I was the only player from Virginia who played in the 1960 US Open) and I was the only one who voted against the change. Since then, the rating system has been known as the Elo Rating System. The Harkness name has been largely forgotten. What is also forgotten is that the Elo Rating System was derived from the data developed by the Harkness Rating System. Professor Elo took the ratings and the results of tournaments played under the Harkness System, observed how the ratings moved up and down based on the results and then developed a system to emulate those results. The basic difference is that under the Harkness System if a player had for example a 1600 rating and then played in a 6-round Swiss and achieved a 1800 performance, then at the end of the rating period if no other tournaments were played the two results would be averaged and the result would be a rating of 1700. Under the Elo System, each game individually was rated. If a player rated 1600 played a game against an opponent rated 1800, and the 1600 player won, he would gain 24 rating points and his opponent would lose 24 points. However, if the 1800 rated player won, he would gain 8 points and the 1600 player would lose 8 points. Finally, if the game was a draw the lower player would gain 8 and the higher rated player would lose 8 points. Under the Elo Formula, the sum of the two ratings would always remain the same. However, a problem with this soon became apparent because in general players improve with experience. New players who established their first ratings could expect to improve dramatically during their first few months of tournament play. However, this improvement would take away points from the long established players with stable ratings. The result was that everybody's rating went down. Ever since, a variety of formulas and methods have been tried to stabilize the ratings. The objective is that if the strength of a player stays the same, his rating should stay about the same too. There is also politics involved too, as some USCF Presidents have tried to increase their personal popularity by tweaking the rating system so that everybody's rating goes up. There have been bonus points and feedback points introduced, along with rating floors. This has led to periods of great rating inflation, such as in the early 1980s when it was not uncommon for a player to gain a hundred rating points in just one tournament, followed by periods of deflation such as in around 1999 when everybody's rating seemed to drop 100-150 points. Nevertheless, overall the rating system has remained rekably stable, with a rating of 1800 reflecting about the same strength in 2008 as a rating of 1800 reflected in 1956. There are now 600,000 players with ratings in the USCF Ratings online database. All of this started with Kenneth Harkness. The Harkness Rating System was established in 1950. In 1960, the USCF converted to the Elo Formula. The Elo formula is no longer in use. Nowadays, nobody except for a few specialists knows what formula is being used. The Elo System was adopted by FIDE in 1970. Since the number of FIDE Rated players was low, less than 2,000, Professor Elo did all the calculations by hand using a simple adding machine. The two systems, the USCF Rating System and the FIDE Rating System using the Elo Formula, have been running in parallel since 1970. However, as time progressed the actual method of doing the calculations has diverged further and further apart. Until recently, FIDE only rated top level elite players. The lowest rating a man could have was 2200. Because fewer women play top level chess, women could have ratings as low as 2000. In the late 1970s and the early 1980s, USCF Rating Statistician George Cunningham decided to combat the problem of rating deflation by introducing "bonus points", "feedback points" and "fiddle points". The idea was to stabilize the ratings but instead so many of these "fiddle points" were introduced that the rating of every active player jumped up. (I was not playing actively during this period so I did not get all these free rating points, a fact that I have lamented ever since.) Cunningham was put out to pasture and the ratings committee wanted to put everybody's rating back down to what it had been, but everybody liked their new sky-high rating so this was politically unacceptable. By then, the average USCF rating was 100 points higher than the FIDE Rating for players rated under both systems. However, FIDE started messing with their own system too. In the mid-1980s, FIDE wanted to encourage chess in third-world countries, but faced the problem that many African and Asian countries had no players of the master standard. So, FIDE decided that by giving out master titles and ratings to some players in those countries, it would encourage others to compete for these ratings. The result was that some very weak players were given ratings of 2205. An extreme example of this was the US Virgin Islands Chess Team. Although not really a country, the US Virgin Islands was allowed to become a FIDE member due to its distance from the mainland. (FIDE has since established rules to prevent such non-countries from becoming new members of FIDE.) The captain of the US Virgin Islands Chess Team was John W. Warlick. FIDE has a rule that anybody who got a plus score in an Olympiad would be awarded a minimum rating of 2205. In the 1988 Olympiad in Thessaloniki Greece, the US Virgin Islands had one of the weakest teams and finished next to last, ahead of only Seychelles, a country with only 500 persons who know how to play chess in the entire country. John Warlick, playing first reserve, was able to pair himself against the weakest possible opponents. Against these very weak players, he scored 5 1/2 out of 10, scoring wins against the bottom board players from Sudan, Mauritius, Liechtenstein, Bermuda and Seychelles. This gave Warlick a FIDE rating of 2205. However, Warlick's USCF rating was 1584, more than 600 points lower!!! Professor Arpad Elo was greatly upset at these bastardizations of his rating system. Obviously, giving away free rating points just to encourage chess in third world countries would have a long term inflationary impact on the rating system. The FIDE System was not hit so hard by rapidly improving players as the USCF rating system had been, because FIDE only rated top-level international tournaments, and the players in those tournaments were likely to be at or near their peaks, unlike the rapidly improving ten year old kids who frequented USCF rated tournaments and who were taking away rating points from their elders. However, this was because Arpad Elo could no longer do anything about it. This was because of a dispute between Arpad Elo and William Goichberg, organizer of many FIDE Rated tournaments. At a time when less than 600 players in the world had FIDE Ratings, Goichberg started an aggressive program to qualify US players for FIDE Ratings. Typicaklly his tournaments were ten player round robins with four players with FIDE ratings, the minimum number necessary to qualify a player for a FIDE Rating. However, it happened by pure chance Goichberg, normally a 2350 player, has the best tournament of his life and scored a 2520 tournament performance. In another event, Michael Valvo, a strong player who had been inactive for a decade, came out of retirement and produced a performance over 2400. Those who knew Valvo knew that he was easily capable of this, but Arpad Elo had never heard of Valvo and thought that this result was suspicious. Another unfortunate incident was that US Junion Champion Peter Winston who had a 2250 FIDE Rating and who was one of the four players entered in the tournament to establish ratings for the others had an incredibly bad tournament and lost all his games, scoring 0-9. His last round game was against Sunil Weeramantry and the event was held at Hunter College High School. Peter Winston left the tournament after having lost all his games and was never seen nor heard from again. It was presumed that he had committed suicide. His body was never found and this is a mystery that has never been solved. Arpad Elo did not believe any of this. He thought that this was all a fix. Therefore, Elo refused to rate these events and to give Goichberg his 2520 rating and Valvo his 2440 rating. The showdown came at the 1978 World Chess Olympiad in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Goichberg protested to the FIDE General Assembly that Elo was biased, refusing to give ratings that had been earned by American players (who also had USCF Ratings) while readily giving ratings to Soviet or Hungarian players. Goichberg was right, of course. The tournaments were not fixed. Goichberg's performance, while unusual, was within the expected normal range of tournament results and Valvo clearly was legitimately a 2440 player even though Elo had never heard of him. Winston had just gone crazy and everybody has a bad tournament every now and then. The result was that the FIDE General Assembly gave Goichberg and Valvo their earned ratings. Soon thereafter, Elo was stripped of his exclusive authority to calculate the ratings and FIDE put him out to pasture. FIDE took over the calculation of FIDE Ratings. However, there were new problems. Two examples were giving Class-C players like John Warlick a FIDE Rating of 2205 and giving 100 Free Rating Points to Every Woman in the World Except for Zsuzsa Polgar, as FIDE did at the 1986 World Chess Olympiad in Dubai. In Dubai, FIDE also decided to award the International Master Title to the Arab Junior Champion. These awards made FIDE the world's laughing stock. The USCF helped out too, by botching the rating list. FIDE in its infinite wisdom decided to give the task of calculating the FIDE ratings to the USCF, since the USCF was already running the USCF rating system on its computers. When the July 1, 1987 FIDE Rating list came out, it was jibberish. The two top rated women players in the world were non-existent persons. Fully ten percent of the ratings were demonstrably wrong. Randy Hough, who was the USCF's technical director and was in charge of this, claimed to have nothing to do with this, as he had resigned just before the botched rating list came out. The end result was that the July 1, 1987 rating list had to be trashed. FIDE took away the authority of the USCF to calculate FIDE Ratings and awarded it to a company in Yugoslavia. Due to the short memories that chess players have, Randy Hough was rehabilitated and ran successfully for the USCF Executive Board in 2006. However, the FIDE Rating System had one big advantage. It had a fixed, published formula and was completely recalculated once every six months. A FIDE Rated player knew that if he played and defeated another player with the same rating he would gain exactly 5 rating points and his opponent would lose the same number of points. If the rating came out and was even 5 points off, the player would know that something was wrong and could protest. This was especially important because the "Cold War" was still going on. The Americans did not trust the Russians and the Soviets did not trust the Americans. This made it necessary that everybody knew exactly what the rating system was, so that everybody could calculate their own rating exactly correctly and any cheating would be immediately obvious. For example, in 1986 I was traveling with Zsuzsa Polgar. She played 59 rated tournament games in the last half of 1986. Knowing all of her opponents and their ratings, it became possible to calculate that her rating was going to be exactly, precisely 2495. This was going to make her the highest rated woman in the history of chess. When her rating came out on the January 1, 1987 rating list, her rating was exactly that, 2495. However, FIDE, not Zsuzsa, had cheated. In order to stop her from being the highest rated female chess player ever, FIDE had awarded 100 free rating points to every woman in the world except for Zsuzsa Polgar. This put Maya Chiburdanidze number one on the woman's list with a rating of 2530, whereas her real rating without the 100 free points was 2430. It was assumed that the rating of Chiburdanidze would quickly fall back to where it had been and Zsuzsa would soon regain her rightful spot as the number one rated woman of all time. However, after that, both the rating of Chiburdanidze and the rating of Gaprindashvili were calculated on the lower standard, even after the 100 free points had been added. In the July 1, 1987 rating list, the top two women players in the world were non-existent Greek Women. Excluding those two fake names, the rating of Chiburdanidze appeared to rise from 2530 to 2560, thus confirming her higher rating. However, that was not the reality. In reality, for purposes of calculation, 100 points were deducted from her rating of 2530, then her games were rated on the basis of a 2430 rating, so her rating went up to 2460, and then the 100 points were added back, giving her a rating of 2560. Thus, Maya's real rating under the standard formula was 2460, not 2560, and the real rating of Nona Gaprindashvili under the normal rating system was 2385, not 2485. Had it not been for this additional manipulation of the rating system, the rating for both Maya and Nona Gaprindashvili would have dropped during 1987 and would have quickly fallen back to their rating levels before receiving the 100 free points. As it turned out, it took Zsuzsa three years to pass Maya Chiburdanidze on the rating list but by that time her sister Judit Polgar had passed Zsuzsa, so Zsuzsa had been cheated out of her hard won title of being the highest rated woman chess player in the world. When Harkness took over as Business Manager of the USCF in 1952, it had a deficit new worth, had been losing money every year, had less than one thousand members, and the only thing keeping the organization alive was the fact that the printer kept printing Chess Life even though his bills were not being paid. During the seven years that Harkness ran the USCF, the organization was profitable EVERY YEAR. The entire delinquent printing bill was paid off, membership greatly increased and when Harkness left the there was a net worth surplus. Perhaps more importantly, the "Harkness Plan" that had been put in place by Kennedy Harkness continued to be followed by his successors. Under this plan, the USCF has experienced a steady growth and expansion. Every now and then a new political group takes over the USCF and one of the first things they usually do is try to scrap the Harkness Plan. The immediate result is a drastic drop in revenues and big financial losses. As a result, the new management is forced to reinstate the plan. Among the elements that Harkness introduced and which are still controversial today is the requirement that in USCF rated tournaments every player must be a USCF member. Another feature is that all members receive a subscription to Chess Life. Even today, there are groups within the USCF trying to drop these measures.
|
|
|
Date: 29 Feb 2008 07:55:42
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: First Draft: Re: Blue Book Encyclopedia of Chess
|
The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess is out, published today. It is available on Amazon at: http://www.amazon.com/dp/0923891927 I have just uploaded the new cover The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess: with Introduction and updates in 2008 by Sam Sloan The Blue Book was originally published by Kenneth Harkness in 1957. It is listed on Amazon as "Currently unavailable" but it will become available in a few hours. Sam Sloan
|
|
Date: 16 Feb 2008 07:41:56
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: First Draft: Re: Blue Book Encyclopedia of Chess
|
The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess http://www.amazon.com/dp/0923891927 The final draft of the new revised Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess has been sent to the printers. It will be out in about ten days to two weeks from today. The new revised Blue Book will have 438 pages. The original Blue Book had 393 pages, so I have added 45 new pages. (Actually, I have added a few more pages than that, as the original Blue Book had several blank pages and I have filled them up as much as possible.) The price will be $24.95. It will first become available at the address above. Sam Sloan
|
|
Date: 16 Feb 2008 00:52:14
From: Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (Wlod)
Subject: Re: First Draft: Re: Blue Book Encyclopedia of Chess
|
On Feb 16, 12:46 am, "Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (Wlod)" <[email protected] > wrote: > The high level tournaments > should use chess sets which record the moves > by themselves, without players wasting > their time and concentration to write the moves > down on the scoresheets. The same goes for punching ther clock. There should be no more of it. The chess set, including the chess clock, should record time by itself. And one should not have to claim winning on time. A player who has exceeded his/her time limit should lose automatically (except when no checkmate is possible). In short, chess players should just play chess. Everything else is at the best the necessary eveil which should be reduced to bare minimum, as much as possible. Wlod
|
| |
Date: 16 Feb 2008 10:46:46
From: Chess One
Subject: QRe: First Draft: Re: Blue Book Encyclopedia of Chess
|
"Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (Wlod)" <[email protected] > wrote in message news:cff19ae6-caad-4c4f-ad49-bc9d34312a93@s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com... > On Feb 16, 12:46 am, "Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (Wlod)" > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The high level tournaments >> should use chess sets which record the moves >> by themselves, without players wasting >> their time and concentration to write the moves >> down on the scoresheets. > > The same goes for punching ther clock. > There should be no more of it. The chess > set, including the chess clock, should > record time by itself. I agree for top level players with everthing Wlod wrote before this about the need to record moves. The trouble with this last one is for a sensory board to establish when a move is complete? How does it tell if Qd2-d4 is a 'hover' and if the piece is actually released onto d4, or held there while thinking of what happens, or eventually moved to d3? > And one should not > have to claim winning on time. A player > who has exceeded his/her time limit should > lose automatically (except when no checkmate > is possible). I agree with that. > In short, chess players should just play chess. > Everything else is at the best the necessary eveil > which should be reduced to bare minimum, as much > as possible. I don't know if Wlod likes this idea also, but the software associated with the board can also /BLEEP!/ illegal moves - so that it either does not allow an illegal move to stand as amove. One other great advantage of allowing softare/hardware to record the game is not just clarity of moves played, but also how many moves have been played. A scrawled score sheet, or one with dashes to indicate a move, may not accurately record if the time limit is reached or surpaseed, without subsequent analysis and reconstruction of the game - which can be contentious, no? > Wlod
|
|
Date: 16 Feb 2008 00:46:54
From: Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (Wlod)
Subject: Re: First Draft: Re: Blue Book Encyclopedia of Chess
|
On Feb 15, 2:44 pm, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote: > > A controversial new tournament rule passed by FIDE is that a player is > no longer allowed to write down a move on his score sheet before > playing it. The pretext for this change was that it constitutes note > taking. The real reason was the possibility of cheating on > computerized score sheets or when connected to a computerized display > board. After FIDE passed this rule, the USCF Delegates barely passed > it too as Rule 15A at the meeting in Oak Brook Illinois on August 12, > 2006. It's so idiotic! The high level tournaments should use chess sets which record the moves by themselves, without players wasting tyeir time and concentration to write the moves down on the scoresheets. This way errors will be avoided, and the moves made in the time scramble will be recorded too, even in the case of blitz games. Sure, there are a few things to discuss but don't be pedantic in a negative way. What I've written above makes sense, granted that a few details should be spelled out. Wlod
|
| |
Date: 16 Feb 2008 05:23:47
From: Mike Murray
Subject: Re: First Draft: Re: Blue Book Encyclopedia of Chess
|
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:46:54 -0800 (PST), "Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (Wlod)" <[email protected] > wrote: >It's so idiotic! The high level tournaments >should use chess sets which record the moves >by themselves, without players wasting >tyeir time and concentration to write the moves >down on the scoresheets. This way errors >will be avoided, and the moves made in the >time scramble will be recorded too, even >in the case of blitz games. >Sure, there are a few things to discuss but >don't be pedantic in a negative way. What >I've written above makes sense, granted >that a few details should be spelled out. > > Wlod Would this lead to two sets of rules -- one for high level events with the new equipment and one for large Swiss tournaments and other contests lacking the self-recording, self-timing sets? To maintain a single set of technology independent rules is a big reason the USCF first took away the option of recording one's move before making it. Of course, it would have been simpler to forbid this option only when recording with devices that present the position graphically, but this would have put the graphic devices at a disadvantage and made it more difficult to ket them. They provided a raft of other reasons when a firestorm of protest broke out after the decision, but this little post facto dance fooled only the gullible.
|
|
Date: 15 Feb 2008 14:44:06
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: First Draft: Re: Blue Book Encyclopedia of Chess
|
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0923891927 The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess Glenn Petersen, editor of "Chess Life for Kids" magazine, former editor of "Chess Life" magazine, and one of the top tournament directors in the United States, writes: "There is no better explanation of the theory behind the Swiss System than what was written by Kenneth Harkness and Eliot Hearst in The Official Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess in 1956." This book was originally published in 1957 as "The Official Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess". In reprinting this book, the word "Official" has been deleted because the official rules in this book have been superseded. I considered calling it "The Original Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess" but finally decided against it. There have been many changes in the official rules. Most of these changes are the result of the development of new kinds of chess clocks, plus the development of computers which are stronger than any human chess player. The rules have been changed because of the advent of Fischer Clocks, Bronstein Clocks and Time Delay Clocks, plus new brands of clocks such as the Chronos Clock and new type of score sheets such as the Monroi digital display score sheet. Currently, the "Official" rules of chess in the USA are to be found in United States Chess Federation's Official Rules of Chess, Fifth Edition ISBN 0812935594, by Tim Just and Dan Berg published in 2003. The inside flap copy of The U.S. Chess Federation's Official Rules of Chess says, "This is the only official rulebook for chess". Needless to say, that is not true. There are other official rulebooks of chess. Probably the most official "Official" rulebook of chess is the FIDE Handbook. Every two years, the FIDE Rules Commission meets to decide on changes in the rules. They still cannot agree on how to move the knight. However, the United States Chess Federation's Official Rules of Chess, Fifth Edition rules are no longer official either. There are many rule changes which have become necessary due to the advent of computer cheating. The big money tournaments now require that the players agree in advance to submit to a search, if asked. Some directors use scanners for radio waves to detect incoming or outgoing radio emissions. In India, a player was caught with a computer in his turban. In the 2006 World Open in Philadelphia with $350,000 in prizes, two players were caught computer cheating. One wore a big floppy hat with flaps that came down over his ears. The other wore a fake hearing aid that was in reality a radio receiver. It is now standard to require suspicious players to remove their shoes. This is the Brave New World of Computer Cheating. Players could type in the moves with their toes and then receive the answers back the same way. In a recent match for the World Chess Championship, both sides accused the other side of computer cheating. A controversial new tournament rule passed by FIDE is that a player is no longer allowed to write down a move on his score sheet before playing it. The pretext for this change was that it constitutes note taking. The real reason was the possibility of cheating on computerized score sheets or when connected to a computerized display board. After FIDE passed this rule, the USCF Delegates barely passed it too as Rule 15A at the meeting in Oak Brook Illinois on August 12, 2006. This caused a tremendous uproar (I voted against it) because many chess coaches teach their students to write down their moves and think about it again before making the move on the board. The purpose of this is to slow the kids down, because children often move too quickly without thinking through the consequences of their moves. As a result of this rule change, there was a great movement especially among the scholastic chess coaches to change the rule back. An amendment of Rule 15A was finally passed at the USCF Delegate's meeting in Cherry Hill, New Jersey on August 5, 2007, allowing tournament directors to adopt as a "variation" of the official rules to allow a player to write down a move before playing it. Note that the nation's largest tournaments, USCF's National Scholastics, did not use the new rule even before the variation was recognized. Meanwhile, the FIDE rules, which only apply to international competitions usually involving grandmasters, still prohibit a player from writing down a move before playing it. However, there is no penalty, other than a warning, for breaking this rule. This is just one example of how the rules are in constant flux. Meanwhile, Eric Schiller has published his own rules of chess, which he calls "The Official Rules of Chess" ISBN 1580420923 . Those are not really the official rules of chess either, of course. Schiller writes in defense of his work: My rules are the FIDE rules with just some language clarification. The FIDE rules are the official rules. The USCF has provincial rules that apply nowhere except in USCF events, a small fraction of chess contests. They cannot seriously be called the official rules. Today, I called Joe Lux, one of the top tournament directors in the United States and asked him if he knew anything about the rules of chess. "A little", was his reply. Seriously, the top tournament directors sometimes make rulings which are proven wrong and have to be corrected. These disputes usually involve time pressure situations. Nowadays, there are no longer adjournments and sealed moves. This is because computers have become so powerful that in a sealed move situation the players would just go home and turn on their computers to find the best next moves. Therefore, all games are now played to their conclusion in one sitting. Since it is necessary to have the pairings ready for the next round, tournament directors need to know that there will be a time certain when all of the games will be finished. Thus, there are sudden death time controls. For example, the time control might be 40 moves in two hours and game in one hour thereafter. This means that a player will have a maximum of three hours to complete all of the moves in his game. Even if the player is a queen ahead and has mate on the next move, if his flag falls, he will have lost the game. Nowadays, tournaments are often played with a 5-second delay. This means that a players clock does not start running until five seconds after it is his turn to move. Since most games are over within 40 moves and it is relatively rare for a game to go beyond 60 moves, directors say that if a five second delay is used then both players should take 5 minutes off their clocks. This means that as long as a player is able to complete his move in five seconds or less, he will never lose on time. This usually ends the upsetting situations where a player who is two queens ahead loses on time. If a player can prove that his opponent has "no winning chances", he can call the director and declare the game drawn. He may also try to claim a draw if his opponent has made "no progress". However, there is no such claim as "no progress." The standard is a position in which a C player would be expected to draw a Master at least 90% of the time, assuming ample time for both. This is often referred to as "insufficient losing chances." Sometimes a TD responds to such a claim by temporarily denying it and watching for progress, but the claim itself is not a "no progress" claim. In these situations, a tournament director will be called to observe the moves and rule whether there is a "no winning chances" situation. Sometimes the tournament directors are not strong players themselves, so they have to call over a grandmaster and get him to tell the tournament director what is going on in the game. That is one reason why I decided to reprint The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess, because this book clearly explains that the knight moves two up and one over or one up and two over. Simple, see! Nothing about Fischer Clocks, Bronstein Clocks, or Time Delay Clocks, or Cats in the Hat who wear big floppy hats to receive their moves. The big difference in the new rules is the need to accommodate the huge number of children who play chess. The US Super-National Championships now have more than four thousand kids playing. Some of these kids do not know the rules well. For example, they sometimes cannot tell the difference between checkmate and stalemate. The now standard rule that was first introduced by Attorney Harry Sabine at the first Super-Nationals is that the directors do not tell the players whether they are in checkmate or not. It is up to the players to negotiate between themselves and decide who won the game, although the director will guide them in their negotiations. It is now standard that there should be one assistant director for every 40 or 50 kids or one assistant director for every 100 adults playing. Thus, in a World Open with 1500 players, there should be on average 15 floor TDs. The main differences between the FIDE Rules and the USCF Rules are that the FIDE Rules call for arbiter intervention. For example, under the FIDE Rules, if a player's flag falls, the arbiter will have been standing there watching and will call that the flag has fallen and that the game has been forfeited. Under the USCF Rules, the tournament director, or "floor TD" as they are called in America, will remain silent if he sees the flag fall. It is up to the opponent to notice and to point out that his opponent's flag has fallen. Thus, under the USCF Rules, a much smaller number of arbiters are needed to referee a tournament. The Big Swiss tournaments with thousands of players that are held in America would be prohibitively expensive to run under the FIDE Rules, because every few games would require a paid arbiter. In the US, those who demand that the USCF abolish its own rules and adopt the FIDE rules instead are invariably Goichberg opponents who want to shut down the huge-Mega-Swiss events that Goichberg runs, because they would be prohibitively expensive to run under the FIDE rules. There are also a few nut cases who want to stop young children from playing chess or who try to insist that children reach at least 1000 in chess strength (which few children ever make) before entering a serious chess tournament. This is the reason why these huge Mega-Swiss events have yet to appear in Europe. Meanwhile, the Europeans are starting to move in the direction of adopting the USCF Rules for the same reason, which is that it makes tournaments cheaper and easier to run. Kenneth Harkness Kenneth Harkness (1896-1972) was a gigantic figure in the World of Chess. According to International Master Norman T. Whitaker (who hated him), Harkness first got to America by jumping ship. He was born on November 12, 1896 in Glasgow, Scotland, and arrived in America in 1918. He retained a trace of a Scottish accent. According to the ch 5, 1955 issue of Chess Life, Kenneth Harkness was a pen name and his real name was Stanley Edgar. However, the Social Security Death Index gives his name as Kenneth Harkness. (SSN 109-28-3362). After a career as an editor and writer of radio articles and textbooks, he took over the fledging publication "Chess Review" magazine. He became the editor and co-publisher of Chess Review magazine in May, 1941. Al Horowitz wrote very little and most of the writing in Chess Review was by Harkness. Harkness was the manager of the US Team that in 1946 traveled to Moscow to play a match against the Soviet Union. He was last listed as "Editor and Publisher" of Chess Review in the August 1948 issue. He had a falling out with Al Horowitz, but later they became friends again. Harkness developed the first chess rating system, which was known as the Harkness System. He worked on it for two years after he left Chess Review and it was officially adopted by the USCF in 1950. In 1952, he was appointed the Business Manager and Membership Secretary of the United States Chess Federation. He established the first USCF Office in 1956. Prior to that, the federation was run out of private homes and offices. It was Harkness who brought about the popularization of the Swiss System. Harkness virtually invented the weekend Swiss. Previously, tournaments were held as round robins. The first ads for "100% USCF Rated" weekend tournaments appeared in the ch 5, 1953 issue of Chess Life. Because he received little or no salary while working for the USCF, Kenneth Harkness made his living traveling around to cities running weekend Swisses, an idea that he had introduced, plus selling chess books and equipment. Harkness introduced the radical idea of pairing players in Swiss Systems by USCF Ratings, which he had developed, rather than by lottery. All of these ideas, first developed by Kenneth Harkness, are now standard around the world today. The terms "Harkness Rating System" and "Harkness Pairing System" were commonly used for what are now the standard methods. When Harkness took over as Business Manager of the USCF in 1952, it had a deficit new worth. It had been losing money every year, had only about one thousand members, and the only thing keeping the organization alive was the fact that the printer kept printing Chess Life even though his printing bills were not being paid. During the seven years that Harkness ran the USCF, the organization was profitable EVERY YEAR. The entire delinquent printing bill was paid off, membership tripled and revenues multiplied eight times. When Harkness left, the USCF had a net worth surplus for the first time (and probably the last time too). Perhaps more importantly, the "Harkness Plan" that had been put in place by Kenneth Harkness continued to be followed by his successors. Under this plan, the USCF has experienced steady growth and expansion. The USCF now has 86,000 members. Every now and then, a new political group takes over the USCF and one of the first things they usually do is try to scrap the Harkness Plan. The immediate result is a drastic drop in membership and revenues and big financial losses. As a result, the new management is forced to reinstate the old plan, or be voted out. Among the elements that Harkness introduced and which are still controversial today is the requirement that in USCF rated tournaments every player must be a USCF member. Another feature is that all members receive a subscription to Chess Life. Even today, there are groups within the USCF trying to drop these measures. They do not know the lessons of history. After Harkness had retired, Glenn Hartleb, made a speech at the dinner at the conclusion of the 1960 US Open Championship in St. Louis, in which he said: "Kenneth Harkness was not able to do everything he said that he was going to do because, if he had been able to do everything he said that he was going to do, we would all be Millionaires." Kenneth Harkness was a big thinker. In the August 20, 1952 issue of Chess Life newspaper, in an article entitled "USCF PLANS FOR THE FUTURE", his big expansion plans were explained. It became known as "The Harkness Plan", or "HP" for short. When he took over as USCF Business Manager, Harkness worked out of his apartment at 93 Barrow Street, Greenwich Village, New York City. He divided his apartment into one section for living space for himself and his wife Sybilla and the rest for USCF business. By 1955, he had moved to a building next door at 81 Bedford Street. By the end of the 1955 fiscal year, his salary (or "commission" as it was called) had risen to the princely sum of $600.40 PER YEAR. This was more than the Chess Life Editor, Montgomery Major, who seems to have received nothing at all. In October, 1956, Harkness was able to move the USCF out of his own apartment and into an office building at 80 East 11th Street, New York NY. That move was announced in the October 5, 1956 issue of Chess Life. (That building is now the home of Fred Wilson's Chess Book Store, although on a different floor.) The last issue of Chess Life that listed Kenneth Harkness as Business Manager was the issue for August 5, 1959. In the following issue, which was for August 20, 1959, Frank Brady was listed as business manager. Brady had already been the Acting Business Manager for some time. In the February 20, 1959 issue of Chess Life, Frank Brady was for the first time listed as the "Assistant Business Manager". However, only two weeks later, Harkness left for a round-the-world trip, leaving Brady in charge. Brady says that he was terrified. He had no idea what to do, or where to start. However, Harkness had left an instruction: "Organize as many chess tournaments as you can". Therefore, Brady started organizing chess tournaments all over the Eastern Seaboard, from Boston to Washington DC (which is how I first met Frank Brady in 1960). Brady learned his job the hard way, on the job. He says that this was instrumental in establishing his career which he has followed ever since. Dr. Brady is now Chairman of the Department of Mass Communications, Journalism, Television and Film at St. John's University, New York. He is Professor of Communication Arts and Journalism at that university. The headline of the August 5, 1959 issue of Chess Life announced "Harkness Retires - Brady In". Apparently, it was not really true that Harkness was retiring because of the fact that he was in a "physically run-down condition". In addition to writing the still-popular book "An Invitation to Chess" with Irving Chernev, Harkness had also written "An Invitation to Bridge". Harkness was a 1900 player at chess and was stronger at bridge than he was at chess. Harkness was tall, 6 feet 2 inches, and was an impressive, good looking man. He often took jobs as the director of ocean cruises where he would give bridge lessons to wealthy widows. One of the wealthy women whom he met in this way convinced him to divorce his wife and ry her. Harkness thereafter lived in a luxurious apartment on Fifth Avenue near Twelfth Street, across the street from the New School for Social Research, and did not have to work any more. His abandoned wife, Sybilla, continued to work for the USCF as its membership secretary. However, by 1964, she was no longer working for the USCF. Bill Goichberg, who was the first full-time USCF Rating Statistician, writes: I worked at this office from 1964 to 1967. The membership secretary was Greta Fuchs. The other employees in 1964 were Joe Reinhardt, a shipping clerk for B & E and myself. Eventually an additional rating statistician was hired. I never met Sybilla Harkness and am sure she did not work for USCF then. In 1962-1963 I went to the office occasionally and don't think she was there then either. The USCF moved from 80 East 11th Street to its new headquarters in Newburgh New York in November 1967. Sybilla lived in the shall Chess Club at 23 West 10th Street. The club gave her a small room to live in after her husband, Kenneth Harkness, had abandoned her. Sybilla Harkness died in July 1971 at age 73 (SSN 105-26-2426). No obituary was published. After Kenneth Harkness left the employment of the United States Chess Federation effective June 30, 1959, it seems that he went to Yugoslavia, because the January 5, 1960 issue of Chess Life contains an article by Harkness reporting from Belgrade the results of the 1959 candidates tournament in Belgrade, that had been won by Tal. When Harkness left the USCF in June, 1959, there was an editorial by Jerry Spann, the USCF President who lived in Oklahoma, welcoming Frank Brady as the new Business Manager. Brady wrote, in effect, that from now on the Business Manager and Chess Life Editor will obey orders received from the elected officials, unlike before. The article by Jerry Spann stated: During the past two years, we have "suggested" rather than "requested" as a matter of policy. Actually, this has been no great problem, as Ken has been quite cooperative. But the difference, though subtle, is vital! Ken's retirement, therefore, signalizes the restoration of USCF policy making to the directors and elected officers, where it belongs, with final authority and responsibility vested in the Federation's chief executive. I will now fully assume this responsibility. The above quote tells the real story. USCF President Jerry Spann would sweep in from the Badlands of Oklahoma, arrive at the USCF Office, tell Harkness to do this and not that or the other thing and then go back to Oklahoma. This sort of thing always happen in any quasi- governmental body. The people who have to actually do the work do not always see eye-to-eye with those who want to issue the orders. It would not by surprising to learn that a strong, active and dynamic person like Kenneth Harkness would have constant run-ins with the elected but relatively inactive board members. A perfect example of this is this book, the "The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess". For years, the USCF Officials had talked about writing a book of tournament rules. However, they could not agree and had never gotten around to doing it. Finally, Harkness got tired of this and just wrote the rules in the book himself, without receiving permission for anyone. It was published, became a great success, and established a standard for the rules. The USCF Tournament Rules chapter in this Blue Book is 42 pages long, pages 53-95. However, the current edition of the Official USCF Tournament Rules is 416 pages. Yet the rules are basically the same. The reason the current rules are so long is that they must deal with situations involving time delay clocks, sudden death time limits, pairings, protests and appeals. The best way to avoid having to deal with these rules is simply do not get into time trouble. Leave adequate time on your clock so that your flag never falls. Another way is simply do not play in tournaments with $300,000 in guaranteed prizes, because it is those big money tournaments where these disputes usually arise. A book review published on Amazon of the Official USCF Rules states: Whereas, "THE USCF OFFICIAL RULES OF CHESS" is written for tournament directors and experienced tournament players to understand, a book for the newcomer to chess is needed that covers: 1. Helping the newcomer focus on what is important for practical use in tournament play. The USCF rulebook has so much material it is impossible to know what is important and what is not so important for a tournament player to learn. Help is needed in the massive maze of material! 2. Some more detail to explain the meanings of some of the rules in more simple language for the newcomer. 3. Are there certain rules that often create problems? What are these rules and how can a player protect his or herself? For the reviewer above, this Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess is the answer, because this book does all of those things, and is short and readable. The Blue Book covers a lot of material not readily available elsewhere, such as the history of establishment of the first international titles, the Russian Rating System, the Harkness Pairing System, the Harkness Rating System, the various tie-breaking systems and their relative merits. There are sections that are definitely out of date, such as the names and addresses of chess clubs and chess publications around the country. However, these are retained for their historical value. Not much is known about what happened to Kenneth Harkness after he left the USCF. Perhaps he got a real, paying job. He died on October 4, 1972. The obituary by Fred Cramer states that he died in Yugoslavia of a heart attack while riding on a train on his way to the 1972 World Chess Olympiad in Skopje, where he was to be awarded the title of International Arbiter. He had been living in Boca Raton Florida. However, another source states that Harkness was actually in the Belgrade Train Station carrying several heavy suitcases of documents that he was going to present to the FIDE Congress in Skopje, when suddenly he dropped dead. His successor was Frank Brady who, in January 1961, converted Chess Life from a bi-weekly newspaper to a slick cover monthly magazine. This was a risky move, as it went into head-to-head competition with "Chess Review" magazine, but it proved to be a success. Brady became both the business manager and the editor of Chess Life, starting with the January 1961 issue. Fred Wren, who had taken over as the editor of Chess Life in January 1958 when Montgomery Major had suddenly quit, retired as editor of the Chess Life newspaper in the last issue, which was dated December 20, 1960. Previously, Montgomery Major had been editor of Chess Life from the beginning of that newspaper in September 1946 until the last issue of 1957. In the December 20, 1957 issue of Chess Life, Montgomery Major wrote an article entitled "At Last We Cry 30", "30" meaning THE END. It seemed that Major assumed that Chess Life would cease publication, perhaps because he was not getting paid and he assumed that nobody else would work for free. However, Fred Wren, who liked to call himself "The Old Woodpusher" and who lived some of the time in Maine and some of the time in Nova Scotia, Canada, came out of retirement and took over. Fred Wren was the editor for exactly three years, from the first issue of 1958 until the last issue of 1960. Montgomery Major was definitely not fired, although many assumed that he had been, as he was not well liked. The USCF management was shocked when Major quit. Had Fred Wren not jumped in, the USCF would have been in real trouble. Major was a contentious person who is not well remembered by those old enough to remember him. According to Bill Goichberg and others including Anthony Saidy, he attacked many people in USCF leadership and delegates, but wasn't fired because he was unpaid. At the 1960 USCF Business Meeting in St. Louis, the Harkness Rating System was replaced by the Elo Rating System, developed by Arpad Elo, a Professor of Physics at quette University who had also been the Wisconsin State Champion. I was there as the delegate from the State of Virginia (since I was the only player from Virginia who played in the 1960 US Open) and I was the only delegate who voted against the change. Since then, the rating system has been known as the Elo Rating System. The Harkness name has been largely forgotten. What is also forgotten is that the Elo Rating System was derived from the data developed by the Harkness Rating System. Professor Elo studied the ratings and the results of tournaments played under the Harkness System, observed how the ratings moved up and down based on the results, and then developed a system to emulate those results. The basic difference is that under the Harkness System, if a player had for example a 1600 rating and then played in a 6-round Swiss and achieved a 1800 performance, then at the end of the rating period if no other tournaments were played the two results would be averaged and the result would be a rating of 1700. Stated differently, the Harkness System had a higher "K" factor than the Elo System. On the other hand, if a player played in several tournaments in a rating period, all the results plus his original rating was averaged together. If four or more tournament were played, what Harkness did was to average each player's last four performance ratings. The trouble with this is that a player could perform better than his rating yet lose points because an even better performance became five tournaments ago rather than four. The USCF office received many complaints because of this. Under the Elo System, each game individually was rated. If a player rated 1600 played a game against an opponent rated 1800, and the 1600 player won, he would gain 24 rating points and his opponent would lose 24 points. However, if the 1800 rated player won, he would gain 8 points and the 1600 player would lose 8 points. Finally, if the game was a draw the lower player would gain 8 and the higher rated player would lose 8 points. Under the Elo Formula, the sum of the two ratings would always remain the same. However, the basic formula to calculate performance rating was the same under the Harkness System and the Elo System. The real difference was that ratings could move faster under the Harkness System (which is the reason why I voted against it as a delegate from Virginia when I was a kid). A problem soon became apparent under either system because in general players improve with experience. New players who established their first ratings could expect to improve dramatically during their first few years of tournament play. However, this improvement would take away points from the long established players with stable ratings. The result was that everybody's rating went down. Ever since, a variety of formulas and methods have been tried to stabilize the ratings. The objective is that if the strength of a player stays the same, his rating should stay about the same too. There is also politics involved, as some USCF Presidents have tried to increase their personal popularity by tweaking the rating system so that everybody's rating goes up. There have been bonus points and feedback points introduced, along with rating floors. This has led to periods of great rating inflation, such as in the early 1980s when it was not uncommon for a player to gain one hundred rating points in just one tournament. Bill Goichberg writes: "About 1980, 'fiddle points' were introduced which caused large rating gains, especially by lower rated players, even if they hardly played at all. This was based on a theory that the average rating used to be 1500 and should be restored to that level. Even if the average rating was once 1500, the theory was flawed because with the great increase in scholastic activity, the average strength of the rating pool was much less than it had been, so the average rating being lower than in the past was to be expected and the fiddle points "correction" caused unwarranted inflation. An even more unwise rule was instituted about the same time as fiddle points, that provided that no opponent's rating could count as less than 1000. The result was that in events for young children all of whom were probably under 500 strength, unrateds would often obtain initial ratings of 1500 or over, at least 1000 points too high. I ran an elementary school tournament once in which an unrated 10-year old scored 5-0 and achieved an initial USCF rating of 2093. He was more than 1000 points too high, as I knew from (among other things) the fact that he didn't know how to castle. (His opponent didn't say anything after he castled illegally, and we were using the procedure that TDs don't call illegal moves unless there is a claim.) Almost all scholastic players became greatly overrated in the 1980s. This was a disaster because the first time a kid played in an adult tournament, he would almost always suffer a heavy rating loss. Word got around about this and the result was that hardly any kids except for a few of the very best played in adult tournaments. USCF lost adult members it could have had because of the foolish "opponent counts as at least 1000" rule, and some who might have eventually made GM dropped out instead. The above quotation may explain why all scholastic players seem to be underrated. Nowadays, scholastic coaches are complaining that their players are rated too low. 800 is a high rating for a scholastic player, but far lower than the rating of almost the weakest adults. When scholastic coaches complain about this, they are told to enter their kids in adult tournaments and their ratings will go up. The reason scholastic players are encouraged to play in adult tournaments is that they will never get to be really good until they start playing against Adults. The great period of rating inflation that started with the "fiddle points" of the early 1980s, was followed by periods of deflation such as in around 1999 when everybody's rating seemed to drop 100-150 points. Nevertheless, overall the rating system has remained rekably stable, with a rating of 1800 reflecting about the same strength in 2008 as a rating of 1800 reflected in 1956. There are now 600,000 players with ratings in the USCF Ratings online database. All of this started with Kenneth Harkness. The Harkness Rating System was established in 1950. In 1960, the USCF converted to the Elo Formula. The Elo formula is no longer in use. Nowadays, k Glickman in consultation with Ken ("No Relation") Sloan is in charge and nobody except for a few specialists know what formula is being used. The formula that is being used is publicly posted, but most people other than mathematicians do not understand how it works. The Elo System was adopted by FIDE in 1970. Since the number of FIDE Rated players was low, less than 1,000, Professor Elo did all the calculations at his home by hand using a simple adding machine. The two systems, the USCF Rating System and the FIDE Rating System using the Elo Formula, have been running in parallel since 1970. However, as time has progressed, the actual method of doing the calculations has diverged further and further apart. Until recently, FIDE only rated top level elite players. The lowest rating a man could have was 2200. Because fewer women play top level chess, women could have FIDE ratings as low as 2000. In the late 1970s and the early 1980s, USCF Policy Board Member George Cunningham ran the USCF office as a volunteer Executive Director after all the top level paid staff quit in protest to some slight. Cunningham decided to combat the problem of rating deflation by introducing "bonus points", "feedback points" and "fiddle points". The idea was to stabilize the ratings, but instead so many of these "fiddle points" were awarded that the rating of every active player jumped up. (I was not playing actively during this period, so I did not get the bonanza of all these free rating points, a fact that I have lamented ever since.) Cunningham was then put out to pasture. The ratings committee wanted to put everybody's rating back down to what it had been, but everybody liked their new sky-high rating, so this was politically unacceptable. By then, the average USCF rating was 100 points higher than the FIDE Rating for players rated under both systems. FIDE started messing with their own system too. In the mid-1980s, FIDE wanted to encourage chess in third-world countries, but faced the problem that many African and Asian nations had no players of the master standard. So, FIDE decided that by giving out master titles and ratings to some players in those countries, it would encourage others to compete for those ratings. The result was that some very weak players were given ratings of 2205, the minimum under the FIDE System. An extreme example of this was the US Virgin Islands Chess Team. Although not really a country, the US Virgin Islands was inadvisedly allowed to become a FIDE member due to its distance from the mainland. (FIDE has since established rules to prevent such non-countries from becoming new members of FIDE.) The captain of the US Virgin Islands Chess Team was John W. Warlick. FIDE had a rule that anybody who got a plus score in an Olympiad would be awarded a minimum rating of 2205. In the 1988 Olympiad in Thessaloniki Greece, the US Virgin Islands had one of the weakest teams and finished next to last, ahead of only Seychelles, a country with only 500 persons who know how to play chess in the entire country. John Warlick, playing first reserve, was able to pair himself against the weakest possible opponents. Against these very weak players, he scored 5 1/2 out of 10, scoring wins against the bottom board players from Sudan, Mauritius, Liechtenstein, Bermuda and Seychelles. This gave Warlick a FIDE rating of 2205. However, Warlick's USCF rating was 1584, more than 600 points lower!!! Professor Arpad Elo was greatly upset at these bastardizations of his rating system. Obviously, giving away free rating points just to encourage chess in third world countries would have a long term inflationary impact on the rating system. The FIDE System was not hit so hard by rapidly improving players as the USCF rating system had been, because FIDE only rated top-level international tournaments, and the players in those tournaments were likely to be at or near their peaks, unlike the rapidly improving ten year old kids who frequented USCF rated tournaments and who were taking away rating points from their elders. However, Arpad Elo could no longer do anything about it. This was because of a dispute between Arpad Elo and William Goichberg, organizer of many FIDE Rated tournaments. At a time when less than 600 players in the world had FIDE Ratings, Bill Goichberg started an aggressive program to qualify US players for FIDE Ratings. Typically, his tournaments were ten player round robins with four players with FIDE ratings, the minimum number necessary to qualify a player for a FIDE Rating. However, it happened by pure chance that Bill Goichberg, normally a 2350 player, had the best tournament of his life and scored a 2520 tournament performance. In another event, Michael Valvo, a strong player who had been inactive, came out of retirement and produced a performance of 2440. Those who knew Valvo knew that this was a typical result for him, but Arpad Elo had never heard of Valvo and thought that this result was suspicious. Another unfortunate incident was that US Junior Champion Peter Winston, who had a 2250 FIDE Rating and who was one of the four players entered in the tournament to establish ratings for the others, had an incredibly bad tournament and lost all his games, scoring 0-9. His last round game was against Sunil Weeramantry. The event was held at Hunter College High School. Peter Winston left the tournament after having lost all his games and was never seen nor heard from again. It is presumed that he had committed suicide. His body was never found and this is a mystery that has never been solved. The result was that Goichberg submitted tournament results showing that he had earned a 2520 FIDE rating and Michael Valvo had earned a 2440 rating. Professor Elo had never heard of Valvo but he knew Goichberg well, due to the many disputes and disagreements between Goichberg and Elo in 1964-67 when Goichberg was the rating statistician working in the New York office and Elo in Wisconsin was overseeing his work. Arpad Elo did not believe any of this. He thought that this was all a fix. Therefore, Elo refused to rate these events and to give Goichberg his 2520 rating and Valvo his 2440 rating. Goichberg complained, pointing out that if some unknown Russian or unknown Yugoslav had produced these results, Elo would have awarded these ratings without question, since Elo knew that there were many players in Russia and Eastern Europe who were very strong and had not been allowed to compete internationally. The showdown came at the 1978 World Chess Olympiad in Buenos Aires, Argentina. USCF Executive Director and Lieut. Col. Edmund B. Edmondson (1920-1982) protested to the FIDE General Assembly that Elo was biased, refusing to give ratings that had been earned by American players (who also had USCF Ratings) while readily giving ratings to Soviet or Hungarian players. Goichberg was right, of course. His tournaments were not fixed. Goichberg's performance, while unusual, was within the expected normal range of tournament results and Valvo clearly was legitimately a 2440 player even though Elo had never heard of him. Peter Winston had just gone crazy. Everybody has a bad tournament every now and then. The result was that the FIDE General Assembly gave Goichberg and Valvo their earned ratings. Soon thereafter, Elo was stripped of his exclusive authority to calculate the ratings and FIDE gave him a gold watch and put him out to pasture. Edmondson was put out to pasture by the USCF as well. FIDE took over the calculation of FIDE Ratings. However, there were new problems. Two examples were giving Class-C players like John Warlick of the US Virgin Islands a FIDE Rating of 2205 and giving 100 Free Rating Points to Every Woman in the World Except for Zsuzsa Polgar, as FIDE did at the 1986 World Chess Olympiad in Dubai. In Dubai, FIDE also decided to award the International Master Title to the Arab Junior Champion. These awards made FIDE the world's laughing stock. The USCF helped out too, by botching the July 1988 rating list. FIDE in its infinite wisdom decided to give the task of calculating the FIDE ratings to the USCF, since the USCF was already running the USCF rating system on its computers. When the July 1, 1988 FIDE Rating list came out, it was jibberish. The two top rated women players in the world were non-existent persons from Greece. Fully ten percent of the ratings were demonstrably wrong. The end result was that the July 1, 1988 rating list had to be trashed. FIDE took away the authority of the USCF to calculate FIDE Ratings and awarded it to a company in Yugoslavia. The FIDE Rating System had one big advantage. It had a fixed, published formula and was completely recalculated once every six months. A FIDE Rated player knew that if he played and defeated another player with the same rating, he would gain exactly 5 rating points and his opponent would lose the same number of points. If the rating list came out and was even 5 points off, the player would know that something was wrong and could protest. This was especially important because the "Cold War" was still going on. The Americans did not trust the Russians and the Soviets did not trust the Americans. This made it necessary that everybody knew exactly what the rating system was, so that everybody could calculate their own rating exactly correctly and any cheating would be immediately obvious. For example, in 1986 I was traveling with Zsuzsa Polgar. She played 59 rated tournament games in the last half of 1986. Knowing all of her opponents and their ratings, we calculated that her new rating was going to be exactly, precisely 2495. This was going to make her the highest rated woman in the history of chess. When her rating came out on the January 1, 1987 rating list, her rating was exactly that, 2495. However, FIDE, not Zsuzsa, had cheated. In order to stop her from being the highest rated female chess player ever, FIDE had awarded 100 free rating points to every woman in the world except for Zsuzsa Polgar. This put Maya Chiburdanidze number one on the woman's list with a rating of 2530, whereas her real rating without the 100 free points was 2430. It was assumed that the rating of Chiburdanidze would quickly fall back to where it had been and Zsuzsa would soon regain her rightful spot as the number one rated woman of all time. However, after that, both the rating of Chiburdanidze and the rating of Gaprindashvili were calculated on the lower standard, even after the 100 free points had been added. In the July 1, 1987 rating list, the top two women players in the world were non-existent Greek Women. Excluding those two fake names, the rating of Chiburdanidze appeared to rise from 2530 to 2560, thus confirming her higher rating. However, that was not the reality. In reality, for purposes of calculation, 100 points were deducted from her rating of 2530, then her games were rated on the basis of a 2430 rating, so her rating went up to 2460, and then the 100 points were added back, giving her a rating of 2560. Thus, Maya's real rating under the standard formula was 2460, not 2560, and the real rating of Nona Gaprindashvili under the normal rating system was 2385, not 2485. Had it not been for this additional manipulation of the rating system, the rating for both Maya and Nona Gaprindashvili would have dropped during 1987 and would have quickly fallen back to their rating levels before receiving the 100 free points. As it turned out, it took Zsuzsa three years to pass Maya Chiburdanidze on the rating list, but by that time her sister Judit Polgar had passed Zsuzsa, so Zsuzsa had been cheated out of her hard won title of being the highest rated woman chess player in the world. Sam Sloan
|
|
Date: 13 Feb 2008 20:25:43
From: Rob
Subject: Sam Sloan
|
On Feb 13, 3:39 pm, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote: > The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess > > http://www.amazon.com/dp/0923891927 > > This book was originally published in 1956 as "The Official Blue Book > and Encyclopedia of Chess". In reprinting this book, the word > "Official" has been deleted because the official rules in this book > have been superseded. I considered calling it "The Original Blue Book > and Encyclopedia of Chess" but finally decided against it. There have > been many changes in the official rules. Most of these changes are the > result of the development of new kinds of chess clocks, plus the > development of computers which are stronger than any human chess > player. The rules have been changed because of the advent of Fischer > Clocks, Bronstein Clocks, and Time Delay Clocks, plus new brands of > clocks such as the Chronos Clock. > > Currently, the "Official" rules of chess are to be found in United > States Chess Federation's Official Rules of Chess, Fifth Edition ISBN > 0812935594, by Tim Just and Dan Berg published in 2003. The inside > flap copy of The U.S. Chess Federation's Official Rules of Chess says, > "This is the only official rulebook for chess". > > Needless to say, that is not true. There are other official rulebooks > of chess. Probably the most official "Official" rulebook of chess is > the FIDE Handbook. Every two years, the FIDE Rules Commission meets to > decide on changes in the rules. They still cannot agree on how to move > the knight. > > However, the United States Chess Federation's Official Rules of Chess, > Fifth Edition rules are no longer official either. There are many rule > changes which have become necessary due to the advent of computer > cheating. The big money tournaments now require that the players agree > in advance to submit to a search, if asked. Some directors use > scanners for radio waves to detect incoming or outgoing radio > emissions. In India, a player was caught with a computer in his > turban. In the 2006 World Open in Philadelphia with $350,000 in > prizes, two players were caught computer cheating. One wore a big > floppy hat with flaps that came down over his ears. The other wore a > fake hearing aid that was in reality a radio receiver. It is now > standard to require suspicious players to remove their shoes. This is > the Brave New World of Computer Cheating. Players could type in the > moves with their toes and then receive the answers back the same way. > In a recent match for the World Chess Championship, both sides accused > the other of computer cheating. > > A controversial new tournament rule passed by FIDE is that a player is > no longer allowed to write down a move on his score sheet before > playing it. The pretext for this change was that it constitutes note > taking. The real reason was the possibility of cheating on > computerized score sheets or when connected to a computerized display > board. After FIDE passed this rule, the USCF Delegates barely passed > it too as Rule 15A at the meeting in Oak Brook Illinois on August 12, > 2006. This caused a tremendous uproar (I voted against it) because > many chess coaches teach their students to write down their moves and > think about it again before making the move on the board. The purpose > of this is to slow the kids down, because children often move too > quickly without thinking through the consequences of their moves. > > As a result of this rule change, there was a great movement especially > among the scholastic chess coaches to change the rule back. This > reversal of Rule 15A was finally passed at the USCF Delegate's meeting > in Cherry Hill, New Jersey on August 5, 2007. So, now you can again > write a move on your score sheet before playing it. > > Meanwhile, the FIDE rules, which only apply to international > competitions usually involving grandmasters, still prohibit a player > from writing down a move before playing it. However, there is no > penalty, other than a warning, for breaking this rule. > > This is just one example of how the rules are in constant flux. > > Meanwhile, Eric Schiller has published his own rules of chess, which > he calls "The Official Rules of Chess" ISBN 1580420923 . Those are not > really the official rules of chess either, of course. > > Today, I called Joe Lux, one of the top tournament directors in the > United States and asked him if he knew anything about the rules of > chess. "A little", was his reply. > > Seriously, the top tournament directors often make rulings which are > proven wrong and have to be corrected. These disputes usually involve > time pressure situations. Nowadays, there are no longer adjournments > and sealed moves. This is because computers have become so powerful > that in a sealed move situation the players would just go home and > turn on their computers to find the best next moves. > > Therefore, all games are now played to their conclusion in one > sitting. Since it is necessary to have the pairings ready for the next > round, tournament directors need to know that there will be a time > certain when all of the games will be finished. Thus, there are sudden > death time controls. For example, the time control might be 40 moves > in two hours and game in one hour thereafter. This means that a player > will have a maximum of three hours to complete all of the moves in his > game. Even if the player is a queen ahead and has mate on the next > move, if his flag falls, he will have lost the game. > > Nowadays, tournaments are often played with a 5-second delay. This > means that a players clock does not start running until five seconds > after it is his turn to move. Since most games are over within 40 > moves and it is relatively rare for a game to go beyond 60 moves, > directors say that if a five second delay is used then both players > should take 5 minutes off their clocks. This means that as long as a > player is able to complete his move in five seconds or less, he will > never lose on time. This usually ends the upsetting situations where a > player who is two queens ahead loses on time. > > If a player can prove that his opponent has "no winning chances", he > can call the director and declare the game drawn. He can also claim a > draw if his opponent has made "no progress". In these situations, a > tournament director will be called to observe the moves and rule > whether there is a "no winning chances" or a "no progress" situation. > Sometimes the tournament directors are not strong players themselves, > so they have to call over a grandmaster and get him to tell the > tournament director what is going on in the game. > > That is one reason why I decided to reprint The Blue Book and > Encyclopedia of Chess, because this book clearly explains that the > knight moves two up and one over or one up and two over. Simple, see! > Nothing about Fischer Clocks, Bronstein Clocks, or Time Delay Clocks, > or Cats in the Hat who wear big floppy hats to receive their moves. > > The big difference in the new rules is the need to accommodate the > huge number of children who play chess. The US Super-National > Championships now have more than four thousand kids playing. Some of > these kids do not know the rules well. For example, they sometimes > cannot tell the difference between checkmate and stalemate. The now > standard rule that was first introduced by Attorney Harry Sabine at > the first Super-Nationals is that the directors do not tell the > players whether they are in checkmate or not. It is up to the players > to negotiate between themselves and decide who won the game, although > the director will guide them in their negotiations. It is now standard > that there should be one assistant director for every 40 or 50 kids or > one assistant director for every 100 adults playing. Thus, in a World > Open with 1500 players, there should be on average 15 floor TDs. > > Kenneth Harkness (1896-1972) was a gigantic figure in the World of > Chess. According to International Master Norman T. Whitaker (who hated > him), Harkness first got to America by jumping ship. He was from > Scotland. He took over the fledging publication "Chess Review" > magazine. He became the editor and co-publisher of Chess Review > magazine in May, 1941. He was last listed as "Editor and Publisher" of > Chess Review in the August 1948 issue. He had a falling out with Al > Horowitz, but later they became friends again. He developed the first > chess rating system, which was known as the Harkness System. In 1952, > he was appointed the Business Manager and Membership Secretary of the > United States Chess Federation. He established the first USCF Office > in 1956. Prior to that, the federation was run out of people's homes > or offices. > > It was Harkness who brought about the popularization of the Swiss > System. Harkness virtually invented the weekend Swiss. Previously, > tournaments were run as round robins. The first ads for "100% USCF > Rated" weekend tournaments appeared in the ch 5, 1953 issue of > Chess Life. Because he received little or no salary while working for > the USCF, Kenneth Harkness made his living traveling around to cities > running weekend Swisses, an idea that he had introduced, plus selling > chess books and equipment. > > Harkness introduced the radical idea of pairing players in Swiss > Systems by their USCF Rating, which he had developed, rather than by > lottery. All of these ideas, first developed by Kenneth Harkness, are > now standard around the world today. The terms "Harkness Rating > System" and "Harkness Pairing System" were commonly used for what are > now the standard methods. > > After Harkness had retired, Glenn Hartleb, at a speech at the > conclusion of the 1960 US Open Championship in St. Louis, said, > "Kenneth Harkness was not able to do everything he said that was going > to do because, if he had been able to do everything he said that he > was going to do, we would all be Millionaires." > > Ken Harkness was a big thinker. In the August 20, 1952 issue of Chess > Life newspaper, in an article entitled "USCF PLANS FOR THE FUTURE", > his big expansion plans were explained. It became known as "The > Harkness Plan", or "HP" for short. > > When he took over as USCF Business Manager, Harkness worked out of his > apartment at 93 Barrow Street, Greenwich Village, New York ... > > read more =BB
|
|
Date: 13 Feb 2008 19:45:15
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: First Draft: Re: Blue Book Encyclopedia of Chess
|
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0923891927 The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess Glenn Peterson, editor of "Chess Life for Kids" magazine, former editor of "Chess Life" magazine, and one of the top tournament directors in the country, writes: "There is no better explanation of the theory behind the Swiss System than what was written by Kenneth Harkness and Eliot Hearst in The Official Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess in 1956." This book was originally published in 1956 as "The Official Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess". In reprinting this book, the word "Official" has been deleted because the official rules in this book have been superseded. I considered calling it "The Original Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess" but finally decided against it. There have been many changes in the official rules. Most of these changes are the result of the development of new kinds of chess clocks, plus the development of computers which are stronger than any human chess player. The rules have been changed because of the advent of Fischer Clocks, Bronstein Clocks, and Time Delay Clocks, plus new brands of clocks such as the Chronos Clock and new type of score sheets such as the Monroi digital display score sheet. Currently, the "Official" rules of chess in the USA are to be found in United States Chess Federation's Official Rules of Chess, Fifth Edition ISBN 0812935594, by Tim Just and Dan Berg published in 2003. The inside flap copy of The U.S. Chess Federation's Official Rules of Chess says, "This is the only official rulebook for chess". Needless to say, that is not true. There are other official rulebooks of chess. Probably the most official "Official" rulebook of chess is the FIDE Handbook. Every two years, the FIDE Rules Commission meets to decide on changes in the rules. They still cannot agree on how to move the knight. However, the United States Chess Federation's Official Rules of Chess, Fifth Edition rules are no longer official either. There are many rule changes which have become necessary due to the advent of computer cheating. The big money tournaments now require that the players agree in advance to submit to a search, if asked. Some directors use scanners for radio waves to detect incoming or outgoing radio emissions. In India, a player was caught with a computer in his turban. In the 2006 World Open in Philadelphia with $350,000 in prizes, two players were caught computer cheating. One wore a big floppy hat with flaps that came down over his ears. The other wore a fake hearing aid that was in reality a radio receiver. It is now standard to require suspicious players to remove their shoes. This is the Brave New World of Computer Cheating. Players could type in the moves with their toes and then receive the answers back the same way. In a recent match for the World Chess Championship, both sides accused the other of computer cheating. A controversial new tournament rule passed by FIDE is that a player is no longer allowed to write down a move on his score sheet before playing it. The pretext for this change was that it constitutes note taking. The real reason was the possibility of cheating on computerized score sheets or when connected to a computerized display board. After FIDE passed this rule, the USCF Delegates barely passed it too as Rule 15A at the meeting in Oak Brook Illinois on August 12, 2006. This caused a tremendous uproar (I voted against it) because many chess coaches teach their students to write down their moves and think about it again before making the move on the board. The purpose of this is to slow the kids down, because children often move too quickly without thinking through the consequences of their moves. As a result of this rule change, there was a great movement especially among the scholastic chess coaches to change the rule back. This reversal of Rule 15A was finally passed at the USCF Delegate's meeting in Cherry Hill, New Jersey on August 5, 2007. So, now you can again write a move on your score sheet before playing it. Meanwhile, the FIDE rules, which only apply to international competitions usually involving grandmasters, still prohibit a player from writing down a move before playing it. However, there is no penalty, other than a warning, for breaking this rule. This is just one example of how the rules are in constant flux. Meanwhile, Eric Schiller has published his own rules of chess, which he calls "The Official Rules of Chess" ISBN 1580420923 . Those are not really the official rules of chess either, of course. Schiller writes in defense of his work: My rules are the FIDE rules with just some language clarification. The FIDE rules are the official rules. The USCF has provincial rules that apply nowhere except in USCF events, a small fraction of chess contests. They cannot seriously be called the official rules. Today, I called Joe Lux, one of the top tournament directors in the United States and asked him if he knew anything about the rules of chess. "A little", was his reply. Seriously, the top tournament directors often make rulings which are proven wrong and have to be corrected. These disputes usually involve time pressure situations. Nowadays, there are no longer adjournments and sealed moves. This is because computers have become so powerful that in a sealed move situation the players would just go home and turn on their computers to find the best next moves. Therefore, all games are now played to their conclusion in one sitting. Since it is necessary to have the pairings ready for the next round, tournament directors need to know that there will be a time certain when all of the games will be finished. Thus, there are sudden death time controls. For example, the time control might be 40 moves in two hours and game in one hour thereafter. This means that a player will have a maximum of three hours to complete all of the moves in his game. Even if the player is a queen ahead and has mate on the next move, if his flag falls, he will have lost the game. Nowadays, tournaments are often played with a 5-second delay. This means that a players clock does not start running until five seconds after it is his turn to move. Since most games are over within 40 moves and it is relatively rare for a game to go beyond 60 moves, directors say that if a five second delay is used then both players should take 5 minutes off their clocks. This means that as long as a player is able to complete his move in five seconds or less, he will never lose on time. This usually ends the upsetting situations where a player who is two queens ahead loses on time. If a player can prove that his opponent has "no winning chances", he can call the director and declare the game drawn. He can also claim a draw if his opponent has made "no progress". In these situations, a tournament director will be called to observe the moves and rule whether there is a "no winning chances" or a "no progress" situation. Sometimes the tournament directors are not strong players themselves, so they have to call over a grandmaster and get him to tell the tournament director what is going on in the game. That is one reason why I decided to reprint The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess, because this book clearly explains that the knight moves two up and one over or one up and two over. Simple, see! Nothing about Fischer Clocks, Bronstein Clocks, or Time Delay Clocks, or Cats in the Hat who wear big floppy hats to receive their moves. The big difference in the new rules is the need to accommodate the huge number of children who play chess. The US Super-National Championships now have more than four thousand kids playing. Some of these kids do not know the rules well. For example, they sometimes cannot tell the difference between checkmate and stalemate. The now standard rule that was first introduced by Attorney Harry Sabine at the first Super-Nationals is that the directors do not tell the players whether they are in checkmate or not. It is up to the players to negotiate between themselves and decide who won the game, although the director will guide them in their negotiations. It is now standard that there should be one assistant director for every 40 or 50 kids or one assistant director for every 100 adults playing. Thus, in a World Open with 1500 players, there should be on average 15 floor TDs. Kenneth Harkness (1896-1972) was a gigantic figure in the World of Chess. According to International Master Norman T. Whitaker (who hated him), Harkness first got to America by jumping ship. He was from Scotland and arrived in America in 1918. After a career as an editor and writer of radio articles and textbooks, he took over the fledging publication "Chess Review" magazine. He became the editor and co- publisher of Chess Review magazine in May, 1941. He was the manager of the US Team that in 1946 traveled to Moscow to play a match against the Soviet Union. He was last listed as "Editor and Publisher" of Chess Review in the August 1948 issue. He had a falling out with Al Horowitz, but later they became friends again. He developed the first chess rating system, which was known as the Harkness System. In 1952, he was appointed the Business Manager and Membership Secretary of the United States Chess Federation. He established the first USCF Office in 1956. Prior to that, the federation was run out of private homes or offices. It was Harkness who brought about the popularization of the Swiss System. Harkness virtually invented the weekend Swiss. Previously, tournaments were run as round robins. The first ads for "100% USCF Rated" weekend tournaments appeared in the ch 5, 1953 issue of Chess Life. Because he received little or no salary while working for the USCF, Kenneth Harkness made his living traveling around to cities running weekend Swisses, an idea that he had introduced, plus selling chess books and equipment. Harkness introduced the radical idea of pairing players in Swiss Systems by USCF Ratings, which he had developed, rather than by lottery. All of these ideas, first developed by Kenneth Harkness, are now standard around the world today. The terms "Harkness Rating System" and "Harkness Pairing System" were commonly used for what are now the standard methods. When Harkness took over as Business Manager of the USCF in 1952, it had a deficit new worth. It had been losing money every year, had only one thousand members, and the only thing keeping the organization alive was the fact that the printer kept printing Chess Life even though his bills were not being paid. During the seven years that Harkness ran the USCF, the organization was profitable EVERY YEAR. The entire delinquent printing bill was paid off, membership tripled and revenues multiplied eight times. When Harkness left, the USCF had a net worth surplus for the first time. Perhaps more importantly, the "Harkness Plan" that had been put in place by Kenneth Harkness continued to be followed by his successors. Under this plan, the USCF has experienced steady growth and expansion. Every now and then, a new political group takes over the USCF and one of the first things they usually do is try to scrap the Harkness Plan. The immediate result is a drastic drop in revenues and big financial losses. As a result, the new management is forced to reinstate the plan. Among the elements that Harkness introduced and which are still controversial today is the requirement that in USCF rated tournaments every player must be a USCF member. Another feature is that all members receive a subscription to Chess Life. Even today, there are groups within the USCF trying to drop these measures. After Harkness had retired, Glenn Hartleb, at a speech at the conclusion of the 1960 US Open Championship in St. Louis, said: "Kenneth Harkness was not able to do everything he said that was going to do because, if he had been able to do everything he said that he was going to do, we would all be Millionaires." Ken Harkness was a big thinker. In the August 20, 1952 issue of Chess Life newspaper, in an article entitled "USCF PLANS FOR THE FUTURE", his big expansion plans were explained. It became known as "The Harkness Plan", or "HP" for short. When he took over as USCF Business Manager, Harkness worked out of his apartment at 93 Barrow Street, Greenwich Village, New York City. He divided his apartment into one section for living space for himself and his wife Sybilla and the rest for USCF business. By 1955, he had moved to a building next door at 81 Bedford Street. By the end of the 1955 fiscal year, his salary (or "commission" as it was called) had risen to the princely sum of $600.40 PER YEAR. This was more than the Chess Life Editor Montgomery Major, who seems to have received nothing at all. In October, 1956, Harkness was able to move the USCF out of his own apartment and into an office building at 80 East 11th Street, New York NY. That move was announced in the October 5, 1956 issue of Chess Life. (That building is now the home of Fred Wilson's Chess Book Store, although on a different floor.) The last issue of Chess Life that listed Kenneth Harkness as Business Manager was the issue for August 5, 1959. In the following issue, which was for August 20, 1959, Frank Brady was listed as business manager. Brady had already been the Acting Business Manager for some time. In the February 20, 1959 issue of Chess Life, Frank Brady was for the first time listed as the "Assistant Business Manager". However, only two weeks later, Harkness left for a round-the-world trip, leaving Brady in charge. Brady says that he was terrified. He had no idea what to do, or where to start. However, Harkness had left an instruction: "Organize as many chess tournaments as you can". Therefore, Brady started organizing chess tournaments all over the Eastern Seaboard, from Boston to Washington DC (which is how I first met Frank Brady in 1960). Brady learned his job the hard way, on the job. He says that this was instrumental in establishing his career which he has followed ever since. Dr. Brady is now Chairman of the Department of Mass Communications, Journalism, Television and Film at St. John's University, New York. He is Professor of Communication Arts and Journalism at that university. The headline of the August 5, 1959 issue of Chess Life announced "Harkness Retires - Brady In". Apparently it was not really true that Harkness was retiring because of the fact that he was in a "physically run-down condition". In addition to writing the still-popular book "An Invitation to Chess" with Irving Chernev, Harkness had also written "An Invitation to Bridge". Harkness was stronger at bridge than he was at chess. Harkness was tall, 6 feet 2 inches, and was an impressive, good looking man. He often took jobs as the director of ocean cruises where he would give bridge lessons to wealthy widows. One of the wealthy women he met in this way convinced him to divorce his wife and ry her. Harkness thereafter lived in a luxurious apartment on Fifth Avenue near Twelfth Street, across the street from the New School for Social Research, and did not have to work any more. His abandoned wife, Sybilla, continued to work for the USCF as its membership secretary until the USCF moved from 80 East 11th Street to its new headquarters in Newburgh New York in November 1967. Sybilla lived in the shall Chess Club at 23 West 10th Street. The club gave her a small room to live in after her husband, Kenneth Harkness, had abandoned her. Sybilla Harkness died in July 1971 at age 73 (SSN 105-26-2426). No obituary was published. After Kenneth Harkness left the employment of the United States Chess Federation effective June 30, 1959, it seems that he went to Yugoslavia, because the January 5, 1960 issue of Chess Life contains an article by Harkness reporting from Belgrade the results of the 1959 candidates tournament in Belgrade, that had been won by Tal. When Harkness left the USCF in June, 1959, there was an editorial by Jerry Spann, the USCF President who lived in Oklahoma, welcoming Frank Brady as the new Business Manager. Brady wrote, in effect, that from now on the Business Manager and Chess Life Editor will obey instructions received from the elected officials. The article by Jerry Spann stated: During the past two years, we have "suggested" rather than "requested" as a matter of policy. Actually, this has been no great problem, as Ken has been quite cooperative. But the difference, though subtle, is vital! Ken's retirement, therefore, signalizes the restoration of USCF policy making to the directors and elected officers, where it belongs, with final authority and responsibility vested in the Federation's chief executive. I will now fully assume this responsibility. The above quote tells the real story. USCF President Jerry Spann would sweep in from the Badlands of Oklahoma, arrive at the USCF Office, tell Harkness to do this and not that or the other thing and then go back to Oklahoma. This sort of thing always happen in any quasi- governmental body. The people who have to actually do the work do not always see eye-to-eye with those who want to issue the orders. It would not by surprising to learn that a strong, active and dynamic person like Kenneth Harkness would have constant run-ins with the elected but relatively inactive board members. A perfect example of this is this book, the "The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess". For years, the USCF Officials had talked about writing a book of tournament rules. However, they could not agree and had never gotten around to doing it. Finally, Harkness got tired of this and just wrote the rules in the book himself, without receiving permission for anyone. It was published, became a great success, and established a standard for the rules. The USCF Tournament Rules chapter in this Blue Book is 42 pages long, pages 53-95. However, the current edition of the Official USCF Tournament Rules is 416 pages. Yet the rules are basically the same. The reason the current rules are so long is that they must deal with situations involving time delay clocks, sudden death time limits, pairings, protests and appeals. The best way to avoid having to deal with these rules is simply do not get into time trouble. Leave adequate time on your clock so that your flag never falls. Another way is simply do not play in tournaments with $300,000 in guaranteed prizes, because it is those big money tournaments where these disputes usually arise. A book review published on Amazon of the Official USCF Rules states: Whereas, "THE USCF OFFICIAL RULES OF CHESS" is written for tournament directors and experienced tournament players to understand, a book for the newcomer to chess is needed that covers: 1. Helping the newcomer focus on what is important for practical use in tournament play. The USCF rulebook has so much material it is impossible to know what is important and what is not so important for a tournament player to learn. Help is needed in the massive maze of material! 2. Some more detail to explain the meanings of some of the rules in more simple language for the newcomer. 3. Are there certain rules that often create problems? What are these rules and how can a player protect his or herself? For the reviewer above, this Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess is the answer, because this book does all of those things, and is short and readable. The Blue Book covers a lot of material not readily available elsewhere, such as the history of establishment of the first international titles, the Russian Rating System, the Harkness Pairing System, the Harkness Rating System, the various tie-breaking systems and their relative merits. There are sections that are definitely out of date, such as the names and addresses of chess clubs and chess publications around the country. However, these are retained for their historical value. Not much is known about what happened to Kenneth Harkness after he left the USCF. Perhaps he got a real, paying job. The obituary by Fred Cramer states that he died in Yugoslavia of a heart attack while riding on a train on his way to the 1972 World Chess Olympiad in Skopje where he was to be awarded the title of International Arbiter. He had been living in Boca Raton Florida. However, another source states that Harkness was actually in the Belgrade Train Station carrying several heavy suitcases of documents that he was going to present to the FIDE Congress in Skopje, when suddenly he dropped dead. His successor was Frank Brady who, in January 1961, converted Chess Life from a bi-weekly newspaper to a slick cover monthly magazine. This was a risky move, as it went into head-to-head competition with "Chess Review" magazine, but it proved to be a success. Brady became both the business manager and the editor of Chess Life, starting with the January 1961 issue. Fred Wren, who had taken over as the editor of Chess Life in January 1958 when Montgomery Major had suddenly quit, retired as editor of the Chess Life newspaper in the last issue, which was dated December 20, 1960. Previously, Montgomery Major had been editor of Chess Life from the beginning of that newspaper in September 1946 until the last issue of 1957. In the December 20, 1957 issue of Chess Life, Montgomery Major wrote an article entitled "At Last We Cry 30", "30" meaning THE END. It seemed that Major assumed that Chess Life would cease publication, perhaps because he was not getting paid and he assumed that nobody else would work for free. However, Fred Wren, who liked to call himself "The Old Woodpusher" and who lived some of the time in Maine and some of the time in Nova Scotia, Canada, came out of retirement and took over. Fred Wren was the editor for exactly three years, from the first issue of 1958 until the last issue of 1960. Montgomery Major was definitely not fired, although many assumed that he had been, as he was not well liked. The USCF management was shocked when Major quit. Had Fred Wren not jumped in, the USCF would have been in real trouble. Major was a contentious person who is not well remembered by those old enough to remember him. At the 1960 USCF Business Meeting in St. Louis, the Harkness Rating System was replaced by the Elo Rating System, developed by Arpad Elo, a Professor of Statistics at quette University who had also been the Wisconsin State Champion. I was there as the delegate from the State of Virginia (since I was the only player from Virginia who played in the 1960 US Open) and I was the only delegate who voted against the change. Since then, the rating system has been known as the Elo Rating System. The Harkness name has been largely forgotten. What is also forgotten is that the Elo Rating System was derived from the data developed by the Harkness Rating System. Professor Elo took the ratings and the results of tournaments played under the Harkness System, observed how the ratings moved up and down based on the results and then developed a system to emulate those results. The basic difference is that under the Harkness System if a player had for example a 1600 rating and then played in a 6-round Swiss and achieved a 1800 performance, then at the end of the rating period if no other tournaments were played the two results would be averaged and the result would be a rating of 1700. Stated differently, the Harkness System had a higher "K" factor than the Elo System. Under the Elo System, each game individually was rated. If a player rated 1600 played a game against an opponent rated 1800, and the 1600 player won, he would gain 24 rating points and his opponent would lose 24 points. However, if the 1800 rated player won, he would gain 8 points and the 1600 player would lose 8 points. Finally, if the game was a draw the lower player would gain 8 and the higher rated player would lose 8 points. Under the Elo Formula, the sum of the two ratings would always remain the same. However, a problem with this soon became apparent because in general players improve with experience. New players who established their first ratings could expect to improve dramatically during their first few months of tournament play. However, this improvement would take away points from the long established players with stable ratings. The result was that everybody's rating went down. Ever since, a variety of formulas and methods have been tried to stabilize the ratings. The objective is that if the strength of a player stays the same, his rating should stay about the same too. There is also politics involved, as some USCF Presidents have tried to increase their personal popularity by tweaking the rating system so that everybody's rating goes up. There have been bonus points and feedback points introduced, along with rating floors. This has led to periods of great rating inflation, such as in the early 1980s when it was not uncommon for a player to gain one hundred rating points in just one tournament, followed by periods of deflation such as in around 1999 when everybody's rating seemed to drop 100-150 points. Nevertheless, overall the rating system has remained rekably stable, with a rating of 1800 reflecting about the same strength in 2008 as a rating of 1800 reflected in 1956. There are now 600,000 players with ratings in the USCF Ratings online database. All of this started with Kenneth Harkness. The Harkness Rating System was established in 1950. In 1960, the USCF converted to the Elo Formula. The Elo formula is no longer in use. Nowadays, nobody except for a few specialists knows what formula is being used. The Elo System was adopted by FIDE in 1970. Since the number of FIDE Rated players was low, less than 2,000, Professor Elo did all the calculations at his home by hand using a simple adding machine. The two systems, the USCF Rating System and the FIDE Rating System using the Elo Formula, have been running in parallel since 1970. However, as time has progressed, the actual method of doing the calculations has diverged further and further apart. Until recently, FIDE only rated top level elite players. The lowest rating a man could have was 2200. Because fewer women play top level chess, women could have FIDE ratings as low as 2000. In the late 1970s and the early 1980s, USCF Rating Statistician George Cunningham decided to combat the problem of rating deflation by introducing "bonus points", "feedback points" and "fiddle points". The idea was to stabilize the ratings, but instead so many of these "fiddle points" were awarded that the rating of every active player jumped up. (I was not playing actively during this period, so I did not get the bonanza of all these free rating points, a fact that I have lamented ever since.) Cunningham was then put out to pasture. The ratings committee wanted to put everybody's rating back down to what it had been, but everybody liked their new sky-high rating so this was politically unacceptable. By then, the average USCF rating was 100 points higher than the FIDE Rating for players rated under both systems. However, FIDE started messing with their own system too. In the mid-1980s, FIDE wanted to encourage chess in third-world countries, but faced the problem that many African and Asian nations had no players of the master standard. So, FIDE decided that by giving out master titles and ratings to some players in those countries, it would encourage others to compete for those ratings. The result was that some very weak players were given ratings of 2205, the minimum under the FIDE System. An extreme example of this was the US Virgin Islands Chess Team. Although not really a country, the US Virgin Islands was inadvisedly allowed to become a FIDE member due to its distance from the mainland. (FIDE has since established rules to prevent such non-countries from becoming new members of FIDE.) The captain of the US Virgin Islands Chess Team was John W. Warlick. FIDE had a rule that anybody who got a plus score in an Olympiad would be awarded a minimum rating of 2205. In the 1988 Olympiad in Thessaloniki Greece, the US Virgin Islands had one of the weakest teams and finished next to last, ahead of only Seychelles, a country with only 500 persons who know how to play chess in the entire country. John Warlick, playing first reserve, was able to pair himself against the weakest possible opponents. Against these very weak players, he scored 5 1/2 out of 10, scoring wins against the bottom board players from Sudan, Mauritius, Liechtenstein, Bermuda and Seychelles. This gave Warlick a FIDE rating of 2205. However, Warlick's USCF rating was 1584, more than 600 points lower!!! Professor Arpad Elo was greatly upset at these bastardizations of his rating system. Obviously, giving away free rating points just to encourage chess in third world countries would have a long term inflationary impact on the rating system. The FIDE System was not hit so hard by rapidly improving players as the USCF rating system had been, because FIDE only rated top-level international tournaments, and the players in those tournaments were likely to be at or near their peaks, unlike the rapidly improving ten year old kids who frequented USCF rated tournaments and who were taking away rating points from their elders. However, Arpad Elo could no longer do anything about it. This was because of a dispute between Arpad Elo and William Goichberg, organizer of many FIDE Rated tournaments. At a time when less than 600 players in the world had FIDE Ratings, Bill Goichberg started an aggressive program to qualify US players for FIDE Ratings. Typically, his tournaments were ten player round robins with four players with FIDE ratings, the minimum number necessary to qualify a player for a FIDE Rating. However, it happened by pure chance that Bill Goichberg, normally a 2350 player, had the best tournament of his life and scored a 2520 tournament performance. In another event, Michael Valvo, a strong player who had been inactive for a decade, came out of retirement and produced a performance of 2440. Those who knew Valvo knew that he was easily capable of this, but Arpad Elo had never heard of Valvo and thought that this result was suspicious. Another unfortunate incident was that US Junior Champion Peter Winston who had a 2250 FIDE Rating and who was one of the four players entered in the tournament to establish ratings for the others had an incredibly bad tournament and lost all his games, scoring 0-9. His last round game was against Sunil Weeramantry and the event was held at Hunter College High School. Peter Winston left the tournament after having lost all his games and was never seen nor heard from again. It is presumed that he had committed suicide. His body was never found and this is a mystery that has never been solved. The result was that Goichberg submitted tournament results showing that he had earned a 2520 rating and Michael Valvo had earned a 2440 rating. Professor Elo had never heard of Valvo but he knew Goichberg well due to the many disputes and disagreements in 1964 when Goichberg was the statistician working in the New York office calculating the ratings and Elo in Wisconsin was overseeing his work. Arpad Elo did not believe any of this. He thought that this was all a fix. Therefore, Elo refused to rate these events and to give Goichberg his 2520 rating and Valvo his 2440 rating. Goichberg complained, pointing out that if some unknown Russian or unknown Yugoslav had produced these results, Elo would have awarded these ratings without question since Elo knew that there were many players in Russia and Eastern Europe who were very strong and had not been allowed to compete internationally. The showdown came at the 1978 World Chess Olympiad in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Goichberg protested to the FIDE General Assembly that Elo was biased, refusing to give ratings that had been earned by American players (who also had USCF Ratings) while readily giving ratings to Soviet or Hungarian players. Goichberg was right, of course. The tournaments were not fixed. Goichberg's performance, while unusual, was within the expected normal range of tournament results and Valvo clearly was legitimately a 2440 player even though Elo had never heard of him. Peter Winston had just gone crazy. Everybody has a bad tournament every now and then. The result was that the FIDE General Assembly gave Goichberg and Valvo their earned ratings. Soon thereafter, Elo was stripped of his exclusive authority to calculate the ratings and FIDE put him out to pasture. FIDE took over the calculation of FIDE Ratings. However, there were new problems. Two examples were giving Class-C players like John Warlick of the US Virgin Islands a FIDE Rating of 2205 and giving 100 Free Rating Points to Every Woman in the World Except for Zsuzsa Polgar, as FIDE did at the 1986 World Chess Olympiad in Dubai. In Dubai, FIDE also decided to award the International Master Title to the Arab Junior Champion. These awards made FIDE the world's laughing stock. The USCF helped out too, by botching the July 1987 rating list. FIDE in its infinite wisdom decided to give the task of calculating the FIDE ratings to the USCF, since the USCF was already running the USCF rating system on its computers. When the July 1, 1987 FIDE Rating list came out, it was jibberish. The two top rated women players in the world were non-existent persons from Greece. Fully ten percent of the ratings were demonstrably wrong. Randy Hough, who was the USCF's technical director and was in charge of this, claimed to have nothing to do with this, as he had resigned just before the botched rating list had come out. The end result was that the July 1, 1987 rating list had to be trashed. FIDE took away the authority of the USCF to calculate FIDE Ratings and awarded it to a company in Yugoslavia. Due to the short memories that chess players have, Randy Hough has been rehabilitated and ran successfully for the USCF Executive Board in 2006. However, the FIDE Rating System had one big advantage. It had a fixed, published formula and was completely recalculated once every six months. A FIDE Rated player knew that if he played and defeated another player with the same rating he would gain exactly 5 rating points and his opponent would lose the same number of points. If the rating list came out and was even 5 points off, the player would know that something was wrong and could protest. This was especially important because the "Cold War" was still going on. The Americans did not trust the Russians and the Soviets did not trust the Americans. This made it necessary that everybody knew exactly what the rating system was, so that everybody could calculate their own rating exactly correctly and any cheating would be immediately obvious. For example, in 1986 I was traveling with Zsuzsa Polgar. She played 59 rated tournament games in the last half of 1986. Knowing all of her opponents and their ratings, it became possible to calculate that her new rating was going to be exactly, precisely 2495. This was going to make her the highest rated woman in the history of chess. When her rating came out on the January 1, 1987 rating list, her rating was exactly that, 2495. However, FIDE, not Zsuzsa, had cheated. In order to stop her from being the highest rated female chess player ever, FIDE had awarded 100 free rating points to every woman in the world except for Zsuzsa Polgar. This put Maya Chiburdanidze number one on the woman's list with a rating of 2530, whereas her real rating without the 100 free points was 2430. It was assumed that the rating of Chiburdanidze would quickly fall back to where it had been and Zsuzsa would soon regain her rightful spot as the number one rated woman of all time. However, after that, both the rating of Chiburdanidze and the rating of Gaprindashvili were calculated on the lower standard, even after the 100 free points had been added. In the July 1, 1987 rating list, the top two women players in the world were non-existent Greek Women. Excluding those two fake names, the rating of Chiburdanidze appeared to rise from 2530 to 2560, thus confirming her higher rating. However, that was not the reality. In reality, for purposes of calculation, 100 points were deducted from her rating of 2530, then her games were rated on the basis of a 2430 rating, so her rating went up to 2460, and then the 100 points were added back, giving her a rating of 2560. Thus, Maya's real rating under the standard formula was 2460, not 2560, and the real rating of Nona Gaprindashvili under the normal rating system was 2385, not 2485. Had it not been for this additional manipulation of the rating system, the rating for both Maya and Nona Gaprindashvili would have dropped during 1987 and would have quickly fallen back to their rating levels before receiving the 100 free points. As it turned out, it took Zsuzsa three years to pass Maya Chiburdanidze on the rating list, but by that time her sister Judit Polgar had passed Zsuzsa, so Zsuzsa had been cheated out of her hard won title of being the highest rated woman chess player in the world. Sam Sloan
|
|