|
Main
Date: 14 Dec 2006 00:22:54
From: Sanny
Subject: Nomorechess was correct.
|
Nomorechess once said me that he is unable to beat Master Level only because it takes long time. Now as the time has been improved, Master level always makes moves in 1-3 minute. Nomorechess has beaten Master Level Thrice. Here are the Recorded games by Nomorechess http://www.getclub.com/cc/showgame.php?num=10&user=nomorechess I was thinking Nomorechess will be beaten by Master Level but it do not happen. Beginner Level which makes moves in 10 seconds is too weak for hime and now he can play all Matches with Master Level which plays quite fast. I would like Nomorechess to find the mistakes in the game. As master Level thinks too deep then why it get defeated by nomorechess. http://www.getclub.com/playgame.php?id=DM5575&game=Chess In above recorded game, It will be good if Nomorechess can specify why a move made by Master Level is wrong and what should be the correct move. It will help me improve the game if Nomorechess can tell Correct move which Master Level Overlooked. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
|
|
Date: 15 Dec 2006 21:36:24
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Nomorechess was correct (it goes without saying)
|
Sanny wrote: > > In other words, the program delayed castling, and then > > moved its Queen over and over and over, finally grabbing > > a Rook -- BUT, > > A little modification made which will stop moving Queen again and > again. Noted. I will now steer for positions wherein it is correct to move the Queen repeatedly, to exploit this new bug. ; >D -- help bot
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 2006 22:35:29
From: Sanny
Subject: Re: Nomorechess was correct (it goes without saying)
|
> In other words, the program delayed castling, and then > moved its Queen over and over and over, finally grabbing > a Rook -- BUT, A little modification made which will stop moving Queen again and again. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 2006 13:06:56
From: Kenneth Sloan
Subject: Re: Nomorechess was correct.
|
Sanny wrote: > Nomorechess once said me that he is unable to beat Master Level only > because it takes long time. > > Now as the time has been improved, Master level always makes moves in > 1-3 minute. Nomorechess has beaten Master Level Thrice. > > Here are the Recorded games by Nomorechess > http://www.getclub.com/cc/showgame.php?num=10&user=nomorechess > > I was thinking Nomorechess will be beaten by Master Level but it do not > happen. > > Beginner Level which makes moves in 10 seconds Beginner Level does NOT make moves in 10 seconds. -- Kenneth Sloan [email protected] Computer and Information Sciences +1-205-932-2213 University of Alabama at Birmingham FAX +1-205-934-5473 Birmingham, AL 35294-1170 http://www.cis.uab.edu/sloan/
|
|
Date: 14 Dec 2006 01:37:03
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Nomorechess was correct (it goes without saying)
|
Sanny wrote: > Nomorechess once said me that he is unable to beat Master Level only > because it takes long time. > > Now as the time has been improved, Master level always makes moves in > 1-3 minute. Nomorechess has beaten Master Level Thrice. > > Here are the Recorded games by Nomorechess > http://www.getclub.com/cc/showgame.php?num=10&user=nomorechess > > I was thinking Nomorechess will be beaten by Master Level but it do not > happen. > > Beginner Level which makes moves in 10 seconds is too weak for hime and > now he can play all Matches with Master Level which plays quite fast. > > I would like Nomorechess to find the mistakes in the game. As master > Level thinks too deep then why it get defeated by nomorechess. No mistakes. It simply loses because I am a natural-born chess genius! : >D Sanny, although the opening play could be improved a bit here and there, the fact is I won this game because the program left its King exposed while grabbing what *superficially* appears to be a material advantage. In other words, the program delayed castling, and then moved its Queen over and over and over, finally grabbing a Rook -- BUT, in doing so, it left its King exposed to a powerful attack, which included some far-advanced passed pawns and nearly ALL of my pieces swarming around the enemy King. While "technicians" will point to several less-than-ideal moves all through the opening phase, it really boils down to superior judgment of position and *perfect* technique on my part, leading to the stellar finish -- which rivals any by the famous grandmasters of old. In fact, many of the most famous "brilliancies" are seriously flawed, unlike mine in this game. Ho-hum. : >D > http://www.getclub.com/playgame.php?id=DM5575&game=Chess > > In above recorded game, It will be good if Nomorechess can specify why > a move made by Master Level is wrong and what should be the correct > move. > > It will help me improve the game if Nomorechess can tell Correct move > which Master Level Overlooked. One quick-and-dirty improvement would be to add a few more moves to your opening book. For example, in place of p-f3, it could play N-f3 in that position. And note that while I was already castled and flinging pawns up to attack the center, your program was still bandying about, sniffing for a free pawn or something to snatch with the Queen. Sometimes this can work, but all things being equal, it is often wiser to put "safety first". The tactics more often favor the player whose own King is not a target. And the Queen, by herself, is no match for an army of "little people", provided they are well coordinated. In sum, you need to focus a bit more on promoting minor-piece development, and King safety. -- help bot
|
|