| |
Main
Date: 20 Aug 2007 13:27:49
From:
Subject: MI5 Persecution: Silly-billy 6/7/96 (533)
|
From: Mike_Corley_Fan_Club@Nut_house.org (Old_500)
Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.media,alt.radio.uk,rec.arts.tv.uk.misc
Subject: MC Exposed as a Fraud
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 1996 17:01:05 GMT
Organization: Anti-Nuts Inc.
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <[email protected] >
References: <[email protected] >
NNTP-Posting-Host: gw5-055.pool.dircon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99e/16.227
Sad, confused and emotional disturbed Mike Corley wrote:
{ snip }
Because he has made himself into a tyr and now he finds it impossible to
back down. Mike's big secret has now been exposed. He made everything up.
Every time Mike makes allegations against the police, MI5,
Tom-Dick-and-Harry etc. those organisations have taken people off vitally
important work to ascertain whether or not there was any substance in Mike's
ranting allegations.
When I'm told by someone who really does know such things that there was
never any plot to get Mike then I trust that person sufficiently enough to
accept his word.
The problem is Mike has escalated matters to an extreme level and like many
silly billys he will find it impossible to give up all his self created crap
and to live a normal life. After all what can Mike do now this crap has
been exposed as untrue ? What new cause can Mike dedicate himself to ?
(Some might read that as: who else can Mike now start upsetting ?)
So Mike write to John Major, c/o the Private Secretary, 10 Downing Street,
London SW1A 2AA and ask the Prime Minister to help you. I'd normally
disclose his fax numbers but if I did that you might jam up the lines with
abusive postings just like you do here on Usenet.
Is anyone interested in joining with me to do a mass e-mailing of protests
to Anon Penet and to Toronto Free Net in an attempt to flood their computer
systems thus forcing them to seriously consider pulling the plug on Mike ?
I'm not sure but is my proposal called a "flame" ?
======================================================================
From: [email protected] (Big Ears.)
Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.media,alt.radio.uk,rec.arts.tv.uk.misc
Subject: Re: MC Exposed as a Fraud
Date: Sat Jul 6 17:34:46 1996
John Youles commented:
> I've found that torfree.net don't respond, perhaps if they got a high
> enough number of complaints they might take notice. See their web pages
> for email addresses.
Perhaps we should give Mike 7 days from today (6 July 96) to come to his
senses and they start a massive multiple E-mailing campaign to Toronto Free
Net. If all us victims send multiple copies of E-mails to the right
addresses in Toronto then perhaps the Canadians will begin to get the
appropriate message.
Copy e-mailed to Mike, just so he knows what is coming if he persists.
Big Ears. Posted to uk.misc
==================================================================
Please think of the people sleeping in shop doorways every night
==================================================================
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: I'm wasting MI5's time! I should be arrested!
Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.legal,rec.arts.tv.uk.misc,alt.journalism,alt.journalism.print,$
Organization: Toronto Free-Net
Sumy:
Keywords:
It's such a pity that the Security Service has no powers of arrest. How are
they supposed to implement a proper secret police state without the ability to
snatch Joe Citizen off the street whenever they feel like it?
"Old_500" aka "Big Ears" aka "PC Plod" wrote:
>Every time Mike makes allegations against the police, MI5,
>Tom-Dick-and-Harry etc. those organisations have taken people off vitally
>important work to ascertain whether or not there was any substance in Mike's
>ranting allegations.
I see. So they're not wasting six years of manpower to persecute you. They're
wasting six years of manpower to prove I'm _not_ being persecuted.
I wish I was clever enough to think of something like that. I really, really do.
>When I'm told by someone who really does know such things that there was
>never any plot to get Mike then I trust that person sufficiently enough to
>accept his word.
Come on "Big Ears", why don't you admit that you made this posting? This is
exactly the same line you were feeding me a few months ago. The posts are from
the same news server, it's even the same newsreading software (Forte Agent
.99e/16.227).
I'm afraid that if you friend "in the know" denied the existence of a plot then
he was being, as they say, economical with the truth. Judging by the extreme
reaction in London in May, and the panic you're showing now, as well as the
replay post yesterday, I would say that things are hotting up again. But for
you this time, not for me. I am out of harm's way, and there is very little you
can do as long as I stay out of the UK.
533
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------- >>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
|
|
| |
Date: 20 Aug 2007 16:52:22
From: Kenneth Sloan
Subject: Re: Statistical significance of score differences - new release of
|
james wrote:
>
> For international registration, the Madrid agreement states that people
> can register their tradek at the WIPO (World Intellectual Property
> Organisation) if they have already registered in one country which has
> signed the Madrid agreement. However, people have to pay for each
> country they want a valid registration, turning an international
> registration into a very costly process.
>
> In many countries, tradeks are not protected any more if they haven't
> been used for a "period of time" (5 years usually), and, as David wrote
> in his previous message, they have to be defended, or protection of the
> tradek is also lost.
>
As well it should. Tradeks are usually restricted to a particular
ket segment AND a geographic region. If your use is in another
country, or for a product/service that cannot reasonably be confused
with the original, then there is no tradek infringement.
The acid test for tradek is: will the consumer be confused?
There is an interesting example in my area - a local theater company was
using a name that was already in use by a theater in another state. As
long as the theater company remained small and local, there was no
problem - but as soon as the theater company "went regional" and started
advertising in the other company's area, there WAS a conflict, and our
local company had to change names (or...remain forever small and local).
It makes little sense to try to register a tradek in a region in
which you don't do business - and if you DO do business in every
country, the cost of registration in each country is trivial. Paying to
register, and then NOT USING the tradek in a particular country, is
likely to lead to your LOSING the court battle when a conflict arises.
Use it, or lose it.
Note that this is very different from copyright, or patent.
--
Kenneth Sloan [email protected]
Computer and Information Sciences +1-205-932-2213
University of Alabama at Birmingham FAX +1-205-934-5473
Birmingham, AL 35294-1170 http://www.cis.uab.edu/sloan/
|
| |
Date: 20 Aug 2007 14:42:05
From: David Richerby
Subject: Re: Statistical significance of score differences - new release of
|
james <[email protected] > wrote:
> David Richerby a �crit :
>> Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com/> wrote:
>>> Pascal wrote:
>>>> I am not sure Scid can be associated to a tradek like RedHat,
>>> You can be sure now. I assure you that it's a valid tradek.
>>> Tradeks are established simply by being used.
>>
>> No, tradeks have to be claimed.
>
> I know for sure that they have to be registered in Germany, France,
> and Benelux [...]
I didn't say `registered'; I said `claimed'. Nothing is tradeked
unless you explicitly say that it is. Registration is a further
level, offering further protection.
This is distinct from copyright which, under many countries' laws is
implicit. Under English law, I own the copyright on my words in this
post just because I created it. I don't have to stick a `Copyright
(c) David Richerby, 2007' at the bottom for this to be the case.
Dave.
--
David Richerby Homicidal Mouldy Composer (TM): it's
www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ like a pupil of Beethoven but it's
starting to grow mushrooms and it
wants to kill you!
|
| | |
Date: 20 Aug 2007 14:44:37
From: David Richerby
Subject: Re: Statistical significance of score differences - new release of
|
David Richerby <[email protected] > wrote:
> james <[email protected]> wrote:
>> David Richerby a �crit :
>>> No, tradeks have to be claimed.
>>
>> I know for sure that they have to be registered in Germany, France,
>> and Benelux [...]
>
> I didn't say `registered'; I said `claimed'. [...]
But, by the way, since people have complained about this in the past,
I agree with the things that you wrote that I snipped.
Dave.
--
David Richerby Chocolate Painting (TM): it's like a
www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ Renaissance masterpiece that's made
of chocolate!
|
|
