|
Main
Date: 12 Mar 2008 09:36:48
From: samsloan
Subject: Bill Brock calls for the Resignations of Goichberg and Truong
|
I agree that Goichberg should resign but I am sure that he will not do so. However, my reasons for believing that Goichberg should resign are entirely different than those suggested by Bill Brock. In the first place, this entire situation was created by Goichberg. After the votes were counted and I was declared to have been elected to the board on July 20, 2006, Goichberg started a series of desperate measures either to prevent me from taking office or to have me immediately thrown off the board. This include writing find letters to the USCF's attorney Michael Matsler, asking for advice on how to stop Sam Sloan from taking the office to which I had been elected. The USCF paid legal fees of nearly $5,000 to Mr. Matsler for responding to these five letters (about $1000 per letter) and I believe that Bill Goichberg should reimburse the USCF for this amount. This entire controversy about my prior relationship with Miss Polgar started because Bill Goichberg and Joel Channing repeatedly, over and over again, demanded to know the details about my relationship with her. I had never even revealed that I ever had a relationship with her, much what the nature of the relationship was. I do not play "kiss and tell". I still have not responded to questions about this. If you could see the Confidential BINFOS (which fortunately remain confidential) you could see how frequently Channing and Goichberg (especially Channing) pressed me for information about this. As I said, they were acting like a "bull in a china shop" because they did not know what they were getting into. This alone is enough reason for throwing Joel Channing and Bill Goichberg off the board. What ever my relationship was with Miss Polgar twenty years ago (and I am not admitting that there even was such a relationship) it was none of the business of Joel Channing and Bill Goichberg and it was reprehensible of them to make a big public issue over it. Now that I was on the board and their efforts to stop me from taking office had failed, Bill Goichberg started taking desperate measures to make sure that I would not be re-elected. I agree that he has every right under freedom of speech to campaign against me. However, he does not have the right to use the financial resources of the USCF or his position as president of the USCF to stop me from being re-elected. Among the things he did to insure that I not be re-elected were: 1. Instructing the Chess Life editor not to publish my name in Chess Life (other than listing me as a member of the board). There were four times during my one year on the board that a Chess Life columnist or news reporter included my name in a story or article submitted for publication. Each time, my name was removed from the article by the editor. 2. Giving a tremendous amount of publicity to Susan Polgar including publishing free ads and pictures of her in every issue of Chess Life, when she had done absolutely nothing noteworthy or news worthy during that entire year. For example, she was given a cover photo in Chess Life claiming that she had won the "Woman's World Cup" when all she had actually done was win an unofficial exhibition event not rated or recognized by either FIDE or the USCF in which all of her opponents were weak players, whereas the real official Woman's World Cup was won by Grandmaster Xu Yu Hua of China (who had not competed in the exhibition event that Susan Polgar had won). 3. Appointing as moderators and "Forum Oversight Committee" members to the USCF Forums vehemently anti-Sam Sloan and pro-Polgar, including Herbert Rodney Vaughn and Gregory Alexander. These moderators proceeded to repeatedly suspend Sam Sloan and anybody who supported Sam Sloan or even agreed with Sam Sloan on one issue. Anybody who agreed with had their postings pulled and they were suspended from posting. More than one thousand postings by USCF members were pulled or deleted from the USCF Fourms during this period. 4. Anybody who asked an embarrassing of Paul Truong or Susan Polgar had their postings pulled. Anybody who questioned or disputed the statements by Paul Truong and Susan Polgar had their posting deleted and found themselves suspended. For example, posters were not allowed to ask Polgar and Truong whether they were ried to each other or not, they were not allowed to ask Truong what companies he had ever worked for or what jobs he had ever held, nor could he be asked to name the "billion dollar companies" that he claimed to have rescued or saved, nor could he be asked to identify the 11 national chess championships that he claimed to have won. In short, Truong was not allowed to be asked to verify any of the outrageous claims that he was making about himself and Susan Polgar. Susan Polgar was not allowed to be asked to identify the four "World Chess Championships" that she claimed to have won. In short, under the Goichberg Rules, the voting public was not allowed to know that almost everything that Polgar and Truong said about themselves during their election campaign was a lie. Had the voting public been allowed to know that Polgar and Truong were lying, Truong would never have been elected (since he just barely squeaked in anyway) and the election of Polgar would have been a lot closer. It is ironic that after Bill Goichberg did all this to insure that Polgar and Truong be elected so as to stop Sam Sloan from being re- elected, Polgar and Truong started attacking Goichberg in the final states of the election campaign in response to which Goichberg mailed 17,000 postcards to USCF members which priily attacked me but was also critical of Polgar and Truong. What has happened is that Goichberg has created this monster and now the monster is about to devour him. Goichberg is being attacked from all sides, especially from the Trollgar side that he had helped elect. I am not aware of anybody who supports Goichberg any more. The recent surprising call by Bill Brock for Goichberg's resignation is just one example of this. Sam Sloan
|
|
|
Date: 16 Mar 2008 05:50:57
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Bill Brock calls for the Resignations of Goichberg and Truong
|
> This is what makes it so shocking that Goichberg started attacking me > so vehemently from the day in 2006 that that I was first elected to > the board. > > Sam Sloan Really? Everyone knows a junkyard dog is useful when wanting to protect your rubbish but no one invites it inside the house to live with you!
|
|
Date: 16 Mar 2008 02:49:25
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Bill Brock calls for the Resignations of Goichberg and Truong
|
[quote="rfeditor"][quote="redman"]I agree with Joe Lux. This is a legitimate USCF issue. I would like to respectfully request that John Hillery let us know how and when he has ever disagreed with President Goichberg. Ever. Cordially, Tim Redman[/quote] Tim, I disagree with Bill about almost every facet of organizing tournaments. Big class prizes (larger than third or fourth overall), high (three-figure) entry fees, multiple sections, re-entries, out-of- state organizers squeezing out the locals -- I've opposed all of them, and had some limited success in keeping them out of Southern California. I did not agree with all of Bill's endorsements in the last, and I didn't vote for all of them (though exactly who I did vote for is none of your business). I was also opposed to OMOV (and still am). I did agree with Bill that those you endorsed should not be elected to the Board in 2001, and that the performance of the Board under your leadership was not entirely satisfactory. Is that really the only issue that matters to you?[/quote] I happen to agree with Bill Goichberg and therefore disagree with John Hillery on every one of these issues. I believe that these huge mega- Swiss tournaments that Goichberg holds are a great contribution to chess. This is what makes it so shocking that Goichberg started attacking me so vehemently from the day in 2006 that that I was first elected to the board. Sam Sloan
|
|
Date: 12 Mar 2008 22:13:42
From:
Subject: Re: Bill Brock calls for the Resignations of Goichberg and Truong
|
On 12, 5:27=A0pm, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote: > Bill Goichberg has been either a member of the board or Executive > Director almost every year since 1996. He was Vice-President from 1996 > to 1999, Executive Director 2003-2005 and President from 2005 until > now. > > Every year but one of those years the USCF has gone down, down down. > > It is time for Bill Goichberg to resign. He has nothing further to > contribute and his presence is doing more harm than good. > > However, I would not want Goichberg to resign if Truong is left on the > board. Goichberg should stay until he is absolutely certain that > Truong is gone. > > Sam Sloan I would think that bill goichberg would begin to want to resign. As demonized as these chess board members are, I don't know who in their right mind Would actually want to serve on a board of directors that is involved in the plotting of an Overthrow of a foreign government. The chess players all knew it was illegal, they just Called the cops and created fake bomb threats at the Tennessee offices to try to Discredit cus Roberts. Becoming a wartime diplomat of St Kitts and Nevis to stay out of jail is not what I imagined Out of this, but I'll take whatever lifesaver I can get. It looks like diplomatic immunity kept me Out of prison - or total shutdown of my r.g.c.p postings, which is now seems less likely, but Possible, due to future political changes. If these folks would sit down and discuss with me their role in the coup-de-ta attempt, maybe I would let this go. You chess players do not understand how many people are mad and upset At the State Department, the United Nations, the IOC, and even in the American National Olympic Committee. This is big trouble. It is on my record, forever. I used diplomatic immunity. That is like a felony Charge that never gets processed. For the rest of my life, I have to watch where I travel, and Everyone in the clique won't get off this that easily. I will get to tell my side, and when I do, More trouble comes our way. Diplomatic immunity is very destructive to chess, and I hope you folks realize this. It isn't about Ego, this is about state sovereignty. cus Roberts Ambassador of St Kitts and Nevis to FIDE and the USCF
|
|
Date: 12 Mar 2008 15:27:55
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Bill Brock calls for the Resignations of Goichberg and Truong
|
Bill Goichberg has been either a member of the board or Executive Director almost every year since 1996. He was Vice-President from 1996 to 1999, Executive Director 2003-2005 and President from 2005 until now. Every year but one of those years the USCF has gone down, down down. It is time for Bill Goichberg to resign. He has nothing further to contribute and his presence is doing more harm than good. However, I would not want Goichberg to resign if Truong is left on the board. Goichberg should stay until he is absolutely certain that Truong is gone. Sam Sloan
|
|
Date: 12 Mar 2008 09:51:07
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Bill Brock calls for the Resignations of Goichberg and Truong
|
I agree that Goichberg should resign but I am sure that he will not do so. However, my reasons for believing that Goichberg should resign are entirely different than those suggested by Bill Brock. In the first place, this entire situation was created by Goichberg. After the votes were counted and I was declared to have been elected to the board on July 20, 2006, Goichberg started a series of desperate measures either to prevent me from taking office or to have me immediately thrown off the board. This included writing five letters to the USCF's attorney Michael Matsler, asking for advice on how to stop Sam Sloan from taking the office to which I had been elected. The USCF paid legal fees of nearly $5,000 to Mr. Matsler for responding to these five letters (about $1000 per letter) and I believe that Bill Goichberg should reimburse the USCF for this amount. This entire controversy about my prior relationship with Miss Polgar started because Bill Goichberg and Joel Channing repeatedly, over and over again, demanded to know the details about my relationship with her. I had never even revealed that I ever had a relationship with her, much what the nature of the relationship was. I do not play "kiss and tell". I still have not responded to questions about this. If you could see the Confidential BINFOS (which fortunately remain confidential) you could see how frequently Channing and Goichberg (especially Channing) pressed me for information about this. As I said, they were acting like a "bull in a china shop" because they did not know what they were getting into. This alone is enough reason for throwing Joel Channing and Bill Goichberg off the board. What ever my relationship was with Miss Polgar twenty years ago (and I am not admitting that there even was such a relationship) it was none of the business of Joel Channing and Bill Goichberg and it was reprehensible of them to make a big public issue over it. Now that I was on the board and their efforts to stop me from taking office had failed, Bill Goichberg started taking desperate measures to make sure that I would not be re-elected. I agree that he has every right under freedom of speech to campaign against me. However, he does not have the right to use the financial resources of the USCF or his position as president of the USCF to stop me from being re-elected. Among the things he did to insure that I not be re-elected were: 1. Instructing the Chess Life editor not to publish my name in Chess Life (other than listing me as a member of the board). There were four times during my one year on the board that a Chess Life columnist or news reporter included my name in a story or article submitted for publication. Each time, my name was removed from the article by the editor. 2. Giving a tremendous amount of publicity to Susan Polgar including publishing free ads and pictures of her in every issue of Chess Life, when she had done absolutely nothing noteworthy or news worthy during that entire year. For example, she was given a cover photo in Chess Life claiming that she had won the "Woman's World Cup" when all she had actually done was win an unofficial exhibition event not rated or recognized by either FIDE or the USCF in which all of her opponents were weak players, whereas the real official Woman's World Cup was won by Grandmaster Xu Yu Hua of China (who had not competed in the exhibition event that Susan Polgar had won). 3. Appointing as moderators and "Forum Oversight Committee" members to the USCF Forums vehemently anti-Sam Sloan and pro-Polgar persons, including for example Herbert Rodney Vaughn and Gregory Alexander. These moderators proceeded to repeatedly suspend Sam Sloan and anybody who supported Sam Sloan or even agreed with Sam Sloan on any issue. Anybody who agreed with Sam Sloan had their postings pulled and they were suspended from posting. More than one thousand postings by USCF members were pulled or deleted from the USCF Forums during this period. 4. Anybody who asked an embarrassing question of Paul Truong or Susan Polgar had their postings pulled. Anybody who questioned or disputed the statements by Paul Truong and Susan Polgar had their posting deleted and found themselves suspended. For example, posters were not allowed to ask Polgar and Truong whether they were ried to each other or not, they were not allowed to ask Truong what companies he had ever worked for or what jobs he had ever held, nor could he be asked to name the "billion dollar companies" that he claimed to have rescued or saved, nor could he be asked to identify the 11 national chess championships that he claimed to have won. In short, Truong was not allowed to be asked to verify any of the outrageous claims that he was making about himself and Susan Polgar. Susan Polgar was not allowed to be asked to identify the four "World Chess Championships" that she claimed to have won. In short, under the Goichberg Rules, the voting public was not allowed to know that almost everything that Polgar and Truong said about themselves during their election campaign was a lie. Had the voting public been allowed to know that Polgar and Truong were lying, Truong would never have been elected (since he just barely squeaked in anyway) and the election of Polgar would have been a lot closer. It is ironic that after Bill Goichberg did all this to insure that Polgar and Truong be elected so as to stop Sam Sloan from being re- elected, Polgar and Truong started attacking Goichberg in the final stages of the election campaign in response to which Goichberg mailed 17,000 postcards to USCF members which priily attacked me but was also critical of Polgar and Truong. What has happened is that Goichberg has created this monster and now the monster is about to devour him. Goichberg is being attacked from all sides, especially from the Trollgar side that he had helped elect. I am not aware of anybody who supports Goichberg any more. The recent surprising call by Bill Brock for Goichberg's resignation is just one example of this. Sam Sloan
|
|