| |
Main
Date: 17 Dec 2008 17:24:04
From: samsloan
Subject: All Quiet on RGCP
|
How many have noticed that for the last three days there has been
almost complete silence on rec.games.chess.politics ?
So far since last midnight there have been only five postings today,
whereas normally there have been several hundred.
This quietness on rgcp coincides with the closing down of Susan
Polgar's website chessdiscussion.com which also happened three days
ago.
What is especially noteworthy is that all of the fake personalities
have vanished at the same time. There have been no more "Fake Sam
Sloan"s, no Nomen Nosisco, no frog, for the last three days. They are
all gone. Everybody still posting is a known real person.
This tends to prove that all these myriad of fakes were all the same
person or small group of people, namely Paul Truong, Susan Polgar and
Gregory Alexander.
I have also heard from several different sources that the Feds are
moving in on them, possibly even to arrest them. Nobody seems to know
where they are right now.
Sam Sloan
|
|
| |
Date: 02 Jan 2009 07:46:40
From: Rob
Subject: Re: USCF Candidates Questions
|
On Jan 1, 11:31=A0pm, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Jan 2, 12:22=A0am, Rob <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I just want to ask a couple of questions. Maybe part of the confusion
> > is what peoples perceptions are? So if we answer these questions maybe
> > we can diffuse much of the hostility?
>
> OK. Shoot.
>
>
>
> > 1. Does the USCF have problems?
>
> No problems at all. Everything is just perfect.
>
> > 2. If they do have problems, what are they?
>
> There are no problems.
>
> > 3. How would you fix the problems if they exist?
>
> No need
>
> > 4.Would you be willing to serve on the EB in order to effect change?
>
> I will just obey our great leader. Whatever he says, goes.
>
> > 5. If yes, what would your first suggestions be and how would you
> > impliment it?
>
> Cannot think of anything.
>
> > 6. If no, the why would you not serve?
>
> I want to be friends with the other board members, agree with whatever
> they say and just make sure that we all get along.
>
> Thank you, Rob for asking such incisive questions.
>
> Sam Sloan
You are welcome
|
| |
Date: 01 Jan 2009 21:31:52
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: USCF Candidates Questions
|
On Jan 2, 12:22=A0am, Rob <[email protected] > wrote:
> I just want to ask a couple of questions. Maybe part of the confusion
> is what peoples perceptions are? So if we answer these questions maybe
> we can diffuse much of the hostility?
OK. Shoot.
>
> 1. Does the USCF have problems?
No problems at all. Everything is just perfect.
> 2. If they do have problems, what are they?
There are no problems.
> 3. How would you fix the problems if they exist?
No need
> 4.Would you be willing to serve on the EB in order to effect change?
I will just obey our great leader. Whatever he says, goes.
> 5. If yes, what would your first suggestions be and how would you
> impliment it?
Cannot think of anything.
> 6. If no, the why would you not serve?
I want to be friends with the other board members, agree with whatever
they say and just make sure that we all get along.
Thank you, Rob the Robber, for asking such incisive questions.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 01 Jan 2009 21:22:59
From: Rob
Subject: USCF Candidates Questions
|
I just want to ask a couple of questions. Maybe part of the confusion
is what peoples perceptions are? So if we answer these questions maybe
we can diffuse much of the hostility?
1. Does the USCF have problems?
2. If they do have problems, what are they?
3. How would you fix the problems if they exist?
4.Would you be willing to serve on the EB in order to effect change?
5. If yes, what would your first suggestiono be and how would you
impliment it?
6. If no, the why would you not serve?
|
| |
Date: 01 Jan 2009 15:10:38
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: All Quiet on RGCP
|
[quote="MikeMurray"][quote="samsloan"]Perhaps I wrote too soon:
Nomen Nescio is back today, posting over on rgcp, through anonymous
remailer dizum.com. He seems to be the real thing because he lists a
bunch of IP addresses that are being investigated.
It is hard to see the impact of these anonymous or fake name posters
because they set their postings to be deleted in 6 days and not to be
archived or to appear on Forte Free Agent, so if you try to look back
at past posting patterns you will not be able to see them.
Sam Sloan[/quote]
Sam, how do they stop a post from appearing on Agent? Are you saying
a Google delete propagates itself into the local repositories
maintained by Agent?
Mike Murray [/quote]
Take a look at the usually hidden headers.
Here is one from today but I have deleted the obscenities. It is from
"Amex Card Number theft". It basically states that the reason that the
account used by the Fake Sam Sloan was paid for with Susan Polgar's
American Express Credit Card is that somebody stole her card number.
Now look down. It says: User-Agent: G2/1.0 and X-No-Archive: Yes:
These apparently keep it out of Forte Agent and stop Google from
archiving it, so that it cannot be traced.
Sam Sloan
Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-
service.com!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.n-ix.net!news2.arglkargh.de!
news.theremailer.net!frell.theremailer.net!anonymous-x3!anonymous-x2!
anonymous
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address
above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at <[email protected] >.
Identifying the real sender is technically impossible.
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.chess
Subject: Amex card number theft
X-No-Archive: Yes
From: revenge will be to sweet <[email protected] >
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 92.40.109.103
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <[email protected] >
<c8ca291f-82e3-4ac9-83b5-18209e81c937@k18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com >
<e5c34kwb-10d7-90s3-b611-32a94c873081@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com >
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:
1.9.0.4) Gecko/2008102920 Firefox/3.0.4,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Message-ID:
<[email protected] >
Precedence: anon
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:46:56 +0100
Mail-To-News-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: Frell Anonymous Remailer
|
| | |
Date: 01 Jan 2009 16:52:52
From: Mike Murray
Subject: Re: All Quiet on RGCP
|
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 15:10:38 -0800 (PST), samsloan
<[email protected] > wrote:
>Sam, how do they stop a post from appearing on Agent? Are you saying
>a Google delete propagates itself into the local repositories
>maintained by Agent?
>Mike Murray [/quote]
>Take a look at the usually hidden headers.
>Here is one from today but I have deleted the obscenities. It is from
>"Amex Card Number theft". It basically states that the reason that the
>account used by the Fake Sam Sloan was paid for with Susan Polgar's
>American Express Credit Card is that somebody stole her card number.
>Now look down. It says: User-Agent: G2/1.0 and X-No-Archive: Yes:
>These apparently keep it out of Forte Agent and stop Google from
>archiving it, so that it cannot be traced.
>Sam Sloan
You mean the post with all-caps obscenities every few lines, directed
to you? I have that post. I retrieved it with Forte's Agent. I
think the "User-Agent" refers to the creating software, not the
intended or allowed receiver.
|
| |
Date: 26 Dec 2008 16:56:54
From: marika
Subject: Re: All Quiet on RGCP
|
On Dec 17, 8:24=A0pm, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> How many have noticed that for the last three days there has been
> almost complete silence on rec.games.chess.politics ?
>
This is pretty neat.
mk5000
"It=92s going to be all right
I know that I got my baby
Like the birds that live in the sky
We never have to worry "--solange, 6 o'clock blues
|
| |
Date: 24 Dec 2008 09:30:58
From: samvaknin
Subject: Re: All Quiet on RGCP
|
Cyber Narcissist
http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/journal67.html
============================
The Narcissist and Psychopath in Society
============================
The Narcissist and Psychopath as Criminals
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/5003
The Narcissist is Above the Law
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/4983
The Narcissist as Liar and Con-man
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/4951
Does the Narcissist Have a Multiple Personality (Dissociative Identity
Disorder)?
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/4950
Narcissists as Drama Queens
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/4948
The Narcissist as Know-it-all
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/4945
|
| |
Date: 23 Dec 2008 12:25:42
From: help bot
Subject: Re: All Quiet on RGCP
|
On Dec 20, 8:09=A0pm, Dave <[email protected] > wrote:
> samsloan wrote:
> > How many have noticed that for the last three days there has been
> > almost complete silence on rec.games.chess.politics ?
> I do not read rec.games.chess.politics, since I am not interested in
> chess politics.
> Unfortunatly however you keep posting political things on
> rec.games.chess.computer. Why the hell do you keep doing this? Is it too
> much to ask for you to keep your chess politics off of
> rec.games.chess.computer? Your post has nothing to do with computers.
>
> If you feel such messages are appropiate on rec.games.chess.computer,
> would you be kind enough to explain why?
I think it is obvious that certain posters in rgc are either
deliberately crossposting, or else they simply lack the
intelligence to determine which groups are appropriate
and which ones aren't. In the case of Mr. Sloan, we
know that he is /desperate for attention/, so there is no
need to wonder how his intellect could have deteriorated
to such a degree as this (although there is definitely
something amiss in that regard as well).
Somebody ought to create a bot which can fix this
problem, sans any personal bias whatever-- a 100%
objective bot, whose job it is to "zap" crossposts from
inappropriate groups. It can't be all that hard; after all,
in the movie Logan' Run they had a bot which froze fish
and another bot which did cosmetic makeovers.
-- help bot
|
| |
Date: 20 Dec 2008 21:06:09
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: All Quiet on RGCP
|
On Dec 20, 10:25=A0pm, Wick <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 20, 7:09=A0pm, Dave <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > samsloan wrote:
> > > How many have noticed that for the last three days there has been
> > > almost complete silence on rec.games.chess.politics ?
>
> > I do not read rec.games.chess.politics, since I am not interested in
> > chess politics.
>
> > Unfortunatly however you keep posting political things on
> > rec.games.chess.computer. Why the hell do you keep doing this? Is it to=
o
> > much to ask for you to keep your chess politics off of
> > rec.games.chess.computer? Your post has nothing to do with computers.
>
> > If you feel such messages are appropiate on rec.games.chess.computer,
> > would you be kind enough to explain why?
>
> Because Mr. Sloan is a narcissistic attention whore who believes that
> cross-posting is a sacrament.
Mr. William Deer is back, attacking me as usual, after an entire year
during which he refused to entertain an ethics complaint against Susan
Polgar and Paul Truong.
Sam Sloan
|
| | |
Date: 21 Dec 2008 08:41:24
From: Dave
Subject: Re: All Quiet on RGCP
|
samsloan wrote:
> On Dec 20, 10:25 pm, Wick <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Dec 20, 7:09 pm, Dave <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> samsloan wrote:
>>>> How many have noticed that for the last three days there has been
>>>> almost complete silence on rec.games.chess.politics ?
>>> I do not read rec.games.chess.politics, since I am not interested in
>>> chess politics.
>>> Unfortunatly however you keep posting political things on
>>> rec.games.chess.computer. Why the hell do you keep doing this? Is it too
>>> much to ask for you to keep your chess politics off of
>>> rec.games.chess.computer? Your post has nothing to do with computers.
>>> If you feel such messages are appropiate on rec.games.chess.computer,
>>> would you be kind enough to explain why?
>> Because Mr. Sloan is a narcissistic attention whore who believes that
>> cross-posting is a sacrament.
>
> Mr. William Deer is back, attacking me as usual, after an entire year
> during which he refused to entertain an ethics complaint against Susan
> Polgar and Paul Truong.
>
> Sam Sloan
And you refuse to entertain a discussion about the merits of posting
your chess politics to rec.games.chess.computer. So this is a case of
the pot calling the kettle black.
Once again, can you tell me why you post this sort of material to
rec.games.chess.computer?
|
| |
Date: 20 Dec 2008 19:25:06
From: Wick
Subject: Re: All Quiet on RGCP
|
On Dec 20, 7:09=A0pm, Dave <[email protected] > wrote:
> samsloan wrote:
> > How many have noticed that for the last three days there has been
> > almost complete silence on rec.games.chess.politics ?
>
> I do not read rec.games.chess.politics, since I am not interested in
> chess politics.
>
> Unfortunatly however you keep posting political things on
> rec.games.chess.computer. Why the hell do you keep doing this? Is it too
> much to ask for you to keep your chess politics off of
> rec.games.chess.computer? Your post has nothing to do with computers.
>
> If you feel such messages are appropiate on rec.games.chess.computer,
> would you be kind enough to explain why?
Because Mr. Sloan is a narcissistic attention whore who believes that
cross-posting
is a sacrament.
|
| |
Date: 21 Dec 2008 01:09:46
From: Dave
Subject: Re: All Quiet on RGCP
|
samsloan wrote:
> How many have noticed that for the last three days there has been
> almost complete silence on rec.games.chess.politics ?
I do not read rec.games.chess.politics, since I am not interested in
chess politics.
Unfortunatly however you keep posting political things on
rec.games.chess.computer. Why the hell do you keep doing this? Is it too
much to ask for you to keep your chess politics off of
rec.games.chess.computer? Your post has nothing to do with computers.
If you feel such messages are appropiate on rec.games.chess.computer,
would you be kind enough to explain why?
|
| | |
Date: 23 Dec 2008 21:39:58
From: Kenneth Sloan
Subject: Re: All Quiet on RGCP
|
Please don't crosspost.
Dave wrote:
> samsloan wrote:
>> How many have noticed that for the last three days there has been
>> almost complete silence on rec.games.chess.politics ?
>
> I do not read rec.games.chess.politics, since I am not interested in
> chess politics.
>
> Unfortunatly however you keep posting political things on
> rec.games.chess.computer. Why the hell do you keep doing this? Is it too
> much to ask for you to keep your chess politics off of
> rec.games.chess.computer? Your post has nothing to do with computers.
>
> If you feel such messages are appropiate on rec.games.chess.computer,
> would you be kind enough to explain why?
--
Kenneth Sloan [email protected]
Computer and Information Sciences +1-205-932-2213
University of Alabama at Birmingham FAX +1-205-934-5473
Birmingham, AL 35294-1170 http://KennethRSloan.com/
|
| |
Date: 19 Dec 2008 03:09:31
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: All Quiet on RGCP
|
Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!
newsfeed.freenet.de!news2.euro.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!
newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!
news.wiretrip.org!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news-x5!mail2news-
x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Subject: AW: All Quiet on RGCP
From: "John Doe 6" <[email protected] >
X-No-Archive: YES
References: <e397e447-
[email protected] >
Newsgroups:
rec.games.chess.politics,misc.legal,rec.games.chess.misc,rec.games.chess.computer,alt.chess
Message-ID: <[email protected] >
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:28:59 -0700 (MST)
Mail-To-News-Contact: [email protected]
Organization: [email protected]
samsloan <[email protected] > wrote on Dec 18 2008...
> the closing down of Susan Polgar's website chessdiscussion
The website is not closed down. There was a HDD failure which
means that most of the past information were lost. Most surely
chessdiscussion.com will be running soon, can be by Christmas.
For operational reasons, the domain is re-registered in a S.E.
Asian nation which does not support or comfort pedophiles.
> This tends to prove that all these myriad of fakes were
(you Mr. Sloan and your supporters?)
> the Feds are moving in
archived
|
| |
Date: 19 Dec 2008 01:28:59
From: John Doe 6
Subject: AW: All Quiet on RGCP
|
samsloan <[email protected] > wrote on Dec 18 2008...
> the closing down of Susan Polgar's website chessdiscussion
The website is not closed down. There was a HDD failure which
means that most of the past information were lost. Most surely
chessdiscussion.com will be running soon, can be by Christmas.
For operational reasons, the domain is re-registered in a S.E.
Asian nation which does not support or comfort pedophiles.
> This tends to prove that all these myriad of fakes were
(you Mr. Sloan and your supporters?)
> the Feds are moving in
At last. A poor infant S_____ Kimura-Sloan will be saved from
the gravest peril she is in. So many complaints were filed the
authorities had eventually to do something. When the 4/5 years
old tries to kill herself on a road by running away from the
so-call 'father', it is only a desparate cry for Help. Reason
being not merely she was transported LEASHED to a courtroom by
the 'father', but because of far more low despicable actions.
How many children you've involved this far, Mr. Sloan? Why are
you publicly called the 'child-molester' by Mr. William Brock?
Do you still hide near the bathroom doors, peeping like here?
MR. VLADIMIR CADET, court-assigned to protect minor's interest,
said on 10/5/2005 before Judge D.S.Wong at the Family Court of
the State of New York (Queens County, NYC) (Docket V11657/05,
the case of Rankoth v Sloan:
"Yes, Judge. I did have an opportunity to speak with my client (Anusha
Rankoth). She denied all of the allegations in Mr. Sloan's custody
petition alleging drug use in the home. She indicated there is no
problem in the home. She also indicated she wanted no contact with her
father. I asked her why. She expressed to me concerns that her older
sibling had told her when she was younger, Mr. Sloan would often walk
into the bathroom when she was bathing, just open the door."
(extract from true and accurate transcript certified by Stephen Gendel
the official Court's reporter)
> possibly even to arrest them
No one will arrest this 'wife'/victim. Only Mr. Sloan. KK is
not guilty of an indictable offense. Her highly, extremely bad
judgement in having an involvement with Mr. Sloan is no offense
but endangerment of her infant by permitting it to be left with
Mr. Sloan alone can be evidence she is unfit to have custody.
Mr. Sloan requires not just court-sanctioned sterilization but
even chemical castration is inadequate. It must be the full
physical castration, not as yet a judicial possibility but in
the future who knows.
> Nobody seems to know where they are right now.
I disagree with you, sorry. I do know. We all do know.
Any case that appears in court involving Mr. Sloan or the USCF
as a plaintiff will face Mrs. Passion D______ as a witness of
the bestialities of Mr. Sloan. Yes Mr. Sloan. We found her in
Texas. You know her by a former surname, J_______.
The conduct of Mr. Sloan before during and after his short stay
on the EB will be made into the centerpiece of all lawsuit. It
was the extreme provocation given to the victims and supporters
by this man that lies behind every alleged event.
Mr. Hough should consider whether any small matter which could
be settled in five minutes between reasonable persons is worth
sacrificing his reputation for ever, to be embarrassed by the
linking to Mr. Sloan and to enabling a victory for Mr. Sloan.
Some of Mr. Sloan's enablers are almost as bad as he is, I do
not have to name names. But we viewed Mr. Hough as being of a
different caliber. What a shame he cannot see how surely he is
destroying himself by allowing these nonsenses to continue in
his name. Many more things will come out in time.
After all dust has settled our side will be seen as the one who
stood against the depravity and danger to children and the USCF
and Mr. Sloan's associates as the ones who allowed it or those
who encouraged it. We can never budge on our principles even
for a billion dollars or a million wild attacks by the corrupt
parties. What will be remembered is who supported Mr. Sloan
and who supported chess, justice and most importantly the kids.
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 08:14:34
From: None
Subject: Re: All Quiet on RGCP
|
On Dec 17, 11:18=A0pm, Matt Nemmers <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Dec 17, 7:24=A0pm, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > How many have noticed that for the last three days there has been
> > almost complete silence on rec.games.chess.politics ?
>
> > So far since last midnight there have been only five postings today,
> > whereas normally there have been several hundred.
>
> > This quietness on rgcp coincides with the closing down of Susan
> > Polgar's website chessdiscussion.com which also happened three days
> > ago.
>
> > What is especially noteworthy is that all of the fake personalities
> > have vanished at the same time. There have been no more "Fake Sam
> > Sloan"s, no Nomen Nosisco, no frog, for the last three days. They are
> > all gone. Everybody still posting is a known real person.
>
> > This tends to prove that all these myriad of fakes were all the same
> > person or small group of people, namely Paul Truong, Susan Polgar and
> > Gregory Alexander.
>
> > I have also heard from several different sources that the Feds are
> > moving in on them, possibly even to arrest them. Nobody seems to know
> > where they are right now.
>
> > Sam Sloan
>
> It's quiet because the RGCP cesspool is dying a slow, painful death.
> And deservedly so.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
As long as Shit-for-Brains Sloan is alive RGCP will suffer on.
|
| |
Date: 17 Dec 2008 20:18:34
From: Matt Nemmers
Subject: Re: All Quiet on RGCP
|
On Dec 17, 7:24=A0pm, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote:
> How many have noticed that for the last three days there has been
> almost complete silence on rec.games.chess.politics ?
>
> So far since last midnight there have been only five postings today,
> whereas normally there have been several hundred.
>
> This quietness on rgcp coincides with the closing down of Susan
> Polgar's website chessdiscussion.com which also happened three days
> ago.
>
> What is especially noteworthy is that all of the fake personalities
> have vanished at the same time. There have been no more "Fake Sam
> Sloan"s, no Nomen Nosisco, no frog, for the last three days. They are
> all gone. Everybody still posting is a known real person.
>
> This tends to prove that all these myriad of fakes were all the same
> person or small group of people, namely Paul Truong, Susan Polgar and
> Gregory Alexander.
>
> I have also heard from several different sources that the Feds are
> moving in on them, possibly even to arrest them. Nobody seems to know
> where they are right now.
>
> Sam Sloan
It's quiet because the RGCP cesspool is dying a slow, painful death.
And deservedly so.
|
|
