|
Main
Date: 07 Jan 2007 00:48:36
From:
Subject: Which Indian defence is:
|
1. Less theorotical? 2. More positional? 3. Playable against flank openings? Thanks.
|
|
|
Date: 22 Jan 2007 05:01:33
From:
Subject: Re: Which Indian defence is:
|
How playable is the Bogo-Indian against flank openings? How does the Queen's Indian fare on all three criteria. hicetnunc wrote: > I'd say : > > 1 - less theoretical =3D Bogo-Indian (1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Bb4+), but > it's tongue in cheek, as you need something against 3.Nc3 too :-) (you > can play 3...d5 though) > > 2 - more positional =3D Bogo-Indian again - very few tactical shots > > 3 - playable against flank openings - clearly King's Indian Defence > (1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7) offers maximum flexibility (white can't > avoid it) > > [email protected] a =E9crit : > > 1. Less theorotical? > > 2. More positional? > > 3. Playable against flank openings? > >=20 > > Thanks.
|
| |
Date: 22 Jan 2007 14:06:14
From: David Richerby
Subject: Re: Which Indian defence is:
|
<[email protected] > wrote: > How playable is the Bogo-Indian against flank openings? I don't understand your question. How can you play anything like the Bogo-Indian (which requires ...Bb4+) unless White has played d4 (or, at least, d3) and c4? > How does the Queen's Indian fare on all three criteria. Try it and see? Dave. -- David Richerby Miniature Atlas (TM): it's like a map www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ of the world but you can hold in it your hand!
|
|
Date: 10 Jan 2007 07:05:15
From: hicetnunc
Subject: Re: Which Indian defence is:
|
I'd say : 1 - less theoretical =3D Bogo-Indian (1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Bb4+), but it's tongue in cheek, as you need something against 3.Nc3 too :-) (you can play 3...d5 though) 2 - more positional =3D Bogo-Indian again - very few tactical shots 3 - playable against flank openings - clearly King's Indian Defence (1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7) offers maximum flexibility (white can't avoid it) [email protected] a =E9crit : > 1. Less theorotical? > 2. More positional? > 3. Playable against flank openings? >=20 > Thanks.
|
|