|
Main
Date: 02 Nov 2006 14:47:39
From: The Last Danish Pastry
Subject: Very simple puzzle with pretty diagram
|
+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+
|
|
|
Date: 02 Nov 2006 07:48:58
From:
Subject: Re: Very simple puzzle with pretty diagram
|
White pawns must have made at least 13 captures, right? But they couldn' t capture the missing black bishop at f8, which must have been taken by a different white piece. Since there are still three black pieces left... looks like it is impossible. am I wrong?
|
| |
Date: 02 Nov 2006 16:25:58
From: The Last Danish Pastry
Subject: Re: Very simple puzzle with pretty diagram
|
<[email protected] > wrote in message news:[email protected]... > White pawns must have made at least 13 captures, right? But they > couldn' t capture the missing black bishop at f8, which must have > been > taken by a different white piece. Since there are still three black > pieces left... looks like it is impossible. > > am I wrong? You are right :) -- Clive Tooth www.clivetooth.dk Stock photos: http://submit.shutterstock.com/?ref=61771
|
|
Date: 02 Nov 2006 07:19:55
From:
Subject: Re: Very simple puzzle with pretty diagram
|
The Last Danish Pastry wrote: > +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ >
|
| |
Date: 02 Nov 2006 16:40:01
From: Antonio Torrecillas
Subject: Re: Very simple puzzle with pretty diagram
|
En/na [email protected] ha escrit: > The Last Danish Pastry wrote: > >>+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ >>
|
| | |
Date: 06 Nov 2006 14:19:19
From: BH
Subject: Re: Very simple puzzle with pretty diagram
|
I must admit I don't get any of the below explanation...where are the 'f' pawns? Looks to me like it's a row of d pawns. And why must the promoted pawn have to have captured 4 pieces? The d7 pawn got there by capturing 3 pieces....but the 'd8' pawn (before promotion) could of got to d7 by capturing 3 pieces before the current d7 pawn got there, and then simply moved to d8 and promoted to a bishop... no need for 4 captures. Also, white can sacrifice his pieces so that the otherwise useless black A and H pawns move in two columns so that they can be captured by white pawns and thus become useful (else black will run out of pieces for white to capture). I tied very quickly using this scheme and it seems to me the position can be reached legally. "Antonio Torrecillas" <[email protected] > wrote in message news:[email protected]... > En/na [email protected] ha escrit: > > > The Last Danish Pastry wrote: > > > >>+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ > >>
|
| | | |
Date: 06 Nov 2006 09:26:13
From: The Last Danish Pastry
Subject: Re: Very simple puzzle with pretty diagram
|
"BH" <[email protected] > wrote in message news:[email protected]... >I must admit I don't get any of the below explanation...where are the >'f' > pawns? Looks to me like it's a row of d pawns. And why must the > promoted > pawn have to have captured 4 pieces? The d7 pawn got there by > capturing 3 > pieces....but the 'd8' pawn (before promotion) could of got to d7 by > capturing 3 pieces before the current d7 pawn got there, and then > simply > moved to d8 and promoted to a bishop... no need for 4 captures. > Also, white can sacrifice his pieces so that the otherwise useless > black A > and H pawns move in two columns so that they can be captured by > white pawns > and thus become useful (else black will run out of pieces for white > to > capture). I tied very quickly using this scheme and it seems to me > the > position can be reached legally. Top posting is *not* the usual method responding on Usenet. I am guessing that you are looking at the position using a variable-width font. Try looking it again using a fixed-width font, such as Courier. I would suggest that you make Courier your default font for reading Usenet. -- Clive Tooth www.clivetooth.dk Stock photos: http://submit.shutterstock.com/?ref=61771
|
| | | | |
Date: 06 Nov 2006 20:30:19
From: BH
Subject: Re: Very simple puzzle with pretty diagram
|
Well sorry, but I've always top posted (lets the reader see the reply without the need to scroll down a thousand pages of info they may not care about), and I've been doing it 1993, so not, if you don't like it , *you* change. "The Last Danish Pastry" <[email protected] > wrote in message news:[email protected]... > "BH" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... > > >I must admit I don't get any of the below explanation...where are the > >'f' > > pawns? Looks to me like it's a row of d pawns. And why must the > > promoted > > pawn have to have captured 4 pieces? The d7 pawn got there by > > capturing 3 > > pieces....but the 'd8' pawn (before promotion) could of got to d7 by > > capturing 3 pieces before the current d7 pawn got there, and then > > simply > > moved to d8 and promoted to a bishop... no need for 4 captures. > > Also, white can sacrifice his pieces so that the otherwise useless > > black A > > and H pawns move in two columns so that they can be captured by > > white pawns > > and thus become useful (else black will run out of pieces for white > > to > > capture). I tied very quickly using this scheme and it seems to me > > the > > position can be reached legally. > > Top posting is *not* the usual method responding on Usenet. > > I am guessing that you are looking at the position using a > variable-width font. Try looking it again using a fixed-width font, > such as Courier. I would suggest that you make Courier your default > font for reading Usenet. > > -- > Clive Tooth > www.clivetooth.dk > Stock photos: > http://submit.shutterstock.com/?ref=61771 > >
|
| | |
Date: 02 Nov 2006 16:32:22
From: The Last Danish Pastry
Subject: Re: Very simple puzzle with pretty diagram
|
"Antonio Torrecillas" <[email protected] > wrote in message news:[email protected]... > En/na [email protected] ha escrit: > >> The Last Danish Pastry wrote: >> >>>+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ >>>
|
| |
Date: 02 Nov 2006 16:36:54
From: Antonio Torrecillas
Subject: Re: Very simple puzzle with pretty diagram
|
En/na [email protected] ha escrit: > The Last Danish Pastry wrote: > >>+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ >>
|
|
Date: 02 Nov 2006 07:18:25
From:
Subject: Re: Very simple puzzle with pretty diagram
|
The Last Danish Pastry wrote: > +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ >
|
|