| |
Main
Date: 02 Aug 2008 19:08:23
From: Hakan
Subject: Sicilian against c3?
|
I like to play the Sicilian Kan variation when playing black. How do
you think that I should adjust it against c3 as white's second move?
Thanks in advance.
--
Newsoffice.de - Die Onlinesoftware zum Lesen und Schreiben im Usenet
Die Signatur l��t sich nach Belieben anpassen ;-)
|
|
| |
Date: 04 Aug 2008 10:03:18
From: SBD
Subject: Re: Sicilian against c3?
|
On Aug 2, 12:08 pm, Hakan <[email protected] > wrote:
> I like to play the Sicilian Kan variation when playing black. How do
> you think that I should adjust it against c3 as white's second move?
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --
> Newsoffice.de - Die Onlinesoftware zum Lesen und Schreiben im Usenet
> Die Signatur l=E4=DFt sich nach Belieben anpassen ;-)
By not playing the Kan.
|
| | |
Date: 25 Aug 2008 17:34:29
From: SBD
Subject: Re: Sicilian against c3?
|
On Aug 21, 9:30 am, Hakan <[email protected] > wrote:
> SBD wrote:
> > On Aug 7, 8:27 am, Hakan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Really? Why?
> > You really can't "adjust" a Kan to the c3 Sicilian. There isn't any
> > fit.
> > So maybe stupid question, obvious answer?
>
> The problem was that your answer didn't help. At least the explanation
> above or some advice as to what I should be playing would be
> constructive. That's why I called it that.
I understand, but just feeding someone "blanket" advice cannot be
helpful.
I mean, the obvious answer is to look in a book on the c3 Sicilian or
a website like chessgames.com and find a variation of the c3 Sicilian
that fits you, that you can work with. Even saying you are a "Kan
player" isn't enough, right? There are many possible ways to play the
Kan, and some fit you better than others? Then just keep fine-tuning
it.
|
| | |
Date: 09 Aug 2008 21:12:23
From: SBD
Subject: Re: Sicilian against c3?
|
On Aug 7, 8:27 am, Hakan <[email protected] > wrote:
> SBD wrote:
> > On Aug 2, 12:08 pm, Hakan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I like to play the Sicilian Kan variation when playing black. How do
> >> you think that I should adjust it against c3 as white's second move?
> >> Thanks in advance.
>
> >> --
> >> Newsoffice.de - Die Onlinesoftware zum Lesen und Schreiben im Usenet
> >> Die Signatur l=E4=DFt sich nach Belieben anpassen ;-)
> > By not playing the Kan.
>
> What an unusually stupid post.
Really? Why?
You really can't "adjust" a Kan to the c3 Sicilian. There isn't any
fit.
So maybe stupid question, obvious answer?
|
| | | |
Date: 21 Aug 2008 16:30:39
From: Hakan
Subject: Re: Sicilian against c3?
|
SBD wrote:
> On Aug 7, 8:27 am, Hakan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Really? Why?
> You really can't "adjust" a Kan to the c3 Sicilian. There isn't any
> fit.
> So maybe stupid question, obvious answer?
The problem was that your answer didn't help. At least the explanation
above or some advice as to what I should be playing would be
constructive. That's why I called it that.
--
Newsoffice.de - Die Onlinesoftware zum Lesen und Schreiben im Usenet
Die Signatur l��t sich nach Belieben anpassen ;-)
|
| | |
Date: 07 Aug 2008 15:27:31
From: Hakan
Subject: Re: Sicilian against c3?
|
SBD wrote:
> On Aug 2, 12:08 pm, Hakan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I like to play the Sicilian Kan variation when playing black. How do
>> you think that I should adjust it against c3 as white's second move?
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> --
>> Newsoffice.de - Die Onlinesoftware zum Lesen und Schreiben im Usenet
>> Die Signatur l��t sich nach Belieben anpassen ;-)
> By not playing the Kan.
What an unusually stupid post.
--
Newsoffice.de - Die Onlinesoftware zum Lesen und Schreiben im Usenet
Die Signatur l��t sich nach Belieben anpassen ;-)
|
|
