Retard Chess

Main

Date: 20 Mar 2007 11:31:41
From: Good Moves Aren't Worth BEANS!
Subject: Retard Chess

Anyone who thinks i'm making this up can easily do about 30 seconds of
"research" and verify. The person in question is a mentally retarded
36 year
old named: "Jason Lohner" who has a 1311 rating and has lost all of
his
tournament games, with the possible exception of one game where the
guy was
pounding him and hung a piece. The retard even admits to this himself.

I didn't go looking for a "bad game" of his. He's a 1311 rated retard
and
all of his games are bad. I did a search in the Canadian games archive
database and three of his games were in it. He lost all three. I just
posted
the first two that were there.

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/Retard_vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

JMR

Date: 25 Mar 2007 06:06:52
From:
Subject: Re: Help-Bitch = low testosterone + low IQ

Were you beaten and humiliated by your parents Help-Bitch? I'm trying
to understand how someone could develop into such a pathetic and lowly
little creature. You're afraid of everyone and everything. You clearly
have absolutely not a shred of a social life, nor do you have a
career. You spend an enormous amount of time, and energy, composing
your nonsensical posts. They are all riddled with lies,
disinformation, and are definitive evidence of your severely low level
of intelligence. Being a Usenet troll is your full time job. The
hilarious thing is you're not even a chess player, yet you're King of
the Trolls in a chess Usenet group!

JMR

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/Retard_vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

Date: 24 Mar 2007 21:20:46
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Help-Bitch = low testosterone + low IQ

On 23, 3:02 pm, "Inconnux" <[email protected] > wrote:

> > Sounds like how many people play your incredible shit chess game. What is
> > your website called? CrapClubChess?
>
> > So far not a single person has ever said anything good about your website,
> > and apparently the game still plays slower than a 1980s Tandy Computer.
>
> Hey I own a 1980's tandy chess computer and it plays much faster. It also
> doesn't spam the newsgroups!

Maybe so, but your Tandy computer probably eats
about 250 watts while using most of it to cool its
hugely-inefficient chips. Sanny's program is purely
software -- a work of art, not metal and technology.

Your crude machine will one day be outmoded,
requiring the hassle of recycling the junk hardware.
Sanny's program can simply be deleted with a few
simple keystrokes -- a universally recognized
advantage as attested even by Sanny's harshest
critics.

-- help bot

Date: 24 Mar 2007 19:22:21
From: Rob
Subject: Retard Repa sucks: g

> On 23, 2:03 pm, "Rob" <[email protected]> wrote:

> > I understand that "Skippy" Repa is so dumb he thinks "Homo Erectus"
> > refers to his "Bi Curious" dating habits!

> Skippy is quite good at bullet-chess. His eye-hand
> coordination has been honed to a fine edge despite
> frequently being drunk and off his prescribed meds.
> Indeed, despite a severe lack of mental and social
> development, Skip has become like the Rain Man
> character played by Dustin Hoffman -- very good at
> one simple task. It is interesting to note that despite
> his mental handicap, Skippy has an amazing ability
> to quickly shift wood with a computer mouse, often
> winning on time against players with twice his IQ!

> I don't know why everyone wants to pick on the poor
> boy. I mean, is it his fault that his development has
> been severely retarded? Is he responsible for being
> born a cretinous blob of frustrated ectoplasm and
> hair? Not that I wish to point a finger at his parents,
> but hey, where were they when the developmental
> phase was supposed to ensue? Where were they
> when Skippy was supposed to be learning to get
> along with other kids, or when he was supposed to
> be attending school? About the only thing they (if
> indeed he can be supposed to have had two parents
> and not just one) got right was in familiarizing the
> poor creature with computers and the mouse.

> Were it not for the renowned skill of the many
> doctors at the sanitarium, we might all have given
> up any hope of any improvement long ago. There
> is always hope... .

> -- coach bot

On 23, 12:58 pm, "Skippy Repa" <[email protected] > wrote:

Bi curious Jason Repa is a failure and a horrible chess player

Results from "Skippy's" Tournament.... a Classic? LOL

Jason Repa Classic

[ Home ] [ Crosstables ]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
=AD=AD-----

Tournament Director Jason Repa Finish Date 2004/3/28
Tournament # 200405008 Province MB

# Name Old Perf New High
Results Tot
1
Cleto, Sam 1888 2074 1933 1992 X X 1 =3D 0 =3D 1 1
4=2E0

2
Zaczek, Jonathon 1876 2011 1918 1918 0 =3D X X 1 =3D 1 =3D 3.5

3
Van Wyk, Joseph 1954 1852 1928 1954 1 =3D 0 =3D X X 0 =3D 2.5

4
Repa, Jason 1992 1773 1 938 1992 0 0 0 =3D 1 =3D X X=
=3D
2=2E0

Notice how he tried to "stack" his tournament with weaker rated
players at the start of the Jason Repa Classic? He finished dead
last
in a tournament he attempted to stack in his favor.

LOL What a joke!

Rob

Most interesting is the fact that he only made Expert because the
CFC
added one point per game to each player's rating under 2200 active
from 2004-2006 - else he would still be a lowly A player. According
to
the CFC, some players gained as many as 200 points from this rather
dubious sounding adjustment.

I understand that "Skippy" Repa is so dumb he thinks "Homo Erectus"
refers to his "Bi Curious" dating habits

Repa has achieved a new title. He is a "MASTER-BAITER"

LOL

I don't think he will figure that out.

If you want to hear what an ape in bi curious ape in heat sounds
like... listen to this clip of Skippy trying to sing!

http://members.shaw.ca/jasonspics/tl.mp3

Date: 24 Mar 2007 15:46:08
From: Good Moves Are Worth BEANS!!
Subject: Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Inbread Small Town Hick = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess rating

There is a reason you're a 1400 chess player Rob Mitchell, aka
Help-Bitch aka No More Chess, aka SBD. There is also a reason you
don't sign
your posts with your real name,
but instead hide behind a potpourri of aliases like the snivelling,
frightened little cowardly eunuch you are. The beauty of this
situation is that I fight with 100% facts and truth, and everyone with
a brain reading this knows it....and you fight with 100% lies and
nonsense. Also, it doesn't take a shrink to see that this idiot is
talking about himself with his chronic mention of being "bi-curious".
One would expect someone who's too cowardly to post under his real
name is in all likelyhood a homo, so it's not surprising.

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/Retard_vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

Date: 24 Mar 2007 14:59:42
From: Rob
Subject: Repa's Retard Chess

On 23, 12:58 pm, "Skippy Repa" <[email protected] > wrote:

Bi curious Jason Repa is a failure and a horrible chess player

Results from "Skippy's" Tournament.... a Classic? LOL

Jason Repa Classic

[ Home ] [ Crosstables ]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
=AD=AD-----

Tournament Director Jason Repa Finish Date 2004/3/28
Tournament # 200405008 Province MB

# Name Old Perf New High
Results Tot
1
Cleto, Sam 1888 2074 1933 1992 X X 1 =3D 0 =3D 1 1
4=2E0

2
Zaczek, Jonathon 1876 2011 1918 1918 0 =3D X X 1 =3D 1 =3D 3.5

3
Van Wyk, Joseph 1954 1852 1928 1954 1 =3D 0 =3D X X 0 =3D 2.5

4
Repa, Jason 1992 1773 1 938 1992 0 0 0 =3D 1 =3D X X=
=3D
2=2E0

Notice how he tried to "stack" his tournament with weaker rated
players at the start of the Jason Repa Classic? He finished dead
last
in a tournament he attempted to stack in his favor.

LOL What a joke!

Rob

Most interesting is the fact that he only made Expert because the
CFC
added one point per game to each player's rating under 2200 active
from 2004-2006 - else he would still be a lowly A player. According
to
the CFC, some players gained as many as 200 points from this rather
dubious sounding adjustment.

I understand that "Skippy" Repa is so dumb he thinks "Homo Erectus"
refers to his "Bi Curious" dating habits

Repa has achieved a new title. He is a "MASTER-BAITER"

LOL

I don't think he will figure that out.

If you want to hear what an ape in bi curious ape in heat sounds
like... listen to this clip of Skippy trying to sing!

http://members.shaw.ca/jasonspics/tl.mp3

Date: 24 Mar 2007 07:15:10
From: Good Moves Are Worth BEANS!!
Subject: Notice this obvious case of projection with the fruitcake's non-stop reference to "Bi-Sexual"?

I think the fact that I stand my ground and sign my posts with my real
name, and you cowardly hide behind various aliases, makes it pretty
clear who the fruitcake here is.

There is a reason you're a 1400 chess player Rob Mitchell, aka
Help-Bitch aka No More Chess, aka SBD. There is also a reason you
don't sign
your posts with your real name,
but instead hide behind a potpourri of aliases like the snivelling,
frightened little cowardly eunuch you are. The beauty of this
situation is that I fight with 100% facts and truth, and everyone with
a brain reading this knows it....and you fight with 100% lies and
nonsense. Also, it doesn't take a shrink to see that this idiot is
talking about himself with his chronic mention of being "bi-curious".
One would expect someone who's too cowardly to post under his real
name is in all likelyhood a homo, so it's not surprising.

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/Retard_vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

Date: 24 Mar 2007 05:24:04
From: Rob
Subject: Skippy Repas Bi Curious mating call

f you want to hear what an ape in bi curious ape in heat sounds
like... listen to this clip of Skippy trying to sing!

http://members.shaw.ca/jasonspics/tl.mp3

Date: 24 Mar 2007 01:56:06
From: Good Moves Are worth BEANS!!
Subject: Re: Help-Bitch = low testosterone + low IQ

There is a reason you're a 1400 chess player Rob Mitchell, aka
Help-Bitch aka No More Chess, aka SBD aka other aliases. There is also
a reason you
don't sign
your posts with your real name,
but instead hide behind a potpourri of aliases like the snivelling,
frightened little cowardly eunuch you are. The beauty of this
situation is that I fight with 100% facts and truth, and everyone with
a brain reading this knows it....and you fight with 100% lies and
nonsense. Also, it doesn't take a shrink to see that this idiot is
talking about himself with his chronic mention of being "bi-curious".
One would expect someone who's too cowardly to post under his real
name is in all likelyhood a homo, so it's not surprising.

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/Retard_vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

JMR

Date: 23 Mar 2007 22:04:35
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Help-Bitch = low testosterone + low IQ

On 23, 3:40 pm, "Sanny Squares" <[email protected] > wrote:
> "Sanny" <> only 1 member Ha Ha Ha. No need to join such a group.
>
> Sounds like how many people play your incredible shit chess game. What is
> your website called? CrapClubChess?
>
> So far not a single person has ever said anything good about your website,
> and apparently the game still plays slower than a 1980s Tandy Computer.

My imbecile student, Skippy Repa, has erred
once again ("surprise!"). I wrote many moons
ago that the chess board graphics at GetClub
were very nice. In fact, they were so good that
I wondered whether they had been "lifted" from
some commercial product.

Now, since that time I have done a few tweaks
to my computer's settings, such as enlarging
the type of certain emails so the small font is
easier to read. And perhaps this would explain
why now the graphics do not appear quite as
pleasant as before -- I don't know. But I do know
that one of the alternative sites pointed to by a
harsh critic had awful graphics, which I believe
gives the computer program an unfair edge; you
see, the computer "sees", if you will, with
absolutely PERFECT, "20/20 vision". So it
seems quite unfair to me to force humans to
play on an ugly or hard-to-see graphic board.

A few of the chess programs that I have seen
over the years which had pleasant graphics,
relative to other programs, are: Genius, Mchess,
NowChess and Fritz. I never much liked
Chessmaster, despite its wide choice of boards
and pieces.

-- coach bot

Date: 23 Mar 2007 13:10:24
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Retard Chess/ Skippy Repa Sings!

On 21, 1:01 am, "Good Moves are worth BEANS!"
<[email protected] > wrote:
> This sounds like a posting from the known RGCM homosexual and troll Matt
> Nemmers. He's a frustrated faggot who's pissed at me for posting about the
> fact that he shoves chess pieces up his arse.
>
> JMR

If you want to hear what an ape in bi curious ape in heat sounds
like... listen to this clip of Skippy trying to sing!

http://members.shaw.ca/jasonspics/tl.mp3

Date: 23 Mar 2007 05:40:17
From: Sanny
Subject: Re: Help-Bitch = low testosterone + low IQ

On 22, 11:21 pm, "Sanny Squares" <[email protected] > wrote:
> http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/Chess_Forum_Uncensored/
>
only 1 member Ha Ha Ha. No need to join such a group.

Bye
Sanny

Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html

Date: 23 Mar 2007 14:40:46
From: Sanny Squares
Subject: Re: Help-Bitch = low testosterone + low IQ

"Sanny" < > only 1 member Ha Ha Ha. No need to join such a group.
>
>
Sounds like how many people play your incredible shit chess game. What is
your website called? CrapClubChess?

So far not a single person has ever said anything good about your website,
and apparently the game still plays slower than a 1980s Tandy Computer.

Date: 23 Mar 2007 19:02:56
From: Inconnux
Subject: Re: Help-Bitch = low testosterone + low IQ

> Sounds like how many people play your incredible shit chess game. What is
> your website called? CrapClubChess?
>
> So far not a single person has ever said anything good about your website,
> and apparently the game still plays slower than a 1980s Tandy Computer.
>
>
Hey I own a 1980's tandy chess computer and it plays much faster. It also
doesn't spam the newsgroups!

:)
J.Lohner

Date: 24 Mar 2007 08:35:46
From: Good Moves are worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Help-Bitch = low testosterone + low IQ

"Inconnux" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:AvVMh.5273$x9.1672@edtnps89...
> Hey I own a 1980's tandy chess computer and it plays much faster. It also
> doesn't spam the newsgroups!

No, you just go out of your way to pick fights and start flame wars with
people you don't know. But could we expect any more intelligence from a 1311
rated imbecile?

JMR

Date: 22 Mar 2007 09:22:48
From: Good Moves Are Worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Help-Bitch = low testosterone + low IQ

Help-Bitch is a usenet troll, a snivelling coward who hides behind
various aliases, and complete imbecile who isn't even a
chess player. His big claim to fame is his moderate success at
computer-assisted corr. games on RedHotPawn where he just does what
his
fritz tells him to.

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/Retard_vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

JMR

Date: 22 Mar 2007 13:21:26
From: Sanny Squares
Subject: Re: Help-Bitch = low testosterone + low IQ

http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/Chess_Forum_Uncensored/

Join the real Chess Forum, where the USCF cannot engage in censorship, and
where trolls like Good Moves and Judgmental cannot participate!

Get out of the troll-infested usenet, and join the Chess Forums Uncensored!

You can finally engage in some real discussions without fear of trolls,
spammers, or the USCF!!

Date: 22 Mar 2007 09:18:38
From: Good Moves Are Worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

Date: 21 Mar 2007 22:20:09
From: Good Moves Are Worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

Help-Bitch is another usenet troll and complete imbecile who isn't
even a
chess player. His big claim to fame is his moderate success at
computer-assisted corr. games on RedHotPawn where he just does what
his
fritz tells him to.

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/Retard_vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

JMR

Date: 21 Mar 2007 17:42:11
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Help-Bitch = low testosterone + low IQ

On 21, 9:25 am, "Good Moves are worth BEANS!"
<[email protected] > wrote:

> > you seem to have overlooked one
> > small thing: unlike Fritz, I have *lost* at RedHot.
>
> I haven't overlooked anything you worthless cretin idiot. As usual, you show
> your extremely low IQ by making the kind of assumptions a 6 year old child
> would make. You assume that because a correspondence chess cheater like
> yourself doesn't ALWAYS use program assistance for EVERY SINGLE move of
> EVERY SINGLE game, therefore you must NEVER use a program for ANY move of
> ANY game.

You seem to have overlooked one small thing,
Skippy: cheating by using a computer program
to "check for blunders" (as it is so often described
by those who admit their crime) is quite addictive.
Why take risks when you can "check for blunders"
on every move, of every game? It makes no sense.

What amazes me is how naive these youngsters
are today; how they think they know everything,
when in fact much of what they ought to know has
been posted right here in rgc!

Obviously, anyone with even *half* a brain would
not claim to know that I am cheating without
first having looked over my games, to see if it
was even a possibility. LOL!

-- coach bot

Date: 22 Mar 2007 05:14:46
From: Good Moves are worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Help-Bitch = low testosterone + low IQ

I haven't overlooked anything you worthless cretin idiot. As usual, you show
your extremely low IQ by making the kind of assumptions a 6 year old child
would make. You assume that because a correspondence chess cheater like
yourself doesn't ALWAYS use program assistance for EVERY SINGLE move of
EVERY SINGLE game, therefore you must NEVER use a program for ANY move of
ANY game. Only a complete imbecile would think this way but there's no
surprise there. We all already knew you were a complete imbecile.

Most program cheater punks like you try to make a few moves on your own. If
you run into trouble, playing someone higher rated, etc, you turn the
program on.

JMR

Date: 22 Mar 2007 16:15:02
From: Bark!
Subject: Re: Help-Bitch = low testosterone + low IQ

"Good Moves are worth BEANS!" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:ahoMh.49588$zU1.41468@pd7urf1no...
>I haven't overlooked anything you worthless cretin idiot. As usual, you
>show
> your extremely low IQ by making the kind of assumptions a 6 year old child
> would make. You assume that because a correspondence chess cheater like
> yourself doesn't ALWAYS use program assistance for EVERY SINGLE move of
> EVERY SINGLE game, therefore you must NEVER use a program for ANY move of
> ANY game. Only a complete imbecile would think this way but there's no
> surprise there. We all already knew you were a complete imbecile.
>
> Most program cheater punks like you try to make a few moves on your own.
> If
> you run into trouble, playing someone higher rated, etc, you turn the
> program on.
>
> JMR
>

It seems you know a lot about cretins, imbecils, morons, retards....
Considering your inner anger I doubt you are a psychologist. Flame down...

Date: 22 Mar 2007 11:36:19
From: Sanny Squares
Subject: Re: Help-Bitch = low testosterone + low IQ

Date: 22 Mar 2007 18:05:19
From: Inconnux
Subject: Re: Help-Bitch = low testosterone + low IQ

"Sanny Squares" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/Chess_Forum_Uncensored/
>
> Join the real Chess Forum, where the USCF cannot engage in censorship, and
> where trolls like Good Moves and Judgmental cannot participate!
>
> Get out of the troll-infested usenet, and join the Chess Forums
> Uncensored!
>
> You can finally engage in some real discussions without fear of trolls,
> spammers, or the USCF!!
>
>
sanny spam?

Date: 21 Mar 2007 17:36:54
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

On 21, 8:52 am, "Heywood Jablowme" <[email protected] > wrote:

> "Inconnux" <> Mr Repa is actually a pretty good chess player, but he holds
> anyone below his rating with contempt. He seems to equate his rating with
> his self worth.

> Mr. Repo apparently dislikes you intensely, and for a chess player, that
> usually means that he harbors an intense homosexual attraction to you. You
> can figure out how queer he is for you by inverting the amount of hatred
> that he spews towards you.
>
> Based on what I have read of his postings regarding you; I think it is fair
> to say that he probably masturbates several times every day fantasizing
> about you, and slides the broomstick up his arse pretending it is you.
>
> Sadly, there is no known cure for chessqueeria, which is the mental illness
> peculiar to gay chess players who are obsessed with men they think they
> hate.

For the record, I would be willing to give up my
lucrative claim to exclusive rights of coaching the
pathetic imbecile, Jason Repa, if for example he
were to visit the Mayo Clinic. Money isn't
everything, after all, and if it is for the good of
mankind, I will step aside, bite the bullet, etc.

-- coach bot

Date: 21 Mar 2007 12:07:28
From: chasmad
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

On 20, 1:31 pm, "Good Moves Aren't Worth BEANS!"
<[email protected] > wrote:
> Anyone who thinks i'm making this up can easily do about 30secondsof
> "research" and verify.

Make that 35 seconds and I'm there, Jammer.

Charles

Date: 21 Mar 2007 02:36:14
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

On 21, 4:30 am, "Good Moves are worth BEANS!"
<[email protected] > wrote:

> What the moron doesn't know, is that I stopped reading what he posts a long
> time ago, lol.

So you keep telling us; but then you prove the
lie by attempting to refute this or that point I have
made. It's really quite embarrassing for me, as
your coach, Skippy. Imagine how people will
react when they see that I am making no progress
whatever with my second-favorite student. (They
might reasonably conclude that I am a poor coach.)
: >(

-- coach bot

Date: 21 Mar 2007 13:30:17
From: Good Moves are worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

Help-Bitch is a low IQ, low testosterone loser and usenet troll who is
afraid of everything, including his own shadow. That's why he feels the need
to cowardly hide behind an alias. He's not even a chess player. His big
claim to fame is his moderate success at
computer-assisted corr. games on RedHotPawn where he just does what his
fritz tells him to.

What the moron doesn't know, is that I stopped reading what he posts a long
time ago, lol. I love the fact that this worthless imbecile continues to
make a complete jackass out of himself with the long-winded drivel that
spews from his keyboard.

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/Retard_vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

JMR

Date: 21 Mar 2007 02:27:07
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Retard-Repa Chess

On 21, 2:03 am, "Good Moves are worth BEANS!"
<[email protected] > wrote:
> Help-Bitch is another usenet troll and complete imbecile who isn't even a
> chess player. His big claim to fame is his moderate success at
> computer-assisted corr. games on RedHotPawn where he just does what his
> fritz tells him to.

Um, Skippy -- you seem to have overlooked one
small thing: unlike Fritz, I have *lost* at RedHot.

Really, I think this is quite nearly impossible to
do if one utilizes the killer program Fritz, because
its moves are really, really strong. In fact, I have
my suspicions that the game in question may
very well show that my opponent was getting
some help, since his rating was not particularly
high and yet he found some computer-style shots
one after another. At any rate, my moves can
simply be checked against any of the better
programs for verification of distinctly human origin.

Oh, and one more thing, Skippy: you once again
contradicted yourself in an obvious manner by at
the same time making two conflicting claims.
One was that I do not play chess, and of course
the other was that I do play, at RedHotPawn. If
you persist in making these "simpletonesque"
blunders I will be forced to give you one demerit
and seat you in the corner, wearing your well-worn
dunce cap, right alongside your pal, IM Innes.

-- coach bot

Date: 21 Mar 2007 13:25:05
From: Good Moves are worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Help-Bitch = low testosterone + low IQ

"help bot" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 21, 2:03 am, "Good Moves are worth BEANS!"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Help-Bitch is another usenet troll and complete imbecile who isn't even a
>> chess player. His big claim to fame is his moderate success at
>> computer-assisted corr. games on RedHotPawn where he just does what his
>> fritz tells him to.
>
> you seem to have overlooked one
> small thing: unlike Fritz, I have *lost* at RedHot.

I haven't overlooked anything you worthless cretin idiot. As usual, you show
your extremely low IQ by making the kind of assumptions a 6 year old child
would make. You assume that because a correspondence chess cheater like
yourself doesn't ALWAYS use program assistance for EVERY SINGLE move of
EVERY SINGLE game, therefore you must NEVER use a program for ANY move of
ANY game. Only a complete imbecile would think this way but there's no
surprise there. We all already knew you were a complete imbecile.

Most program cheater punks like you try to make a few moves on your own. If
you run into trouble, playing someone higher rated, etc, you turn the
program on.

Date: 21 Mar 2007 00:41:52
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

On 21, 2:01 am, "Good Moves are worth BEANS!"
<[email protected] > wrote:
> This sounds like a posting from the known RGCM homosexual and troll Matt
> Nemmers. He's a frustrated faggot who's pissed at me for posting about the
> fact that he shoves chess pieces up his arse.

Um, Skippy -- I thought I advised you not to
mention this, on account of embarrassing
questions regarding how you might happen
to have knowledge of such things as who puts
what, where. It is *self-incriminating*.

You're not paying any attention to my helpful
advice at all. If you don't start paying attention
in class, I may have to tell the men in white
coats that I'm through, and turn you over to their
shrinks. You know how they are -- always asking
annoying questions about how you feel toward
your dear mother and so forth... .

-- coach bot

Date: 21 Mar 2007 08:28:14
From: Good Moves are worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

Help-Bitch isn't very bright and needs things to be repeated a few times
before he can understand.

This sounds like a posting from the known RGCM homosexual and troll Matt
Nemmers. He's a frustrated faggot who's pissed at me for posting about the
fact that he shoves chess pieces up his arse.

JMR

Date: 21 Mar 2007 00:35:19
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

On 21, 1:49 am, "Good Moves are worth BEANS!"
<[email protected] > wrote:

> > but I must make a few observations.
> > First, quotation ks are used in this context to qualify the word
> > enclosed. Therefore, "research" isn't really research at all but some
> > other process.
>
> Not "some other process" (quotes were used that time to indicate what your
> verbatim statement was) but an indication that it is not really research to
> simply click on a link or go to a single website. Just as it isn't really
> physical exercise to get up and grab a beer from the fridge. You need to
> understand that quotes are used for more than thing. I believe these
> concepts are taught at the elementary school level.

Here I believe that Skippy must be regarded as an
*expert*, especially when it comes to what is currently
taught in his school -- and on the subject of beer.

> > Third, if the individual in question is actually mentally retarded and is
> > not suffering merely from your contempt, then I can't see how a 1311
> > rating is poor. I myself have an IQ of 130
>
> You don't have an IQ of 130 buddy. I can tell you that for a fact. Your
> gross assumptions

Uh, you can tell us for a "fact" what you assume?

> and logic errors in this post of yours is evidence enough.
> The fact that you're completely missing the meaning of what was said, but
> instead focus on peripherals such as grammatical rules/spelling/etc is more
> evidence of a low IQ and clerk mentality.

Low IQ and "clerk mentality" are two different
things, Skip. In fact, a person of fairly high IQ
might well make an excellent clerk, as perhaps
did Albert Einstein in the patent office.

> The fact that you're a 1224 chess
> player is further proof. Although there is definitely no one-to-one
> correlation between chess elo and intelligence, it is clear that someone who
> plays tournaments and gets a rating that low has a very modest level of
> intelligence. You don't even have to know anything about chess to get to
> 1600.

Hmm. Things are awfully easy up in Winterpeg.

Down here in the USA one needs to know a little
bit about chess to get to 1600, because it is
above the average rating. So you need to know
enough to beat the untalented who have spent a
good number of years studying the game.

> Simple calculation and not leaving material hanging will achieve this.

For a computer it will. But humans are, well,
fallible. What is hard is seeing all the tactics
at every turn.

> If you're rated 1224 it's because you're unable to calculate simple 2 or 3
> move combinations and approach the problem-solving

This may be correct. I expect that I could now
achieve a decent rating by emulating a dumb
computer which sees only tactics, but then, I
can only do this because I am a chess genius.

> You probably got this number from some online site (tickle test?) that is
> trying to make you feel good about yourself so they can sell you something.
> I know some really dumb people that scored over 130 on that test.

One of the ads which try to lead people to that
test shows a column of critters and asks: which
one does *not* belong to the group? Of course,
the supposed rote answer is the spider, because
it has more legs than the others (which all, I believe,
have exactly six, making them "insects"). And yet
a wiser man might get this wrong, seeing that the
particular number of limbs is of *far less importance*
than a certain other aspect. I am speaking of ants,
and if you can figure out what I mean, you may have
some hope yet. I fully expect the test creators
were well pleased with themselves on constructing
this question, and yet it is indicative of their general
lack of high intelligence, in my view.

As to Tickle, I found their test to contain what
I consider to be several flaws. For one thing, there
were "trick" answers, which I deemed inappropriate
for this sort of test. For another, a few of the
questions had no inarguably correct answer, so
they should have been tossed out as a matter of
course. To me, this sort of thing demonstrates
laziness (or perhaps an evil desire to trip test-
takers up by purely artificial means) or else
incompetence. What is disturbing is that they
claim to have snatched many of their questions
from Mensa, and if this is so one can only gasp
in awe.

> The questions are all extremely simple.

Not true. however, the test does include
questions for which the answer is a bit obvious.
This is so that even numskulls like Skippy will
not finish up with a score of zero (+ correct
guesses).

> On a serious intelligence test the
> questions start out simple but get much, much harder. A serious intelligence
> test is also timed and has alot more questions.

This is correct. The lack of any time limit
means that those who put in more effort will
score better than those who take the test
lightly. It's another serious flaw. When I took
the test, I was exceedingly tired but
nevertheless put in considerable time in an
effort to get everything correct. Afterward I
found that several of my mistakes were
"obvious" ones, just as in my chess games.
The thing is to stand back and ask oneself:
are they trying to trip me up here, or is the
apparently correct answer correct? Again,
the trick questions came unexpected to me,
while veteran IQ test takers would have had
no problem in seeing them for what they are.

In chess, I always expect tricks and traps,
for it is a competitive game. Bit in this sort
of test, I expected honesty, integrity, and
a genuine attempt to test my knowledge
(if not my actual intelligence).

-- help bot

Date: 21 Mar 2007 08:30:08
From: Good Moves are worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

Help-Bitch is another usenet troll and complete imbecile who isn't even a
chess player. His big claim to fame is his moderate success at
computer-assisted corr. games on RedHotPawn where he just does what his
fritz tells him to.

What the moron doesn't know, is that I stopped reading what he posts a long
time ago, lol. I love the fact that this worthless imbecile continues to
make a complete jackass out of himself with the long-winded drivel that
spews from his keyboard.

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/Retard_vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

JMR

Date: 20 Mar 2007 16:47:32
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

On 20, 6:52 pm, "Heywood Jablowme" <[email protected] > wrote:

> "Michael Steen" <> Third, if the individual in question is actually mentally
> retarded and is not suffering merely from your contempt, then I can't see
> how a 1311 rating
>
> > is poor. >
>
> You are dealing with a usenet troll who is probably sliding a broomstick up
> his ass while he posts these messages about someone who probably beat him in
> a tournament. Jason Lohner supposedly has only one chess win, and it was
> probably over the guy who keeps posting the messages.

Another point is that *I* recruited the troll first; he
is my student by all rights, and I resent this attempt
to muscle-in on my lucrative(??!) position as tutor to
the broom-stick boy known variously as Skippy or
Jason Repa. Frankly, I'm not sure if you -- or anyone
for that matter -- has the patience and time to deal
with his kind. No, this is the sort of work which is
tailor made for help bots (and trained psychiatrists).

-- coach bot

Date: 21 Mar 2007 06:03:59
From: Good Moves are worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

Help-Bitch is another usenet troll and complete imbecile who isn't even a
chess player. His big claim to fame is his moderate success at
computer-assisted corr. games on RedHotPawn where he just does what his
fritz tells him to.

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/Retard_vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

JMR

Date: 20 Mar 2007 17:43:58
From: Michael Steen
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

"Good Moves Aren't Worth BEANS!" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Anyone who thinks i'm making this up can easily do about 30 seconds of
> "research" and verify. The person in question is a mentally retarded
> 36 year
> old named: "Jason Lohner" who has a 1311 rating and has lost all of
> his
> tournament games, with the possible exception of one game where the
> guy was
> pounding him and hung a piece. The retard even admits to this himself.
>
> I didn't go looking for a "bad game" of his. He's a 1311 rated retard
> and
> all of his games are bad. I did a search in the Canadian games archive
> database and three of his games were in it. He lost all three. I just
> posted
> the first two that were there.

I will admit that I've come late to this thread and have no idea why you
seem to have it in for this person, but I must make a few observations.
First, quotation ks are used in this context to qualify the word
enclosed. Therefore, "research" isn't really research at all but some other
process. And "Jason Lohner" must clearly be a pseudonym. If his name really
is Jason Lohner, no quotes are necessary.
Second, the term "mentally retarded" (quotes here used properly to call
attention to the term AS a term) is an acceptable description of a person
with reduced mental abilities in one or more cognitive areas and is even
used by caring professionals in the field. The term "retard," however, is
offensive in all contexts. It should not be used by any person who cares to
be taken seriously.
Third, if the individual in question is actually mentally retarded and is
not suffering merely from your contempt, then I can't see how a 1311 rating
is poor. I myself have an IQ of 130 (well out of the retarded range), but I
"boast" (quotes used here to call qualify the term enclosed) of a mere 1224
rating. I'd be pretty happy to see it go to 1311.
BTW, I can't help but wonder: If this individual has lost ALL of his
tournament games, how does he have a rating AT ALL? And how did it get to be
1311? Did he somehow start out at 2000 and steadily plummet to this point?
It doesn't make any logical sense.

Date: 21 Mar 2007 05:49:07
From: Good Moves are worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

"Michael Steen" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I will admit that I've come late to this thread and have no idea why you
> seem to have it in for this person

You're right. You have no idea what you're talking about, but that doesn't
seem to prevent you from giving your unqualified opinion of what you "think"
(notice the quotes? They're being used to denote the fact that you really
aren't thinking) is going on.

> but I must make a few observations.
> First, quotation ks are used in this context to qualify the word
> enclosed. Therefore, "research" isn't really research at all but some
> other process.

Not "some other process" (quotes were used that time to indicate what your
verbatim statement was) but an indication that it is not really research to
simply click on a link or go to a single website. Just as it isn't really
physical exercise to get up and grab a beer from the fridge. You need to
understand that quotes are used for more than thing. I believe these
concepts are taught at the elementary school level.

> Second, the term "mentally retarded" (quotes here used properly to call
> attention to the term AS a term)

I didn't use quotes for "mentally retarded", nor are they necessary. Nor
would I use quotes if I referred to the person as HOMELESS or ECONOMICALLY
CHALLENGED. You're completely in error here. Go back and finish your junior
high and perhaps you'll understand.

> Third, if the individual in question is actually mentally retarded and is
> not suffering merely from your contempt, then I can't see how a 1311
> rating is poor. I myself have an IQ of 130

You don't have an IQ of 130 buddy. I can tell you that for a fact. Your
gross assumptions and logic errors in this post of yours is evidence enough.
The fact that you're completely missing the meaning of what was said, but
instead focus on peripherals such as grammatical rules/spelling/etc is more
evidence of a low IQ and clerk mentality. The fact that you're a 1224 chess
player is further proof. Although there is definitely no one-to-one
correlation between chess elo and intelligence, it is clear that someone who
plays tournaments and gets a rating that low has a very modest level of
intelligence. You don't even have to know anything about chess to get to
1600. Simple calculation and not leaving material hanging will achieve this.
If you're rated 1224 it's because you're unable to calculate simple 2 or 3
move combinations and approach the problem-solving

You probably got this number from some online site (tickle test?) that is
trying to make you feel good about yourself so they can sell you something.
I know some really dumb people that scored over 130 on that test. The
questions are all extremely simple. On a serious intelligence test the
questions start out simple but get much, much harder. A serious intelligence
test is also timed and has alot more questions.

I can see why you're shoving your nose into this thread though. Retards do
tend to stick together.

JMR

Date: 20 Mar 2007 23:42:22
From: Inconnux
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

> I will admit that I've come late to this thread and have no idea why you
> seem to have it in for this person

I called the city he lives in 'winterpeg' he seems a little touchy about it.

> And "Jason Lohner" must clearly be a pseudonym. If his name really is
> Jason Lohner, no quotes are necessary.

It is my real name :)

> The term "retard," however, is offensive in all contexts. It should not be
> used by any person who cares to be taken seriously.

Nobody takes his posts seriously, I suggest you filter his comments out.

> is poor. I myself have an IQ of 130 (well out of the retarded range), but
> I "boast" (quotes used here to call qualify the term enclosed) of a mere
> 1224 rating. I'd be pretty happy to see it go to 1311.

Mr Repa is actually a pretty good chess player, but he holds anyone below
his rating with contempt. He seems to equate his rating with his self
worth.

> BTW, I can't help but wonder: If this individual has lost ALL of his
> tournament games, how does he have a rating AT ALL? And how did it get to
> be 1311? Did he somehow start out at 2000 and steadily plummet to this
> point? It doesn't make any logical sense.

He loves to post games from my first tournament. I was unrated going into
the tournament and came out with only one draw (against a 1600 rated
player).
I started playing chess against chessmaster 10k a couple of years ago, I
haven't
played OTB chess until Last september. I currently play on chessworld.net
under "Inconnux".

My second tournament I only won one game. In the third tournament I won two
games, and in my last tournament I won one and drew one although I did beat
a
class A player.

J.Lohner

Date: 21 Mar 2007 07:52:54
From: Heywood Jablowme
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

"Inconnux" < > Mr Repa is actually a pretty good chess player, but he holds
anyone below his rating with contempt. He seems to equate his rating with
his self
> worth.>

Mr. Repo apparently dislikes you intensely, and for a chess player, that
usually means that he harbors an intense homosexual attraction to you. You
can figure out how queer he is for you by inverting the amount of hatred
that he spews towards you.

Based on what I have read of his postings regarding you; I think it is fair
to say that he probably masturbates several times every day fantasizing
about you, and slides the broomstick up his arse pretending it is you.

Sadly, there is no known cure for chessqueeria, which is the mental illness
peculiar to gay chess players who are obsessed with men they think they
hate.

Date: 21 Mar 2007 13:27:16
From: Good Moves are worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

So far you've made 2 posts "Heywood" and both have contained alot of ranting
about homosexuality. That, and the fact that you hide behind an alias like a
typical frightened little fruitcake would make it 100% clear that you're
gay.

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/Retard_vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

JMR

Date: 22 Mar 2007 06:58:07
From: Heywood Jablowme
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

"Good Moves > So far you've made 2 posts "Heywood" and both have contained
alot of ranting about homosexuality. That, and the fact that you hide behind
an alias like a
> typical frightened little fruitcake would make it 100% clear that you're
> gay.
>

Most male aggression is prompted by insecurity. Insecurity is usually caused
by A) Small Dick Syndrome (is your pee-pee smaller than five inches?) and/or
B) Queer Fear (does your heart skip a beat when you see a handsome,
well-built man? Are you fingering your butthole when you jack-off?)

So which one is it for you? Is your dick really small, or are you just gay;
or both?? Everyone knows your problem, you might as well cum clean.

Date: 22 Mar 2007 16:21:08
From: Bark!
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

"Heywood Jablowme" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Good Moves > So far you've made 2 posts "Heywood" and both have contained
> alot of ranting about homosexuality. That, and the fact that you hide
> behind
> an alias like a
>> typical frightened little fruitcake would make it 100% clear that you're
>> gay.
>>
>
> Most male aggression is prompted by insecurity. Insecurity is usually
> caused
> by A) Small Dick Syndrome (is your pee-pee smaller than five inches?)
> and/or
> B) Queer Fear (does your heart skip a beat when you see a handsome,
> well-built man? Are you fingering your butthole when you jack-off?)

WAIT A MINUTE!!! Fingering your butthole while jerking doesn't mean
anything! LOL

Date: 22 Mar 2007 11:35:38
From: Sanny Squares
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

Date: 22 Mar 2007 12:15:21
From: Good Moves are worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

Date: 21 Mar 2007 06:12:38
From: Good Moves are worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

"Inconnux" <[email protected] > wrote in message
news:yj_Lh.67652$lY6.40015@edtnps90...
> He loves to post games from my first tournament.

Actually, as I started earlier, you've lost pretty much ALL of the chess
games you've ever played. You keep telling us about this game where you beat
some 1700 player who was kicking your ass and hung a piece. But I think
that's your only "victory".

I'm assuming that even a 1311 rated inbred hick from a small town like you
can figure out how to find the Canadian Chess Game archive. It has three of
your games and you lost all three of them, including where you lost to
someone even LOWER rated than yourself. 1311 is your rating NOW. After your
first tournament you were 1200 and change, so don't give us this bullshit
about how you've "improved". You're an idiot in all areas of thinking, not
just in chess. You've proven this time and time again.

Also, as was told to you several times now, but you've refused to
acknowledge, is the fact that I didn't even know your worthless ass from a
stray packet in a voip line untill you made the rather stupid decision to
start flaming and harassing me in a thread that had nothing to do with you.
An extremely dumb guy such as yourself, who's a wide open target, should
have known better than to pick a fight with someone who's superior to you in
every way imaginable.

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/Retard_vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

JMR

Date: 20 Mar 2007 17:52:30
From: Heywood Jablowme
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

"Michael Steen" < > Third, if the individual in question is actually mentally
retarded and is not suffering merely from your contempt, then I can't see
how a 1311 rating
> is poor. >

You are dealing with a usenet troll who is probably sliding a broomstick up
his ass while he posts these messages about someone who probably beat him in
a tournament. Jason Lohner supposedly has only one chess win, and it was
probably over the guy who keeps posting the messages.

Date: 21 Mar 2007 06:01:36
From: Good Moves are worth BEANS!
Subject: Re: Retard Chess

This sounds like a posting from the known RGCM homosexual and troll Matt
Nemmers. He's a frustrated faggot who's pissed at me for posting about the
fact that he shoves chess pieces up his arse.

JMR