|
Main
Date: 01 Apr 2008 06:28:57
From: Rob
Subject: Mitchell vs Sloan 2008
|
Here is the recent loss Sloan suffered. Jerry Nash of the USCF officiated the match. It was a single game, no time limit. Mitchell drew white and began the game. Sloan defended with black. At the end of the game Nash presented Mitchell with a cashiers check in the amount of 10k. Here is the PGN Mitchell <white > vs Sloan <black > 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 3.d4 fxe4 4.Nxe5 Nf6 5.Nc3 d5 6.f3 Bf5 7.fxe4 Nxe4 8.Nxe4 Bxe4 9.Bd3 h5 10.Bxe4 Qh4+ 11.Kf1 Qxe4 12.Qf3 Qxf3+ 13.Nxf3 Nc6 14.Bg5 Kf7 15.Ke2 Re8+ 16.Kd2 Re4 17.c3 Rg4 18.g3 Kg6 19.Bf4 Bd6 20.Ne5+ Nxe5 21.dxe5 Be7 22.h3 Rg5 23.Bxg5 Bxg5+ 24.Kd3 c5 25.Rhf1 Be7 26.Rae1 c4+ 27.Kc2 Kh6 28.Rf7 Re8 29.e6 b5 30.a3 a5 31.Rf5 Rd8 32.Ree5 g6 33.Rf7 1-0
|
|
|
Date: 02 Apr 2008 00:45:01
From: help bot
Subject: Re: Mitchell vs Sloan 2008
|
On Apr 1, 9:28 am, Rob <[email protected] > wrote: > Here is the recent loss Sloan suffered. Jerry Nash of the USCF Hey, would that be Nash as in Nash-ville, Tennessee? > officiated the match. It was a single game, no time limit. Bad idea. Did you not see what happened when those two Russians with the K-names went at it, no time limit, no substitutions? It was something akin to the movie "Rollerball", starring James Caan. > Mitchell > drew white and began the game. Sloan defended with black. > At the end of the game Nash presented Mitchell with a cashiers check > in the amount of 10k. Ten kroner, eh? Not very much, but then, it was only a one-game match. > Here is the PGN > > Mitchell <white> > vs > Sloan <black> > > 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 3.d4 Ohmygawd! This reminds me of a recent game I played at GetClub, where I had Black and after 1. e4 e5, 2. Bc4 Nf6, the confounded machine hit me with 3. d4!?!, and I was forced to calculate actual variations-- right in the opening! That was a close one, too. If I recall, we had quite a tussle and ended up in a drawable Rook ending, which I quite naturally won. > fxe4 4.Nxe5 Nf6 5.Nc3 d5 6.f3 Bf5 7.fxe4 Nxe4 > 8.Nxe4 Bxe4 9.Bd3 h5 10.Bxe4 Qh4+ 11.Kf1 Qxe4 12.Qf3 Qxf3+ 13.Nxf3 Nc6 > 14.Bg5 Kf7 15.Ke2 Re8+ 16.Kd2 Re4 17.c3 Rg4 18.g3 Kg6 19.Bf4 Bd6 > 20.Ne5+ Nxe5 21.dxe5 Be7 22.h3 Rg5 23.Bxg5 Bxg5+ 24.Kd3 c5 25.Rhf1 Be7 > 26.Rae1 c4+ 27.Kc2 Kh6 28.Rf7 Re8 29.e6 b5 30.a3 a5 31.Rf5 Rd8 32.Ree5 > g6 33.Rf7 1-0 The trouble with this ruse is that nobody would take the idea seriously-- unless it were preceded by vicious attacks back and forth between the two players, and I think it goes without saying that SS would be expected to give QN odds and still win. -- help bot
|
|
Date: 01 Apr 2008 21:31:51
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Mitchell vs Sloan 2008
|
On Apr 1, 10:23 pm, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote: > On Apr 1, 10:21 pm, Rob <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sam, > > You are a vastly weaker player! LOL > > Rob Mitchell does not play chess AT ALL. Chessbase will be publishing the game soon.
|
|
Date: 01 Apr 2008 20:42:40
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: Mitchell vs Sloan 2008
|
On Apr 1, 8:28 am, Rob <[email protected] > wrote: > Here is the recent loss Sloan suffered. Jerry Nash of the USCF > officiated the match. It was a single game, no time limit. Mitchell > drew white and began the game. Sloan defended with black. > At the end of the game Nash presented Mitchell with a cashiers check > in the amount of 10k. A check which will possibly go towards a Chess Masterminds broadcast. Lucky us.
|
|
Date: 01 Apr 2008 20:39:04
From: The Historian
Subject: Re: Mitchell vs Sloan 2008
|
On Apr 1, 7:36 pm, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote: > This game is a hoax. The OP must be trying to emulate his buddy the Fake Sam Sloan. Talk about the ape imitating the lion; in this case it's the ape imitating the liar.
|
|
Date: 01 Apr 2008 20:25:04
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Mitchell vs Sloan 2008
|
On Apr 1, 10:23 pm, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote: > On Apr 1, 10:21 pm, Rob <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sam, > > You are a vastly weaker player! LOL > > Rob Mitchell does not play chess AT ALL. LOL Thats right. I don't "play" when I sit down at the board. SOmething that surprised you
|
|
Date: 01 Apr 2008 20:23:17
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Mitchell vs Sloan 2008
|
On Apr 1, 10:21 pm, Rob <[email protected] > wrote: > Sam, > You are a vastly weaker player! LOL Rob Mitchell does not play chess AT ALL.
|
|
Date: 01 Apr 2008 20:21:38
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Mitchell vs Sloan 2008
|
On Apr 1, 10:20 pm, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote: > On Apr 1, 9:01 pm, Kenneth Sloan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > samsloan wrote: > > > > This game is a hoax. I never played any such game. > > > > Also, the game is a beginner's game. No reasonable player would play > > > like this. > > > > Sam Sloan > > > Sam is absolutely correct. Here is the way that Sam really plays: > > >http://www.cis.uab.edu/sloan/ChessGames/SloanVsSloan/ > > > -- > > Kenneth Sloan [email protected] > > Computer and Information Sciences +1-205-932-2213 > > University of Alabama at Birmingham FAX +1-205-934-5473 > > Birmingham, AL 35294-1170 http://KennethRSloan.com/ > > OK. I realize that this looks like a terrible game and I made many bad > moves, but I usually win games like this because my opponent gets > confused. > > If I had just played 24. Rg2, I would have survived a bit longer and > might have eventually won the game. > > The game posted by Rob Mitchell is by vastly weaker players. It looks > like a game that Sonny might have played. > > Sam Sloan Sam, You are a vastly weaker player! LOL
|
|
Date: 01 Apr 2008 20:20:33
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Mitchell vs Sloan 2008
|
On Apr 1, 9:01 pm, Kenneth Sloan <[email protected] > wrote: > samsloan wrote: > > > This game is a hoax. I never played any such game. > > > Also, the game is a beginner's game. No reasonable player would play > > like this. > > > Sam Sloan > > Sam is absolutely correct. Here is the way that Sam really plays: > > http://www.cis.uab.edu/sloan/ChessGames/SloanVsSloan/ > > -- > Kenneth Sloan [email protected] > Computer and Information Sciences +1-205-932-2213 > University of Alabama at Birmingham FAX +1-205-934-5473 > Birmingham, AL 35294-1170 http://KennethRSloan.com/ OK. I realize that this looks like a terrible game and I made many bad moves, but I usually win games like this because my opponent gets confused. If I had just played 24. Rg2, I would have survived a bit longer and might have eventually won the game. The game posted by Rob Mitchell is by vastly weaker players. It looks like a game that Sonny might have played. Sam Sloan
|
|
Date: 01 Apr 2008 17:56:49
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Mitchell vs Sloan 2008
|
On Apr 1, 7:36 pm, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote: > On Apr 1, 6:11 pm, Rob <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Sam > > You are just a tad upset that I beat you. Your lack of bathing and > > that Chinese fish hot sauce crap you ate before the match to "blow" > > into my face didn't work. Mostly because of my hay fever and my stuffy > > nose. Had I taken my antihistamines you might have beaten me. But Phil > > has been training me for weeks to play you and you Dam-I KNow defense! > > > Here are the results again for everyone to play through. It will soon > > be on chessgames.com > > > Mitchell <white> > > vs > > Sloan <black> > > > 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 3.d4 fxe4 4.Nxe5 Nf6 5.Nc3 d5 6.f3 Bf5 7.fxe4 Nxe4 > > 8.Nxe4 Bxe4 9.Bd3 h5 10.Bxe4 Qh4+ 11.Kf1 Qxe4 12.Qf3 Qxf3+ 13.Nxf3 Nc6 > > 14.Bg5 Kf7 15.Ke2 Re8+ 16.Kd2 Re4 17.c3 Rg4 18.g3 Kg6 19.Bf4 Bd6 > > 20.Ne5+ Nxe5 21.dxe5 Be7 22.h3 Rg5 23.Bxg5 Bxg5+ 24.Kd3 c5 25.Rhf1 Be7 > > 26.Rae1 c4+ 27.Kc2 Kh6 28.Rf7 Re8 29.e6 b5 30.a3 a5 31.Rf5 Rd8 32.Ree5 > > g6 33.Rf7 1-0 > > This game is a hoax. I never played any such game. > > Also, the game is a beginner's game. No reasonable player would play > like this. > > Sam Sloan I agree you did play badly, Mr. Sloan
|
|
Date: 01 Apr 2008 17:36:06
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Mitchell vs Sloan 2008
|
On Apr 1, 6:11 pm, Rob <[email protected] > wrote: > Sam > You are just a tad upset that I beat you. Your lack of bathing and > that Chinese fish hot sauce crap you ate before the match to "blow" > into my face didn't work. Mostly because of my hay fever and my stuffy > nose. Had I taken my antihistamines you might have beaten me. But Phil > has been training me for weeks to play you and you Dam-I KNow defense! > > Here are the results again for everyone to play through. It will soon > be on chessgames.com > > Mitchell <white> > vs > Sloan <black> > > 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 3.d4 fxe4 4.Nxe5 Nf6 5.Nc3 d5 6.f3 Bf5 7.fxe4 Nxe4 > 8.Nxe4 Bxe4 9.Bd3 h5 10.Bxe4 Qh4+ 11.Kf1 Qxe4 12.Qf3 Qxf3+ 13.Nxf3 Nc6 > 14.Bg5 Kf7 15.Ke2 Re8+ 16.Kd2 Re4 17.c3 Rg4 18.g3 Kg6 19.Bf4 Bd6 > 20.Ne5+ Nxe5 21.dxe5 Be7 22.h3 Rg5 23.Bxg5 Bxg5+ 24.Kd3 c5 25.Rhf1 Be7 > 26.Rae1 c4+ 27.Kc2 Kh6 28.Rf7 Re8 29.e6 b5 30.a3 a5 31.Rf5 Rd8 32.Ree5 > g6 33.Rf7 1-0 This game is a hoax. I never played any such game. Also, the game is a beginner's game. No reasonable player would play like this. Sam Sloan
|
| |
Date: 01 Apr 2008 21:01:22
From: Kenneth Sloan
Subject: Re: Mitchell vs Sloan 2008
|
samsloan wrote: > > This game is a hoax. I never played any such game. > > Also, the game is a beginner's game. No reasonable player would play > like this. > > Sam Sloan Sam is absolutely correct. Here is the way that Sam really plays: http://www.cis.uab.edu/sloan/ChessGames/SloanVsSloan/ -- Kenneth Sloan [email protected] Computer and Information Sciences +1-205-932-2213 University of Alabama at Birmingham FAX +1-205-934-5473 Birmingham, AL 35294-1170 http://KennethRSloan.com/
|
|
Date: 01 Apr 2008 16:11:44
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Mitchell vs Sloan 2008
|
Sam You are just a tad upset that I beat you. Your lack of bathing and that Chinese fish hot sauce crap you ate before the match to "blow" into my face didn't work. Mostly because of my hay fever and my stuffy nose. Had I taken my antihistamines you might have beaten me. But Phil has been training me for weeks to play you and you Dam-I KNow defense! Here are the results again for everyone to play through. It will soon be on chessgames.com Mitchell <white > vs Sloan <black > 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 3.d4 fxe4 4.Nxe5 Nf6 5.Nc3 d5 6.f3 Bf5 7.fxe4 Nxe4 8.Nxe4 Bxe4 9.Bd3 h5 10.Bxe4 Qh4+ 11.Kf1 Qxe4 12.Qf3 Qxf3+ 13.Nxf3 Nc6 14.Bg5 Kf7 15.Ke2 Re8+ 16.Kd2 Re4 17.c3 Rg4 18.g3 Kg6 19.Bf4 Bd6 20.Ne5+ Nxe5 21.dxe5 Be7 22.h3 Rg5 23.Bxg5 Bxg5+ 24.Kd3 c5 25.Rhf1 Be7 26.Rae1 c4+ 27.Kc2 Kh6 28.Rf7 Re8 29.e6 b5 30.a3 a5 31.Rf5 Rd8 32.Ree5 g6 33.Rf7 1-0
|
|
Date: 01 Apr 2008 14:29:07
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Mitchell vs Sloan 2008
|
On Apr 1, 11:37 am, Rob <[email protected] > wrote: > On Apr 1, 10:32 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 1, 9:54 am, Rob <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Apr 1, 8:45 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 1, 8:28 am, Rob <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Here is the recent loss Sloan suffered. Jerry Nash of the USCF > > > > > officiated the match. It was a single game, no time limit. Mitchell > > > > > drew white and began the game. Sloan defended with black. > > > > > At the end of the game Nash presented Mitchell with a cashiers check > > > > > in the amount of 10k. > > > > > > Here is the PGN > > > > > > Mitchell <white> > > > > > vs > > > > > Sloan <black> > > > > > > 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 3.d4 fxe4 4.Nxe5 Nf6 5.Nc3 d5 6.f3 Bf5 7.fxe4 Nxe4 > > > > > 8.Nxe4 Bxe4 9.Bd3 h5 10.Bxe4 Qh4+ 11.Kf1 Qxe4 12.Qf3 Qxf3+ 13.Nxf3 Nc6 > > > > > 14.Bg5 Kf7 15.Ke2 Re8+ 16.Kd2 Re4 17.c3 Rg4 18.g3 Kg6 19.Bf4 Bd6 > > > > > 20.Ne5+ Nxe5 21.dxe5 Be7 22.h3 Rg5 23.Bxg5 Bxg5+ 24.Kd3 c5 25.Rhf1 Be7 > > > > > 26.Rae1 c4+ 27.Kc2 Kh6 28.Rf7 Re8 29.e6 b5 30.a3 a5 31.Rf5 Rd8 32.Ree5 > > > > > g6 33.Rf7 1-0 > > > > > This game is a hoax. I did not play this game, and I do not know who > > > > did. > > > > > Sam Sloan- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Sam is to embarrised to admit he lost! LOL > > > I think he blew the game at move 23. > > > This is not a suitable April Fools Joke. > > > Sam Sloan- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Still not able to swallow your pride and admit your wallet is 10k > lighter now? There have been three bad April Fools Jokes so far today. They are: 1. Susan Polgar is resigning all her chess positions and moving back to Hungary. 2. Paul Truong died yesterday. 3. Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell beat Sam Sloan a game of chess. Of the three above, the least likely (and least funny) is number three. Sam Sloan
|
|
Date: 01 Apr 2008 09:37:07
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Mitchell vs Sloan 2008
|
On Apr 1, 10:32=A0am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote: > On Apr 1, 9:54 am, Rob <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 1, 8:45 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Apr 1, 8:28 am, Rob <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Here is the recent loss Sloan suffered. Jerry Nash of the USCF > > > > officiated the match. It was a single game, no time limit. Mitchell > > > > drew white and began the game. Sloan defended with black. > > > > At the end of the game Nash presented Mitchell with a cashiers check= > > > > in the amount of 10k. > > > > > Here is the PGN > > > > > Mitchell <white> > > > > vs > > > > Sloan <black> > > > > > 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 3.d4 fxe4 4.Nxe5 Nf6 5.Nc3 d5 6.f3 Bf5 7.fxe4 Nxe4 > > > > 8.Nxe4 Bxe4 9.Bd3 h5 10.Bxe4 Qh4+ 11.Kf1 Qxe4 12.Qf3 Qxf3+ 13.Nxf3 N= c6 > > > > 14.Bg5 Kf7 15.Ke2 Re8+ 16.Kd2 Re4 17.c3 Rg4 18.g3 Kg6 19.Bf4 Bd6 > > > > 20.Ne5+ Nxe5 21.dxe5 Be7 22.h3 Rg5 23.Bxg5 Bxg5+ 24.Kd3 c5 25.Rhf1 B= e7 > > > > 26.Rae1 c4+ 27.Kc2 Kh6 28.Rf7 Re8 29.e6 b5 30.a3 a5 31.Rf5 Rd8 32.Re= e5 > > > > g6 33.Rf7 1-0 > > > > This game is a hoax. I did not play this game, and I do not know who > > > did. > > > > Sam Sloan- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Sam is to embarrised to admit he lost! LOL > > I think he blew the game at move 23. > > This is not a suitable April Fools Joke. > > Sam Sloan- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Still not able to swallow your pride and admit your wallet is 10k lighter now?
|
|
Date: 01 Apr 2008 08:32:52
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Mitchell vs Sloan 2008
|
On Apr 1, 9:54 am, Rob <[email protected] > wrote: > On Apr 1, 8:45 am, samsloan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 1, 8:28 am, Rob <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Here is the recent loss Sloan suffered. Jerry Nash of the USCF > > > officiated the match. It was a single game, no time limit. Mitchell > > > drew white and began the game. Sloan defended with black. > > > At the end of the game Nash presented Mitchell with a cashiers check > > > in the amount of 10k. > > > > Here is the PGN > > > > Mitchell <white> > > > vs > > > Sloan <black> > > > > 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 3.d4 fxe4 4.Nxe5 Nf6 5.Nc3 d5 6.f3 Bf5 7.fxe4 Nxe4 > > > 8.Nxe4 Bxe4 9.Bd3 h5 10.Bxe4 Qh4+ 11.Kf1 Qxe4 12.Qf3 Qxf3+ 13.Nxf3 Nc6 > > > 14.Bg5 Kf7 15.Ke2 Re8+ 16.Kd2 Re4 17.c3 Rg4 18.g3 Kg6 19.Bf4 Bd6 > > > 20.Ne5+ Nxe5 21.dxe5 Be7 22.h3 Rg5 23.Bxg5 Bxg5+ 24.Kd3 c5 25.Rhf1 Be7 > > > 26.Rae1 c4+ 27.Kc2 Kh6 28.Rf7 Re8 29.e6 b5 30.a3 a5 31.Rf5 Rd8 32.Ree5 > > > g6 33.Rf7 1-0 > > > This game is a hoax. I did not play this game, and I do not know who > > did. > > > Sam Sloan- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Sam is to embarrised to admit he lost! LOL > I think he blew the game at move 23. This is not a suitable April Fools Joke. Sam Sloan
|
|
Date: 01 Apr 2008 07:54:27
From: Rob
Subject: Re: Mitchell vs Sloan 2008
|
On Apr 1, 8:45=A0am, samsloan <[email protected] > wrote: > On Apr 1, 8:28 am, Rob <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Here is the recent loss Sloan suffered. Jerry Nash of the USCF > > officiated the match. It was a single game, no time limit. Mitchell > > drew white and began the game. Sloan defended with black. > > At the end of the game Nash presented Mitchell with a cashiers check > > in the amount of 10k. > > > Here is the PGN > > > Mitchell <white> > > vs > > Sloan <black> > > > 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 3.d4 fxe4 4.Nxe5 Nf6 5.Nc3 d5 6.f3 Bf5 7.fxe4 Nxe4 > > 8.Nxe4 Bxe4 9.Bd3 h5 10.Bxe4 Qh4+ 11.Kf1 Qxe4 12.Qf3 Qxf3+ 13.Nxf3 Nc6 > > 14.Bg5 Kf7 15.Ke2 Re8+ 16.Kd2 Re4 17.c3 Rg4 18.g3 Kg6 19.Bf4 Bd6 > > 20.Ne5+ Nxe5 21.dxe5 Be7 22.h3 Rg5 23.Bxg5 Bxg5+ 24.Kd3 c5 25.Rhf1 Be7 > > 26.Rae1 c4+ 27.Kc2 Kh6 28.Rf7 Re8 29.e6 b5 30.a3 a5 31.Rf5 Rd8 32.Ree5 > > g6 33.Rf7 1-0 > > This game is a hoax. I did not play this game, and I do not know who > did. > > Sam Sloan- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Sam is to embarrised to admit he lost! LOL I think he blew the game at move 23.
|
|
Date: 01 Apr 2008 06:45:48
From: samsloan
Subject: Re: Mitchell vs Sloan 2008
|
On Apr 1, 8:28 am, Rob <[email protected] > wrote: > Here is the recent loss Sloan suffered. Jerry Nash of the USCF > officiated the match. It was a single game, no time limit. Mitchell > drew white and began the game. Sloan defended with black. > At the end of the game Nash presented Mitchell with a cashiers check > in the amount of 10k. > > Here is the PGN > > Mitchell <white> > vs > Sloan <black> > > 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 3.d4 fxe4 4.Nxe5 Nf6 5.Nc3 d5 6.f3 Bf5 7.fxe4 Nxe4 > 8.Nxe4 Bxe4 9.Bd3 h5 10.Bxe4 Qh4+ 11.Kf1 Qxe4 12.Qf3 Qxf3+ 13.Nxf3 Nc6 > 14.Bg5 Kf7 15.Ke2 Re8+ 16.Kd2 Re4 17.c3 Rg4 18.g3 Kg6 19.Bf4 Bd6 > 20.Ne5+ Nxe5 21.dxe5 Be7 22.h3 Rg5 23.Bxg5 Bxg5+ 24.Kd3 c5 25.Rhf1 Be7 > 26.Rae1 c4+ 27.Kc2 Kh6 28.Rf7 Re8 29.e6 b5 30.a3 a5 31.Rf5 Rd8 32.Ree5 > g6 33.Rf7 1-0 This game is a hoax. I did not play this game, and I do not know who did. Sam Sloan
|
|