|
Main
Date: 28 Nov 2005 14:28:39
From: Richard
Subject: Help with a Reinfeld problem
|
I have been working with the Reinfeld 1001 Winning Chess Sacrifices and Combinations and am having trouble understanding problem #7. It is supposed to deal with pinning, but I can't see it. Since I can't display the position here, I've posted it on my site. Please check it out at [email protected] and let me know what I am missing. Thanks, Richard www.richardschess.blogspot.com
|
|
|
Date: 29 Nov 2005 09:45:18
From:
Subject: Re: Help with a Reinfeld problem
|
David Richerby wrote: > Yes, that's what I was trying to say when I pointed out that it isn't > really cheating. Absolutely right, good advice. I think a lot of average players cheat themselves in this regard, thinking that checking the solution is somehow cheating. During an actual game, it would be, but not when you're trying to learn. > > A book similar to Reinfeld's, but featuring more recent positions, is > > "The ChessCafe Puzzle Book" by GM Karsten Mueller. > > Ah, I might have a look at that. _Fundamental Chess Endings_ (with Frank > Lamprecht) is excellent. Yes, Mueller is one of the better chess writers extant, and a real endgame expert. We almost lost him to a brain tumor a while back; fortunately he recovered. I've worked with him on several books, and he is a very nice guy to work with.
|
|
Date: 29 Nov 2005 06:06:11
From:
Subject: Re: Help with a Reinfeld problem
|
Richard wrote: > Thanks guys. This helps a lot. I don't own the book, but just have the > postitions I downloaded online. I keep fighting a temptation to buy the > book, but I am afraid I'll give up too early if I have the solutions > too readily available. Resisting that temptation is not too important, according to a FIDE Master friend of mine. With tactical exercises like those of the Reinfeld book, pondering indefinitely is not the most effective use of your time and brain. Instead, he recommends using only a few minutes at most trying to solve the position, then checking the solution if you're still stumped. Do the same with one or two dozen exercises at a time. Then repeat the whole process a few days later, and again a few days later, etc. Eventually you will see all or almost all the solutions without checking the answers. While this might seem to be mere memorization, it is really more a process of teaching yourself *pattern recognition*, which is perhaps the most important skill of strong players. You will be learning tactical motifs which will apply to similar situations in your own games, and because of the repetitive study you will see them more quickly and frequently. For example, let's say in your game you have a position with an open h-file and a knight able to move to g6 as in the Reinfeld problem. Your work on that problem will immediately make you think of the potential mate threat of Ng6 and Rh8. You may not have a queen sacrifice like in the Reinfeld problem, but you may see some other tactical blow, based on the mate threat. That is what I mean by pattern recognition. When you have these patterns stored in your brain, good moves will just pop into your head. For example, in this position: B: Kb8, Qe6, Rc8, Rh8, Bd7, Be5, Nd5, a7, b7, f7, g4, h7 W: Kf1, Qb4, Rc1, Rh1, Bb2, Bc4, Nc3, a3, b5, e3, f2, g2, h2 I, playing Black, immediately saw 1...Rxc4! winning, since if 2.Qxc4 Nxe3+ wins the queen. I didn't even have to think about it, it just came as if by divine inspiration, because I was familiar with discovered check patterns. This allowed me to beat the state champ. A word on the thematic headings of the Reinfeld book: the fact that a given puzzle comes under "pinning" or "discovered check" or whatever, does not mean that every variation of the solution will feature that motif. It just means that it figures prominently in at least one of the main lines. In Reinfeld's #7, pinning is prominent if Black plays 1=2E..KxQg8, but not so much if he plays 1...Ke7. A book similar to Reinfeld's, but featuring more recent positions, is "The ChessCafe Puzzle Book" by GM Karsten M=FCller. Its solutions are more accurate than Fred's (I know, because I edited the book and checked them by computer), and it presents the puzzles within the framework of a systematic program of study. I strongly recommend it if you are serious about learning tactical pattern recognition. Taylor Kingston
|
| |
Date: 29 Nov 2005 16:15:25
From: David Richerby
Subject: Re: Help with a Reinfeld problem
|
<[email protected] > wrote: > While this might seem to be mere memorization, it is really more a > process of teaching yourself *pattern recognition*, which is perhaps > the most important skill of strong players. You will be learning > tactical motifs which will apply to similar situations in your own > games, and because of the repetitive study you will see them more > quickly and frequently. Yes, that's what I was trying to say when I pointed out that it isn't really cheating. > A book similar to Reinfeld's, but featuring more recent positions, is > "The ChessCafe Puzzle Book" by GM Karsten M=FCller. Ah, I might have a look at that. _Fundamental Chess Endings_ (with Frank Lamprecht) is excellent. Dave. -- David Richerby Broken Old-Fashioned Apple (TM): www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ it's like a tasty fruit but it's perfect for your grandparents and it doesn't work!
|
|
Date: 29 Nov 2005 09:58:14
From: David Richerby
Subject: Re: Help with a Reinfeld problem
|
Richard <[email protected] > wrote: > Since I can't display the position here, I've posted it on my site. > Please check it out at [email protected] and let me > know what I am missing. YM richardschess.blogspot.com, of course. You can post positions here by using FEN. Pretty much any chess program that has a `copy position to clipboard' option will copy it as FEN and you can paste it into your post and people can paste it into their chess programs to see it. Google will tell you how to read and write FEN by hand, if you want to know. Dave. -- David Richerby Chocolate Sushi (TM): it's like a raw www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ fish that's made of chocolate!
|
|
Date: 28 Nov 2005 15:25:07
From: Richard
Subject: Re: Help with a Reinfeld problem
|
Thanks guys. This helps a lot. I don't own the book, but just have the postitions I downloaded online. I keep fighting a temptation to buy the book, but I am afraid I'll give up too early if I have the solutions too readily available. Thanks, Richard www.richardschess.blogspot.com
|
| |
Date: 29 Nov 2005 09:55:21
From: David Richerby
Subject: Re: Help with a Reinfeld problem
|
Richard <[email protected] > wrote: > Thanks guys. This helps a lot. I don't own the book, but just have the > postitions I downloaded online. I keep fighting a temptation to buy the > book, but I am afraid I'll give up too early if I have the solutions > too readily available. To be honest, if you can't solve one of these puzzles after about ten minutes' thought, you're probably never going to solve it without help. At that point, it's a good idea to take a look at the solution, which will teach you something you didn't already know. Make a note of the puzzles you couldn't do and go back to them, say a couple of weeks after you first tried. See how many you can do then and don't feel that this is cheating because it isn't -- it's all helping you become better at tactics, which is the whole point of the exercise. Another advantage of having the answers to hand is that you can see how many of the puzzles you're getting wrong. Quite often, I find that I think I've solved it by winning the exchange and the answer shows me that I could have won a whole piece or even a whole rook. Of course, winning the exchange should still win the game but the win's easier when you're a whole piece up. Of course, occasionally, you see a position where you have a better solution than Reinfeld does. There's at least one where Reinfeld wins a rook instead of checkmating (can't remember which, off the top of my head, sorry). Note down the positions you got wrong and go back to those, too. Dave. -- David Richerby Permanent Disposable Smokes (TM): www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ it's like a pack of cigarettes but you never have to clean it and it'll be there for ever!
|
|
Date: 29 Nov 2005 00:03:46
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claus-J=FCrgen_Heigl?=
Subject: Re: Help with a Reinfeld problem
|
Richard wrote: > I have been working with the Reinfeld 1001 Winning Chess Sacrifices and > Combinations and am having trouble understanding problem #7. It is > supposed to deal with pinning, but I can't see it. Since I can't > display the position here, I've posted it on my site. Please check it > out at [email protected] and let me know what I am > missing. FEN: r1b1rk2/pp3ppQ/1np5/4q3/2B4N/4P3/PP3PP1/2R2K1R w - - You are not missing anything. The pin in question is the possible pin of the pawn at f7. If Black denies accepting the sacrifice, White takes the pawn and continues with his attack. I don't know the book, doesn't it mention your defense (which is best, but should still lose)? Claus-Juergen
|
| |
Date: 29 Nov 2005 08:33:47
From: Jay
Subject: Re: Help with a Reinfeld problem
|
A stronger defense for Black is: 2...Kd6 > FEN: r1b1rk2/pp3ppQ/1np5/4q3/2B4N/4P3/PP3PP1/2R2K1R w - - >
|
|
Date: 28 Nov 2005 14:54:23
From:
Subject: Re: Help with a Reinfeld problem
|
Richard wrote: > I have been working with the Reinfeld 1001 Winning Chess Sacrifices and > Combinations and am having trouble understanding problem #7. It is > supposed to deal with pinning, but I can't see it. Since I can't > display the position here, I've posted it on my site. Please check it > out at [email protected] and let me know what I am > missing. If we're talking about the same position, Reinfeld's solution is essentially correct, though he does not give the best defense. In my version of the book, the position is: B: Kf8, Qe5, Ra8, Re8, Bc8, Nb6, a7, b7, c6, f7, g7 W: Kf1, Qh7, Rc1, Rh1, Bc4, Nh4, a2, b2, e3, f2, g2 The key is 1.Qg8+!!. If then 1...Kxg8 Ng6! and mate by Rh1-h8 is inevitable. The pin motif is seen in the fact that the black f-pawn is pinned by the Bc4, so the Ng6 is invulnerable. So Black's only other move is 1...Ke7, when after 2.Qxf7+ Kd8/Kd6 3.Rd1+ White will win easily, one sample line being 2...Kd8 3.Rd1+ Nd7 4.Ng6 Qf6 5.Rh7 Qxf7 6.Bxf7 Re4 7.Rxg7 Kc7 8.f3 Rb4 9.Be6 etc. The main line Reinfeld gives, 3.Ng6 Qxb2? (better 3...Qd6) makes it easy for White, viz. 4.Rd1+ Bd7, and now Fritz8 likes 5.Nf8! much better than Reinfeld's 5.Qxe8+, though both win handily.
|
|